Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Psych Final Finished
Psych Final Finished
Psychology 1100
Spring 2019
Final Project
It’s not very often that you hear about a child killing another human being. Every time it
happens, it’s a tragedy for everyone involved. It is often discussed whether or not the parents
are to blame. Is a child born to kill, or is it simply a product of their environment? Can these
violent and scary actions simply be chalked up to the developmental capacity of an adolescent
and their need to partake in risky behavior? Is the child’s self-concept seriously damaged from
lack of acceptance or bullying? There are many types of children in the world, and many types
of children who kill. When watching the Netflix docuseries “Kids who Kill”, there was mention
of group occult types of killings, kids who killed alone, and kids who killed out of pure rage. In
some cases, it is obvious that the child is engaging in psychopathic behavior, but in other cases
it appears to be unknown why these events take place. Most of the time these killings are
brutal and deliberate, and rarely do the perpetrators show any remorse for their actions, as if
they are unaware of just how serious the offenses are. What drives a child to kill, is it a natural
instinct, or the way a child is raised and the environment around them? The parenting style is
likely to be questioned, as it is with almost anything a child does or does not do. A child’s
egocentrism may drive them to kill if they feel as though they are special, invincible, or
legendary. In a few of the cases that were discussed in the docuseries, peer pressure weighed
Nature Versus Nurture is often a topic used in psychology over the growth and
development span of a human being. Nature is something a human being is born with
genetically. These traits are inherited from the moment that conception occurs. Nurture
includes environmental influences. This could be the way a child was raised, the way a child is
fed, and even the way a mother ate during her pregnancy. When discussing kids who kill, this
topic is very prevalent. Whenever you hear of a child committing a crime, the integrity of the
parental structure is questioned. What did the parents do to make that child so angry? Where
were the parents? Why was that child not being supervised? Nurture plays a role in a large
majority of these killings based off of the discussions in the docuseries, but nature may play a
role as well. In one episode, a boy was born to a young mother. She told nobody about the birth
of her son, and after only a few short months she abandoned the child. He rotated through
foster homes until he was finally with a foster mother that agreed to keep him long term. It was
obvious that the boy was troubled, and she spent a lot of time and energy trying to
compensate. She quit her job and took him on as a full-time responsibility. In this case, nurture
wasn’t ample in the beginning, but later on he was very nurtured. Generally, a child will self-
right in this scenario, but for this boy, the trauma of his youngest years of development were
too much. He went on to kidnap, and brutally murder at least 5 small children from his
neighborhood despite his foster mother trying so hard to make the child feel loved and stable.
In yet another case, a young girl was born to a prostitute mother, who forced her child to
engage in risqué behavior with paying men from an extremely young age. One might think that
psychologically, the mother had her own set of imbalances that were passed on to the young
girl. This in addition to her severely neglected and abusive upbringing coupled together to
create a tragedy, when she brutally murdered a little boy that lived nearby. After the killing she
had the audacity to knock at the boy’s home and ask if she could see him in the coffin, before
his body was ever even found. Studies have shown that the majority of serial killers are
psychopaths, some with very warm and loving families, and positive upbringings. In these cases,
It is believed that mostly nature has an effect on the vicious behavior. Only two of the children
on the docuseries seemed to have loving and happy childhoods, while sadly, all of the other
children were bullied, neglected, abused, and mistreated in general. Attachment comes in to
play for these scenarios. If attachment doesn’t take place early on in development, is it then too
late for a child to live a normal life? Some children thrive no matter what environment they’re
brought up in, or how insecure their attachment is, while other children suffer and never
recover. There are many factors, as there are with anything studied in psychology. It’s not black
and white, the grey area is the interesting and puzzling part.
The style of parenting could very well play heavily into the motives of a child that would
kill someone. It fits perfectly with nature versus nurture as well. It begins as early as the
attachment phase of development. Most of the examples from this docuseries were extreme
could be as simple as a mother that works and doesn’t have much time for her children. It
varies case by case. In the docuseries, one mother abandoned her new baby, teaching him from
the beginning of life that the world could not be trusted. The child likely had a very insecure
attachment to his mother. Children rely on routine and comfort, and he was bounced around
throughout the foster care system rather than being loved or cared for consistently. One
example used in the docuseries of a child in a loving family could even still be considered
neglectful. The child in this example exhibited unusual behavior from a very young age, and the
mother refused to get help for her child. The child killed and tortured animals, and the mother
knew about it. She was in denial, much to the detriment of her young child. Even though the
boy had what he needed and was very much loved by his family, he needed help. He was too
young to realize that he needed intervention and was denied that by his family for the sake of
appearances. This is neglectful only because denying a child proper treatment can be harmful
to their development, as well as harmful to people around the child. On the other hand, I
watched on episode about a boy with very authoritarian parents. This style of parenting can be
very controlling. Strict punishment is normal in this household. There isn’t a lot of emotional
exploration or expressions of affection. Children tend to feel like an employee, not a valued
member of the family. At times this style of parenting can hinge towards abusive, but of course
this is not always the case. The abuse can range from emotional abuse to physical abuse,
sometimes both. In the example from the episode mentioned above, this boy would get beaten
with a belt over tiny offences. Things like leaving the lid off the toothpaste or not closing a
cereal box. This type of abuse leaves a child feeling unloved, unwanted, and desperate to find a
place that they fit in. Children from authoritarian parents become guilty or depressed, and they
internalize feelings and frustrations. They often rebel as adolescents and leave home early.
Some children of authoritarian parents end up living happy and successful lives, but because of
the many other factors involved in this case, happiness was not the ending of the story. In this
case, the boy ended up killing another young neighborhood boy at the age of fourteen. The
killing was extremely brutal, and he showed no remorse. He almost seemed happy to be going
to prison and away from his father’s brutally strict punishments. A lot of the influences for a
child’s behavior come from outside the home, but in these extreme cases, nurture is a huge
part of their development, or lack thereof. All children need love and an environment that is
patient, and willing to help the child learn and grow. The absence of a loving home
environment doesn’t always lead a child to kill. In fact, it’s pretty rare statistically, according to
the CDC website, in 2015 a total of 605 juveniles were arrested for homicide in the US, but
these cases all seemed to be a mixture of less than favorable parenting, as well as unfavorable
inherited traits paired with the inability to provide the intervention necessary when problems
comes in to play for this case, and the adolescent feels as though their every move is being
examined by others, like they’re a famous Rockstar or something. This egocentrism is normal
for the most part, but paired with the extreme self-concept these girls created, it was a recipe
for disaster. Adolescents feel as though they are socially significant and unique, and sometimes
this is beneficial for society, but in cases of extreme self-esteem issues, the way they interpret
everything around them as judgement, tragedy can strike. They form a perception of others,
and how this relates to them and who they want to become. In the docuseries there was a
story about a small group of 13 and 14-year-old girls. The girls begin to really enjoy horror
movies, they start to relate with the killers in the films. The girls feed off of each other, paying
close attention to each other’s’ behavior with a desire to be powerful like the killers in the
movies. Since they all have fairly low self-esteem, they tend to do things to get the approval of
one another. One day while they sat in a circle slapping each other, it was one of their favorite
games, one girl took it too far. The other two immediately revolted. They beat her, and slit her
wrists, leaving her in a cellar to rot. She lived, which was a miracle! The other two girls told
police about their infatuation with the movies and didn’t quite seem to grasp the seriousness of
their offense. Both of the girls admitted to having low self-esteem. They were desperate to fit in
any way they could, and they felt like they really resonated with horror films and violence. They
had developed a self-concept that portrayed themselves like powerful killers, they glamorized
killing in their minds. Since killing was glamorous, their egocentrism drove them to kill, to be
legendary. Their concept of themselves, and their concept of killing were both thwarted
because of their severe self-esteem issues, and their struggle to fit in.
times it was said that a certain child would have never committed the crimes if they hadn’t
been accompanied by another child, or children. Peer pressure isn’t always a bad thing, but for
this docuseries, it was a horrible thing. Peer pressure is not always spoken, it is a drive for an
adolescent to fit in with their peers. Maybe in an academic league, there is peer pressure to
compete better than peers or receive the highest academic marks. A well-known example of
peer pressure is drug use, if one cool kid uses drugs, the other kids will feel compelled to use
drugs to impress the initial cool kid. The first episode was primarily focused on occult type
killings, all of which were committed with two or more children. For a specific example, in the
docuseries, a group of four boys around the age of 15 became friends. The boys enjoyed heavy
metal, the lyrics often talking about rape, murder, and the sacrificing of a virgin. The boys often
talked about how they’d like to do those things, but never made an actual plan. One cold night
they went to a campfire and invited a young “cool girl” to hang out and drink beers. Without a
word, the boys began beating her and stabbing her. Nobody begged anyone to join in, nobody
tried to convince anyone to do anything, yet somehow, they all joined into this sadistic ritual.
The boy considered to be the leader took the first move, and the others followed suit. This is
still considered peer pressure, an internal pressure to join in, a fear that whoever wasn’t in on it
would be killed next, a desire to impress the others, to be part of the team. During the court
trial it was discussed how two of the boys would have never committed a crime at all, let alone
a violent crime, had they not met the other two boys that were considered to be the “trouble
makers.” Another similar case involved a boy girl pair. This case was a bit more stereotypical for
peer pressure. The boy told the girl she was going to help him kill her mother, so they could be
together. The girl’s mother had made it clear that she did not approve of the relationship. She
did protest, but after much begging, bribing, and pleading, she caved. She helped the boy kill
her mother. They felt it was the only way to be together. Peer pressure comes in many forms
and has been proven to be a driving factor for homicide based off of the information in the
docuseries, since at least half of the killings described involved some type of peer pressure.
Adolescents are more susceptible to peer pressure than other age groups for various reasons.
Identity versus role confusion is huge for an adolescent, their main goal is to identify who they
are, and how they fit in. Since fitting in is so huge during this stage, adolescents will do a lot of
things to try to fit in, specifically with their peers. Peer pressure is really just encouragement to
conform. If a teen finds themselves in the wrong crowd, conforming leads to a slew of bad
behavior. If a teen finds themselves in a sports team or honors society, conforming is actually
succeeding.
Watching this docuseries, I felt like I saw a lot of the concepts that we learned in class
coming to life. The ones that I mentioned previously, as well as several others. Some of it was
uncomfortable for me, as we learned certain things in class I convinced myself that the
textbook had dramatized certain things. I feel like seeing the media portrayal changed my views
a little bit by opening my eyes to things I never really thought about. Seeing the way that a
mistreated child could easily justify heinous actions made me really reflect on myself and how I
treat others, especially young minded individuals. Part of me wishes that as soon as a family
found out they were expecting a baby, they were required to take a lifespan class. Learning
about some of these concepts and how a human develops and grows might help parents to
better nurture their child and give them the kind of childhood that they don’t need to recover
from. Even just understanding why a child behaves a certain way is very helpful. Understanding
where someone is coming from brings empathy and compassion rather than anger and
confusion. It’s really sad how many lives can be destroyed when a child doesn’t get what they
need during crucial development points. Whether it’s a loving home, a secure attachment, or
the feeling of acceptance, something is lacking in each one of the stories I watched in this
docuseries. Things that could have been such simple fixes, but they were missed, and people
A topic I chose to research further was what drives a child to kill. In the article “From
abused child to serial killer: investigating nature vs nurture in methods of murder,” Dr Adrian
Raine discusses a specific variation of an A gene, he says that a carrier of this variation is more
likely to commit a violent crime. The variation alone, however, is not a guarantee that a crime
will be committed. Genetics and nurture work together to form the outcomes. The article
states that not all abused children become serial killers, and not all serial killers are victims of
abuse. The article goes on to give examples of significant adolescent killers and the relation to
physically abusive parents. A study was conducted with ex FBI profiler Joe Navarro to profile the
types of abuse with the type of killing. In this study they found that childhood rape victims were
more likely to conduct rape, lust, or anger killings, as well as postmortem sex. Children who
were abused psychologically were tied to crimes involving torture. Children who were
physically abused were tied to crimes where the body was tied or left at the scene. In the
Southern Illinois University Carbondale there was a publication titled “The relations between
parenting styles and juvenile delinquency.” In the study conducted to create this publication,
permissive parenting style yielded the highest scores correlated with juvenile delinquency.
Authoritarian was a close second, and in a further study it was concluded that there wasn’t
much of a difference between the two as far as delinquency. In the united states it’s reported
that about 80% of adolescents admitted to committing a crime that could have resulted in
being arrested. The study discussed that demanding parents can play a huge role in the stress
that causes a teen to act out and partake in risky or even deadly behaviors. Authoritarian
parents tend to be high in the demanding aspect of parenting, and low in responsiveness. They
are often described as cold. The extremes of each parenting style are variant and dependent on
many factors, but this style of parenting with the rigid discipline and limited emotional
availability can be very harmful to a child’s rapidly developing mind. Permissive parents can be
just as damaging but for a different slew of reasons. A permissive parent tends to set little to no
rules. The children do as they please, and for the phase of development that an adolescent is in,
this can be very harmful. The adolescent egocentrism doesn’t allow the teen to think clearly,
and without clear rules to follow, horrible things could follow. The big factors that lead to the
antisocial behavior conducive to committing a murder are lack of emotional support, rejection,
lack of supervision, and lack of discipline. On the other hand, though, too much discipline was
also listed. Parenting styles in either extreme can lead to high stress in the adolescent which
leads to risky behaviors. In an article from Psychology Today titled “Why Kids Kill Parents,” They
discuss how sometimes teens feel smothered at home, and unlike an adult, they can’t just
leave. When certain personality traits meet overly strict, or completely uninvolved parenting,
some teens may feel backed against a wall. Murder is the only way out in their still developing
minds. An analysis report from the FBI actually stated that in the great majority of cases, the
child who committed murder was a white male. The children who kill are almost always
adolescents. It makes sense after learning about all of the impulsive and risky behavior that
adolescents are engaged in. They walk around feeling like they’re center stage, the world
revolves on them and all of their overly charged emotions. Even in a good home, adolescents is
a difficult time in development for both the teen and their family. Some cases of adolescent
homicide are not the product of abuse or neglect, but sadly a severely mentally ill child. The
most often offenders are the severely abused. By severely abused, the article discusses sexual
abuse, frequent beatings, and extremely neglected children. 90% of children who murder their
own parents were severely abused by their parents before the murders took place. The children
described their crimes as the only way to escape the horrible conditions at home, an act of pure
desperation. The article doesn’t forget to mention the very few children who kill with no
remorse but come from a loving home. In interviewing 75 children charged with murder. Seven
of which killed their parents, and six out of that seven were severely abused. There isn’t a
statistic as a whole for how many children from loving homes go on to kill, but based off of this
particular study, that number is extremely low, one out of 75. Based on all of the articles I read
as well as the docuseries I watched, it seems as though a few big problems here are the
parenting styles, and the fact that a child’s development is not fully understood by the people
with the biggest impact on the child’s life. The psychology today article mentions that parents
need help with coping and enhancing good communication skills with their children, and I
completely agree. I feel that parents should be required to take a beginner level lifespan class
so that they can better understand what’s going on in a child’s life, and what they need from
their caregivers. Prevention education needs to be revamped to teach children about where
they can go if they’re being abused so they don’t feel so backed into a wall. Overall, it seems as
though parenting style does in fact have a correlation with homicides committed by
adolescents, but there are so many other factors that the information isn’t entirely concrete.
Having a neglectful parent alone will not ensure that the child will commit a crime, let alone a
murder. Not all authorian parents produce murderous children, and sometimes children from a
loving family will still go on to commit a homicide. Overall, this was an interesting topic for me
Davies, N. (2019, January 28). From Abused Child to Serial Killer: Investigating Nature vs Nurture
https://www.psychiatryadvisor.com/home/topics/violence-and-aggression/from-abused-child-to-
serial-killer-investigating-nature-vs-nurture-in-methods-of-murder/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/199209/why-kids-kill-parents