Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2019-05-02T221854.997
2019-05-02T221854.997
Requirements:
6-7 pages double spaced (not counting title page and reference page)
12 point Times New Roman font
Include graphics and illustrations where appropriate
Use APA style citations and references
Conform to plain language requirements
At least four scholarly sources used as references
Submit the Business Case to Drop Box 6.1.
Business case: Tube Laser Purchase 2
Executive Summary
Precision Steel Fabrication (PSF) has potential investment opportunity in form of Tube
Laser Machine to be installed on the manufacturing floor. Tube Laser are new technology
machines which can potentially reduce three or more manufacturing processes at the PSF shop
floor. Tube Laser will save time on production and in turn will save money. The federal
government is offering tax benefit in form of 50% depreciation bonus on all the equipment.
Buying Tube Laser by the end of 2004 relieves PSF of any tax liabilities. Due to the decline in
the economy at the end of 2001, PSF had made some critical decisions regarding its operations
and cost cutting. Since the economy is on uptrend with projected PSF sales of $10 million, and
after factoring in Government tax benefits; it is probably a good idea to take advantage of the
opportunity at hand and buy Tube Laser Machines. This will help PSF get few new projects in
upcoming years, which can help PSF breakeven the cost of the Tube Laser, which is around $1
million.
Business case: Tube Laser Purchase 3
Precision Steel Fabrication (PSF) fabricates its products using roller tubular steel, solid
steel wire and sheet metal. The rolled tubular steel constitutes to approximately 75% of the
products sold, 20% sales come from wire and remaining 5% sales are from sheet metal. At PSF,
the parts are produced as per the customer’s orders and specifications. The price package
includes the part price, tooling cost and service. Tooling cost is significant component of the
package and could go up to $60,000 per project. The customer’s orders are fed in to the PSF’S
MRP system, Syteline, which then creates the job orders with instructions for shop floor. It
enlists all the manufacturing steps required to complete the job along with the bill of material.
Cold Saw: First, operator loads the tube by standing in from of the saw and then manually
cuts the tube using the saw. Each tube is sized 20 feet in length of the tubular steel. Typical
production rate for manually cut parts is about 80 to 100 parts per hour.
Hydraulic Presses: To punch and pierce the holes into the tube by using additional custom
tooling, depending on the number and shapes of the holes. The current process has
Deburring Wheel: To remove the sharp burrs from the tube often created by cutting and
punching the steel tubes. For the safety purposes the burrs must be removed manually by
Robotic Welder: To robot weld the steel components by holding them in a weld fixture.
Power Coating: To clean the components of any dirt and oil and spray them with
Proposal
Tube Laser is relatively new manufacturing technology, which cuts the tubular steel
better than traditional method adopted by PSF at the manufacturing floor. For tube laser cutting,
the entire bundle of the steel can be loaded onto the tube laser loader. The machine loads each
individual tube autonomously, to laser cut the tubes at desired lengths. Compared to traditional
saw cutting, the laser cut production is up to 300% more efficient (300 to 400 parts per hour).
Tube Laser does not require any kind of special tooling to punch and pierce the holes as required
in traditional hydraulic press punch. Tube Laser can punch the holes of different shapes and sizes
at the rate of 200 pieces per hour, at a better production rate compared to hydraulic press rate of
150 pieces per hour. Additionally, since the Tube Laser is extremely precise and makes smooth
cuts, the parts do not need deburr operations which not only saves time but also avoids potential
Clearly, the use of tube laser at manufacturing floor could potentially make three or more
process and machines obsolete (depending on the number of punching holes per part), and
achieve cost savings. Tube Laser does not require any special tooling, which saves the time to
change the tools and reduces upfront cost to the customers. By using the Tube Laser, there will
be 40%-50% of reduction in the upfront tooling costs to the customers. JLS/Brodure, Nakamura,
and Luxemburg are the three manufactures that sell Tube Laser in the United States. The Tube
Lasers are roughly invoiced around $1 million by each of these suppliers. Even though, all the
companies have promising Tube Laser features, the most suitable to the PSF’s operational needs
is the Tube Laser sold by JLS/Brodure. Buying Tube Laser from JLS Group, which is based in
the United State, will save PSF on cost of shipping and required maintenance service in future.
The tube laser has auto-loading and autonomous operation features, saving the manpower
Business case: Tube Laser Purchase 5
required on traditional machines. JLS has tube lasers in the inventory and ready to purchase by
the end of 2004. Since the IRS has announced industrial tax savings program which rewards 50%
depreciation bonus on all the equipment purchased before December 31, 2004, there will be tax
benefit to the PSF. A $1 million tube laser would essentially eliminate the income tax liability of
the PSF in 2004. The tax cost savings could act as down payment for the Tube Laser purchased
from JLS Group. Furthermore, PSF might be able to hire back some of the employees laid off
that the industry is on the rebound and in 2005 the sales are projected to be $10.02 billion.
Having a Tube Laser machine installed on the shop floor gives PSF competitive advantage over
rivals Lakeshore Steel and GVS to win more projects. Buying Tube Laser wins PSF the new
projects of $160,000 in year 1 and $600,000 in year 2, which otherwise PSF does not have
capacity to produce. The following financial analysis confirms that the cost of the purchase of
The proposal section is where you unveil the Grand Idea. The previous section has foreshadowed it and established
that the company is experiencing pain. Now is the time to explain how to make that pain go away.
Address both the opportunities and the risks of this solution. If necessary, perform a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses,
Opportunities, Threats) analysis be- fore writing this section. SWOT analysis is a common business analysis tool;
for more information, search the Internet.
Anticipate any objections management (or anyone else) might have to the plan and preempt them. Either counter
them with information about how they won’t be a factor, or explain how the bene ts outweigh the objections.
Business case: Tube Laser Purchase 6
Financial Proof
How the ROI is calculated or the factors included and compared in the CA
The sources for those numbers (did they come from historic company data, an external source, or some-
place else?)
Use the company’s historical data if possible. Make friends with the nance group in order to access the
data. If no data are available, use industry standard numbers. These are almost always avail- able through
any associations for your industry; for example, the Consumer Electronics Association has a lot of data
about the consumer electronics industry (DVD players, iPods, toasters, and the like). If there are no
associations, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or similar
government agencies usually have at least some industry data.
Keep it simple: use charts and graphs rather than the raw spreadsheet data. Provide full details in the
supporting materials.
Conclusion
This section summarizes the problem and the solution, referring back to points made in the body of the document. The
conclusion states that spending $X will generate $Y in cost savings or new revenue. It reinforces that this is an urgent
(or at least important) problem and that you know the answer. It ends with a call to action: adopt your proposal.