1) Social media allows people to curate an idealized version of themselves that does not always match their true selves, which can lead to feelings of inauthenticity and depression when comparing online and offline selves.
2) While social media enables finding friends with similar interests more easily, it also encourages censoring negative emotions and problems to maintain a positive online image.
3) Experiments found that people are better able to express their true selves during online interactions rather than face-to-face, as the Internet provides a more accessible means for conveying one's inner qualities and feelings.
1) Social media allows people to curate an idealized version of themselves that does not always match their true selves, which can lead to feelings of inauthenticity and depression when comparing online and offline selves.
2) While social media enables finding friends with similar interests more easily, it also encourages censoring negative emotions and problems to maintain a positive online image.
3) Experiments found that people are better able to express their true selves during online interactions rather than face-to-face, as the Internet provides a more accessible means for conveying one's inner qualities and feelings.
1) Social media allows people to curate an idealized version of themselves that does not always match their true selves, which can lead to feelings of inauthenticity and depression when comparing online and offline selves.
2) While social media enables finding friends with similar interests more easily, it also encourages censoring negative emotions and problems to maintain a positive online image.
3) Experiments found that people are better able to express their true selves during online interactions rather than face-to-face, as the Internet provides a more accessible means for conveying one's inner qualities and feelings.
By John Bargh, Katelyn McKenna & Grainne Fitzsimons
According to the Journal “Those who feel better able to express their “true selves” in Internet rather than face‐to‐face interaction settings are more likely to form close relationships with people met on the Internet” Social media puts an interesting lens on the creation of the self, and how this construction affects our mental well-being. One’s self-image is the person we are based on the actions, behaviors, and habits currently possessed. The idea of companionship in the internet sometimes have advantages and disadvantages to college students like us. Social media is not only extremely pervasive, it is an activity in which you are expected to participate. Not all social media is Facebook and Instagram. Think LinkedIn, the new virtual business profile quickly replacing the traditional printed resume. As a student freelance photographer, I very often see job postings that you have “strong social media presence”, or “influential” and wide range of users seeing your post. We can manipulate “ourselves” to our liking. It's easy as posting a genuine picture of our self or tweeting an inspirational quote. It gives us the image that we are always positive and free from problems. It can attract friends or users with the same vibes, giving us our own “social circle of friends” They found friends with the same liking and interests, which makes them comfortable to the things that they can usually talk about. But the disadvantage of this topic is that one factor for the high rates of depression seen in social media-friendly people is the inconsistency they observe between their ideal cyber self and their self-image. The desire to be seen positively has taught us to silence our troubles and we now have no idea how to express inner turmoil without feeling like we’re accepting social defeat. According to the Journal “Experiments 1 and 2, using a reaction time task, found that for university undergraduates, the true‐self concept is more accessible in memory during Internet interactions, and the actual self is more accessible during face‐to‐face interactions.” It said that actual self is more accessible during face-to-face interactions, meaning that when we can talk to the person personally. For obvious reasons, people always do not advertise their negative traits on their social profiles, nor do they pose unflattering pictures. Because of this strict control of the way we are viewed, we are often fooled into believing other people’s lives are much better than our own. What is essential to remember is they too wear masks, the way I do, the way everyone does. Experiment 3 confirmed that people randomly assigned to interact over the Internet (vs. face to face) were better able to express their true‐self qualities to their partners. Communication between human beings is always imperfect. Expressing yourself in a completely accurate way is impossible, especially when it comes to talking about your feelings. It’s much easier to communicate ideas than feelings. That’s because we are more accustomed to talking about our ideas. It improves our communication skills. It’s worth doing because it has a huge impact on interpersonal relationships. After all, verbal communication is the basis of relationship. Whether our communication works well or gets stuck, much of it depends on the way we use words.
Nicola Call Sally Featherstone The Thinking Child Resource Book - Brain Based Learning For The Early Years Foundation Stage Second Edition Continuum 2010 PDF