Download as xls, pdf, or txt
Download as xls, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 25

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: RAY A. MARIMAT Name of Rater: ESTHER M. VILLARIN


Position: SPST-1 Position: Principal I
Division: Negros Oriental Date of Review:
Rating Period: January- April 2019

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q
1. TEACHING- 1. Prepared Daily August 2016 10% *DLP/DLL with *DLP/DLL *One *DLP/DLL with *DLP/DLL prepared on *One 4
LEARNING Lesson to March 2019 complete parts filled prepared on time DLP/DLL complete parts time DLP/DLL for
PROCESS Plans/Daily up *Objectives are for 4 days filled up *Objectives are 4 days
Lesson Logs *All parts well expressed checked 2 *All parts well expressed following checked 2
accomplished based following SMART days accomplished SMART criteria days before
on Budget of criteria before based on Budget of *Activities are varied
Work/CG *Activities are Work/CG * DLP/DLL
*Each part with varied *
*Each part with adhers to the
appropriate DLP/DLL adhers
appropriate standards
description and to the standards
examples (format,contents description and (format,contents per
*Reflection describes per DepEd Order # examples DepEd Order #
end result of 42,2015) *Reflection 42,2015)
DLP/DLL *Evidence of describes end *Evidence of
coherence in result of DLP/DLL coherence in
objectives, objectives, activities
activities and and
assesssment/evalua assesssment/evaluati
tion on
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Weight Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q
2. Facilitated August 2018 10% *DLP/DLL aligned to *80% objectives Target *DLP/DLL aligned to *80% objectives Target 4
learning in the to March 2019 CG with challenging achieved as timelines CG with achieved as specified timelines
school through and measurable specified in the CG met 80% challenging and in the CG used met 80%
functional lesson objectives used measurable *80% of activities
plans, daily logs *Teaching methods *80% of activities objectives prepared aligned to
and innovative /strategies employed prepared aligned to *Teaching the DepEd VMCV
teaching elicit 100% the DepEd VMCV methods *80% of performance
strategies interaction *80% of /strategies activities are
*Results of previous performance
employed elicit authentic
students' assessment activities are
used as basis for authentic 100% interaction *80%
follow-up activities *80% *Results of activities/materials
activities/materials previous students' localized
localized assessment used ICT Integrated
ICT Integrated as basis for follow-
up activities
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Weight Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q
3. Initiated August 2018 5% *Classroom rules and * 80 % individual Within the *Classroom rules * 80 % individual Within the 5
discipline of to March 2019 policies clearly journals of students SY but and policies clearly journals of students SY but
students explained as kept started explained as kept started
including evidenced by 0% * 80 % untoward June evidenced by 0% * 80 % untoward June
classroom rules, classroom related behaviour/s classroom related behaviour/s recorded
guidelines and behavior problems of recorded in the behavior problems in the individual’s
individual and students individual’s journal of students journal
group tasks *Routine activities in *Timley and *Routine activities *Timley and
within the rating the classroom appropriate
in the classroom appropriate
period understood by disciplinary
students as evidenced action/s but not understood by disciplinary action/s
by 0% misbehaving untimely provided students as but not untimely
students report to students evidenced by 0% provided to students
misbehaving students concerned and 50% misbehaving concerned and 50%
report cases recorded students report cases recorded
*Routine activities * Structure of misbehaving * Structure of
during learning classroom students report classroom leadership
interactive sessions leadership and *Routine activities and mechanism well-
well defined and mechanism well- during learning defined as evidenced
followed by students defined as interactive sessions with the written ToRs
as evidenced by 0% evidenced with the well defined and
confusions written ToRs followed by
students as
evidenced by 0%
confusions
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Weight Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q
*Mechanisms * Student leaders *Mechanisms * Student leaders
organized by the establish leadership organized by the establish leadership
teacher to maintain roles in the teacher to maintain roles in the classroom
order and discipline in classroom order and discipline especially in the
the classroom but especially in the in the classroom absence of the
with defined roles absence of the but with defined teacher
*Student leadership teacher roles *80% students’ report
established and *80% students’
*Student cards reflect
facilitate order and report cards reflect
leadership descriptive rating of
discipline in the descriptive rating
classroom of the students’ established and the students’
behaviors facilitate order and behaviors
discipline in the
classroom

4. Monitored August 2018 5% * 100 % timely, *DORP in place Within the * 100 % timely, *DORP in place Within the 5
attendance, to March 2019 accurate checking of * Child friendly SY but accurate checking * Child friendly SY but with
diversity attendance done as classroom as with of attendance done classroom as innovations
appreciation, evidenced in SF 1 evidenced of the innovation as evidenced in SF evidenced of the once every
safe, positive and * Classroom is free absence of any s once 1 absence of any grading
motivating from unnecessary hazard every * Classroom is free hazard period
environment, files, waste, structures *Corners/structures grading from unnecessary *Corners/structures in
overall physical unbecoming of the in the classroom period
files, waste, the classroom are
atmosphere, eyes are utilized for
structures utilized for learning
cleanliness and * Chair to student learning purposes
orderliness of ratio is 1:1 * unbecoming of the purposes
classrooms * Waste Effective and eyes * Effective and
including proper segregation is practical * Chair to student practical structuring
waste disposaL evidenced as seen in structuring of ratio is 1:1 of classrooms
the waste receptacle classrooms *
provided Waste segregation
is evidenced as
seen in the waste
receptacle provided
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Weight Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q
* Classroom is *Systematic * Classroom is *Systematic checking
structured checking of structured of attendance
appropriately attendance appropriately established
according to established according to
subjects/lessons subjects/lessons

KRA 1 TOTAL
2. 1. Monitored and August 2018 10% *100% formative *Table of Within the *100% formative *Table of Within the 5
PUPILS/STUDE evaluated and to March 2019 tests and other types Specifications SY tests and other Specifications match SY
NTS OUTCOME maintained of assessment match ever test
30%
types of ever test material
pupils/students’ activities conducted material assessment * Students' portfolio
progress are recorded * Students' activities checked regularly by
*Regular conduct of portfolio checked conducted are the teacher
formative tests and regularly by the recorded * Analysis of test
other types teacher
*Regular conduct of results done with
assessmen* * Analysis of test
formative tests and evidence
Assessment is varied results done with
and well planned evidence other types * Class records/score
* Class assessmen* sheets in the custody
* Class records/Score records/score Assessment is of the teacher and
sheets updated sheets in the varied and well made available
* Records of students custody of the planned anytime
needing teacher and made *Intervention/remedia
intervention/remediati available anytime * Class tion activities
on established *Intervention/reme records/Score conducted
authentic and diation activities sheets updated
evidenced-based conducted * Records of
students needing
intervention/remedi
ation established
authentic and
evidenced-based
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Weight Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q
2. Conducted August 2018 10% *90% *90% of the target Within the *90% *90% of the target Within the 3
remediation/enric to March 2019 remediation/enrichme students got 80% SY remediation/enrich students got 80% SY
hment programs nt activities are passing score at the ment activities are passing score at the
to improve evidence-based end of the evidence-based end of the
performance *Remediation/Enrich remediation/enrich *Remediation/Enric remediation/enrichme
indicators ment activities are ment session hment activities nt session *Action
provided to 90% of *Action plan are provided to plan prepared before
the students needing prepared before
90% of the remediation/enrichme
them remediation/enrich
students needing nt activities
*2% drop out rate ment activities
*2% failure rate conducted them conducted
*Remediation/Enrich *Priority list of *2% drop out rate *Priority list of
ment activities are learners according *2% failure rate learners according to
conducted without to the needs are *Remediation/Enric the needs are also
sacrificing class also prepared hment activities prepared
schedules * Localized are conducted * Localized materials
*List of students materials are without sacrificing are prepared to be
needing remediation prepared to be class schedules used for the
is available used for the *List of students remediation/enrichme
*Remediation/Enrich remediation/enrich needing nt activities
ment activities are ment activities remediation is * Results of
appropriate to the * Results of available remediation/enrichme
needs of the target remediation/enrich *Remediation/Enric nt activities are
beneficiaries with ment activities are hment activities tracked down
evidences tracked down are appropriate to
the needs of the
target beneficiaries
with evidences
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Weight Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q
3. Maintained August 2018 10% *80% of students has *School records Within the *80% of students *School records with Within the 4
updated students’ to March 2019 a record of updated with issues on SY has a record of issues on supporting SY
school records Form 137, Form 138, supporting updated Form 137, documents and
Form 9 in the custody documents and Form 138, Form 9 authenticity
of the teacher authenticity in the custody of
*80% School Form 5 the teacher *School records made
is error-free *School records *80% School Form available anytime in
*Updated School made available
5 is error-free school except any two
Register with errors anytime in school
*Updated School of those enumerated
*80% of the class has except any two of
portfolio/journal those enumerated Register with errors *School Form 5
*80% of subjects *School Form 5 *80% of the class prepared but not
taught have score prepared but not has submitted on time
sheets and grading submitted on time portfolio/journal with errors
sheets with errors *80% of subjects *School Register
* 6-10% of the total *School Register taught have score updated with 4 days
class enrolment has updated with 4 sheets and grading of omission
issue from parents on days of omission sheets *85% Class
grades of students *85% Class * 6-10% of the portfolio/journal
portfolio/journal total class prepared according to
prepared according enrolment has specs
to specs issue from parents
on grades of
students
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Weight Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q
*Analysis of the *Analysis of the
results of the results of the
test/assessment ade test/assessment ade
ready but lacking ready but lacking
intervention design intervention design

KRA 2 TOTAL
3. COMMUNITY 1. Conducted August 2018 5% * Conduct of 3 *85% attendance Only once * Conduct of 3 *85% attendance Only once 5
INVOLVEMENT regular/periodic to March 2019 special meetings of achieved within 4 special meetings of achieved within 4
PTA PTA+ *Two meetings in a months PTA+ *Two meetings in a months
meetings/conferen * Regular PTA year at least one * Regular PTA year at least one
ces Meeting conducted meeting per Meeting conducted meeting per grading
*Conduct of 4 special grading period *Conduct of 4 period
meetings of PTA *Agenda made special meetings of *Agenda made
specific
PTA specific
*Clarity of the agenda *Agenda for
*Clarity of *Agenda for special
for the meeting called special meeting
for clarified the agenda for the meeting clarified
* Minutes of the meeting called for
meeting recorded * Minutes of the
*Notice of the meeting recorded
meeting served *Notice of the
meeting served
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Weight Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q
2. Visited parents August 2018 5% *99-90 % of the *List of SARDOs Within the *99-90 % of the *List of SARDOs are Within the 4
of students to March 2019 students identified as are evidenced SY students identified evidenced based SY
needing academic SARDOs are visited based as SARDOs are * Designed
monitoring/follow *89-80 % of the * Designed visited intervention got
-up students identified as intervention got *89-80 % of the approval from the
SARDOs have approval from the students identified Dept Head or
appropriate designed Dept Head or as SARDOs have Principal
intervention Principal
appropriate *Schedule of Visits to
*89-80 % of the *Schedule of Visits
designed SARDOs have
students visited have to SARDOs have
signed commitments approval from the intervention approval from the
of cooperation principal *89-80 % of the principal
students visited
have signed
commitments of
cooperation

KRA 3 TOTAL
4. PROFESSIONAL 1. Conducted August 2016 5% * Conducted two * Proposal Within the NONE NONE Within the SY 2
GROWTH AND Action Research to March 2019 action research recommended by SY
DEVELOPMENT
*Action research the Principal
conducted address a *Action Research
major classroom issue approved by the
*Action research is SDO
data-driven *Action research is
timely
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Weight Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q
*All data NONE NONE
supporting the
action research is
system based
*Interventions as
result of the action
research is 100%
implemented

2. Participated, August 2018 10% *Attendance to *DepEd related Within the *Attendance to *DepEd related Within the 5
initiated relevant to March 2019 training at the School, training of any SY training at the training of any kind SY
training, District, Division, kind not less than 3 School, District, not less than 3 days
workshops, Regional & Central days Division, Regional *Non-DepEd related
activities for level which is DepEd *Non-DepEd & Central level training of any kind
personal and related related training of which is DepEd not less than 4 days
professional * Attendance to other any kind not less related *Earned an aggregate
development training which are not than 4 days
* Attendance to of at least 24 units in
DepEd related *Earned an
other training either graduate or
*Enrolment to aggregate of at
graduate, post least 24 units in which are not post graduate studies
graduate studies either graduate or DepEd related
*Coached a winning post graduate *Enrolment to
student-contestant in studies graduate, post
the School, District, graduate studies
Divisio, Region, and *Coached a
Central level winning student-
activities contestant in the
School, District,
Divisio, Region, and
Central level
activities
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Weight Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q
3. Produced August 2018 10% *Any of the 5 *Any of the 4 Within the NONE NONE Within the SY 2
publications/creat to March 2019 indicators indicators SY
ive work for
school
paper/division
publication/acted
as adviser of
school journalists

KRA 4 TOTAL
Plus Factor 5% GSP District Coordinator

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS KRA 1 TOTAL


KRA 2 TOTAL
KRA 3 TOTAL
KRA 4 TOTAL
Plus Factor
Overall Rating For Accomplishment

ESTHER M. VILLARIN RONEL D. BATOHANON ERLINDA N. CALUMPANG, Ed.D.


Rater Ratee Approving Authority
E COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

ESTHER M. VILLARIN
Principal I

TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION


Rating
Score
E T Ave.

4 3 3.66667 0.36667
TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Score
E T Ave.
5 4 4 0.4
TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Score
E T Ave.
4 4 4.3 0.2
TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Score
E T Ave.

4 4 4 0.2
TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Score
E T Ave.

KRA 1 TOTAL 1.233333


4 5 4.66667 0.46667
TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Score
E T Ave.
3 3 3 0.3
TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Score
E T Ave.
4 4 4 0.4
TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Score
E T Ave.

KRA 2 TOTAL 0.466667


5 5 5.0 0.25
TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Score
E T Ave.
4 4 4.00 0.2

KRA 3 TOTAL 0.5


2 2 2 0.1
TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Score
E T Ave.

5 5 5.00 0.50
TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Score
E T Ave.
2 2 2 0.2

KRA 4 TOTAL 0.8

2 0.1

KRA 1 TOTAL 1.233333


KRA 2 TOTAL 1.166667
KRA 3 TOTAL 0.45
KRA 4 TOTAL 0.8
Plus Factor 0.1
Overall Rating For Accomplishment 3.75
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES Teamwork CORE SKILLS
Self-Management 5 Willingly does his/her share of responsibility. Oral Communication
Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal
4 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development. 4 accomplishment across the organization. 5 Follows instruction accurately.

Undertake personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and takes
4 into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization. 4 Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements. 5 Expresses self clearly, fluently and articulately.

Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher


5 goals. 4 Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions. 5 Uses appropriate medium for the message.

Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt charts, checklists, etc.) to Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across
4 achieve goals 5 organizations to accomplish organizational goals and objectives. 5 Adjust communication styles to others.

4 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others. Service Orientation 5 Guides discussions between and among peers to meet an objective.

Professionalism and Ethics 5 Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems. Written Communication

Demonstrate the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer Knows the different written business communication formats used in
5 Ethical Standards for public officials and employees (RA 6713). 5 service issues and concerns. 4 the DepEd.

Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women Writes routine correspondence/communications, narrative and descriptive
5 impact of his/her actions and decisions. 5 empowerment. 5 report based on a readily available information data with minimal spelling or
grammatical error/s (e.g. memos, minutes, etc.).

Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates and
5 punctuality, good grooming and communication. 5 strategies based on DepEd strategies and directions. 5 Secures information from required references (i.e., Directories, schedules,
notices, instructions) for specific purposes.

Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified


5 Makes personal sacrifices to meet organization’s need. 5 procedures that will further enhance service delivery. 5 Self-edits words, numbers phonetic notation and content, if necessary.

Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs, Demonstrates clarity, fluency, impact, conciseness and effectiveness
4 improve systems and help others improve their effectiveness Innovation 5 in his/her written communications.

Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Fosters new
Result Focus 5 ideas, processes, and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational Computer/ICT Skills
efficiency).

Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on Prepares basic compositions (e.g., letters, reports, spreadsheets and graphics
4 Achieves result with optimal use of time and resources most of the time. 5 improving personal productivity to create higher value and results. 5 presentation using Word Processing and Excel.

Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing Identifies different computer parts, turns the computer on/off, and work on a
Promotes a creative climate and inspires co – workers to develop original ideas or
4 organizational needs before personal needs. 5 solutions 5 given task with acceptable speed and accuracy and connects computer
peripherals (e.g. printers, modems, multimedia projectors, etc.).

Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating procedures Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that
4 correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality of work in terms of 4 improve the work unit and organization. 5 Prepares simple presentation using Powerpoint.
usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision required.

Express a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates Utilizes technologies to: access information to enhance professional
4 May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set. 4 resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with minimal resources. 5 productivity, assists in conducting research and communicate through local
and global professional networks.

Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Recommends appropriate and updated technology to enhance
4 Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, more efficiently, or 4 productivity and professional practice.
improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal

OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS


CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 4
CORE SKILLS 4
OVERALL RATINGS 4
PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating

Accomplishment of KRAs and Objectives 3.750

Employee - Supervisor Agreement


The signatures below confirms that the employee and his/ her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.

Name of Employee: Name of Superior:


RAY A. MARIMAT ESTHER M. VILLARIN
Signature Signature

Date 15-Apr-19 Date 15-Apr-19

PART IV DEVELOPMENT PLANS

ACTION PLAN
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Timeline Resources Needed
Teaching Learning Intervention)
Process; Community In Students Outcomes; Seminars, Trainings, Conduct and August 2018-
Involvment Professional Growth Initiate Leadership Training March 2019 Finance;
Stakeholders

RAY A. MARIMAT ESTHER M. VILLARIN


Ratee Rater
DR. ROSE MARIE L. TORES
PSDS
Approving Authority
rm.

Resources Needed

Finance;
Stakeholders

M. VILLARIN
ter

You might also like