Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ragini Pandey
Ragini Pandey
DISSERTATION SUBMITTED
B.COM.LL.B (H)
TO
FACULTY OF LAW
LUCKNOW
SUPERVISOR SUBMITTED BY
FACULTY OF LAW
LUCKNOW
2019
Dr. Shakuntala Misra National Rehabilitation
University, Lucknow
Faculty of Law
CERTIFICATE
Lucknow
Dr. Shakuntala Misra National Rehabilitation
University, Lucknow
DECELARATION
The study is not submitted anywhere earlier in full or any part for any purpose.
I also declare that no part of dissertation is/are a reproduction from any other source,
published or unpublished without acknowledgement.
Date: Student,
B.Com.LL.B (H)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would also like to take the opportunity of acknowledging the assistance of all
other ‘Faculty Members’ & the staff at DSMNRU, Lucknow, who have in some way,
helped in carrying out the research work in time.
Date: Student,
B.Com.LL.B (H)
AP : Andhra Pradesh
Art. : Article
Co. : Company
Ed. : Edition
etc. : Etcetera
HC : High Court
i.e. : That is
J. : Justice
No. : Number
Pvt. : Private
SC : Supreme Court
Sec. : Section
Supra : As above
Ltd : Limited
v. : versus
viz. : Namely
Vol. : volume
Review of literature
Analysis of problem
Research methodology
Research question?
Objective of the study
Hypothesis
CHAPTER -1
(i) Introduction
(ii) POSITION OF CHILDREN IN INDIA
(iii) Status Of Child
(iv) Magnitude Of The Child Labour Problem
CHAPTER -2
(i) Concept And Definition Of Child
(ii) Inadequacy In Definition Of Child
CHAPTER -3
(i) Problem Of Child Labour-Nature of work,working
conditions of child labourers
(ii) Causes
(iii) Effect
CHAPTER -4
Child LabourIn Organized Sectors
CHAPTER -5
CHAPTER -7
Conclusion ,suggestions,Recommendations
BIBLIOGRAPHY
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Chapter– I: introduce that the Children are the greatest gift of GOD to man, our
most precious and very important asset. They are tiny apostles of pears and we
should not forget that they are at first, very much human being – though young.
They are not a commodity. They are not from other galaxy. This chapter also throws
a flash light on the position of chidren in India ,the status possessed by them and the
magnitude of child labour problem .
Chapter–2: depicts the concept of child and its definition given in various Acts,
national and international conventions,the issue of inadequacy of definition of child
is also raised.
Chapter -4: dealt with the child labourlabour in organized sectors and present the real
scenario.
Chapter -7: concludes the entire study and prescribe some general and specific
suggestions with the help of which the child labour can be tackled and eliminated.
ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEM
I analysed during research in these factories that children still work hard
and for long hours in hazardous factories for earning minimal wages to provide their
family for two time meal.Children working in these factories mentioned above inhale
toxic fumes .they have no facility of transportation though on papers it is
provided.They are treated like animals.When I asked the factory manager for taking
interview of those workers he did not allow me .then I decided to talk to them after
their working hours .I talked with them and realize that though there are a lot of
statutory and constitutional provisions but reality is totally different .It shows the dark
side of society where we live .
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Thus, Indian Laws relating to child labour are deficient from the international
standards as laid down by the International Labour Organisation but even then they
can be considered satisfactory in view of the prevalent economic conditions of the
country. There are plethora of statutes142 to prevent the misuse of children in
hazardous employment and to protect the general rights of the children. But
sociological studies have revealed either the ineffective nature of these laws or their
blatant violations. Major findings in the study –I visited in a firework factory in
Kanpur a large number of children were working in that factory .Children working in
fire work factories inhale toxic vumes while mixing chemicals .They also suffer high
degrees of intense heat and run the risk of awefully burnt and injured in fire accidents
.Children who stamp frames on the metal sheets also suffer heat ,toxic fumes and
excessive strains on the arm and shoulders ,while they remove and place the heavy
fringes with great rapidity. Delay of a second can cause the entire frames to grip in
roaring flames resulting in instant death of the child .Such type of news we read
today. A large number of children who were working in glass bangle industries ,work
with furnaces with temperature 1400 degree Centigrade .They are usually employed
in jurai (jointing the end ),chhatai(sorting),kotai etc..
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
The spiritual basis of our constitutional order is “human dignity” and “social
justice” not the sadistic cruelty and hard work.Though the reality is totally different
.Children still work hard and for long hours in hazardous factories for earning
minimal wages to provide their family for two time meal.The object of this study is to
have first hand information from the children working in factories regarding their
working hour s,transport facilities ,education facelities ,entertainment ,playing ,meals
and medical facilities etc…
HYPOTHESIS
The hypothesis of this research study is to make a critical study of the pains
and pleasures of children working in factories with special reference to constitutional
mandates under Article 24 of the Constitution.
CHAPTER -1
(i) INTRODUCTION
-Rabindranath Tagore
The Children are called as the greatest gift of GOD to man, our most precious
and very important asset. They are tiny apostles of pears but we forget that they are at
first, very much human being – though young. They are not a commodity. They are
not from other galaxy.
“The child shows the man as morning shows the day. “ Milton.
The children are very important for any nation. Their needs and right should
not be attended merely as a bye product of progress. They should be attended as an
end and means of progress. Unless this change is achieved all investments in food
production, community service and human resource development would remain less
effective because the children constitute a significant proportion of the people and
they would not be able to contribute fully to them nor benefit full from them. WE
must not forget that the children are the ultimate goal for development and also the
most effective tool for development. WE must also realize that the efforts for advance
in the human condition must start as early as possible beginning with the child and
with the mother well before the child is born. Protecting the health and education of
today’s children is the first and foremost right of those children but it is also the most
basic and wisest of all investments and therefore in social and economic development
of society.
The welfare and development of any community depends largely on the health
and well-being of its children. It has been said that ‘who holds the souls of children
holds the nation’.
The physical and mental health of a nation is determined largely in the manner
in which it is shaped in the early stages. A generation which fails to recognize that the
baggy is its first charge is lost in barbarity and the hall mark of culture and advance of
civilization consists in the fulfilment of our obligation of the young generation by
opening up all opportunities for every child to unfold its personality and rise to its full
stature physical, moral and spiritual says Justice V.R. Krishna Iyerand adds that is
the birth right of every child that cries for justice from the world as a whole.
During world war II Winston Churchill said:
“There is no finer investment for any community than putting milk into
babies”.
This deep appeal to the people everywhere, this fundamental faith in juvenile
justice, this recognition of the worth of the infants born and unborn, is the beginning
of juvenile justice says Justice Krishna Iyer.
Children are a human resources, invaluable but vulnerable, yet developing
with a potentially to bloom with joy in an atmosphere of a caring society.’ They are
great promises of tomorrow, the dawn of humanity and buds of social development.
Legal policy towards then has undergone a sea change from a position where children
were treated as non-entity and mere material objects to a position of human dignity
where they are not only made free from exploitation and abuses but also enabled to
develop their full potentiality with fair access to food, health and education. Social
change towards better world for children to enjoy their right to be child is an inspiring
objective beneath this policy. Growth of human rights perception regarding child
spearhead the movement of creating child friendly environment for them.
As stated in above lines children are the greatest gift to humanity and
Childhood is an important and impressionable stage of human development as it
holds the potential to the future development of any society. Children who are
brought up in an environment, which is conducive to their intellectual, physical and
social health, grow up to be responsible and productive members of society. Every
nation links its future with the present status of its children. By performing work
when they are too young for the task, children unduly reduce their present welfare or
their future income earning capabilities, either by shrinking their future external
choice sets or by reducing their own future individual productive capabilities. Under
extreme economic distress, children are forced to forego educational opportunities
and take up jobs which are mostly exploitative as they are usually underpaid and
engaged in hazardous conditions. Parents decide to send their child for engaging in a
job as a desperate measure due to poor economic conditions. It is, therefore, no
wonder that the poor households predominantly send their children to work in early
ages of their life.
One of the disconcerting aspects of child labour is that children are sent to
work at the expense of education. There is a strong effect of child labour on school
attendance rates and the length of a child’s work day is negatively associated with his
or her capacity to attend school.
Child labour restricts the right of children to access and benefit from
education and denies the fundamental opportunity to attend school. Child labour,
thus, prejudices children’s education and adversely affects their health and safety.
India currently has an estimated 2.4 mn child workers as per the 68th NSS
survey. If we include the part time workers, this number shoots up to 3.22 mn. The
working children are primarily boys who carry the burden of the patriarchal social
construct in their roles as protectors/ providers of the family and at that young age
have to shoulder the responsibilities of the family. Still India has for education and
development of a girl child and not for a boy child. Child Labour, consisting of
children below 14 years of age, is defined by the International Labour Organisation
(ILO) as the type of work performed by children that deprives them of their childhood
and their dignity, which hampers their access to education and acquisition of skills
and which is performed under conditions harmful to their health and their
development. Children are the greatest gift to humanity and the same gift is being
misused for personal gains as child labour. They constitute 36% of India population
but a large majority of children in the age group of 5-14 years continue to remain in
distress and turmoil. One in every five children below the age of 14 is a labourer.
The flower (Child) withers before it blossoms. Child labour is more a rural
phenomenon than an urban phenomenon. Due to acute poverty poor families residing
in rural areas send their children to urban areas for bread and butter. In urban areas, to
survive in a cutthroat competition, manufacturers have lowered the real wages for
adult workers in order to employ child workers on low wages. The problem is very
much vast in its dimension. Children are forced to work in the most hazardous,
unhygienic conditions, where they are vulnerable to many severe health problems.
(ii) POSITION OF CHILDREN IN INDIA
Despite hectic planning welfare programmes, legislation and administrative
action in the past five decades, a large majority of the Indian children continue to
remain in distress and turmoil. In most families, the parents neglect them, caretakers
better then and in work places employers sexually abuse them. Though this problem
of emotional physical and the sexual abuse of children in India is increasing, it has
failed to capture the attention of sociologists and psychiatrists in our country. The
public and the government also are yet to recognize it as a serious problem. Public
indignation and professional concern is yet to be translated into positive and realistic
action. In Our Country, traditionally the responsibility for care and protection of
children lies with the parents (family). Children were the recipient of welfare
measures in the patriarchal society and while looking after their children, there was
no realization that children are also individuals with their own rights. Even the
constitutional guarantee of fundamental rights of children is more need based rather
than the rights based. Children in most sections of the Indian society are traditionally
and conventionally not consulted in matters and decisions affecting their lives. In the
family and household, the neighbourhood and wider community, in school or at work
place and across the social and cultural setup in our country, children’s views are not
given much importance. If they speak out, they are not normally heard. The
imposition of restrictive norms is especially true for girl children. This limits their
access to information and to choice, and reduces the possibility of seeking help
outside their immediate circle.
It was during the twentieth century that the concept of Children’s Rights
emerged and the focus shifted from the welfare to the rights based approach and this
transition from welfare to right based approach in the Government and civil society is
evolving with time. This shift in approach is primarily concerned with issues of social
justice, non-discrimination, equity and empowerment. In the right based approach,
children are viewed as citizens, entitled to all that has been promised to then under the
Constitution of India and United Nations Child Rights Charter 1989. The
consciousness relating to child welfare is also reflected under various provisions of
Indian Constitution. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Child 1989,
which is a landmark in International Child Rights Legislation, also embodies rights
perspective.
Article 15(3). Nothing in this article shall prevent the state from making any
special provision for women and children.
Article 21A: right to free and compulsory education for children between the
age group of six to fourteen years.
Article 23, Prohibition of trafficking in human beings and forced labour.
Article 24: No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to
work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment.
Article 45: Provision for early childhood care and education to children below
the age of six years.
Articles 47: Duty of the state to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of
living and to improve public health.
Articles 51A(k): Fundamental duty of parents or guardian to provide
opportunities for education to his child between the age of six to fourteen years.
The Preamble of the Child Rights Convention, conceived that the family is a
fundamental group of society and the natural environment for the growth and the
well-being of all its members and particularly children should be afforded the
necessary protection and assistance so that the child can fully assume its
responsibilities within the community.
Nineteen per cent of the world’s children live in India. The child population in
India is a large percentage as per the National census. According to the 2001 Census
around 440 million people in the country were aged below eighteen years and
constituted 42 per cent of India’s total population. This means for out of every ten
persons is a child. This is an enormous number of children that the country has to take
care of, while articulating its vision of progress, development and equity. India has
expressed its recognition of the fact that when its children are educated, healthy and
happy with access to opportunities, they are the country’s greatest human resource.
But children are vulnerable to abuse, exploitation and neglect. In our country the
problem of child abuse has not received enough attention through it is widely
prevalent and there is a need to understand its dimensions and complexities.
In India infant and child mortality rates are far higher as compared to those in
developed countries of the world. Female foeticide is widely rampant in certain states
like Punjab, Haryana, Delhi, Rajasthan, U.P. Etc. Despite various National and
International Legislation, National Policy for children and a variety of other
programmes designed for promoting child development, the conditions of children
has not been improved. Child malnutrition is distinctly visible especially among
children coming from poor families, scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. A large
number of children remain deprived of immunization and health check-ups. Much
lower percentage of children is enrolled in schools, despite right to education being a
fundamental right and Government’s drive for Sarv-Shisha-Abhiyaan.
Every year in India, 2.1 million children die before their fifth birthday.
Half of these children die even before they are 28 days.
Shelter, food, health and education. According to an estimate, there are around
340 million deprived children in India. The vulnerable group of Deprived children
can be categorized as orphans, abandoned and Destitute children, working and street
children, victims of disasters and calamities, juvenile offenders, children in conflict
with law, migrants and construction worker, children of prisoners and single parents.
Among the vulnerable group of children, India has the largest population of
street children in the world. At least 18 million children live or work on the streets in
urban India. Next category of vulnerable children is that of child labourers. Today,
India has the largest population of employed children. Children are the easiest and
weakest to be victimized and they are also the cheapest source of labour. These
children are exposed to physical and mental abuse, besides hazardous work and
unsafe working conditions.
Though child is an important segment of human society but they have been
abused and exploited in every period and every society. As discussed earlier, India ia
a home to almost 19 per cent of the total population of the world. Children between
the ages of Zero to eighteen years constitute 44 per cent of the total population of the
country, out of which 40 per cent do not have actual access to basic needs, i.e. food,
shelter, health, education, care and other early opportunities. In India, the problem of
Child Rights violation has not received enough attention. There have been few and
sporadic efforts to understand and address the problem. The problem of Child abuse
and Child Rights violation is prevalent in India as in many other countries and there is
an urgent need to understand its dimensions and complexities.
Various reasons for the Child Rights violation include lack of education,
unemployment, poverty, big families, divorced parents, parental power, parental
incapacity to control impulses, prescribed stigma about the sex of the child and
commercial motives. The problem of child abuse is not an isolated problem.
The basic course of this problem is poverty and economic backwardness of
the country. Generally, the children of poor families are the victim of child abuse, and
resultantly, also suffer from various other problems in childhood; they always have a
negative approach towards life.
A study conducted by the Ministry of Women and Child Development along
with Prayas (an NGO) observed, that child abuse in India, as in other developing
societies, is a phenomenon which is widespread and cuts across ethnic, social and
economic boundaries. There are children who are particularly disadvantaged because
of their social, economic, physical or mental condition. In fat, a large number of
children of tender age are exposed to labour and are abused in many ways.
Sometimes children are abused by their own parents, who want their children to seek
employment to augment the income of their families and expose them to the work
which is not suitable to their age. Sometimes when the parents themselves are unable
to seek a job and the family income is very limited they are frustrated and instead of
giving anything to their children, they eat them and harass them in many other ways.
These children are placed under the category of children under special or
difficult circumstances. The following groups of children have further been included
in this category by the Government of India. Child labour, street children, neglected
children, juvenile offender, physically and mentally challenged children, destitute,
children in need to adoption, drug addicts, children in prostitution, children of
prostitutes, children of prisoners, refugee children, slum and migrated children,
missing children etc.
(iii) STATUS OF THE CHILD
It is widely accepted facts that the children are most important asset of any nation. In
fact, a nation’s future primarily depends upon what are children become when they grow up
as citizens. And this depends upon what priority is accorded to children’s healthy and holistic
development and what kind of education and care are given to them right from their
conception up to the stage of their education and training, and finally their placement in some
suitable economically gainful and professionally attractive job.
As discussed earlier, in our country traditionally the responsibility of care and
protection of children has been with families and communities. A strong knit patriarchal
family that is meant to look after its children well has seldom realized that children are
individuals with their own rights. While the Constitution of India guarantees many
fundamental rights to the children, the approach to ensure the fulfilment of these rights was
more needs based rather than rights based. With the adoption of right based approach, the
issues that were earlier peripheral came to the forefront. It is then, that the gap between child
abuse and Child Right protection became more obvious.
It emerges from the above discussion that on the one hand there were large number of
children in need of care and protection while on the other hand there are not enough schemes
or sufficient budget allocation to deal with the problem of Child rights violation. It is also
observed that to carry the issue of Child Rights protection forward, there is a need to create
and enabling environment through legislation which can address the issues of child abuse and
Child rights exhaustively make a policy on child protection, formulate intervention and
outreach services
Today there is growing concern about the rights of children and recognition of the
need to protect them from neglect and abuse as Child abuse has become one of the major
problems all over the world. The Indian legal system has some relevant provision for Child
Right’s Protection. However at present, there is no single legislation to dial exclusively with
the problem of child exploitation and abuse. Most of the existing legal provisions are merely
idealized postulates and are far from reality, due to the peculiar socio-economic structure of
our country. It is only a dream to provide necessary facilities and protection to the children.
Our Constitution incorporates many commitments for protection of Human Rights
for Children even without specific references to Child Rights. It is the Fundamental Right of
the children to have a happy and healthy childhood free from abuse and exploitation. The
word life occurring in article in article 21 of the Constitution of India includes education and
thus right to education upto the age of 14 years is a fundamental right. Recently the
government passed the Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act with the object of
providing free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years.
This legislation is anchored in the belief that the values of equality, social justice, democracy
and the creation of a just and humane society can be achieved only through provision of
inclusive elementary education to all. To provide free ad compulsory education is not merely
the responsibility of school or supported but the appropriate governments but also of school
which are not dependent on Government funds
Article 23 of the constitution prohibits trafficking in human beings and beggar and
other forms of forced labour. Article 24, provides that , no child below the age of fourteen
years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous
employment. Further Article 39(e) provides that the states shall direct its policy towards
securing its health and strength of workers, men and women and tender age of children are
not abused and the citizens are not forced by economic necessity to enter avocation unsuited
to their age or strength. Article 39(f) casts a duty on the State to declare that children are
given opportunities and facilities to develop in a healthy manner and in condition of freedom
and dignity and that childhood and youth are protected against exploitation and against moral
and material abandonment. Article 45 provides that the state shall endeavour to provide
within a period of ten years from the commencement of the Constitution, for free and
compulsory education for all the children until they complete the age of fourteen years.
All international conventions including the united Nations Convention on the Rights
of the Child (UNCRC) adopted the recommendations hereunder, plan and programmes
unconditionally recognize that children have the first charge on the resources howsoever
limited they may be India ratified the United Nations Conventions on the rights of Child 1989
(UNCRC), in 1992. tofulfil its international obligations, later in 2000 in 2005 laws such as
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2000 and National Commission for the Protection
of Child Rights Act, 2005 have been enacted by the Indian Legislature. Ratification and
enactments are certainly a step forward, but other actions and agencies are equally important.
Right holder should assess demand for realization of rights. The best interest of the child as a
guiding principle is not reflected in Government policies. Development of Children should be
grounded on linkage between development and rights, accountability, empowerment,
participation and non-discrimination.
Despite all these efforts, the conditions of the children in general let alone female and
disabled ones, is far from the satisfactory. In a male dominated society this gender
discrimination began from womb and continues after birth. Resultantly the female child gets
double exploited.
Despite Article 21 A, which provide for free and compulsory education for children
from six to fourteen years of age, there are around 35 million children who are out of school.
Even those who are in school are deprived fo quality education. This means that children are
deprived of quantitative as well as qualitative education. As per the constitutional guarantee
under Article 21 A, all the children (including 1-50 million child labourers) should be
provided with free and compulsory education.
The Indian Penal Code too, deplores child exploitation and considers exposing a
child below twelve years of age to physical risk, or deserting the child immediately after
birth, as child abuse and Child Rights violation. Kidnapping or maiming a child for begging
or for prostitution is an offence. There are various other legislations, such as Child Labour
(Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 Factories Act, 1948 etc. which prohibit the
employment of children in certain sectors and regulate the conditions of working children in
certain other sectors and employment.
In addition to this, and important piece of legislation relating to child welfare is the
juvenile justice (Care & Protection of Children)Act, 2000 which is an Act to Consolidate and
amend the laws relating to juveniles in conflict with law, and children in need of care and
protection, by providing for proper care, protection and treatment by catering to their
development needs, and by adopting a child-friendly approach in adjudication and disposition
of matter in the best interest of children and for their ultimate rehabilitation through various
institutions established under this enactment.
Section 125 CrP.C. imposes a responsibility on parents, to maintain their children,
who having sufficient means, neglect or refuse to maintain his legitimate or illegitimate
minor child, whether married or not, unable to maintain themselves, and also the
responsibility to maintain, his legitimate or illegitimate minor child (not being a married
daughter) who has attained majority where such child is, by reason of any physical or mental
abnormality or injury unable to maintain itself.
(iv) MAGNITUDE OF THE CHILD LABOUR PROBLEM
The children as work force participate in several economic activities where
they are paid extremely low wages. They clean clothes and floors, cook food and take
care of children in houses. They also work in non-domestic but non-monetary sectors
which include working at forms, fuel and water collection. Sometimes they have also
go to markets for purchasing. The children have also to work as bonded labour which
arises from perceived obligations to landlords or money lenders whereby the
provision of child labour is part of a family ‘s rent or debt settlement. As many 90 per
cent of children in the carpet industry in Mirzapur in U.P. have been bonded i.e. sold
into virtual slavery. Then for wages they work in agriculture, manufacturing or
service industries on piece rate of time rate basis as regular or casual workers.
In India, the problem of child abuse and child right violation is prevailing on a
large scale. Everyday large numbers of children are abused in the sphere of their own
family. Abuse of female child and illegitimate child starts even before birth, Female
foeticide by amniocentesis is a very common form of abuse and is widely prevailing
in India. A large number of children are abandoned, by their own parents and in-loco-
parentis. Abuse by beating, burning and sexually exploiting little girls is very
common among parents. Illiteracy, backward social conditions and poor economic
conditions are the most common reason of all kinds of Child Right Violations
especially among parents.
A large number of children are exploited by employers by employing for
hazardous work. Children are also used for immoral proposes, such as selling them to
big gangsters, indulging them for the supply of narcotic drugs and other prohibited
substances. Because of poverty, large numbers of children are suffering from
malnutrition, ill health and are dying. Crimes of kidnapping and abduction are very
common in our country. Children are kidnapped for the purpose of making them
beggars, prostitutes, selling them to circuses, tamashes, organ trade, eating their flesh
etc. Large numbers of children are killed and organs of children are used for various
trades and experiments. Child abandonment and child prostitution is widespread and
brazenly advertised and is closely linked to the systematic promotion of tourism.
The magnitude of child abuse and neglect can be expressed in terms of
prevalent and incident rates. The time when usually abuse and neglect begins is hard
to establish. An incidence rate which measures the occurrence of new cases are highly
questionable. One of the major problems in understanding the scope of the subject of
Child Right violation is that it is extremely difficult to get responses from children on
such a sensitive subject because of their inability to fully understand the different
dimensions of Child Right violation and to talk about them. It is therefore difficult to
gather data on abused children. Further definition of abuse and Child Right violation
is not yet consistent within the countries. It varies from country to country and from
region to region.
How much child labour is there in the world” The answer to this question
depends, of course, on what one means by child labour. At one extreme, all non-
educational, non-leisure time of individuals below a certain age can be counted as
child labour. At the other extreme, only full-time employment in economic activity
would be counted. The former includes light work after school or in school holidays,
which helps in skill acquisition, while the latter excludes part-time engagement in
such horrendous activities as child prostitution. Part of the definitional problem arises
because when most people talk of child labour they mean “bad” child labour such as
prostitution, or scavenging, or backbreaking work on a construction site, or long
hours in a carpet factory, etc. Such “bad” child labour can be part-time or full-time,
and a child can both engage in schooling and in “bad” child labour. Getting
comparable estimates for such child labour is impossible, not least because what
constitutes “bad” child labour is itself in dispute.
The term child labour covers a wide range of situations, to which the ethical,
economic and legal response could be very different. To begin with, it is not clear
how to define “child”. In the West, it is customary to do so by chronological age, but
in many societies cultural and social factors enter as well (Rodgers and Standing,
1981). The evolution of a child to adulthood passes through socially and biologically
defined life phases, over which the degree of dependence and the need for protection
of the child gradually declines, e.g., in many societies an apprentice even if only eight
or nine years old is often not considered a child - a determination based on social
status rather than age (Morice, 1981). In that sense too, many societies, especially
poor rural ones, do not view child work as “bad”. Rather, it is part of the socialization
process which gradually introduces the child into work activities and teaches the child
survival skills.
LITERATURE REVIEW:
There is no law fixing minimum age for employment of children in griculture. The
Factories Act, 1948, fixes minimum age of 14 whereas the International Labour
Organisation Convention prescribes minimum age for any employment to be 15. In
the case of plantations, the age of employment has been fixed at 12 years but in the
case of non-industrial employment the minimum age varies from 12 to 14 years.
Thus, Indian Laws relating to child labour are deficient from the international
standards as laid down by the International Labour Organisation but even then they
can be considered satisfactory in view of the prevalent economic conditions of the
country. There are plethora of statutes142 to prevent the misuse of children in
hazardous employment and to protect the general rights of the children. But
sociological studies have revealed either the ineffective nature of these laws or their
blatant violations. Major findings in the study –I visited in a firework factory in
Kanpur a large number of children were working in that factory .Children working in
fire work factories inhale toxic fumes while mixing chemicals .They also suffer high
degrees of intense heat and run the risk of awfully burnt and injured in fire accidents
.Children who stamp frames on the metal sheets also suffer heat ,toxic fumes and
excessive strains on the arm and shoulders ,while they remove and place the heavy
fringes with great rapidity. Delay of a second can cause the entire frames to grip in
roaring flames resulting in instant death of the child .Such type of news we read
today. A large number of children who were working in glass bangle industries ,work
with furnaces with temperature 1400 degree Centigrade .They are usually employed
in jurai (jointing the end ),chhatai(sorting),kotai etc.
4. JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY:
Every child who works takes away the job of an adult and every child who works for
lower wages reduces the possibility of fair wages to adults. This fact also proves that
profit motivation of the factory owners and poor living condition o millions of people
have of course, threatened the perpetuation of the problem of child labour. Article 32
of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989 which has already been
acceded to by the government of India calls for elimination of child labour. However,
the poverty issue in developing states has made the implementation of this article a
challenging task. The practical enforcement of the Child Labour (Prohibition and
Regulation) Act 1986 belies the expectations of law-maker. Despite the hope aroused
of some improvement in the lot of bonded child workers, enactment of the Child
Labour Act has not activated either the state or Central government to any sort of
purposive action. The ‘enactment is ineffective in protecting children from
exploitation. The serious omission in the legislation relates to enforcement
machinery, the laxity of which has enabled employers to circumvent provision of the
law with impunity. In the absence of an efficient and rigrous impaction machinery
nothing prevents employers from flouting legal provision in the full knowledge that
child workers themselves will become willing accomplices in covering it up.
5. OBJECTVES & HYPOTHESIS:
The spiritual basis of our constitutional order is “human dignity” and “social justice”
not the sadistic cruelty and hard work. Though the reality is totally different .Children
still work hard and for long hours in hazardous factories for earning minimal wages to
provide their family for two time meal. The object of this study is to have first hand
information from the children working in factories regarding their working hours,
transport facilities ,education facilities ,entertainment ,playing ,meals and medical
facilities etc.
The hypothesis of this research study is to make a critical study of the pains and
pleasures of children working in factories with special reference to constitutional
mandates under Article 24 of the Constitution.
CHAPTER- 2
(i) Concept And Definition Of Child
In our country we have multiple variation in the definitions of the age of the child.
Almost in every sphere, age limits formally regulate children’s activities, such as age for
chool admission, age for marriage, age for casting vote, age for adulthood, age for joining
services, and age to enter into employment. Generally the age limits differ from activity to
activity and from country to country. The census of India defines persons below the age of
fourteen as children. The age at which a person ceases to be child also varies under different
laws. The word Child has been used in various specific protection.
Following are some of the legislative provisions relating to age of the child under
various legislations.
The Indian majority Act, 1875was enacted basically to bring about uniformity in
the applicability of laws to person of different religions. It provides, unless a particular
personal law specifies otherwise, every person domiciled in India is deemed to have attained
majority upon completion of eighteen years of age. But in case of a minor for whose person
or property or for both, a guardian has been appointed or declared by any Court of Justice the
majority may be attained before the age of eighteen years.
The word ‘child’ has not been defined under the Constitution of India or under the
General Clauses Act, 1873. However the word child cannot be said to be identical with the
word minor.
Under Indian Contract Act, 1870a person below the age of eighteen years has to
capacity to contract.
The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 (HMGA) defines a minor,
as a person who has not completed the age of eighteen years.
Under Muslim Law also the age of Majority is completion of eighteen years. Even
under the Christian Law and Parsi Law the age of majority is eighteen years. However the of
marriage under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act 2006 is twenty one years for males and
eighteen years for females.
The mines (Amendment) Act, 1952 defines the age at which a person can enter
in employment. It says, no person below eighteen years of age shall be allowed to work in
any mine or any part thereof. Further, the Factories Act, 1948 lays down that a child below
fourteen years of age is not allowed the work in any factory. Any adolescent between fifteen
and eighteen years can be employed in a factory only if he obtains a certificate of fitness from
an authorized medical doctor. A child between fourteen from an authorized years of age
cannot be employed for more than four and a half hours.
The Apprentices Act, 1961states that a person is qualified to be engaged as an
apprentice only if he is not less than fourteen years of age an satisfied such standards of
education and physical fitness as may be prescribed.
Under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, there are various age limits for various
purposes. Such as for the purposes of criminal liability the age limit is seven years and in
certain cases twelve years, for the purpose of protecting a child from defines child to mean a
male or female child of the age of six to fourteen years.
Thus, it can be observed that various Acts do not have a uniform definition of the tem
child. All the status varies the upper age limit between fourteen, sixteen and eighteen years.
The variation goes further, as Article 445 of the Constitution specifies that the State shall
endeavour to provide an early childhood specifies that the state shall endeavour provide an
early childhood care and protection for all children until they complete the age of six years.
Fundamental Right to Education under Article 21 A of the Constitution is restricted the age
limit for compulsory education up the fourteen years. Keeping the view the aforesaid
flexibility and variation, it is strongly felt that the age for a person to be a child should be
increased to eighteen years. Even the drafted Bill of the new Prevention of Offences against
the Children Act, 2009 is subject to criticism on age issues. According to this law, a sexual
offence can only be called so it is committed with or without the consent of a child below
fourteen years of age or without the consent of a child below fourteen years of age or without
the consent of a child above sixteen years.
But whereas this draft sets sixteen years this draft sets sixteen years as the definite
age of children, voting and marriage laws set the age at eighteen years and twenty-one years
for girls and boys respectively. Clearly, there is disparity and the fact that Indian law does not
recognize a uniform age for children, often leads to complications. Under these alternative
specifications, the term child as provide in various statutes, is viewed as burden who invokes
right to maintenance and support.
Child labourers are exploited, exposed to hazardous work conditions and paid
a pittance for their long hours of work. Forced to forego education, shouldering
responsibilities far beyond their years, becoming worldly- wise when their peers have
yet to leave the cocoons of parental protection, these children never know what
childhood is. The Indian Constitution enshrines that:
No child below the age of 14 years shall be employed to work in any factory
or in any hazardous employment (Article 24).
Childhood and youth are to be protected against exploitation and against
moral and material abandonment (Article 39(1)).
The state shall endeavour to provide within a period of 10 years from the
commencement of the Constitution free and compulsory education for all
children until they complete the age of 14 years (Article 45).
There are very bad effects of child labor for our society, which forces some
children to steal things from others in order to satisfy their daily living. Many small
girls are even made to indulge in prostitution. A recent case of child labor came into
picture where a 10 year old kid was beaten to death because the innocent kid was slow
at things. The cruel owner went angry and threw the child across the room resulting in
the most extreme punishments. It was not only the cruel owner who was at the fault,
but the parents of the child were also equally involved in this incident. They took $10
as advance and sent their child to work for the sake of getting some monthly income.
May be even the parents would never have thought that a little sum of money could
lead to such horrible incident. There are various organizations which are fighting
against child labour by helping children and imparting education among that part of
society from where majority of the child labour comes. Poor families should be given
knowledge about family planning/control so that they are not burdened by children.
It would be advisable not to keep small children at home for taking domestic help in
daily household chores. Let us all take some step in this direction so that we can bring
smiles to many faces and make this world a beautiful place for a child to live in.
CHAPTER-4
BEEDI MANUFACTURING
Though the beedi and cigar conditions of Employment Act 1966 prohibits the
employment of children below the age of fourteen years in any industrial premises,
but child labour is prevalent in beedi manufacturing. Children roll beedis and assist
adult workers by clearing and cutting the leaves and closing the ends. Studies have
shown that children involved in beedi manufacturing show anemia. There is a
significant indication to suspect a high incidence of tuberculosis among the beedi
workers. The children involved in beedi making, start smoking at an early age and
become habitual smokers. Sometimes these children also start taking drugs with
beedis.
As per the data of the study on child abuse, amongst the total number of
working children, 7.8% children were working in beedi rolling. Among these 83.33%
were girls. Out of all children working in beedi rolling industry, 47.92% were in the
age group of five to twelve years, 25% in the age group of thirteen to fourteen year4s
and 27.08% in the age group of fifteen to eighteen years. Within each of these age
groups, from the percentage of boys and girls, it can be observed that there were a vey
large number of girl working in the beedi rolling sector. Almost half of these were in
the age group of give to twelve years. The impact on the health and development of
these children is a matter of concern. Out of the total children working in beedi
rolling, 14.04% reported physical abuse by employers. Among these, 91.94% were
boys. Further age wise break up of physically abused children by the employer
showed that 53.23% of these boys were from the age group of five to twelve years,
20.97% in the age group of thirteen to fourteen years and 25.81% in the age group of
fifteen to eighteen.
GLASS AND BANGLES INDUSTRY:
A large number of children who work in glass bangle industries work in
furnaces with temperature upto 1400 centigrade.They’re usually employed in Jurai
(joining the end), Chhatai (sorting), Kotai (ingraining different pattern with the help
of abrasive wheel), Pakai (heating) and then in counting and packaging. The
decoration of bangles with bill (liquid gold) is done by girls and women.
The glass and bangle factories run for about eitght months in the year and
work only at night. Children between eight to fourteen years of age constitute one
fifth of the total labour force employed in the industry and are paid low wages. The
high temperature inside the factory makes working during summers miserable. A
large number of cases of asthma and bronchitis are reported each year. The life span
of these child workers is reduced because of the intense heat and dust. According to
doctors of Firozabad (a town in U.P. famous for bangles making), 90 percent of the
workers contact pneumoconiosis, a condition which leads to tuberculosis. In fact,
Firozabad has the highest incidence of tuberculosis. In fact, Firozabad has the highest
incidence of tuberculosis in the State of Uttar Pradesh. These young children also
suffer from various eye diseases.
MATCH AND FIREWORK INDUSTRY:
In my Kanpur visit I felt that children working in match and firework factories
inhale toxic fumes while mixing chemicals. They also suffer high degrees of internes
heat and run the risk of being awfully burnt and injured in fire accidents. Children
who stamp frames on the metal sheets also suffer heat, toxic fumes and excessive
strain on the arms and shoulders, while they remove and place the heavy fringes with
reatrapidity. Delay of second can cause the entire frames to grip in roaring flames
resulting in instant death of the child.
LIQUOR AND PESTICIDE INDUTRY: Similarly in liquor and pesticide factories
the condition is not different .The childrens employed in such factories are always at
risk .No safety measures are provided to them .There are no register by which the
employer could prove that they employ the child workers only for that hours fixed by
various enactments .There is no medical facility to children employed there.
LOCK INDUSTRY
A large mumber of children working in the lock industry work on hand press,
on buffing machine, polishing rusted metal pieces in electroplating workshops and in
from tuberclosis and other upper respiratory tract diseases. Workers in electroplanting
plants complain of breathness, asthama and acute headaches.
PRECIOUS STONE POLISHING INDUSTRIES
This industry also employs huge number of children, all of whom are from
slums and work in miserable conditions. The work is finalized by tycoons whose
middle men prune children for pittance and swallow the profit they generate.
OTHER BUSINESSES
In handlooms and carpet weaving industry, children assist the adult workers.
They work in the middle of the loom, while adults work on the ends. The carpet
weaving in Jammu & Kashmir employ large number of children of eight to ten years
of age forcing then to work for six hours a dayfor a very meager salary. In
powerlooms and handlooms, the cildren are packed into sheds in long rows behind
giant looms. Around the area, the air is thick with particles of cotton fluffs and wool.
About 60 percent of the children working in carpet and handloom industry are
asthmatic or have primary and other lung diseases such as bossiness, which is caused by
cotton dust and fiber which get embedded in the lining of the lungs and causes fibrosis of
tissue. This reduces the normal capacity of the lungs and puts pressure on the surviving
tissues. A patient of bossiness is highly susceptible to bronchitis and tuberculosis. There are a
large number of children working in the power looms industry of Bhiwandi in Maharashtra.
Recently on the basis of the information provided by an NGO Human Rights
Watch, a joined raid was carried out by the Central District Police, Labour
Department and activists of the NGO and the owners of various leather bag
manufacturing units employing a large number of children having been detained and
cases have been registered against them under the Juvenile justice (care and
protection of children) Act 2000, Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act 1986
and Bonded Labour Abolition Act, 1976. The children, who were completed to work,
were found working in dingy and dirty shacks. These children were also made to
work for long hours and were paid little or no wages.
According to the study on child abuse, amongst the total number of working
children, 57.81 per cent were children working in other occupations. Amongst the
children working in other occupations (shop sales assistant, construction workers,
artisans, auto repairing, lock, carpet and agarbatti making, embroidery and zari, etc.),
61.28 per cent were boys and 38.72 per cent were girls. Out of those children working
in other occupations. 51.41 per cent were from the age group of five to twelve years
and 22.99 per cent in the age group of thirteen to fourteen years, followed by 25.60
per cent in the age group of five to twelve years and 22.99 per cent in the age group
of thirteen to fourteen years. Out of the total children working in other occupations,
46.40 per cent reported physical abuse by employers. Among these, 75.19 per cent
were boys and 24.81 per cent girls. Further age wise break up showed that 23.26 per
cent of these children were from the age group of five to twelve years, 27.91 per cent
in the age group of thirteen to fourteen years and 48.84 per cent in the age group of
fifteen to eighteen years.
CHAPTER-5
( I) INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
The Declaration of the Rights of the Child which was unanimously adopted by
the General Assembly of the United Nations on 20 November 1959 says that
‘Mankind owes to the child the best it has to give. Then the Declaration also provides:
(I) ‘The child by reasons of his physical and mental immaturity needs
special safeguard and care including appropriate legal protection’
(II) ‘the child shall enjoy the benefits of social security’....
(III) ‘the child shall enjoy special protection and shall be given
opportunities and facilities by law and by other means, to enable
him to develop .... in a healthy and normal manner and in
conditions of freedom and dignity.
In the enactment of laws for this purpose,
(I) the, best interests of the child shall be the paramount considerations’;
(II) ‘the General Assembly calls upon local authorities and national
governments to recognise these rights and strive for their observance’
(III) ‘All children without any exception whatsoever shall he entitled to
these rights, without distinction or discrimination on account of
national or social origin, poverty, birth or status, whether of himself or
of his family’.
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child adopted by the General
Assembly of the United Nations on 20 November 1989 and ratified by 135 nations
including India, lays down that state parties recognise the right of the child to
protection from economic exploitation and from performing any work that is likely to
be hazardous or to interfere with the child’s education, or to be harmful to the child’s
health or physical, mental, spiritual, moral and social development. 1 Further, it
stipulates that the countries shall take legislative, administrative, social and
educational measures to ensure implementation of the present article. It specifies the
following measures:
(a) provide for a minimum age or minimum wages for admission to
employment;
1
Art.32 of UN Convention on Rights of the Child 1989.
(b) provide for appropriate regulation of the hours and conditions for
employment;
(C) provide for appropriate penalties or other sanctions to ensure the effective
enforcement of the present article.2
Subsequently it has also been reaffirmed in the (I) World Conference on Education
for All at Jomtien in March 1990; (ii) World Summit on the Children in the autumn of
1990; and (iii) SAARC Conference on Children in 1991 and 1992. It is to be noticed
that SAARC countries have resolved to eliminate child labour progressively and in an
accelerated manner. Also there are several conventions and recommendations adopted
by the ILO since its inception in 1919 which clearly speak that children below 14
years of age must not be put to work.
However ,the harsh reality is that in India ratification of international labour standards
has been effective more as a ‘status symbol’ and for upholding the country's image
abroad rather than for their sincere implementation and compliance in practice. The
ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child by the Government of
India is merely window dressing, says Swami Agnivesh.3 Whereas, the Constitution
of India provides that the stale shall endeavour to foster respect for international law
and treaty obligations in dealing with organised people, with one another.4 So also the
apex court of India has observed that international convention if ratified by ‘ the
Government of India would be binding on it.5
2
Id..art.32. para 2.
3
See. Mainstream 2 Oct. 1983
4
Art. 51(c). Constitution of India
5
SheelaBarse‘.v. Union of India, (1983) I.S.C.C. 1975; Legal Aid Committee v. Union of India; (1989)
S.C.C. 331
(II) NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
Taking the position of law, in India, on the point of interest and welfare of the
child, we find that the Constitution provides that no child below the age of 14 years
shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous
employment.6 It further provides that the health and strength of workers, man and
woman and the tender age of children are not abused and that citizens are not forced
by economic necessity to enter avocations unsuited to their age and strength. 7 It also
proclaims that childhood and youth are protected it against exploitation and against
moral and material abandonment)8 Besides, there are several special laws relating to
child labour safeguarding interests of the child workers.9
It is to be noted that Britishers in 1938 had enacted Abolition of Child Labour
Act with a cleat intent to abolish the employment of children whereas Indian
Parliament after a long period of about half a century has legislated this Child Labour
(Prohibition and Regulation) Act 1986 which does not speak for abolition hut just for
prohibition and regulation of child labour. In the statement of objects and reasons of
this Act the continuance of child labour has been justified on the ground of economic
necessity.
The constitutional position in this regard is contained in the provisions under
article 39 (e) which, as has been referred to above, mandates the state to direct its
policies towards children in such a way as not to be abusive of their tender age and
prohibits that the citizens would not he forced by economic necessity to enter any
avocation harmful and abusive of their age or strength. 10 Thus we see that employing
of children as workers even under excessive pressure of economic necessity has been
prohibited.
Now coming to the point of constitutional status of this provision, it is to be
noted that it falls under chapter. IV of the Directive Principles of State Policy. In the
beginning the principles were considered not be justifiable in courts of law and hence
6
Art 24.
7
Art.39(e)
8
Art. 39(f)
9
Factories Act 1948: Mines Act 1952: Merchant Shipping Act 1958: Motor Transport Workers
Act 1961: Plantation Labour Act 1951: Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act
1966: Children (Pledging of Labour) Act 1933: Apprentices Act 1961: Child Labour (Prohibition and
Regulation) Act 1986: and Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, etc.
10
See, art. 39(e) Constitution of India
not binding on the state. They were supposed to be merely guidelines which may or
may not be followed by the state while framing the policies. However, the judiciary
has altogether altered the position. Once the Supreme Court held that Parliament is
competent to amend the Constitution to override or abrogate any of the fundamental
rights in order to enable the state to implement the Directives so long as the basic
structure of the Constitution is not affected.11 The court could not like their non-
implementation which is evident from the fact that it has been directing governments
and administrative authorities to take positive action to remove any grievance which
may be existing only because of non-implementation of the Directives. The point of
relationship between the Directive Principles and Fundamental Rights was further
elaborated by Y.V. Chandrachud C.J. in the case of Minerva Mills v. Union of
India12that Part Ill and Part IV are like two wheels of a chariot and observed that “to
give absolute primacy to one over the other is to disturb the harmony of the
Constitution.” Then just after two years the court raised the status of Directives at par
with the Fundamental Rights when it observed that the Directive Principles are to be
read into Fundamental Rights.13 Then the court in another case held that it should
make every attempt to reconcile the Fundamental Rights with the Directive
Principles.14 Thus it may be taken as well settled that the provisions under Part Ill and
Part IV of the Constitution are supplementary and complementary to each other and
that fundamental rights are a means to achieve the goal indicated in Part IV. 15 Thus
we notice that the constitutional directives under Part HI are being implemented, if
any, by the states and the administrative authorities only after they become a sort of
‘judicial directive’. Now the question arises as to why non-enforceability of the
Directive Principles of State Policy was maintained by the framers of the Indian
Constitution? The only answer seems to be to give the state some reasonably
sufficient time to implement these principles. A long time of more than four decades
has elapsed which is definitely a reasonably sufficient tune. Therefore, if today the
central or state governments justify the existence and continuance of child labour on
the ground of economic necessity that cannot be accepted as sufficient. It is
11
KesavanandBharti v. State of Kerala, A.I.R. 1973 S.C. 1461
12
A.I.R. 1980 S.C. 1789
13
Randhir Singh v. Union of India A.I.R. 1982 S.C. 879
14
BandhuaMuktiMorcisav. Union of India, A.1.R.1984 S.C.802.
15
See. R.R. Dangwal’s paper “Article 21 and Child’s Right to Education” presented at the National
Workshop on Rights of the Child held in the Law Faculty of Lucknow University on 14-15 Jan.
1994
ridiculous. It amounts to constitutional mockery. It reflects total lack of will and
advertent slackness on the part of the state. The state is’3udicially accountable for not
giving priority to implement such a humane and significant constitutional mandate.
Justice K.N. Singh, has also pointed out that the laws have been there but there has
been no will to enforce them effectively. 16
(iii) Child Labour and Constitutional Provisions
Our Constitution manufacturers were wise and sagacious to produce, that
youngsters should receive distributive justice in free Bharat. The rights against
exploitation were mentioned within the draft projected by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, K.M.
Munshi and K.T. Shah.
While Dr. Ambedkar’s draft merely on condition that subjecting an individual
to forced labouror involuntary thralldom would be AN offence, K.M. Munshi’s draft
article instructed for abolishment of all types of slavery,childlabour, traffic inchild
and compulsory labour.
Constitution of Bharat contains provisions for survival, development and
protection of children; these are primarily enclosed partly III and half IV of the
Constitution, i.e., elementary rights and directive principles of state policy. India
follows pro-active policy towards attempt child labour downside. the priority for
children normally and childlabour especially is mirrored through the Articles of the
Constitution of Bharat. In Article twenty three, it prohibits traffic in person and begar
and alternative similar types of forced labour. below Article twenty four it's set down
that “no child below the age of fourteen years shall be used to figure in any mill or
mine or engaged in the other unsafe employment”. Article 39(e) and (f) needs the
State and secure that the tender age of youngsters aren't abused and to confirm that
they're not forced by economic necessity to enter avocations incompatible in their age
or strength.
Those youngsters ar given opportunities and facilities to develop during a
healthy manner and conditions of freedom and dignity which childhood and youth ar
protected against exploitation and against ethical and material abandonment. Article
forty five provides, for free and mandatory education for all youngsters till they
complete the age of fourteen years. Article 51A(k) makes it a elementary duty of the
16
See. Justice K.N. Singb, “No will to Enforce Child Labour Laws”, The Economic Times 12 Oct.
1992.
parent or Guardian to provide opportunities for education to the child or ward
between the age of six and fourteen years. Art. 21-A acknowledges that the proper to
Education as elementary right and it mandates that, the state shall offer free and
mandatory education to any or all youngsters of age of six to 14 years in such manner
because the state could, by law, determine.
Article Title Discription
21-A Right to Free And The State shall provide free and
compulsory education to all
Compulsory Education
children of the age of 6 to 14
years in such manner as the
State, by law, may determine.
24 Prohibition of Employment
of Children’s in Factories No child below the age fourteen
years shall be employed in work
in any factory or mine or
engaged in any other hazardous
employment.
The first protective legislation for child labour in India was seen in 1881 in the
form if Indian factories Act which had the provisions prohibiting employment of
children below 7 years, limiting the working hours for children to 9 hours a day and
providing 4 holidays in a month and rest hours. This was actually made by the ruling
British Government to decrease the production in Indian industries through some
legal restrictions.
I OBJECT:
DEFENITION:
Child: Child means a person who has not completed his fourteen years of age.
II APPLICABILITY: In extends to the whole of India.
OR
1. Beedi making
2. Carpet Weaving
3. Cement manufacture including bagging of cement.
4. Cloth printing, deying and weaving.
5. Manufacture of matches, explosive and fire works.
6. Mica cutting and splitting.
7. Shellac manufacture
8. Soap manufacture
9. Tanning.
10. Wool cleaning
11. Building and construction industry
12. Manufacture of slate pencils (including packing)
13. Manufacture of products of agate
14. Manufacturing processes using toxic metals and substances such as lead,
mercury, manganese, chromium, cadmium, benzene, pesticides and asbestos
(Section-3).
15. All Hazardous prossess an defined in section 2(cb) and dangerous operations
as notified in ruler made under section 87 of the factories Act 1948.
16. Printing (as defined in section 2(k) of the factories Act 1948.
17. Cashew and cashew nut descaling and processing
18. Soldering process in electronic industries.
19. Agarbathi manufacturing.
20. Automobile repairs and maintenance (namely welding lather work, dent
beating and printing)
21. Brick kilns and Roof files units.
22. Cotton ginning and processing and production of hosiery goods.
23. Detergent manufacturing.
24. Fabrication workshop (ferrous and non-ferrous)
25. Gem cutting and polishing.
26. Handling of chromites and manganies ores.
27. Jute textile manufacture and of coir making.
28. Lime kilns and manufacture of lime
29. Lock making.
30. Manufacturing process having exposure to lead such as primary and secondary
smelting, welding etc. ( See item 30 of part B process).
31. Manufacture of glass, glass ware including bangles fluorescent tubes bulbs
and other similar glass products.
32. Manufacturing of cement pipes, cement products, and other related work.
33. Manufacture of dyes and dye stuff.
34. Manufacturing or handling of pesticides and insecticides.
35. Manufacturing or processing and handling of corrosive and toxic substances,
metal cleaning and photo enlarging and soldering processes in electronic
industry.
36. Manufacturing of burning coal and coal briquette.
37. Manufacturing of sports goods involving to synthetic materials, chemicals and
leather.
38. Moulding and processing of fiberglass and plastics
39. Oil expelling and refinery.
40. Paper making
41. Potteries and ceramic industry.
42. Polishing, moulding, cutting welding and manufacture of brass goods in all
forms.
43. Process in agriculture where tractors, threshing and harvesting machines are
used and chabt cutting
44. Saw mill all process.
45. Sericulture processing.
46. Skinning dyeing and process for manufacturing of leather and leather
products.
47. Stone breaking and stone crushing.
48. Tobacco processing including manufacturing of tobacco, tobacco paste and
handling of tobacco in any form.
49. Tyre making repairing, re-trading and graphite beneficiation.
50. Utensils making polishing and metal buffing 51 ZariMaking (all process)
The period of work on each day shall not exceed three hours and no child shall
work for more than three hours before he has had an interval for rest for at least one
hour. No child shall be permitted or required to work between 7 P.m. and 8 a.m.
No child shall be required or permitted to work overtime. (Section-7).
VI WEEKLY HOLIDAY:
Every child shall be allowed in each week a holiday of one whole day.
(Section-8).
Every occupier shall within 30 days send a written notice in Form-A to the
inspector within whose local limits the establishment is situated. (Section-8 read with
Rule-4).
IX REGISTERS:
Every occupier of an establishment shall maintain a register in respect of
children employed or permitted to work at the establishment in F orm-B. (Sect.II read
with Rule-15)
X DISPLAY OF NOTICE:
Every occupier shall display in the establishment the abstract of section-3 and 14 in
form-D of the Act (Section 12 read with Rule -17)
X1 PENALITIES:
Violations under Section-3 shall be punishable with imprisonment which shall
not be less than three months which may extend to one year or with fine which shall
not be less than ten thousand rupees but which may extend to twenty thousand rupees
or with both. Continuing offence under section (3) shall be punishable with
imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may
extend to two years.
Any other violations under the Act shall be punishable with simple
imprisonment, which may extend to one month or with fine, which may extend to ten
thousand rupees or with both.
X11 WHO CAN FILE PROSPECUTIONS:
1. Any person
2. Police Officer 3. Inspector appointed under the Act
No. court inferior to that of a metropolitan Magistrate or a Magistrate of the
First Class shall try any offence under this Act. (Section-16)
Shall be a Government Medical Officer not below the rank of an Assistant
Surgeon of a district or an officer of equivalent rank employed on a regular basis in
Employees State Insurance dispensaries or hospitals. 17. Abstract of the Act.- An
abstract of sections 3 and 14 of the Act shall be displayed in form D suspended to
these rules (Rule 17)
Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act (1986) was the culmination of
efforts and ideas that emerged from the deliberations and recommendations of various
committees on child labour. Significant among them were the National Commission
on Labour (1966-1969), the Gurupadaswamy Committee on Child Labour (1979) and
the Sanat Mehta Committee (1984). The Act aims to prohibit the entry of children
into hazardous occupations and to regulate the services of children in non-hazardous
occupations. In particular it is aimed at (i) the banning of the employment of children,
i.e. those who have not completed their 14th year, in 18 specified occupations and 65
processes; (ii) laying down a procedure to make additions to the schedule of banned
occupations or processes; (iii) regulating the working conditions of children in
occupations where they are not prohibited from working; (iv) laying down penalties
for employment of children in violation of the provisions of this Act and other Acts
which forbid the employment of children; (v)bringing uniformity in the definition of
the child in related laws.
The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation Amendment Bill, 2012 was
introduced in RajyaSabha on 4 December, 2012 further to amend the Child Labour
(Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986. The amendment also seeks a blanket ban on
employing children below 18 years in hazardous industries like mining. The Bill is
referred to Standing Committee on Labour and Employment.
FACTORIES ACT,1948
The provisions regarding children are as follows :
Section 67. Prohibition of employment of young children.—Section 67
provides that no child who has not completed his fourteenth year shall be required or
allowed to work in any factory.
Section 68. Non-adult workers to carry tokens.—Section 68 lays down that
a child who has completed his fourteenth year or an adolescent shall not be required
or allowed to work in any factory unless,—
(a) a certificate of fitness granted with reference to him under Section 69 is in the
custody of the manager of the factory ; and
(b) such child or adolescent carries while he is at work a token giving a reference to
such certificate.
Section 69. Certificate of fitness.—According to Section 69 a certifying
surgeon shall, on the application of any young person or his parent or guardian
accompanied by a document signed by the manager of a factory that such person will
be employed therein if certified to be fit for work in a factory, or on the application of
the manager of the factory in which a young person wishes to work, examine such
person and ascertain his fitness for work in a factory.
Section 69(2) lays down that the certifying surgeon, after examination, may
grant to such young person, in the prescribed form, or may renew-
(a) a certificate of fitness to work in a factory as a child, if he is satisfied that the
young person has completed his fourteenth year, that he has attained the prescribed
physical standards and that he is fit for such ork
(b) a certificate of fitness to work in a factory as an adult, if he is satisfied that the
young person has completed his fifteenth year, and is lit for a full day’s work in a
factory.
But unless the certifying surgeon has personal knowledge of the place where
the young person proposes to work and the manufacturing process in which he will be
employed, he will not grant or renew a certificate under this sub-section until he has
examined such place.
Section 69(3) lays down that a certificate of fitness granted or renewed under
sub-section (2)-
(a) shall be valid only for a period of twelve months from the date thereof
(b) may be made subject to conditions in regard to the nature of the work in which the
young person may be employed or requiring re-examination of the young person
before the expiry of the period of twelve months.
According to Section 69 (4) a certifying surgeon shall revoke any certificate
granted or renewed under sub-section (2) if in his opinion the holder of it is no longer
fit to work in the capacity stated therein in a factory.
Section 69(5) lays down that where a certifying surgeon refuses to grant or
renew a certificate or a certificate of the kind requested or revokes a certificate he
shall, if so requested by any person who could have applied for the certificate or the
renewal thereof, state his reasons in writing for so doing.
Section 69(6) provides that where certificate under this section with reference to any
young person is granted or renewed subject to such conditions as are referred to in
clause (b) of sub-section (3), the young person shall not he required or allowed to
work in any factory except in accordance with those conditions.
According to Section 69(7) any fee payable for certificate under this section
shall be paid by occupier and shall not be recoverable from the young person, his
parents or guardian.
Section 70. Effect of certificate of fitness granted to adolescent.-Section
70(1) lays wn that an adolescent who has bean granted a certificate of fitness at work
in a factory as an adult under clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 69 and who
while at work in a factory carries a token giving reference to the certificate shall be
deemed to be an adult for all the purposes of Chapters VI and VIII.
According to Section 70 (I-A) no female adolescent or a male adolescent who
has not attained the age of seventeen years but who has been granted a certificate of
fitness to work in a factory as an adult, shall be required or allowed to work in any
factory except between 6 a.m. and 7 p.m.:
Provided that the State Government may by notification in the official Gazette, in
respect of any factory or group or class or description of factories,-
(i) vary the limits laid down in this sub-section so however, that no such
section shall authorise the employment of any female adolescent between
10 p.m. and 5 a.m.
(ii) grant exemption from the provisions of this sub-section in case of serious
emergency where national interest is involved.
According to Section 70(2) and adolescent who has not been granted a
certificate of fitness to work in a factory as an adult under the aforesaid clause (b)
shall, n twithsting his age, be deemed to be a child for the purposes of this Act.
Section 71. Working hours for children.—Section 71(1) prohibits a child
from being employed or permitted to work in any factory—
a) in any day
b) during the night.
Explanation- For the purposes of this sub-section “night” shall mean a period
of at least twelve consecutive hours which shall include the interval between 10 p.m.
and 6 a.m.
Section 71(2) lays down that the period of work of all children employed in a
factory shall be limited to two shifts which shall not overlap or spreadover more than
five hours each and each child shall be employed in only one of the days which shall
not, except with the previous permission in writing of the Chief Inspector, be changed
more frequently than once in a period of thirty days.
Section 7 1(3) provides that the provisions of Section 52 shall apply also to
child workers, and no exemption from the provisions of that section may be granted in
respect of any child.
No child, under Section 7 1(4), shall be required or allowed to work in any
factory on any day on which he has already been working in another factory.
(5) No female child shall be required or allowed to work in any factory except
between 8 am. and 7 p.m.
Section 72. Notice of periods of work for children.-Section 72(1) provides
that there shall he displayed and correctly maintained in every factory in which
children are employed, in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section
108 a notice of periods of work for children, showing clearly for every day the periods
during which children may be required or allowed to work.
According to Section 72(2), the periods shown in the notice required by sub-
section (I) shall be fixed before-hand in accordance with the method laid down for
adult workers in Section 61 and shall be such that children working for those periods
would not be working in contravention of any of the provisions of Section 71.
The provisions of sub-sections (8), (9) and (10) of Section 61 shall, in view of
Section 72(3), apply also to the notice required by sub-section (1) of this section.
Section 73. Register of child workers.—According to Section 73(1). the
manager of every factory in which children are employed shall maintain a register of
child workers to be available to the Inspector at all times during working hours or
when any work is being carried on in a factory, showing-
(a) the name of each child worker in the factory’;
(b) the nature of his work
(c) the group, if any, in which he is included
(d) where his group works on shifts, the relay to which he is allotted ;
(e) the number of hi certificate of fitness granted under Section 69.
No child worker shall be required or allowed to work in any factory unless his
name and other particulars have been entered in he register of child workers.
Section. 73(2) authorises the State Government to prescribe the form of the
register of child workers, the manner in which it shall be maintained and the period
for which it ‘shall be preserved.
Section 74. Hours of work to correspond with notice under Section 72 and
register under Section 73.—Under Section 74 a child shall not be employed n any
factory otherwise than in accordance with the notice of periods of work for children
displayed in the factory and the entries made before-hand against his name in the
register of child workers of the factory.
Section 75. Power to require medical examination.—Under Section 75 an
Inspector may serve on the manager of the factory a notice requiring that—
(i) such person or young person, as the case may be, shall be examined
by a certifying surgeon ; and
(ii) such person or young person shall not, if the Inspector so directs be
employed, or permitted to work, in any factory until he has been so
examined and has been granted a certificate of fitness or a fresh
certificate of fitness, as the case may be, under Section 69 or ‘as been
certified by the certifying surgeon examining him not to be a young
person.
The Inspector may as aforesaid serve the notice if he is of opinion-
(a) that any person working in a factory without a certificate of fitness is a young
person ; or
(b) that any young person working in a factory with a certificate of fitness is no
longer fit to work in the capacity stated therein.
Section 76. Power to make rule.-Section 76 empowers the State Government
to make rules -
(a) prescribing the forms of certificates of fitness to be granted under
Section 69, providing for the grant of duplicate in the event of loss
of the original certificates, and fixing the fees which may be charged
for such certificates and renewals thereof and such duplicates.
(b) prescribing the physical standards to be attained by children and
adolescents working in factories
(c) relating to the procedure of certifying surgeons under this Chapter
(d) specifying other duties which a certifying surgeon may he required
to perform in connection with the employment of young persons in
factories and fixing the fees which may be charged for. such duties
and the persons by whom they shall he payable.
Section 77.Certain other provisions of law not barred-Section. 77
provides that the provisions of this Chapter shall be in addition to and not in
derogation of, the provisions of the Employment of the children Act, 1938.
Other Acts:
The Children (Pledging of Labour) Act, 1933
The Employment of Children Act, 1938
Historical Backdrop
Committee Method
Under this method, committees and sub-committees are set up by the
appropriate Governments to hold enquiries and make recommendations with regard to
fixation and revision of minimum wages, as the case may be.
Notification method
In this method, Government proposals are published in the Official Gazette for
information of the persons likely to be affected thereby and specify a date not less
than two months from the date of the notification on which the proposals will be taken
into consideration.
After considering advice of the Committees/Sub-committees and all the
representations received by the specified date in Notification method, the appropriate
Government shall, by notification in the Official Gazette, fix/revise the minimum
wage in respect of the concerned scheduled employment and it shall come into force
on expiry of three months from the date of its issue.
Variable Dearness Allowance (VDA)
In order to protect the minimum wages against inflation, the Central
Government has made provision of Variable Dearness Allowance (VDA) linked to
Consumer Price Index Number for Industrial Workers (CPI – IW). As regards States
Governments/Union Territory Administrations, 26 of them have made VDA as a
component of minimum wages. Both Central and State Governments are revising the
minimum wages in respect of these scheduled employments from time to time with
100% neutralization. Accordingly, VDA is revised periodically twice a year effective
from 1 st April and 1st October in the Central Sphere.
Enforcement
The enforcement of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 is secured at two levels.
While in the Central Sphere, the enforcement is secured through the Inspecting
officers of the Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) commonly designated as
Industrial Relations Machinery (CIRM), the compliance in the State Sphere is ensured
through the State Enforcement Machinery. They conduct regular inspections and in
the event of detection of any case of non-payment or under-payment of minimum
wages, they advise the employers to make payment of the shortfall of wages. In case
of non-compliance, penal provisions prescribed in the Act are taken recourse to.
17
See, supra note 14.
18
Minerva Mills v. Union of India, (1960)2 S.C.C. 660.
19
(1978) 4 S.C.C. 161.
20
(1981) 1 S.C.C. 618
In BandhuaMuktiMorchav. Union of India21Justice P.N. Bhagwati held:
It is the fundamental right to everyone in this country assured under the
interpretation given to Article 21 ..to live with human dignity.... It must include the
tender age of children against abuse opportunities and facilities for children to
develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity, educational
facilities, just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief. These are the
minimum requirements which must exist in order to enable a person to live with
human dignity and no state neither the central government nor the state government,
has the right to take any action which will deprive a person of the enjoyment of these
basic essentials which go to make up a life of human dignity.22
In the light of Supreme Court judgments in the cases of Maneka Gandhi23and
Sunil Batra24any kind of brutality, constant fear of violence, psychological restraint,
encroachment of person, destruction of any organ of the body through which the soul
communicates with the outer world, physical assault, allotment of degrading labour,
lack of adequate medical care, poor food service, inadequate or non-existent
rehabilitative and educational facilities and payment of nominal subsistence
allowance have been forbidden under article 21 of the Constitution of India.25
However, it remains a bitter truth that in most of the cases the little workers are not
provided adequate medical care, rehabilitation and educational facilities, good food
service, payment of normal subsistence allowance and so on. Then the apex court in
L.K. Pandeyv. Union of India26observed that welfare of the entire community, its
growth and development depends upon the health and well-being of its children and
that children need special protection because of their tender age and physique, mental
immaturity and incapacity to look after themselves.
The Supreme Court is of the view that construction work is hazardous
employment and hence no child below the age of 14 years can be allowed to be
employed in construction work.27 In the case of M. C. Mehia V. State of TN28this
court had said that the children must be provided basic diet during working period.
21
See, supra note 17
22
Id.at 183
23
(1978) 1 S.C.C. 248
24
(1978) 4 S.C.C. 494
25
See, art. 21.
26
(1984) 2 S.C.C. 244 at 249
27
Labourers working in Salal Hydro Project v. State of J and K., A.I.R. 1984 S.C. 177
28
A.IR.1991 S.C. 417
However, the court could not maintain its activism and championship for
rights of the child in this case when it went out of tune with the constitutional spirit
and aspirations envisaging a fair deal for children. It is a matter of surprise that the
Supreme Court in this case allowed children to be employed in match factories of
Sivakasi in Madras, where admittedly hazardous manufacturing process of matches
and fireworks is carried on. The court could not foresee that risk is also involved in
sorting out and processing for the purpose of packing of such objects, when it
observed that the tender hands of young workers are more suited to sorting out the
manufactured products and process it for the purpose of packing. Going a step further
against the rights of the child it considered childrens’ special adaptability working in
match and fireworks in sorting out and packing manufactured products and ruled that
at least 60 per cent of the prescribed minimum wages for an adult worker doing the
same work should be given to the child worker. This author could not understand as to
why only 60 per cent? While they have specially adopted efficiency, why not at least
equal to what is paid to the adult workers? The judgment is not in accordance with the
constitutional spirit and aspirations speaking for a fair play with the rights of the
child.29
JUDICIAL RESPONSE IN CHILD LABOUR CASES
Over 40 million children are out of school in India. Out of these 25-30 million
are child labourers and over 75% of them work in hazardous occupations. As per the
recommendations of the Technical Advisory Committee on Child Labour the new set
of occupations added on the hazardous work are domestic work and the work in the
hospitality sector. The children working in these sectors most often suffer physical
violence, psychological traumas and at times even sexual abuse. Such incidents often
go unnoticed and unreported as they take place in the close confines of households or
dhabas or restaurants. Children are made to work for long hours and to undertake
various hazardous activities, which affects their health and physique.
These children start working at an early age, shoulder excessive
responsibilities, such as caring for babies and infants, handling fuel stoves, sharp tools
etc. They work for long hours with no rest period, with little or no remuneration. They
29
See also Shriniwas Gupta, "Human rights of the Child and Judicual Activism in India". Central India
L.Q. vol. VII, pp.133-168 (1994)
are deprived of access to schools, play and social activities and the affection and
support of their family and friends. These conditions not only apply to child domestic
workers but all children at work. Children who are employed in roadside canteens and
highway dhabas are the most vulnerable and are easy prey to sex and drug abuse as
they come in contact with all kinds of people. Following are some cases on Child
Labour where the judiciary has show its activist approach.
In Labourers of Salal Hydro Project30 the Supreme Court observed that
whenever the Central Government undertakes a construction project which is likely to
last for a considerable period of time, it should ensure that children of construction
workers who are living at or near the project site are given facilities for schooling.
The court also specified that this may be done either by Central Government itself or
if the Central Government entrusts the project work or any part thereof to a contractor
or, and the necessary provision to this effect may be made in the contract.
30
Labourers of Salal Hydro Project v. State of Jammu & Kashmir, 1983 Lab IC 542.
31
M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu, AIR 1991 SC 283.
32
AIR 1997 SC 699: 1997 AIR SCW 407: (1996) 6 SCC 756.
Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986. But many of these inspectors
are themselves responsible for the tardy implementation of the Act. There is a need
for orientation and training of these inspectors and the other staff concerned to
sensitize them toward eradication of child labour".
In People’s Union for Democratic Rights,33also known as theAsaid case, the
Supreme Court provided a rule to determine what constitutes forced labour. The court
held that where a person provides labour or service to another for remuneration which
is less than the minimum wages, the labour or service provided by him clearly falls
Within the scope and ambit of forced labour .
The court held that although the constructioi1 industry is not mentioned in the
schedule under the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 and is not
within the scope of provision Section 3(3) of the Employment of Children Act, 1938,
yet, a child under the age of fourteen years can be protected from working
construction industry by virtue of Article 24 of the constitution.34 This is a
constitutional prohibition which, if not followed up by the appropriate legislation,
must operate’ proprio-vigoreas construction Work is plainly and undoubtedly a
hazardous employment.
In NeerjaChaudharyv. State of M.P,35 Upon a PIL filed by public spirited
journalist the Supreme Court directed the State Government to form a vigilance
committee to work for rehabilitation of freed child bonded labourers and carry out
these, directions Within one month. The Court also directed the State Government to
take immediate action for identification and release of bonded labourers.
InBandhuaMuktiMorcha36 judgment, the court directed the Central
Government to convene a meeting of the concerned Ministers from different States to
evolve policies for the progressive elimination of child labour. The court held that the
workers who were being held in bondage without basic amenities such as shelter,
drinking water or two square meals in a day, amounts to violation of fundamental
rights, as everyone has a right to live in this country free from exploitation. Thus it
was pointed out that thre is a need for compulsory education of children, vocational
training, health checkups and nutritious food.
33
People's Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India, (1982) 3 SCC 235: AIR 1982 SC 1480
34
Article 24 provides that no child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any
factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment.
35
(1984) 3 SCC 24
36
BandhuaMuktiMorcha v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 2218: 1997 AIR SCW 2083: (1997) 2 SCR 379.
In People's Union for Civil Liberties, a PIL was brought under Article 32 of
the Constitution of India. This was based upon a report given by an NGO called
"campaign against Child Labour". According to this report, One Rajput used to travel
to Madurai in Tamil Nadu for the purpose of procuring child labour by paying a paltry
sum ranging between Rs. 500-1500 to the poor parents . The children aged below 15
years so procured were forced into bonded labour. It was further stated in the report
that one of the boys, ShiveMurugan, aged about 8 years was beaten to death by the
Rajput. Rajput was already tried for murder by the trial court.
The other four boys named Raja Murugan (aged 8 years), Rajesh (aged 13
years), Muniyadi (aged 15 years) and Mukesh aged 16 years) were not traceable after
the death of Shiva Murugan. Under the directions of the court three of the boys
namely Rajesh, Muniyadi and Mukesh were traced by the Maharashtra Police. But the
fourth boy Raja Murugan who was the real brother of Shiva Murugan was still
untraceable. It was argued on behalf of the petitioner, that the parents of these boys
were entitled to compensation and to support their contention, they relied on
NilabatiBeherav. State of Orissa.37
The Supreme Court held that “a claim in public law for compensation for
contravention of human rights and fundamental freedoms, the protection of which is
guaranteed in the Constitution”, is an acknowledged remedy for enforcement and
protection of such rights. A claim based on strict liability made by resorting to a
constitutional remedy provided for the enforcement of a fundamental right, is ‘distinct
from, and in addition to, the remedy in private law for damages for the tort’ resulting
from the contravention of the fundamental right. The defense of sovereign immunity
being inapplicable and alien to the concept of guarantee of the fundamental rights, it
is this principle which justified the award of monetary compensation for
contravention of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. It is the only
practicable mode of redress available for the contravention made by the States r its
servants in the purported exercise of their powers, and enforcement of fundamental
rights is claimed by resort to the remedy in public law under the Constitution by
recourse to Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution.
It is further contended that, under the Bonded Labour (Abolition) Act, 1976,
the State of Maharashtra was required to set up effective vigilance machinery to
37
AIR 1993 SC 1960: 1993 AIR SCW 2366: (1993) 2 SCC 746
ensure that the children in the State were not exploited. The trial Court, while
convicting Rajput, came to the conclusion that the District Magistrate and the
Vigilance Committees were set up under the above mentioned Act were not
functioning properly.
The Supreme Court directed the State of Maharashtra to pay a sum of Rs. 2
Lakh to Raja Murugan for himself and also for the death of his brother Shiva
Murugan. Since Raja Murugn (a minor) was an orphan, the amount had to be
deposited with the District Magistrate of the area where Raja Murugan lived. The
District Magistrate had to deposit the amount in a scheduled bank. The total income
so earned had to be divided into 12 months and given to Raja Murugan till he attained
majority when he would be entitled to receive the principal amount. This amount of
Rs. 2 Lakh had to be paid by the State of Maharashtra.
So far as the other three boys Rajesh, Muniyadi and Mukesh were concerned,
the Court directed that they had to be given Rupees Seventy Five thousand each as
compensation which -would be given by the State of Tamil Nadu within two months
from the judgment. The amount had to be deposited to the District Magistrate
concerned who would deposit the sum in a scheduled bank. Monthly interest had to
be paid to the parents till the children attain majority, d when they would be entitled
to the principal amount
CHAPTER -6
The term child right and child welfare in a broad sense refers to all those
measure which lead to the proper physical, social and psychological development of
the child as against inhuman treatment and child neglect which often causes a lot of
damage to the victims and are responsible for their hyperactivity, low intelligence
quotient, physical defect, withdrawal symptoms, less coaxial responsibility, anxiety,
rebellious feelings,. Continuous abuse and neglect, despite awareness regarding its
implications can be disastrous for the child development. There is no denying the fact
that India is lagging far behind the west in providing welfare measure to child. During
my research I found in theoratical study and the study of data collected earlier that
inspite of several legislative measures by enactment of statutory provisions to curb
employment of children in hazardous employment and those injurious to health, the
exploitation of children by different profit makers for their personal gains continued
unabated in utter disregard of constitutional injunction and statutory prohibition.
From the analysis of the relevant statutory provisions of the Indian laws relating to
child labour, it has become abundantly clear that the statutes vary as to the age limit
of a child employed or permitted to work in various occupations.
There is no law fixing minimum age for employment of children in agriculture. The
Factories Act, 1948, fixes minimum age of 14 whereas the International Labour
Organisation Convention prescribes minimum age for any employment to be 15. In
the case of plantations, the age of employment has been fixed at 12 years but in the
case of non-industrial employment the minimum age varies from 12 to 14 years.
Thus, Indian Laws relating to child labour are deficient from the international
standards as laid down by the International Labour Organisation but even then they
can be considered satisfactory in view of the prevalent economic conditions of the
country. There are plethora of statutes142 to prevent the misuse of children in
hazardous employment and to protect the general rights of the children. But
sociological studies have revealed either the ineffective nature of these laws or their
blatant violations. Major findings in the study –I visited in a firework factory in
Kanpur a large number of children were working in that factory .Children working in
fire work factories inhale toxic fumes while mixing chemicals .They also suffer high
degrees of intense heat and run the risk of awfully burnt and injured in fire accidents
.Children who stamp frames on the metal sheets also suffer heat ,toxic fumes and
excessive strains on the arm and shoulders ,while they remove and place the heavy
fringes with great rapidity .Delay of a second can cause the entire frames to grip in
roaring flames resulting in instant death of the child .Such type of news we read
today.
A large number of children who were working in glass bangle industries ,work
with furnaces with temperature 1400 degree Centigrade .They are usually employed
in jurai (jointing the end ),chhatai(sorting),kotai etc.
A policy contradiction?
Although most countries have ratified the Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights, the Convention for the Right of the Child, both ILO Conventions and
have subscribed to the Millennium Development Goals, the policy of many
governments and international donors with regard to education in developing
countries and the policy against child labour is not always based on a comprehensive
and integrated view of these agreements.
To a large extent these (policy) contradictions arise out of the assumption that
two important values clash: the right to education and the right to survive/ live. A
choice is then made for the latter presuming that poverty makes it impossible for
working children to follow full-time education – a choice between the lesser of two
evils, or so it seems. We believe, and the experience of the MV Foundation and
organizations in Africa and Latin America have shown, that the survival versus
education arguments are not mutually exclusive, and that – although there are of
course many obstacles - also poor parents will go to great lengths to send their
children to school.
(B) BOOKS
1. Ahuja ,Ram,Social Problems In India,Second Edition.
2. Mishra,S.N.,Labour And Industrial Laws ,25th Edition.
3. Bhatt ,Ishwara .P Law & Social Transformation 1st Edition.
4. Pandey ,J.N.,The Constitutional Law Of India ,45th Edition.
5. Bakshi,P.M.,The Constitution Of India 12th Edition.
6. Khan,NuzratParveen,Child Right And The Law 2012th Edition.
7. Blanchet, Therese ,Lost Innocence ,Stolen Childhoods,University Press Ltd
Dhaka (1996).
8. Burra,Neera ,Born To Work :Child Labour In India.
9. Human Rights Watch Children’s Rights Project ,Small Hand Of Slavery:
Bonded Child Labour In India ,Human Rights Watch ,USA(1996).
10. Jain M.P.,Indian Constitutional Law.
11. Sarkar,Helen ,Child Labour Legislation In India ,A Study Of
Restrospects,ProspectsV.V.Giri National Labour Institute Noida ,U.P., India.
12. Vidhyasagar ,R,Child Labour In India :An Analysis.
13. Weiner,Myron ,The Child And The State In India
14. Sinha ,Shantha:Child Labour And Education Policy In India ,
15. Sharma k:Child Labour In India ,The Lawyers Collective.
16. Basu,D.K. The Constitution Of India,SHORTER.
17. Seervai,H.M, Constitutional Law of India, 4thEdition, 2007, Universal Law
Publishing Company, New Delhi.
18. Shukla,V.N., Constitution of India, 10th Edition, 2001, Eastern Book
Company, New Delhi.
19. Basu,D.D., Commentary on the Constitution of India, Volume 2, 8thEdition,
2007, Wadhwaand Company, Nagpur.
( C ) JOURNALS
(D) WEBSITES
1. www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/.../wcms_155428.pdf
2. labour.nic.in › Home › Division
3. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_labour
4. www.hrw.org/reports/2003/india/India0103-05.htm
5. labour.gov.in/content/division/nclp.php
6. www.vakilno1.com/bareacts/factoriesact/factoriesact.html
7. www.uoit.ca/files/assets/Section-specific/.../WHMIS_Booklet.pdf
8. www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/.../Managing%20Risks%20of%20Hazard...
9. www.firstcallbc.org/.../First%20Call-Child%20Labour%20is%20No%20...
10. www.bls.gov/opub/rylf/pdf/chapter2.pdf
(E) MAGZINES
Yojna
PratiyogitaDarpan
Political Law Times
Chronicle
( F ) NEWS PAPER
The Hindu
Indian Express
Hindustan Times
Times Of India