This document discusses the reconstitution of certificates of title in the Philippines. It covers both judicial and administrative reconstitution.
For judicial reconstitution, the document outlines the sources that can be used to reconstitute an original or transfer certificate of title. These include duplicates of the certificate, deeds, and other documents registered with the property. It also discusses the jurisdictional requirements, including notifying adjacent property owners.
For administrative reconstitution, the grounds and process are described. The registered owner must submit an affidavit stating there are no pending instruments affecting the property and that the duplicate certificate is in proper form. Administrative reconstitution avoids a court case when possible.
This document discusses the reconstitution of certificates of title in the Philippines. It covers both judicial and administrative reconstitution.
For judicial reconstitution, the document outlines the sources that can be used to reconstitute an original or transfer certificate of title. These include duplicates of the certificate, deeds, and other documents registered with the property. It also discusses the jurisdictional requirements, including notifying adjacent property owners.
For administrative reconstitution, the grounds and process are described. The registered owner must submit an affidavit stating there are no pending instruments affecting the property and that the duplicate certificate is in proper form. Administrative reconstitution avoids a court case when possible.
This document discusses the reconstitution of certificates of title in the Philippines. It covers both judicial and administrative reconstitution.
For judicial reconstitution, the document outlines the sources that can be used to reconstitute an original or transfer certificate of title. These include duplicates of the certificate, deeds, and other documents registered with the property. It also discusses the jurisdictional requirements, including notifying adjacent property owners.
For administrative reconstitution, the grounds and process are described. The registered owner must submit an affidavit stating there are no pending instruments affecting the property and that the duplicate certificate is in proper form. Administrative reconstitution avoids a court case when possible.
Week 9- Reconstitution of Certificate of Title; Recording of (c) A certified copy of the certificate of title,
dealings relating to registered lands previously issued by the register of deeds or
by a legal custodian thereof; 1. Judicial Reconstitution of Certificate of Title (d) An authenticated copy of the decree of a. Purpose registration or patent, as the case may be, The reconstitution of a certificate of title denotes the pursuant to which the original certificate of restoration in its original form and condition of a lost or title was issued; destroyed original or transfer certificate of title on file in (e) A document on file in the registry of deeds, the office of the Register of Deeds. The purpose of by which the property, the description of reconstitution of title is to have the title reproduced in which is given in said document, is exactly the same way it was at the time of its loss or mortgaged, leased or encumbered, or an destruction. authenticated copy of the said document b. R.A. No. 26 showing that its original had been registered; Reconstitution of title under R.A. No. 26 is an action in rem. and A judicially reconstituted title has the same validity and (f) Any other document, which in the judgment legal effect as the original thereof, and is not subject to the of the court is sufficient and proper basis for reservation that it shall be without prejudice to any party reconstituting the lost or destroyed whose right or interest in the property was duly noted in certificate of title. (Survey plan and technical the original at the time of loss or destruction but which description of the land are mere additional entry or notation has not been made in the reconstituted requirements and are not by themselves title. sources for reconstitution.) c. Where to file the petition For transfer certificates of title The petition for reconstitution shall be filed by the (a) The owner’s duplicate of the certificate of registered owner, his assigns, or any person having an title; interest in the property with the Regional Trial Court of the (b) The co-owner’s, mortgagee’s, or lessee’s province or city where the land lies based on sources duplicate of the certificate of title; enumerated in Sections 2(c), 2(d), 2(e), 2(f), 3(c), 3(d), 3(e) (c) A certified copy of the certificate of title, and/or 3(f) of the Act. previously issued by the register of deeds or by a legal custodian thereof; 2. Sources of reconstitution of title (d) A deed of transferor other document, on file a. Exclusive enumeration in the register of deeds, containing the For original certificate of title description of the property, or an (a) The owner’s duplicate of the certificate of authenticated copy thereof, showing that its title; original had been registered, and pursuant to (b) The co-owner’s, mortgagee’s, or lessee’s which the lost or destroyed transfer duplicate of the certificate of title; certificate of title was issued; (e) A document on file in the registry of deeds, by which the property, the description of which is given in said document, is Section 10 of R.A. No. 26 requires publication and posting mortgaged, leased or encumbered, or an of the notice of the petition for reconstitution if based on authenticated copy of the said document sources enumerated in Sections 2(a), 2(b), 3(a), 3(b) showing that its original had been registered; and/or 4(a) of the Act; it does not require that notice be and specifically sent to adjoining property owners. (f) Any other document, which in the judgment On the other hand, sections 12 and 13 of R.A. No. 26, which of the court, is sufficient and proper basis for refer to petitions for reconstitution based on sources reconstituting the lost or destroyed enumerated in Sections 2(c), 2(d), 2(e), 3(c), 3(d), 3(e) certificate of title. and/or 3(f), require that the notice be published, posted b. Presentation of other proofs of existence of title and copies sent to adjoining owners. The court enumerated what should be shown before an order for reconstitution can validly issued, namely: 4. Effect of a void reconstitution of title (1) That the certificate of title had been lost or a. Writ of possession in a reconstitution case destroyed; If a certificate of title has not been lost but is in fact in the (2) That the documents presented by petitioner are possession of another person, the reconstituted title is void sufficient and proper to warrant reconstitution and the court rendering the decision has not acquired of the lost or destroyed certificate to title; jurisdiction over the petition for the issuance of a new title. (3) That the petitioner is the registered owner of Reconstitution does not confirm or adjudicate ownership the property or had an interest therein; over the property covered by the reconstituted title as in (4) That the certificate of title was in force at the original land registration where, in the latter, a writ of time it was lost or destroyed; and possession may be issued to place the applicant-owner in (5) That the description, area and boundaries of the possession. property are substantially the same and those contained in the lost or destroyed certificate of 5. Administrative Reconstitution of Certificate of Title title. a. Grounds 3. Jurisdictional requirements for judicial reconstitution The petition shall be accompanied with the necessary a. Effect of non-compliance sources for reconstitution and with an affidavit of the The failure or omission to notify the person as owner, registered owner stating, among other things: possessor or occupant of property adjacent to the land (1) That no deed or other instrument affecting the subject to reconstitution or as claimant or person having an property had been presented for registration, or, interest, title or claim to said land, as well as the failure or if there be any, the nature thereof, the date of its omission to post copies of the notice of hearing on the main presentation, as well as the names of the parties, entrance of the municipality on which the land is situated, and whether the registration of such deed or at the provincial building and at the municipal building instrument is still pending accomplishment; thereat, are fatal to the acquisition and exercise of (2) That the owner’s duplicate certificate of title or jurisdiction by the trial court. co-owner’s duplicate is in due form without any b. Service of notice to adjacent owners apparent intentional alterations or erasures; (3) That the certificate of title is not the subject of Regional Trial Courts have exclusive jurisdiction over all litigation or investigation, administrative or applications for original registration of title to lands judicial, regarding its genuineness or due including improvements and interests therein, and over all execution or issuance; petitions filed after original registration of title, with power (4) That he certificate of title was in full force and to hear and determine all questions arising upon such effect at the time was lost or destroyed; applications or petitions. (5) That the certificate of title is covered by a tax c. Procedure to replace lost, destroyed of stolen Owner's declaration regularly issued by the Assessor’s Duplicate Certificate of Title Office; and The procedural requirements for the replacement of a lost (6) That real estate taxes have been fully paid up to duplicate certificate: at least 2 years prior to the filing of the petition (1) The registered owner or other person in for reconstitution. interest shall send notice, under oath, of If the reconstitution is to be made from any of the sources the loss or destruction of the owner’s enumerated in Section 2(b) or 3(b), the affidavit should duplicate certificate of title to the further state that the owner’s duplicate has been lost or Register of Deeds of the province or city destroyed and the circumstances under which it was lost or where the land lies as soon as the loss or destroyed. destruction is discovered; b. Section 110 of P.D. No. 1529 as amended R.A. No. 6732 (2) The corresponding petition for the Administrative reconstitution of lost or destroyed replacement of the loss or destroyed certificate of titles may be availed of only in case of owner’s duplicate certificate shall then be substantial loss or destruction of land titles due to fire, filed in court and entitled in the original flood, or other force majeure, as determined by the case in which the decree of registration Administrator of the Land Registration Authority, and on was entered; the further condition that: (3) The petition shall state under oath the (1) The number of certificates of title lost or facts and circumstances surrounding damaged should be at least 10% of the total such loss or destruction; number in possession of the office of the (4) The court shall set the petition for Register of Deeds; nut hearing, after due notice to the Register of (2) In no case shall the number of certificates be Deeds and all other interested parties as less than 500. shown in the memorandum of encumbrances noted in the original or 6. Replacement of lost, destroyed or stolen Owner's Duplicate transfer certificate of title on file in the Certificate of Title office of the Register of Deeds; and a. Section 109 of R.A. No. 1529 (5) After due notice and hearing, the court Section 109 of P.D. No. 1529 is the law applicable in may direct the issuance of a new petitions for the replacement of lost or destroyed owner’s duplicate certificate which shall contain a duplicate certificate of title. memorandum of the fact that it is issued b. Venue in place of the lost or destroyed certificate and shall in all respects be Article 1608 of the Civil Code provides that “ the vendor entitled to the same faith and credit as may bring his action against every possessor whose right is the original duplicate. derived from the vendee even if in the second contract no mention should have been made of the right of repurchase, 7. Recording of instruments related to unregistered lands without prejudice to the provisions of the Mortgage Law a. Section 113 of P.D. No. 1529 and the Land Registration Law with respect to third The system of registration under the Spanish Mortgage persons. Law, by express provision of Sec. 2 of the Property A person who has acquired ownership of unregistered land Registration Decree, has been discontinued and all lands by prescription under the Civil Code may be considered as registered under the said system, which are not yet covered having acquired a right unaffected by a subsequent by the Torrens titles shall be considered unregistered transaction over the land even if recorded under said lands. All instruments affecting lands originally registered section. under the Spanish Mortgage Law may be recorded under Sec. 113 of the decree until the land shall have been brought under the operation of the Torrens system. b. Purpose The principal purpose of registration is merely to notify other persons not parties to a contract that a transaction involving the property has been entered. The conveyance of unregistered land shall not be valid against any person unless registered, except: (1) The grantor; (2) His heirs and devisees; and (3) Third persons having actual notice or knowledge thereof. c. Recording without prejudice to a third party with better right The mere registration of a sale in one’s favor does not give him any right over the land having previously sold the same to somebody else even if the earlier sale was unrecorded. d. Ministerial recording The duty of the ROD with respect to the notation or recording of these instruments, so far at least as relates to unregistered property is ministerial only and the registration of such instruments adds nothing to their intrinsic effect. e. Applicability of the Civil Code
G.R. No. 150741 June 12, 2008 Republic of The Philippines, Petitioner, vs. Sps. Vicente Lagramada and Bonifacia Lagramada, Respondents. Decision Carpio, J.