RESULT-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW

Name of Employee:
Position:
Division: Davao del Norte
Rating Period: July 2015 - December 2015
TO BUILD IN DURING PLANNING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight for
Timeline

KRA

Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives
Quantity Efficiency

ISP prepared, submitted and

5 without revision

July 2015 - December 2015

approved

ISP prepared, submitted but not

4 approved
with 1 revision
1. Prepared,
submitted and
approved 5% 3 ISP prepared but not submitted with 2 revisions
Instructional
Supervisry Plan.
2 ISP partially prepared with 3 revisions

with 4 or more
A. 1 No ISP prepared
revisions

I Instructional
5 or more teachers are observed,
Leadership 5 supervised, trained or coached.
without complaints
July 2015 - December 2015

(40%)
2. Implemented
the ISP through 4
4 teachers are observed,
with 1 complaint
supervised, trained or coached.
clinical
supervision,
training or 3
3 teachers observed, supervised,
with 2 complaints
10% trained or coached.
coaching to at
least 5 teachers
without 2
2 teachers are observed,
with 3 complaints
supervised, trained or coached.
complaints within
the month.
1 teacher is observed, with 4 or more
1 supervised, trained or coached. complaints
July 2015 - December

Provided 5 or more learning

5 materials to teachers
without lapses

3. Provided three
(3) k-12 learning Provided 4 learning materials to
4 with 1 lapse
2015

materials to teachers
5%
teachers without Provided 3 learning materials to
delay within a 3 teachers
with 2 lapses

semester Provided 2 learning materials to

2 teachers
with 3 lapses

Provided 0 or 1 learning with 4 or more

1 materials to teachers lapses
 1 Curriculum enrichment is

July 2015 - December 2015

5 planned, shared to parents and without lapses
implemented
1 Curriculum enrichment is
4. Planned, 4 planned not shared to parents with one lapse
shared to parents but implemented
and implemented 1 Curriculum enrichment is
1 curriculum 8% 3 implemented but no evidence of with 2 lapses
planning and sharing to parents.
enrichment
A. without lapses 1 Curriculum enrichment is
within a semester 2 planned, shared to parents but with 3 lapses
not implemented
I Instructional No curriculum enrichment is
with 4 or more
Leadership 1 planned, shared to parents and
lapses
implemented
(40%) Proposed, conducted and

July 2015 - December

5 submitted results of 1 action without revision
5. Proposed, research
Action Research proposal is
conducted and
4 approved and conducted but with 1 revision
submitted results submitted partial results.

2015
of 1 action 6% Conducted and submitted results
research without 3 of 1 action research without with 2 revisions
approved proposal
revision within a Action Research proposal is
semester. 2 approved but not conducted
with 3 revisions

with 4 or more
1 No Action Research
revisions

Inspected teacher's records 28

5 without lapses
December 2015

times or more
6. Inspected
July 2015 -

teacher's records 4
Inspected teacher's records 25-
with 1-2 lapses
27 times
4 times a month
6% Inspected teacher's records 24
without lapses 3 times
with 3-4 lapses

within a Inspected teacher's records 21-

2 23 times
with 5-6 lapses
semester.
Inspected teacher's records 20 with 7 or more
1 times or less lapses

2 Values Enhancement Activity

July 2015 - December 2015

5 prepared, submitted, approved without lapses

1. Prepared, and conducted.
submitted, 1 Values Enhancement Activity
4 prepared, submitted, approved with 1 lapse
approved and and conducted.
conducted 1 1 Values Enhancement Activity
Values 4% 3 prepared and conducted but not with 2 lapses
approved.
Enhancement
1 Values Enhancement Activity
activity without 2 prepared, submitted, approved with 3 lapses
lapses within the but not conducted.
semester No Values Enhancement activity with 4 or more
1 prepared and conducted. lapses

Retrieved 75% or more of the

July 2015 - December

5 without lapses
SARDOs

Retrieved more than 50% but

4 with 1 lapse
less than 75% of the SARDOs
2. Retrieved 50%
2015

of SARDOs within 4%
Retrieved 25% or more but not
the rating period. 3 with 2 lapses
more than 50% of the SARDOs
B.
Retrieved less than 25% of the
Learning 2 with 3 lapses
II Environment
SARDOs

(15%)
 the rating period.

July 201
B.
Learning
II Environment with 4 or more
1 No SARDO was retrieved
(15%) lapses

Reduced 75% or more of the

5 without complaints

December 2015
conflicts
3. Reduced 50%

July 2015 -
of the conflicts Reduced more than 50% but less
4 than 75% of the conflicts
with 1 complaint
without 3%
complaints within 3 Reduced 50% of the conflicts with 2 complaints
Reduced less than 50% of the
the rating period 2 conflicts
with 3 complaints

with 4 or more
1 No conflict was resolved
complaints
1 ADM was planned, approved

July 2015 - December

5 without lapses
4. Planned, and implemented
approved and 1 ADM was planned and
4 with 1 lapse
implemented at implemented without approval

2015
least 1 1 ADM implemented without plan
4% 3 with 2 lapses
Alternative and approval
1 ADM was planned and
Delivery Mode 2 approved without with 3 lapses
within the rating implementation
period 1 No plan at all
with 4 or more
lapses

5 3 or more INSET conducted without lapses

December 2015
July 2015 -

1. Conducted 1 4 2 INSET conducted with 1 lapse

INSET without
5% 3 1 INSET conducted with 2 lapses
lapses on the
1 INSET planned but not
scheduled date 2 conducted
with 3 lapses

with 4 or more
1 No INSET conducted
lapses
4 or more teachers enrolled in
5 without complaint
December 2015

MA, PhD or EdD.

C. 3 teachers enrolled in MA, PhD or
July 2015 -

2. At least 3 4 with 1 complaint

EdD.
Human
teachers enrolled 2 teachers enrolled in MA, PhD or
Resource 5% 3 EdD.
with 2 complaints
in Advance
III Management
Studies. 2
1 teacher enrolled in MA, PhD or
with 3 complaints
and EdD.
Development 1
No teacher enrolled in MA, PhD with 4 or more
or EdD. complaints
(15%)
July 2015 - December

5 9 and above were sent without complaint

3. At least 5
teachers were 4 7 - 8 were sent with 1 complaint
sent to a
2015

seminar- 5% 3 5 - 6 were sent with 2 complaints

workshop without
complaints within 2 3 - 4 were sent with 3 complaints
a semester
with 4 or more
1 2 or less were sent
complaints
- December 2015

Partnered with 4 or more

5 sectoral groups
without lapse

1. Implemented
D. school 4 Partnered with 3 sectoral groups with 1 lapse
Parents' partnership with
Involvement the engagement
IV and Community of at least 3
4%

Partnerships sectoral groups

 1. Implemented

July 2015 - December

D. school
Parents' partnership with
Involvement the engagement
IV and Community of at least 3
4% 3 Partnered with2 sectoral groups with 2 lapses

Partnerships sectoral groups

(10%) without lapses 2 Partnered with 1 sectoral group with 3 lapses

within a semester
with 4 or more
1 No school partnership
lapses

4 or more PTA assemblies

5 without delay

December 2015
conducted

July 2015 -
2. Conducted 2 4 3 PTA assemblies conducted with 1 delay
PTA Assembly
3% 3 2 PTA assemblies conducted with 2 delays
without delay
D. within a semester 2 1 PTA assembly conducted with 3 delays

with 4 or more
Parents' 1 no PTA assembly conducted
delays
IV Involvement
5
1 or more complete projects with
without complaint
and Community

December 2015
complete documentation
Partnerships 3. Acquired 1

July 2015 -
1 complete project with
(10%) school project 4 incomplete documentation
with 1 complaint

without complaint 3% 3
1 incomplete project with
with 2 complaints
complete documentation
within the
1 incomplete project with
semester 2 incomplete documentation
with 3 complaints

with 4 or more
1 No project implemented
complaints

5 Implemented 4 or more PAPs without lapses

December 2015

1. Implemented
July 2015 -

at least 2 PAPs 4 Implemented 3 PAPs with 1 lapse

without lapses 7%
3 Implemented 2 PAPs with 2 lapses
within the
semester 2 Implemented 1 PAP with 3 lapses

with 4 or more
E. 1 No PAP implemented
lapses
School provided 2 interventions with
July 2015 - December 2015

leadership, 5 no lapses
complete documentation
V management
and Operation 2.Provided 2 provided 2 interventions with
4 incomplete documentation with one lapse
(20%) interventions to
fast track
provided 1 intervention with
attainment of EFA 7% 3 complete documentation with two lapse
Goals without
lapses within the provided 1 interventions with
2 incomplete documentation with Three lapse
rating period.
No Intervention
1 No Intervention made made
15 - December 2015

5 Liquidated 100% of the CA without lapses

3.Liquidated cash
E.
advances without
School
lapses every 10th
leadership,
V management
working day of 6%
the following
and Operation
month within the
(20%)
 July 2015 - December 20
3.Liquidated cash
E.
advances without
School 4 Liquidated 95% of the CA with 1 lapse
lapses every 10th
leadership,
V management
working day of 6%
the following 3 Liquidated 90% of the CA with 2 lapses
and Operation
month within the
(20%)
rating period
2 Liquidated 85% of the CA with 3 lapses

Liquidated 80% and below of with 4 or more

1 the CA lapses

DR. WINNIE E. BATOON

Ratee Rater
GEMENT SYSTEM FOR SCHOOL PRINCIPAL
OMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Rater: DR. WINNIE E. BATOON
Position: OIC - ASDS
Date of Review:

NG TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Weight ACTUAL RESULT SCORE

Timeliness Q E T Ave

submitted 2 weeks before

deadline

submitted 1 week before

deadline

submitted July 27, 2015 0.000

Submitted 1 week after

the deadline

Submitted 2 weeks or
more after the deadline

Observation done as
scheduled

with 1 time delayed

with 2 times delayed

0.000

with 3 times delayed

with 4 or more times

delayed

Two or more weeks

before July 1, 2015

One week before July 1,

2015
0.000
July 1, 2015

One week after July 1,

2015
Two or more weeks after
July 1, 2015
2 or more weeks before
September 1, 2015

1 week before September

1, 2015

September 1, 2015 0.000

1 week after September

1, 2015

2 weeks or more after

September 1, 2015

2 weeks or more before

December 29, 2015

1 week before December

29, 2015

0.000
December 29, 2015

1 week after December

29, 2015
2 weeks or more after
December 29, 2015

2 weeks or more before

December 29, 2015

1 week before December

29, 2015

December 29, 2015

1 week after December

29, 2015
2 weeks or more after
December 29, 2015
Sub total 0.000
2 weeks or more before
December 29, 2015

1 week before December

29, 2015

December 29, 2015 0.000

1 week after December

29, 2015

2 weeks or more after

December 29, 2015

2 weeks or more before

December 29, 2015

1 week before December

29, 2015

December 29, 2015

1 week after December

29, 2015
2 weeks or more after
December 29, 2015

2 weeks or more before

December 29, 2015

1 week before December

29, 2015
0.000
December 29, 2015
1 week after December
29, 2015
2 weeks or more after
December 29, 2015
2 weeks or more before
August 3, 2015

1 week before August 3,

2015

August 3, 2015

1 week after August 3,

2015

2 weeks or more after

August 3, 2015
Sub total 0.000
2 weeks before the
scheduled date
1 week before the
scheduled date

on time 0.000
1 week after the
scheduled date
2 weeks after the
scheduled date
2 weeks before the
scheduled date
1 week before the
scheduled date

on time 0.000
1 week after the
scheduled date
2 weeks after the
scheduled date

2 weeks or more before

December 29, 2015

1 week before December

29, 2015

December 29, 2015 0.000

1 week after December
29, 2015

2 weeks or more after

December 29, 2015

Sub total 0.000

2 weeks or more before
December 29, 2015

1 week before December

29, 2015

0.000
December 29, 2015 0.000

1 week after December

29, 2015

2 weeks or more after

December 29, 2015

as scheduled

1-3 days delayed

4-6 days delayed 0.000

7-9 days delayed

10 or more days delayed

2 weeks or more before

December 29, 2015

1 week before December

29, 2015

December 29, 2015 0.000

1 week after December
29, 2015
2 weeks or more after
December 29, 2015
Sub total 0.000
2 weeks or more before
December 29, 2015

1 week before December

29, 2015

December 29, 2015 0.000

1 week after December
29, 2015
2 weeks or more after
December 29, 2015

2 weeks or more before

December 29, 2015

1 week before December

29, 2015

December 29, 2015 0.000

1 week after December

29, 2015

2 weeks or more after

December 29, 2015

3 days or more before

the 10th day of the
following month

0.000
1-2 days before the
10th day of the
following month
0.000
On the 10th working
day of the following
month
1-2 days after the 10th
day of the following
month
3 days or more after
the 10th day of the
following month

Sub total 0.000

Overall rating for

0.000
accomplishements
VS

DR. JOSEPHINE L. FADUL

Approving Authority
 RESULT-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND RE
Name of Employee:
Position:
Division:
Rating Period:
TO BUILD IN DURING PLANNING
PERFORMANCE INDICA

Weight for
Timeline

KRA

Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives
Quantity

ISP prepared, submitted and

5 approved

ISP prepared, submitted but not

4 approved

June 1, 2015
1. Prepared,
3 ISP prepared but not submitted
submitted and
approved 5%
Instructional
Supervisry Plan. 2 ISP partially prepared

1 No ISP prepared

75% - 100% of the target

5 observed, supervised, trained or
July 2015 - December 2015

coached.
2. Implemented
the ISP through 51% - 74% of the target
clinical 4 observed, supervised, trained or
coached.
supervision,
training or
10% 50% of the target observed,
coaching to at 3 supervised, trained or coached.
least 50% of the
26% - 49% of the target
teachers without
2 observed, supervised, trained or
complaints within coached.
the semester
0% - 25% of the target
1 observed, supervised, trained or
coached.

Provided 5 or more learning

July 2015 - December 2015

5 materials to teachers

Provided 4 learning materials to

3. Provided three 4 teachers
(3) k-12 learning
materials to Provided 3 learning materials to
5% 3
teachers without teachers
delay within a
semester Provided 2 learning materials to
2 teachers
A. Instructional
Leadership
(40%)
 5%
teachers without

July 2015 - D
delay within a
semester
A. Instructional
Leadership
Provided 0 or 1 learning
(40%) 1 materials to teachers

1 Curriculum enrichment is
5 planned, shared to parents and
implemented

July 2015 - December 2015

1 Curriculum enrichment is
4 planned not shared to parents
but implemented
4. Planned,
shared to parents
1 Curriculum enrichment is
and implemented
3 implemented but no evidence of
1 curriculum 10% planning and sharing to parents.
enrichment
without lapses
within a semester 1 Curriculum enrichment is
2 planned, shared to parents but
not implemented

No curriculum enrichment is
1 planned, shared to parents and
implemented

Proposed, conducted and

July 2015 - December
5 submitted results of 1 action
5. Proposed, research
Action Research proposal is
conducted and
4 approved and conducted but
submitted results submitted partial results.
2015

of 1 action 5% Conducted and submitted results

research without 3 of 1 action research without
approved proposal
revision within a Action Research proposal is
semester. 2 approved but not conducted

1 No Action Research

Inspected teacher's records 28

5
December 2015

times or more
6. Inspected Inspected teacher's records 25-
July 2015 -

teacher's records 4 27 times

4 times a month Inspected teacher's records 24
5% 3 times
without lapses
Inspected teacher's records 21-
within a 2 23 times
semester. Inspected teacher's records 20
1 times or less
July 2015 - December

5 91% - 100% of the target

1. Achieved 75% 4 81% - 90% of the target

completion rate
2015

within the rating 5% 3 71% - 80% of the target

period without
complaints. 2 61% - 70% of the target

1 below 60% of the target

 July 2015 - December
5

1. Achieved 75% 4
survival rate

2016
within the rating 105% 3
period without
complaints. 2

5 reduced 2%
B. Learning
2. Reduced Drop out
II Environment rate to 2% from
June -
4 reduced 1.75%

(15%) previous school year

March 5% 3 reduced 1.50%
with 4 interventions
2015
on the scheduled date 2 reduced 1.25%
based on the AIP
1 reduced 1%

2 Values Enhancement
5 Activity prepared, submitted,
approved and conducted.

3. Prepared, July 2015 - December 2016 1 Values Enhancement

submitted, 4 Activity prepared, submitted,
approved and approved and conducted.
conducted 1
1 Values Enhancement
Values 5%
3 Activity prepared and
Enhancement conducted but not approved.
activity without
lapses within the 1 Values Enhancement
semester 2 Activity prepared, submitted,
approved but not conducted.
No Values Enhancement
1 activity prepared and
conducted

5 2 INSET conducted
December 2016
July 2015 -

4 1 INSET conducted
1. Conducted 1
INSET without 1 training conducted with
5% 3
lapses on the complete documentation
scheduled date 2
1 training conducted with
complete documentation

1 No training conducted

5 100-80% mentored

Jan.-
C. Human June 4 61-80% mentored

Resource 2. Mentored/coached
2015/
all teachers without
III Management lapses within the
Jul. 5% 3 41-60% mentored

and -Decem
scheduled date
ber
Development 2015
 Jan.-
C. Human June
Resource 2. Mentored/coached
2015/
all teachers without
III Management lapses within the
Jul. 5%
and -Decem
scheduled date
ber 2
Development 2015
20-40% mentored

1 below 20%

5 13 or more meetings conducted

3. Conducted 10
faculty meetings 4 12 meetings conducted

without lapses within

Jan-Dec.
the the scheduled 5% 3 10-11 meetings conducted
2015
date(except for
instances of conflict 2 8-9 meetings conducted
activities)
1 7 below meetings conducted

1. Implemented 5 Partnered with 4 sectoral groups

school partnership
resource mobilization 4 Partnered with 3 sectoral groups
January-
plan with the
Decemb 3% 3 Partnered with2 sectoral groups
engagement of 3
er 2015
sectoral groups 2 Partnered with 1 sectoral group
without lapses on
scheduled date. 1 No Implementation Plan

5 4 general assemblies

2. Conducted 4 PTA 4 3 general assemblies

D. Parents ' January-
General Assembly
Involvement without lapses on the Decemb 43% 3 2 general asemblies

IV and Community scheduled date

er 2015
2
Partnerships 1 general assembly

(10%) 1 no general assembly conducted

5 2 projects with complete documentation

June 20 4 2 projects with incomplete documentation

3. Acquired 2 school 2015 -
project without lapses
4% 3 1 projects with complete documentation
within the calendar Decemb
year er 20,
2015 2 1 projects with incomplete documentation

1 No project implemented

1. Implemented the
school/community 5 Implemented 4 or more PAPs per devt goal

Education
4 Implemented 3
Improvement Plan at
January-
least 2
programs/activities/p
Decemb 10% 3 Implemented 2 PAPs
er 2015
rojects in each
development goal 2 Implemented 1 PAP per devt goal

without lapses within 1 No PAP implemented/dev't goal

the rating period.
 provided 2 interventions with complete
5 documentation

provided 2 interventions with insufficient

2.Provided 2 4 documentation
interventions to fast
January-
track attainment of
E. School Decemb 5% provided 1 interventions with sufficient
leadership,
EFA Goals without
er 2015 3 documentation
lapses within the
V management rating period.
and Operation provided 1 interventions with insufficient
2 documentation
(20%)

1 No Intervention made

5 Liquidated 100% of the CA

3.Liquidated cash 4 Liquidated 95% of the CA

advances without
lapses every 10th January-
working day of the Decemb 5% 3 Liquidated 90% of the CA

following month er 2015

within the rating
period 2 Liquidated 85% of the CA

1 Liquidated 80% and below of the CA

Ratee

DR. WENNIE BATOON

Rater
DR. JOSEPHINE L. FADUL
Approving Authority
MENT SYSTEM FOR SCHOOL PRINCIPAL
MMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Rater: DR. WINNIE E. BATOON
Position: OIC - ASDS
Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS Weight ACTUAL RESULT SCORE

Efficiency Timeliness Q E T Ave

submitted 2 weeks before

without revision
deadline

submitted 1 week before

with 1 revision
deadline

with 2 revisions submitted on time

0.05 0.00 0.000

Submitted 1 week after
with 3 revisions
the deadline

with 4 or more Submitted 2 weeks or

revisions more after the deadline

Observation done as
without complaints
scheduled

with 1 complaint with 1 time delayed

with 2 complaints with 2 times delayed 0.05 0.00 0.000

with 3 complaints with 3 times delayed

with 4 or more with 4 or more times

complaints delayed

Two or more weeks

without lapses
before July 1, 2015

One week before July 1,

with 1 lapse
2015

with 2 lapses July 1, 2015 0.05 0.00 0.000

One week after July 1,

with 3 lapses
2015
 0.05 0.00 0.000

with 4 or more Two or more weeks after

lapses July 1, 2015

2 or more weeks before

without lapses
September 1, 2015

1 week before September

with one lapse
1, 2015

with 2 lapses September 1, 2015

0.05 0.00 0.000

1 week after September

with 3 lapses
1, 2015

with 4 or more 2 weeks or more after

lapses September 1, 2015

2 weeks or more before

without revision
December 29, 2015

1 week before December

with 1 revision
29, 2015

0.05 0.00 0.000

with 2 revisions December 29, 2015

1 week after December

with 3 revisions
29, 2015
with 4 or more 2 weeks or more after
revisions December 29, 2015
2 weeks or more before
without lapses
December 29, 2015
1 week before December
with 1-2 lapses
29, 2015

with 3-4 lapses December 29, 2015

1 week after December

with 5-6 lapses
29, 2015
with 7 or more 2 weeks or more after
lapses December 29, 2015

Sub total 0.000

no complaint

with 1 complaints

with 2 complaints

with 3 complaints

with 4 or more
complaints
0.05 5 5 4 4.67 0.233
 0.05 5 5 4 4.67 0.233

with 4 interventions on time

with 3 interventions 1 week after the scheduled date

with 2 interventions 2 weeks after the scheduled date 0.05 5 5 4 4.67 0.233
with 1 interventions 3 weeks after the scheduled date

with no intervention 4 weeks after the scheduled date

2 weeks or more before

without lapses December 29, 2015

1 week before December

with 1 lapse 29, 2015

with 2 lapses December 29, 2015

0.05 5 5 4 4.67 0.233

1 week after December

with 3 lapses 29, 2015

with 4 or more 2 weeks or more after

lapses December 29, 2015

Sub total 0.700

without lapses on time

with 1 lapse 1 week after the scheduled date

with 2 lapses 2 weeks after the scheduled date 0.05 5 5 4 4.67 0.233

with 3 lapses 3 weeks after the scheduled date

No training conducted No training conducted

without lapse on time

with 1 lapse 1 week after the scheduled date

with 2 lapses 2 weeks after the scheduled date 0.05 5 5 4 4.67 0.233
 0.05 5 5 4 4.67 0.233

with 3 lapses 3 weeks after the scheduled date

with 4 lapses 4 weeks after the scheduled date

without lapse on time

with 1 lapse 1 time delayed

with 2 lapses 2 times delayed 0.05 5 5 4 4.67 0.233

with 3 lapses 3 times delayed

Efficiency, 4 times delayed

Sub total 0.700

without lapse on time

with 1 lapse 1 week delayed

with 2 lapses 2 week delayed 0.05 5 5 4 4.67 0.233

with 3 lapses 3 weeks delayed

No Implementation Plan No Implementation Plan

without lapse on time

with 1 lapse 1 week delayed

with 2 lapses 2 weeks delayed 0.05 5 5 4 4.67 0.233

with 3 lapses 3 weeks delayed

no general assembly
no general assembly conducted
conducted

without lapse on time

with 1 lapse 1 week after implementation date

with 2 lapses 2 week after implementation date 0.05 5 5 4 4.67 0.233

with 3 lapses 3 week after implementation date

No project implemented No project implemented

Sub total 0.700

without lapses implemented as scheduled

implemented with 2 times delay

with 1 lapse
within the rating period

with 2 lapses
implemented with 4 times delay
within the rating period 0.05 5 5 4 4.67 0.233
implemented with 6 times delay
with 3 lapses
within the rating period
implemented with more than 6
with 4 or more lapses times delay within the rating
period
 no lapses implemented as scheduled

implemented with 2 times delay

with one lapse
within the rating period

with two lapse

implemented with 4 times delay 0.05 5 5 4 4.67 0.233
within the rating period

implemented with 6 times delay

with Three lapse
within the rating period

No Intervention made No Intervention made

On or before the 10th working day

without lapses
of the following month

On the 12th working day of the

with 1 lapse
following month

On the 14th working day of the

with 2 lapses
following month 0.05 5 5 4 4.67 0.233

On the 16th working day of the

with 3 lapses
following month

After the 16th working day of the

with 4 or more lapses
following month

Sub total 0.700

Overall rating for

2.800
accomplishements
VS

EPHINE L. FADUL
ving Authority