Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anaerobic Bacteria Grow Within Candida Albicans Biofilms and Induce Biofilm Formation in Suspension Cultures
Anaerobic Bacteria Grow Within Candida Albicans Biofilms and Induce Biofilm Formation in Suspension Cultures
Anaerobic Bacteria Grow Within Candida Albicans Biofilms and Induce Biofilm Formation in Suspension Cultures
057
Report
Anaerobic Bacteria Grow within
Candida albicans Biofilms and Induce
Biofilm Formation in Suspension Cultures
Emily P. Fox,1,2 Elise S. Cowley,3,4 Clarissa J. Nobile,1,5 serum-coated, polystyrene well for 90 min and were allowed
Nairi Hartooni,1 Dianne K. Newman,3,4 to develop into biofilms for 24 hr, a standard procedure for pro-
and Alexander D. Johnson1,* ducing C. albicans biofilms [11, 12]. Confocal scanning laser
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University microscopy (CSLM) images confirmed that in all cases, both
of California, San Francisco, 600 16th Street, San Francisco, fungal and bacterial species incorporated into the biofilm (Fig-
CA 94158, USA ure 1). The bacteria adhered to both C. albicans hyphal and
2Tetrad Program, Department of Biochemistry and yeast-form cells (Figure 1; Figures S1A–S1F available online).
Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, 600 16th Whereas B. fragilis and C. perfringens had minimal effect on
Street, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA the biofilm architecture, incorporation of E. coli, E. faecalis,
3Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California and K. pneumoniae reduced the overall biofilm thickness (Fig-
Institute of Technology, 147-75, 1200 East California ure S1G). We designed a colony-forming units (cfu) assay as a
Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA readout for live bacterial and C. albicans cells present and
4Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of found that both bacteria and C. albicans were incorporated
Technology, 147-75, 1200 East California Boulevard, into the biofilms over time (Figures 2A–2D and S2A–S2C).
Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
5School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, C. perfringens and B. fragilis Proliferate in Cocultured
5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA 95343, USA Biofilms with C. albicans under Ambient Oxic Conditions
C. albicans and/or C. perfringens or B. fragilis cells were cocul-
tured in biofilms for 4, 24, 48, or 72 hr, under ambient oxic or
Summary anoxic conditions. Growth of each species over time was
measured by plating for cfu (Figures 2A–2D). The adherence
The human microbiome contains diverse microorganisms, and growth of C. albicans was unaffected by the presence or
which share and compete for the same environmental niches absence of bacterial cells; however, the initial adherence of
[1, 2]. A major microbial growth form in the human body is the C. perfringens and B. fragilis increased 10-fold in the presence
biofilm state, where tightly packed bacterial, archaeal, and of C. albicans. In mixed biofilms, after adherence, C. perfringens
fungal cells must cooperate and/or compete for resources showed substantial growth, from w5 3 105 cfu/ml to w1 3 107
in order to survive [3–6]. We examined mixed biofilms com- cfu/ml in 24 hr, regardless of whether the biofilm was grown un-
posed of the major fungal species of the gut microbiome, der ambient oxic or anoxic conditions (Figures 2A and 2C).
Candida albicans, and each of five prevalent bacterial gas- Without C. albicans, viable C. perfringens cells decreased
trointestinal inhabitants: Bacteroides fragilis, Clostridium below detection (<10 cfu/ml) after 24 hr in ambient oxic condi-
perfringens, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and tions (Figure 2A). B. fragilis showed the same trend (Figures
Enterococcus faecalis [7–10]. We observed that biofilms 2B and 2D). In addition to the standard laboratory strain of
formed by C. albicans provide a hypoxic microenvironment C. albicans (SC5314), we tested two other clinical isolates of
that supports the growth of two anaerobic bacteria, even C. albicans and found that they are also able to support
when cultured in ambient oxic conditions that are normally anaerobe growth (Figures S2D and S2E). Our data demonstrate
toxic to the bacteria. We also found that coculture with bacte- that incorporation into a C. albicans biofilm grown under
ria in biofilms induces massive gene expression changes in ambient oxic conditions enables growth of the anaerobes
C. albicans, including upregulation of WOR1, which encodes C. perfringens and B. fragilis; without the protective biofilm,
a transcription regulator that controls a phenotypic switch in the viability of both bacterial species rapidly declines.
C. albicans, from the ‘‘white’’ cell type to the ‘‘opaque’’ cell
type. Finally, we observed that in suspension cultures, C. albicans Biofilms Create a Hypoxic Microenvironment
C. perfringens induces aggregation of C. albicans into To test the hypothesis that biofilms create locally hypoxic
‘‘mini-biofilms,’’ which allow C. perfringens cells to survive environments that enable the growth of anaerobic bacteria,
in a normally toxic environment. This work indicates that bac- we measured oxygen levels in biofilms using a miniaturized,
teria and C. albicans interactions modulate the local chemis- switchable trace oxygen (STOX) sensor, an instrument capable
try of their environment in multiple ways to create niches of measuring oxygen concentrations as low as 10 nM [13]. Mea-
favorable to their growth and survival. surements with the STOX sensor revealed a gradient of oxygen
concentration throughout the depth of the biofilm, decreasing
Results from w300 mM (ambient oxygen) near the top of the biofilm to
less than 50 mM near the bottom (Figure 2E). The oxygen
The Fungal Species C. albicans Forms Mixed Biofilms gradient remained the same whether C. albicans was grown
with Five Bacterial Species in monoculture or was cocultured with C. perfringens or
Candida albicans, with or without Clostridium perfringens, B. fragilis.
Bacteroides fragilis, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli,
or Klebsiella pneumoniae cells, were adhered to a bovine- Coculture in Biofilms with Bacteria Alters Gene Expression
in C. albicans
To determine whether C. albicans was responding to bacteria
*Correspondence: ajohnson@cgl.ucsf.edu in the mixed-species biofilm, we measured gene expression
Current Biology Vol 24 No 20
2412
Alexa 594 Syto 13 merge Alexa 594 Syto 13 merge Figure 1. C. albicans Forms Biofilms with Five
Different Species of Bacteria In Vitro
C. albicans alone
+E. faecalis
Top either alone (A) or with E. coli (B), K. pneumoniae
Top
(C), E. faecalis (D), C. perfringens (E), or B. fragilis
(F). Biofilms were stained with conconavalin A,
Alexa 594 and Syto 13 dyes, then imaged by
CSLM. Images are maximum intensity projections
Side Side of the top and side view. Representative images of
at least three replicates are shown. Scale bars
B E represent 50 mm. See also Figure S1.
+C. perfringens
+E. coli
Top Top
(Figure 4H).
+B. fragilis
Top Top Although the mini-biofilms are too
small to directly probe for oxygen con-
centration, we note that C. albicans
gene expression under these conditions
Side Side was significantly enriched for genes
regulated during hypoxic conditions
(p = 1.4 3 1025) [22] (Figure S4A; Data
changes in C. albicans by microarray (Figure 3A; Data Set S1). Set S3), suggesting that the mini-biofilms, like conventional,
Relative to the C. albicans biofilm formed in the absence of surface-adhered biofilms, provide a hypoxic environment.
bacteria, many genes were upregulated and downregulated Consistent with this idea, we found that C. perfringens cells
in the presence of bacteria. Some genes changed expression also stimulate aggregation in early stages of conventional
in response to all of the bacterial species, whereas others were C. albicans biofilm formation on a solid surface (Figure S4B).
specific to a few species. We repeated the suspension growth experiment with cell-free
Among the most differentially regulated genes were those supernatant or heat-killed C. perfringens cells and observed
encoding the transcription regulators controlling the white- that both are able to induce aggregation of C. albicans (Figures
opaque switch in C. albicans, a transition between two cell 4E and 4F). We blindly screened a library of 205 deletion strains
types, each of which is heritable for many generations [15–18] in C. albicans [23] (Table S2) and identified eight transcription
(Figure 3B). In particular, WOR1, which encodes the ‘‘master’’ regulator-encoding genes and two other genes that are re-
regulator of white-opaque switching, was strongly upregulated quired for the observed interspecies aggregation (Figures 4K–
by coculture with K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and E. faecalis. Cocul- 4R and S4C). Notably, six of the transcription regulators
ture with K. pneumoniae also induced upregulation of several (Brg1, Tec1, Rob1, Bcr1, Ndt80, and Efg1) found in our screen
other transcription regulators known to play roles in the were previously identified master regulators of conventional
white-opaque switch, in a WOR1-independent manner (Fig- biofilm formation [12], providing strong evidence that C. perfrin-
ure S3; Data Set S2) [14, 17, 19–21]. gens induces aggregate formation via the biofilm genetic pro-
Although a number of opaque-specific genes were upregu- gram. The other two regulator mutants deficient in aggregation
lated, the full opaque-specific gene expression pattern was were rim101D/D and flo8D/D, which have not been reported to
not observed, and when removed from this condition, the be required for conventional biofilm formation. DEF1, which is
C. albicans cells reverted to ‘‘classical’’ white cells. We propose important for hyphal extension [24], and ALS3, which encodes
that coculture with bacterial cells poises C. albicans to switch an adhesin important for biofilm formation and plays a role in in-
from white to opaque but that additional signals are required teracting with many bacterial species [25–29], were also
for full switching. required for aggregation (Figure S4C). As described in the Sup-
plemental Experimental Procedures, we quantified aggregation
C. perfringens Is Protected by and Induces Aggregation using a sedimentation assay and verified that the deletion
of C. albicans in Suspension Culture strains were complemented by gene ‘‘add-backs’’ (Figures
To further explore interactions between C. albicans and the S4D and S4E).
bacterial microbiome members, we cocultured them in sus- These results support a model whereby, in ambient oxic
pension cultures and observed that some of the bacteria suspension culture, C. perfringens induces C. albicans to
induced coaggregation with C. albicans cells (Table S1; Figures form protective aggregates, which depend on the C. albicans
4A–4D). The most dramatic effect occurred with C. perfringens biofilm genetic program. These mini-biofilms, which contain
in ambient oxic conditions. Light microscopy revealed that the both C. albicans and C. perfringens, allow C. perfringens to
aggregates induced by C. perfringens were composed of survive in oxic conditions that are normally toxic.
dense clumps containing both C. albicans and C. perfringens
cells and resembling miniature biofilms (Figure 4G). By moni- Discussion
toring cfu/ml of C. perfringens grown in suspension cultures
over time (Figures 4H and 4I), we observed that the presence In this work, we uncovered multiple interactions between
of C. albicans enabled survival of C. perfringens in oxic suspen- C. albicans, a major fungal species of the human microbiome,
sion conditions to levels of w1 3 106 cfu/ml; in the absence of and several bacterial members of the microbiome.
Fungal Biofilms Protect Anaerobic Bacteria
2413
WOR3
WOR2
expression levels measured in opaque versus
EFG1
PTH2
CZF1
Control
E. coli
K. pneumoniae
of considering the microenvironments
E. faecalis
encountered by microbiome members.
C. perfringens The strategy of studying pairwise inter-
B. fragilis actions between fungi and bacteria in
the context of heterogeneous microen-
vironments can be expanded to better
understand the complex community
Aggregation Induction by Coculture in Suspension of thousands of species that encounter one another in the
We found that C. perfringens induces aggregation of host.
C. albicans in ambient oxic suspension cultures and that the
aggregates, which contain both fungi and bacteria, allow Experimental Procedures
C. perfringens to survive in a normally toxic environment. In-
duction of aggregation may be similar to induction of biofilm Cocultures in Suspension or Biofilms
C. albicans and/or bacteria were grown in suspension or in biofilms adhered
formation because aggregation requires the same master reg- in six-well polystyrene plates, in brain heart infusion (BHI) medium, supple-
ulators needed for C. albicans to form a ‘‘conventional’’ biofilm mented with 5% fetal bovine serum (BHI-FBS). Additional details are pro-
on a solid surface. Moreover, the cells in the aggregates vided in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures.
resemble cells in biofilms on solid surfaces. These observa-
tions indicate that the biofilm program in C. albicans does Colony-Forming Units Assay
not require a solid surface to become activated, and the defini- Colony-forming units were plated from serial dilutions of either biofilms or
suspension cultures. Dilutions were plated on YPD agar, LB agar, or blood
tion of a C. albicans biofilm may be expanded from a substrate-
agar at 30 C or 37 C, depending on the species. Additional details are pro-
attached community to include suspended aggregates. E. coli, vided in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures.
Pediococcus damnosus, and several other bacterial species
were previously found to induce aggregation when cocultured Oxygen Measurement
with several yeast species, including Candida utiliz, Saccharo- Oxygen concentration in biofilms was measured with a Unisense STOX
myces cerevisiae, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe [45]. The sensor microelectrode, with measurements obtained every 10 mm, from
evidence suggests that many microbial species are able to top to bottom. Additional details are provided in the Supplemental Experi-
mental Procedures.
coaggregate, and our work has demonstrated that adherence
between fungi and bacteria can allow the survival of the
Gene Expression Microarrays
bacteria. Cy3- or Cy5-labeled cDNA was hybridized to custom Agilent microarrays,
analyzed in GenePix Pro, and normalized with LOWESS. Additional details
Interspecies Interactions are provided in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures.
We have shown that C. albicans interacts in a variety of ways
with several representative species of the gut microbiome. Accession Numbers
These microbes are clearly able to sense one another; for
example, C. albicans responds through large changes in The GEO accession number for the raw gene expression array data reported
in this paper is GSE55026.
adherence and gene expression. We have provided new ev-
idence of antagonistic (reduction of C. albicans biofilm thick-
Supplemental Information
ness by the presence of K. pneumoniae) and beneficial
(protection of C. perfringens by C. albicans biofilms) rela- Supplemental Information includes Supplemental Experimental Proce-
tionships and have begun to uncover the genes involved in dures, four figures, four tables, and three data sets and can be found with
these interactions. These findings highlight the importance this article online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.057.
Fungal Biofilms Protect Anaerobic Bacteria
2415
Acknowledgments 3. López, D., Vlamakis, H., and Kolter, R. (2010). Biofilms. Cold Spring
Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a000398.
We thank Matthew Lohse, Aaron Hernday, Chiraj Dalal, Oliver Homann, and 4. Kolter, R., and Greenberg, E.P. (2006). Microbial sciences: the superfi-
Jose Christian Perez for strains or plasmids used in this study; Sheena cial life of microbes. Nature 441, 300–302.
Singh Babak and Trevor Sorrells for comments on the manuscript; and 5. Donlan, R.M., and Costerton, J.W. (2002). Biofilms: survival mecha-
Jorge Mendoza for technical assistance. We appreciate the use of the nisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15,
UCSF Nikon Imaging Center. This study was supported by NIH grant 167–193.
R01AI083311 (to A.D.J.) and by a UCSF Program for Breakthrough Biomed- 6. Wolcott, R., Costerton, J.W., Raoult, D., and Cutler, S.J. (2013). The
ical Research award, funded partly by the Sandler Foundation. E.P.F. was polymicrobial nature of biofilm infection. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 19,
supported by NIH fellowship T32AI060537, C.J.N. was supported by NIH 107–112.
grant K99AI100896, and D.K.N. and E.S.C. were supported by the Howard 7. Iliev, I.D., Funari, V.A., Taylor, K.D., Nguyen, Q., Reyes, C.N., Strom,
Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood S.P., Brown, J., Becker, C.A., Fleshner, P.R., Dubinsky, M., et al.
Institute of the NIH (R01HL117328). D.K.N. is an HHMI Investigator. (2012). Interactions between commensal fungi and the C-type lectin re-
ceptor Dectin-1 influence colitis. Science 336, 1314–1317.
Received: March 9, 2014 8. Moyes, D.L., and Naglik, J.R. (2012). The mycobiome: influencing IBD
Revised: July 31, 2014 severity. Cell Host Microbe 11, 551–552.
Accepted: August 22, 2014 9. Ghannoum, M.A., Jurevic, R.J., Mukherjee, P.K., Cui, F., Sikaroodi, M.,
Published: October 9, 2014 Naqvi, A., and Gillevet, P.M. (2010). Characterization of the oral fungal
microbiome (mycobiome) in healthy individuals. PLoS Pathog. 6,
References e1000713.
10. Khatib, R., Riederer, K.M., Ramanathan, J., and Baran, J., Jr. (2001).
1. Savage, D.C. (1977). Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract. Faecal fungal flora in healthy volunteers and inpatients. Mycoses 44,
Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 31, 107–133. 151–156.
2. Eckburg, P.B., Bik, E.M., Bernstein, C.N., Purdom, E., Dethlefsen, L., 11. Nobile, C.J., and Mitchell, A.P. (2005). Regulation of cell-surface genes
Sargent, M., Gill, S.R., Nelson, K.E., and Relman, D.A. (2005). Diversity and biofilm formation by the C. albicans transcription factor Bcr1p. Curr.
of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 308, 1635–1638. Biol. 15, 1150–1155.
Current Biology Vol 24 No 20
2416
12. Nobile, C.J., Fox, E.P., Nett, J.E., Sorrells, T.R., Mitrovich, Q.M., 32. Rossignol, T., Ding, C., Guida, A., d’Enfert, C., Higgins, D.G., and Butler,
Hernday, A.D., Tuch, B.B., Andes, D.R., and Johnson, A.D. (2012). A G. (2009). Correlation between biofilm formation and the hypoxic
recently evolved transcriptional network controls biofilm development response in Candida parapsilosis. Eukaryot. Cell 8, 550–559.
in Candida albicans. Cell 148, 126–138. 33. Bonhomme, J., Chauvel, M., Goyard, S., Roux, P., Rossignol, T., and
13. Revsbech, N.P., Larsen, L.H., Gundersen, J., Dalsgaard, T., Ulloa, O., d’Enfert, C. (2011). Contribution of the glycolytic flux and hypoxia adap-
and Thamdrup, B. (2009). Determination of ultra-low oxygen concentra- tation to efficient biofilm formation by Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol.
tions in oxygen minimum zones by the STOX sensor. Limnol. Oceanogr. 80, 995–1013.
Methods 7, 371–381. 34. Stichternoth, C., and Ernst, J.F. (2009). Hypoxic adaptation by Efg1 reg-
14. Hernday, A.D., Lohse, M.B., Fordyce, P.M., Nobile, C.J., DeRisi, J.L., ulates biofilm formation by Candida albicans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
and Johnson, A.D. (2013). Structure of the transcriptional network con- 75, 3663–3672.
trolling white-opaque switching in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 90, 35. Loesche, W.J. (1969). Oxygen sensitivity of various anaerobic bacteria.
22–35. Appl. Microbiol. 18, 723–727.
36. Tally, F.P., Stewart, P.R., Sutter, V.L., and Rosenblatt, J.E. (1975).
15. Slutsky, B., Staebell, M., Anderson, J., Risen, L., Pfaller, M., and Soll,
Oxygen tolerance of fresh clinical anaerobic bacteria. J. Clin.
D.R. (1987). ‘‘White-opaque transition’’: a second high-frequency
Microbiol. 1, 161–164.
switching system in Candida albicans. J. Bacteriol. 169, 189–197.
37. Li, J., Adams, V., Bannam, T.L., Miyamoto, K., Garcia, J.P., Uzal, F.A.,
16. Srikantha, T., Borneman, A.R., Daniels, K.J., Pujol, C., Wu, W.,
Rood, J.I., and McClane, B.A. (2013). Toxin plasmids of Clostridium per-
Seringhaus, M.R., Gerstein, M., Yi, S., Snyder, M., and Soll, D.R.
fringens. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77, 208–233.
(2006). TOS9 regulates white-opaque switching in Candida albicans.
38. Stevens, D.L., Aldape, M.J., and Bryant, A.E. (2012). Life-threatening
Eukaryot. Cell 5, 1674–1687.
clostridial infections. Anaerobe 18, 254–259.
17. Zordan, R.E., Galgoczy, D.J., and Johnson, A.D. (2006). Epigenetic 39. Lewis, K. (2010). Persister cells. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64, 357–372.
properties of white-opaque switching in Candida albicans are based 40. Yeater, K.M., Chandra, J., Cheng, G., Mukherjee, P.K., Zhao, X.,
on a self-sustaining transcriptional feedback loop. Proc. Natl. Acad. Rodriguez-Zas, S.L., Kwast, K.E., Ghannoum, M.A., and Hoyer, L.L.
Sci. USA 103, 12807–12812. (2007). Temporal analysis of Candida albicans gene expression during
18. Rikkerink, E.H., Magee, B.B., and Magee, P.T. (1988). Opaque-white biofilm development. Microbiology 153, 2373–2385.
phenotype transition: a programmed morphological transition in 41. Uppuluri, P., Chaturvedi, A.K., Srinivasan, A., Banerjee, M.,
Candida albicans. J. Bacteriol. 170, 895–899. Ramasubramaniam, A.K., Köhler, J.R., Kadosh, D., and Lopez-Ribot,
19. Lohse, M.B., and Johnson, A.D. (2010). Temporal anatomy of an epige- J.L. (2010). Dispersion as an important step in the Candida albicans bio-
netic switch in cell programming: the white-opaque transition of C. albi- film developmental cycle. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1000828.
cans. Mol. Microbiol. 78, 331–343. 42. Baillie, G.S., and Douglas, L.J. (1999). Role of dimorphism in the devel-
20. Tuch, B.B., Mitrovich, Q.M., Homann, O.R., Hernday, A.D., Monighetti, opment of Candida albicans biofilms. J. Med. Microbiol. 48, 671–679.
C.K., De La Vega, F.M., and Johnson, A.D. (2010). The transcriptomes 43. Nett, J.E., Lepak, A.J., Marchillo, K., and Andes, D.R. (2009). Time
of two heritable cell types illuminate the circuit governing their differen- course global gene expression analysis of an in vivo Candida biofilm.
tiation. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001070. J. Infect. Dis. 200, 307–313.
21. Zordan, R.E., Miller, M.G., Galgoczy, D.J., Tuch, B.B., and Johnson, A.D. 44. Pande, K., Chen, C., and Noble, S.M. (2013). Passage through the
(2007). Interlocking transcriptional feedback loops control white-opa- mammalian gut triggers a phenotypic switch that promotes Candida al-
que switching in Candida albicans. PLoS Biol. 5, e256. bicans commensalism. Nat. Genet. 45, 1088–1091.
22. Synnott, J.M., Guida, A., Mulhern-Haughey, S., Higgins, D.G., and 45. Peng, X., Sun, J., Iserentant, D., Michiels, C., and Verachtert, H. (2001).
Butler, G. (2010). Regulation of the hypoxic response in Candida albi- Flocculation and coflocculation of bacteria by yeasts. Appl. Microbiol.
cans. Eukaryot. Cell 9, 1734–1746. Biotechnol. 55, 777–781.
23. Homann, O.R., Dea, J., Noble, S.M., and Johnson, A.D. (2009). A pheno-
typic profile of the Candida albicans regulatory network. PLoS Genet. 5,
e1000783.
24. Martin, R., Moran, G.P., Jacobsen, I.D., Heyken, A., Domey, J., Sullivan,
D.J., Kurzai, O., and Hube, B. (2011). The Candida albicans-specific
gene EED1 encodes a key regulator of hyphal extension. PLoS ONE 6,
e18394.
25. Zhao, X., Daniels, K.J., Oh, S.H., Green, C.B., Yeater, K.M., Soll, D.R.,
and Hoyer, L.L. (2006). Candida albicans Als3p is required for wild-
type biofilm formation on silicone elastomer surfaces. Microbiology
152, 2287–2299.
26. Liu, Y., and Filler, S.G. (2011). Candida albicans Als3, a multifunctional
adhesin and invasin. Eukaryot. Cell 10, 168–173.
27. Silverman, R.J., Nobbs, A.H., Vickerman, M.M., Barbour, M.E., and
Jenkinson, H.F. (2010). Interaction of Candida albicans cell wall Als3
protein with Streptococcus gordonii SspB adhesin promotes develop-
ment of mixed-species communities. Infect. Immun. 78, 4644–4652.
28. Peters, B.M., Ovchinnikova, E.S., Krom, B.P., Schlecht, L.M., Zhou, H.,
Hoyer, L.L., Busscher, H.J., van der Mei, H.C., Jabra-Rizk, M.A., and
Shirtliff, M.E. (2012). Staphylococcus aureus adherence to Candida albi-
cans hyphae is mediated by the hyphal adhesin Als3p. Microbiology
158, 2975–2986.
29. Nobile, C.J., Andes, D.R., Nett, J.E., Smith, F.J., Yue, F., Phan, Q.-T.,
Edwards, J.E., Filler, S.G., and Mitchell, A.P. (2006). Critical role of
Bcr1-dependent adhesins in C. albicans biofilm formation in vitro and
in vivo. PLoS Pathog. 2, e63.
30. Bradshaw, D.J., Marsh, P.D., Allison, C., and Schilling, K.M. (1996).
Effect of oxygen, inoculum composition and flow rate on development
of mixed-culture oral biofilms. Microbiology 142, 623–629.
31. Bradshaw, D.J., Marsh, P.D., Watson, G.K., and Allison, C. (1998). Role
of Fusobacterium nucleatum and coaggregation in anaerobe survival in
planktonic and biofilm oral microbial communities during aeration.
Infect. Immun. 66, 4729–4732.