Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Extending Predictive Capabilities To Network Models
Extending Predictive Capabilities To Network Models
Extending Predictive Capabilities To Network Models
Network Models
P.-E. Øren, SPE, Stig Bakke, and O.J. Arntzen, Statoil A/S
SO D
21
3
1 1
G5 , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3)
4 tan bi
i51
G5
sin~2b1 !
2 S
21
sin~2b1 !
sin~2b2 ! D 22
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4)
Flow in the Network Fig. 4 —Fd(ur, G) vs. ur when water is present in at least one of the
We wish to simulate two-phase flow in our pore networks. The corners. The results for each G are the average of 1,000 real-
displacing fluid is injected through an external reservoir that is izations.
connected by pore throats to every pore body on the inlet side of
the network. The displaced fluid escapes through the outlet face on
the opposite side. Periodical boundary conditions are imposed For a pore body or throat i, the critical capillary pressure P *c is
along the sides parallel to the main direction of flow. given by
We assume that capillary forces dominate at the pore scale. This
P*c, i 5 Pi 1 Gi xi , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6)
is a reasonable assumption for low capillary number (1026 or less)
processes47 that are typical of most reservoir displacements. In the where P and G 5 input parameters and x varies uniformly between
following, we present a precise description of the different pore- zero and one. The first term on the right represents the disjoining
scale displacement mechanisms that may occur in the pore network pressure, whereas the second term represents the film curvature. If
during primary drainage and water injection. P *c is exceeded in an oil filled pore body or throat, the contact angle
must change.54 We assume that the new value of u r , 908 2 b 1 .
Primary Drainage. Initially, the network is fully saturated with This ensures that water is always present in at least one of the
water and is strongly water-wet. Then, oil enters the network corners.
representing migration into the reservoir. At every stage of the Primary drainage and the film rupturing process continue until a
process, oil invades the available pore body or throat with the maximum capillary pressure P c, max is reached. If P c, max exceeds P *c
lowest threshold capillary pressure. This forms the basis for the in a pore body or throat, the water film collapses and the wettability
invasion percolation algorithm48, 49 used previously to model drain- changes. In this case, the corners contain bulk water and remain
age processes. water-wet. Away from the corners, adsorption of hydrophobic
Threshold or entry capillary pressures are calculated with the components make the pore wall oil-wet. We refer to these pore
Mayer and Stowe50 and Princen51-53 (MS-P) method. The details of bodies and throats as being mixed-wet. Pore bodies and throats
the calculations are given in Appendix A. The threshold capillary where P c, max , P *c remain water-wet.
pressure is governed by both the pore shape and the receding
contact angle u r . Water Injection. The capillary pressure drops during water in-
jection, and water first invades the available water-wet pore bodies
g~1 1 2 ÎpG!cos ur and throats. Pore-scale displacement mechanisms for strongly wet-
Pec 5 Fd ~ur , G!, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5)
r ting systems have been described by Lenormand et al.55 There are
three types of displacements: piston type, pore body filling, and
where r 5 the inscribed radius of the pore body or throat. In general, snap-off. We summarize the behavior and the threshold capillary
the function F d is dependent on the particular corner angles and is pressures for each of these displacement in mixed-wet pores.
not universal for a specific G. In practice, however, F d varies little Piston Type. This refers to the displacement of oil from a pore
for a given G. This is illustrated in Fig. 4, which shows the full throat by an invading interface initially located in an adjoining
variation in F d when water is present in at least one of the corners. water filled pore body. If there is no contact angle hysteresis, the
For strongly water-wet systems (i.e., u r 5 08), F d 5 1. threshold capillary pressure is the same as for drainage (Eq. 5). In
a more realistic scenario, the advancing contact angle u a is different
Wettability Alteration. When oil initially invades a water filled from u r . This is always true for mixed-wet systems in which u a may
pore body or throat, a stable water film protects the pore surface be much larger than u r .
from wettability change by adsorption. At a critical capillary In this case, there is a range of capillary pressure in which the
pressure, the film collapses to form a molecular thin film. This invading interface remains pinned. As the capillary pressure drops,
allows surface active components in the oil to adsorb on the pore the interface remains fixed in place, and the contact angle adjusts
surface. The capillary pressure at which the water film ruptures to a new value u h . The hinging angle u h can acquire any value
depends on the curvature of the pore wall and on the shape of the between u r and u a . Water enters the throat after the capillary
disjoining pressure isotherm. Kovscek et al.54 present a detailed pressure is lowered sufficiently so that u a is reached. The calcu-
analysis of this scenario for star-shaped pores. Blunt32 recently lation of the threshold capillary pressure for this case is given in
extended the analysis to square pores and presents a parametric Appendix A.
model for the critical capillary pressure at which the water film Solutions for the normalized threshold capillary pressure (P Nc 5
collapses. A similar approach is adopted here. rP ec / g ) show that spontaneous imbibition (P Nc . 0) by piston type
S D
causes the AM to advance toward the center of the pore space.
Eventually, this AM meets another AM, causing snap-off. If u a ,
O
n
1
Rn 5 r 1 bi ri xi , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (9) 908 2 b 1 , the curvatures of the AM’s are positive and snap-off
cos ua p occurs at a positive capillary pressure. The capillary pressure at
i51
which this occurs can be calculated from elementary geometry
where r p 5 the pore body radius, b i 5 input parameters, r i 5 the (Appendix A). In contrast to piston type invasion, spontaneous
radii of the oil filled throats, and x i 5 random numbers between imbibition by snap-off only occurs for u a , 908 (Fig. 7).
zero and one. The threshold capillary pressure is P c, n 5 2 g /R n . If If u a . 908 2 b 1 , the curvatures of the AM’s are negative and
u a . u a, max, the water invasion is forced, and the threshold capillary the invasion is forced. Once the hinging angle in the sharpest corner
pressure is the same as for the I 1 mechanism. has increased to u a , the AM advances toward the center of the pore
space. This causes the absolute value of the negative curvature to
Snap-Off. Snap-off refers to the invasion of an oil filled pore space decrease. The AM is unstable and the pore body or throat imme-
by arc menisci (AM’s), which always exist in the corners of oil
filled pore bodies and throats. In the absence of contact angle
OF S DG
3
cos u cos~u 1 bi ! p u 1 bi
Aw 5 r2w 2 12
2
, . . . . . . (13) Aw,
sin bi
i
2 90 gw, i 5 , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (20)
i51 Cw, i ki m
where r w 5 g /P c 5 radius of curvature of the AM’s and u can be
where C w is evaluated at u 5 0° and k is given by
u r , u h , or u a , depending on the circumstances. When oil films are
S D
present in the corners of a pore body or throat, the area occupied cos bi p bi
by the oil is ki 5 2 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (21)
sin bi 2 90
OF S DG
3
cos ua cos~ua 2 bi ! p ua 2 bi
Ao 5 r2w 2 21 2 Aw , If oil films are present in the corners of a pore body or throat, the
sin bi 2 90 oil conductance is found from Eq. 20, but with A w replaced by A o .
i51
This is an approximation because the geometry of the oil film is
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (14) different from that of a water AM.32
where A w is given by Eq. 13 and the sum includes only the corners
where oil films exist. The volume of water or oil is assumed to be
the fraction of the cross section occupied by the phase multiplied
by the total pore body or throat volume. The volume of trapped fluid
is computed by use of the capillary pressure at which the fluid was
first trapped. The overall saturation of each phase is found by
adding the volume of each phase in every pore body and throat and
dividing by the total pore volume of the network.
O J
qi, IJ 5 0, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (24)
where J runs over all the pore throats that are connected to Pore
Body I. Eqs. 22 through 24 give rise to a set of linear equations for
the pore body pressures. Fig. 9 —Standard deviation in local porosity for a reconstructed
The permeability of the network is computed by imposing a model and a micro-CT image of a Fontainebleau sandstone.
constant pressure gradient across the network and letting the system
relax by use of a conjugate gradient method to determine the pore
body pressures. From the pressure distribution, we calculate the
total flow rate and, thus, the permeability by use of Darcy’s law.
Relative permeabilities are computed similarly. At various stages
of the displacement, we compute the pressure drop in each phase
separately. The saturation and the total flow rate in each phase are
also calculated. Then, relative permeabilities may be determined
from Darcy’s law.
Because of the analogy between Poseuille’s law and Ohm’s law,
the flow of electrical current in the network is also described by
Eqs. 22 through 24, but with pressure replaced by voltage and
hydraulic conductance by electrical conductance. The electrical
conductance g e is assumed to depend only upon the geometry of the
pore body or throat (i.e., pore walls are insulating) and is given by
ge 5 sw A, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (25)
where s w 5 the electrical conductivity of the fluid that fills the pore
network. The electrical conductivity, s, of the pore network is
computed by applying a constant voltage drop across the network
and then applying Eq. 22 to find the flow of current between each
pore body. From this, one may calculate the total current and, thus,
the formation factor, F F 5 s w / s .
Results
Fontainebleau Sandstone. The sandstone reconstruction algo-
rithm was validated by comparing a reconstructed sample of Fig. 10 —Horizontal (top) and vertical (bottom) two-point corre-
Fontainebleau sandstone with microtomographic images of the lation functions for the Fontainebleau sandstone. Micro-CT im-
actual sample. Fig. 9 compares the standard deviation in local age (left), reconstructed model (right) (1 unit 5 7.5 mm).
porosity for the two samples. Local porosity distributions were
measured by means of a moving box technique with a logarithmic
increase in box size. This ensures that both local and global Thin-section analyses reveal that it is well sorted with an average
variations in porosity are captured. The model closely mimics the grain size of around 200 mm. The porosity and permeability,
actual sample, except at large box sizes, where the variation in however, vary widely. The variation in these properties is predom-
porosity is too small. This suggests that the reconstructed model inantly caused by variation in the volume of quartz cement over-
does not capture all the global heterogeneities that are present in the growth. On the basis of the reconstructed model, we generated
real sample. models with different porosities by varying the amount of quartz
The horizontal and vertical two-point correlation functions were cement overgrowth. The value of the cement growth exponent a
computed as a function of varying box size and distance, thus was 0.6 for all the models.
covering both local and global correlations. Fig. 10 shows these Fig. 11 compares the predicted permeability vs. porosity trend
correlation functions, which may be represented as 2D surfaces. with the experimental data of Bourbie and Zinszner.57 Although the
The correlation functions for the two samples are very similar. measured permeabilities span nearly five orders of magnitude, the
Statistical analysis shows that there is no significant differences predicted permeability vs. porosity trend is in good agreement with
within the level of noise we experience (1,000 replications for each the experimental one. Fig. 11 shows that there is a change in the
box size/distance combination). permeability vs. porosity trend at approximately 10 to 13% poros-
Bourbie and Zinszner57 performed extensive laboratory mea- ity. Our simulation results show that this corresponds to the porosity
surements of the hydraulic properties of Fontainebleau sandstone. at which quartz cement begins to close off pore throats. This
The Fontainebleau sandstone is an aeolan fine grained quartzite. increases the tortuosity of the medium, and the permeability de-
Parameter B1 B2 B3 R1 R2
Permeability
Porosity (md) Formation Factor
Conclusions
Fig. 13—Comparison between predicted and measured primary
drainage capillary pressure for the water-wet Bentheimer sand- 1. Petrographical data obtained from image analysis of 2D thin-
stone. sections are used to reconstruct model sandstones, which give a
realistic description of the complex microstructure exhibited in real
sandstones.
The experimentally determined S or for the reservoir rock is 5%. 2. Image analysis techniques are used to transform the recon-
From Fig. 15, this corresponds to f 5 0.85. Fig. 16 shows predicted structed pore space into a pore network that can be used as input
waterflood capillary pressure and relative permeability curves for to a network simulator.
this case. The simulated capillary pressure curve is in fair agree- 3. Predicted permeabilities and formation factors of a recon-
ment with the experimental data except at low oil saturations. At structed Fontainebleau sandstone model correspond well with pub-
low oil saturations, the simulated capillary pressure curve displays lished data over a wide range of porosity.
a sharper break than does the experimental data. This suggests that 4. Predicted primary drainage and waterflood relative perme-
the reconstructed sample has a narrower pore size distribution than ability curves for a water-wet Bentheimer sandstone are in good
the actual sample and that some of the smaller pores are not agreement with experimental data.
Acknowledgments 16. Bryant, S., King, P.R., and Mellor, D.W.: “Network Model Evaluation
The authors acknowledge Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap A/S (Sta- of Permeability and Spatial Correlation in a Real Random Sphere
toil) for granting permission to publish this paper. We are indebted Packing,” Transport in Porous Media (1993) 11, 53.
to Svein H. Midtlyng for performing the experimental work. We 17. Billiotte, J., De Moegen, H., and Øren, P.E.: “Experimental Micro-
also graciously thank David Stern, Exxon Research Production Co., Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Gas/Water Injection/With-
for providing us with the microtomography data. drawal Cycles as Applied to Underground Gas Storage Reservoir,” SPE
Advanced Technology Series (April 1993) 133.
References 18. McDougall, S.R. and Sorbie, K.S.: “The Combined Effect of Capillary
1. Fatt, I.: “The Network Model of Porous Media. I. Capillary Pressure and Viscous Forces on Waterflood-Displacement Efficiency in Finely
Characteristics,” Trans., AIME (1956) 207, 144. Laminated Porous Media,” paper SPE 26659 presented at the 1993 SPE
2. Fatt, I.: “The Network Model of Porous Media. II. Dynamic Properties Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 3–6 October.
of a Single Size Tube Network,” Trans., AIME (1956) 207, 160. 19. Blunt, M.J. and Scher, H.: “Pore Level Modelling of Wetting,” Physical
3. Fatt, I.: “The Network Model of Porous Media. III. Dynamic Properties Review E (December 1995) 52, 6387.
of Networks With Tube Radius Distribution,” Trans., AIME (1956) 207, 20. Øren, P.E. et al.: “Prediction of Relative Permeability and Capillary
164. Pressure From Pore-Scale Modelling,” Proc., European Conference on
4. Larson, R.G., Scriven, L.E., and Davis, H.T.: “Percolation Theory of the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Leoben, Austria (3–6 September
Two-Phase Flow in Porous Media,” Chemical Engineering Science 1996).
(1981) 36, 57. 21. Hazlett, R.D.: “Simulation of Capillary-Dominated Displacements in
5. Koplik, J.: “Creeping Flow in Two-Dimensional Networks,” J. Fluid Microtomographic Images of Reservoir Rocks,” Transport in Porous
Mechanics (1982) 119, 219. Media (1995) 20, 21.
6. Koplik, J. and Lasseter, T.J.: “Two-Phase Flow in Random Network 22. Dunsmuir, J.H. et al.: “X-Ray Microtomography: A New Tool for the
Models of Porous Media,” SPEJ (February 1985) 22, 89. Characterization of Porous Media,” paper SPE 22860 presented at the
7. Chan, D.Y.C. et al.: “Simulating Flow in Porous Media,” Physical 1991 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 6–9
Review A (1988) 38, 4106. October.
8. Touboul, E., Lenormand, R., and Zarcone, C.: “Immiscible Displace- 23. Coles, M.E. et al.: “Computed Microtomography of Reservoir Core
ments in Porous Media: Testing Network Models by Micromodel Ex- Samples,” Proc., Intl. SCA Meeting, Stavanger, Norway (12–14 Sep-
periments,” paper SPE 16954 presented at the 1987 SPE Annual Tech- tember 1994).
nical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 27–30 September.
24. Coles, M.E. et al.: “Developments in Synchroton X-Ray Microtomog-
9. Lenormand, R., Touboul, E., and Zarcone, C.: “Numerical Models and
raphy with Applications to Flow in Porous Media,” paper SPE 36531
Experiments on Immiscible Displacements in Porous Media,” J. Fluid
presented at the 1996 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibi-
Mechanics (1988) 189, 165.
tion, Denver, Colorado, 6–9 October.
10. Lenormand, R.: “Flow Through Porous Media: Limits of Fractal Pat-
25. Baldwin, C.A. et al.: “Determination and Characterization of the Struc-
terns,” Proc., Royal Society, London A (1989) 423, 159.
ture of a Pore Space from 3D Volume Images,” J. Colloid and Interface
11. Blunt, M.J. and King, P.R.: “Macroscopic Parameters From Simulation
Science (1996) 181, 79.
of Pore Scale Flow,” Physical Review A (1990) 42, 4780.
12. Jerauld, G.R. and Salter, S.J.: “The Effect of Pore-Structure on Hys- 26. Lin, C. and Cohen, M.H.: “Quantitative Methods of Microgeometric
teresis in Relative Permeability and Capillary Pressure: Pore-Level Modelling,” J. Applied Physics (1982) 53, 4152.
Modelling,” Transport in Porous Media (1990) 5, 103. 27. Holt, R. et al.: “Petrophysical Laboratory Measurements for Basin and
13. Blunt, M.J. and King, P.R.: “Relative Permeabilities From Two- and Reservoir Evaluation,” Marine and Petroleum Geology (1996) 13, No.
Three-Dimensional Pore-Scale Network Modelling,” Transport in Po- 4, 383.
rous Media (1991) 6, 407. 28. Dixit, A.B., McDougall, S.R., and Sorbie, K.S.: “A Pore-Level Inves-
14. Blunt, M.J., King, M., and Scher, H.: “Simulation and Theory of tigation of Relative Permeability Hysteresis in Water-Wet Systems,”
Two-Phase Flow in Porous Media,” Physical Review A (1992) 46, 7680. SPE Journal (June 1998) 115.
15. Bryant, S. and Blunt, M.J.: “Prediction of Relative Permeability in 29. McDougall, S.R. and Sorbie, K.S.: “The Impact of Wettability on
Simple Porous Media,” Physical Review A (1992) 46, No. 4, 2004. Waterflooding: Pore-Scale Simulation,” SPERE (August 1995) 208.
OF S DG
3
53. Princen, H.M.: “Capillary Phenomena in Assemblies of Parallel Cyl- cos ur cos~ur 1 bi ! p ur 1 bi
inders. III. Liquid Columns Between Horizontal Parallel Cylinders,” J. Aeff 5 A 2 r2d 2 12
Colloid and Interface Science (1970) 34, 171.
sin bi 2 90
i51
54. Kovscek, A.R., Wong, H., and Radke, C.J.: “A Pore-Level Scenario for
the Development of Mixed Wettability in Oil Reservoirs,” AIChE J. r2
5 2 r2d S1 , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (A-3)
(1993) 39, No. 6, 1072. 4G
O
2prd
3 corresponds to the limit when L eff 5 0. If u a . u a, max, the threshold
and Low 5 ~90 2 ur 2 bi ! 5 rd S3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (A-5) capillary pressure may be determined from Eqs. 5 or 8.
180
i51
In this case D is dependent only on u r and F d ( u r , G) is universal The event that actually takes place is the one occurring at the
for a particular G. highest capillary pressure. Because the hinging angle depends on
the prevailing capillary pressure, the above equation cannot be
Piston Type. If there is contact angle hysteresis, the threshold solved analytically. If u a . 908 2 b 1 , the curvatures of the AM’s
capillary pressure for piston type invasion during water injection is are negative and the threshold capillary pressure is given by
different from that during drainage. The invading interface enters Eq. 10 or 11.
the throat after the curvature is lowered sufficiently that u a is
reached. The oil/water interfaces of the AM’s in the throat remain
pinned at the position L b established at the end of the primary SI Metric Conversion Factors
drainage, i.e., bar 3 1.0* E105 5 Pa
cos~ur 1 bi ! cp 3 1.0* E203 5 Pazs
Lbi 5 rpd , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (A-10) °F (°F232)/1.8 5 °C
sin bi
*Conversion factors are exact. SPEJ
where r pd 5 g /P c, max and L bi 5 the distance between the pinned
contact line and the corner i. As the capillary pressure drops, the
hinging angle of the pinned AM’s adjusts to give the same curvature
as for the invading interface. Provided that u a is not too large, the Pål-Eric Øren is at Statoil Research Centre in Trondheim, Nor-
way. e-mail: peoe@statoil.com. His research interests include
invading interface meets these AM’s at zero contact angle. The
physics of multiphase flow in porous media and reservoir engi-
radius of curvature r pt of the AM’s may be calculated by equating neering. He holds a BS degree in chemical engineering from
r pt to A eff /L eff . The effective area A eff is given by Eq. A-3, but with the U. of Michigan and a PhD degree in petroleum engineering
r pt substituted for r d and u r replaced by the hinging angle from the U. of New South Wales. Øren served as a member of
S D
rpd the Annual Meeting Program Committee and has served on
uh, i 5 cos21 cos~ur 1 bi ! 2 bi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (A-11) Annual Meeting Technical Committees. Stig Bakke is a geolo-
rpt gist at Statoil Research Centre in Trondheim. e-mail
stiba@statoil.com. His research interests include microscale res-
The effective perimeter L eff is given by ervoir description, numerical modeling of geological pro-
S D
cesses, and 2D and 3D image analysis. Before joining Statoil, he
O O
3 3
r 2prpt worked at IKU in Trondheim. Bakke holds an MS degree in
Leff 5 cosua 22 Lbi 1 ai , . . . . . . . . . (A-12) geology from Norwegian Technical U. Ole Jacob Arntzen is a
2G 180
i51 i51 research scientist at Statoil Research Centre in Trondheim.
e-mail oja@statoil.com. His research interests include mul-
where the angle a i is given by tiphase flow in porous media, probability, and statistics. Be-