Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design and Fabrication of Indexing Drill Jig For Cylindrical Work Pieces
Design and Fabrication of Indexing Drill Jig For Cylindrical Work Pieces
A.ADITYA [14311A0360]
1|Page
SREENIDHI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE ANDTECHNOLOGY
Yamnampet, Ghatkesar, Hyderabad – 501 301
CERTIFICATE
DECLARATION
2|Page
We hereby declare that the project work entitled “DESIGN AND
FABRICATION OF INDEXING DRIL JIG FOR CYLINDRICAL
WORK PIECES” is an authenticated work carried out by us for the partial
fulfilment of the award of degree of BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY in
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING from Sreenidhi Institute of Science and
Technology (A) affiliated to JNTU-H
The content of this report, in full or parts have not been submitted
to any other institute or university for the award of any degree.
PLACE: Hyderabad
DATE:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
3|Page
The satisfaction and euphoria that accompany the successful completion
of any task would be incomplete without the mention of the people who made it
possible .We express our deepest sense of respect, gratitude and sincere thanks to
our guide Dr. D.KONDAYYA (Professor department of Mechanical engineering),
Sreenidhi institute of Science and Technology (A), R.R district for his
encouragement and advise for the successful completion of this project.
ABSTRACT
This project is about designing a work holding component called jig in order
to hold the cylindrical workpieces for mass production of drilling operations.
This design is obtained by making several considerations in drilling holes.
This abstract involves the definition of jig and types of jigs advantages
disadvantages of this indexing drill jig. The objective of this project is to hold
the cylindrical work pieces and drill holes which are 90 degrees to each other
and equidistant from one another.
5|Page
CONTENTS
Declaration 3
Acknowledgement 4
Abstract 5
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Objective of the project 9
1.2 What is jig. 9
1.3 Types of drill jigs
CHAPTER 2
CHAPTER 3
MODEL DESCRIPTION
CHAPTER-5
SIMULATION RESULTS
5.1 Results 23
5.2 Graphs 39
5.3 Contours 43
CHAPTER-6
CONCLUSION 49
CHAPTER-7
REFERENCES 51
7|Page
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF GRAPHS
8|Page
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION:
Q =-kA∇T
10 | P a g e
Where:
Q = heat flow, (W)
k = thermal conductivity (W/m K)
A = Cross sectional area in direction of heat flow. (m2)
∇T = Gradient of temperature (K/m) = (∂T/∂x) i + (∂T/∂y) j + (∂T/∂z) k
CONVECTION:
The transfer of heat between the solid surface and the liquid is called
as convection heat transfer. Let us considering a vessel of water being heated,
in this case heating of water due to transfer of heat from the vessel is
convection heat transfer.
Convection is explained by using Newtons laws of cooling.
NEWTON’S LAWS OF COOLING:
Q = h As ∆T
Where:
Q = heat flow (W)
h = heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)
As = Surface area from which convection is occurring. (m2)
∆T = =Ts − T∞ Temperature Difference between surface and coolant. (K)
11 | P a g e
RADIATION:
Radiation heat transfer involves the transfer of heat by
electromagnetic radiation that a rises due to the temperature of the body.
Radiation does not need matter.
STEFFAN BOLTZMAN LAW:
Emissive power of a surface:
E=σεTs4 (W/ m2)
Where:
ε = emissivity, which is a surface property (ε = 1 is black body)
σ = Steffan Boltzmann constant = 5.67 x 10-8 W/m2 K4.
Ts = Absolute temperature of the surface (K)
The above equation is derived from Stefan Boltzmann law, which describes a
gross heat emission rather than heat transfer. The expression for the actual
radiation heat transfer rate between surfaces having arbitrary orientations can
be quite complex, and will be dealt with in Module 9. However, the rate of
radiation heat exchange between a small surface and a large surrounding is
given by the following expression:
12 | P a g e
q = ε·σ·A (Ts4 – Tsur4)
Where:
ε = Surface Emissivity
A= Surface Area
Ts = Absolute temperature of surface. (K)
Tsur = Absolute temperature of surroundings. (K)
1.4 NANO-FLUIDS
What is nano fluid?
A nanofluid is a fluid containing nanometre-sized particles,
called nano particles. These fluids are engineered colloidal suspensions of
nanoparticles in a base fluid. The nanoparticles used in nano fluids are
typically made of metals, oxides, carbides, or carbon nano tubes. Common
base fluids include water, ethylene glycol and oil.
Nano fluids have novel properties that make them potentially useful in
many applications in heat transfer, including microelectronics, fuel cells,
pharmaceutical processes, and hybrid-powered engines, engine cooling/vehicle
thermal management, domestic refrigerator, chiller, heat exchanger, in grinding,
machining and in boiler flue gas temperature reduction. They exhibit
enhanced thermal conductivity and the convective heat transfer
coefficient compared to the base fluid. Knowledge of the rheological behavior of
nano-fluids is found to be critical in deciding their suitability for convective heat
transfer applications. Nano-fluids also have special acoustical properties and in
ultrasonic fields display additional shear-wave reconversion of an incident
compression wave; the effect becomes more pronounced as concentration
increases.
In analysis such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD), nano-fluids can
be assumed to be single phase fluids; however, almost all new academic papers use
a two-phase assumption. Classical theory of single phase fluids can be applied,
13 | P a g e
where physical properties of nano-fluid are taken as a function of properties of
both constituents and their concentrations. An alternative approach simulates nano-
fluids using a two-component model.
The spreading of a nano-fluid droplet is enhanced by the solid-like
ordering structure of nano particles assembled near the contact line by diffusion,
which gives rise to a structural disjoining pressure in the vicinity of the contact
line. However, such enhancement is not observed for small droplets with diameter
of nanometer scale, because the wetting time scale is much smaller than the
diffusion time scale.
In this work, a two-phase mixture approach is utilized to examine the
influence of nano additive shape on the fluid flow and heat transfer aspects of γ-
AlOOH nano-fluid flowing through a twisted oval tube. The γ-AlOOH (boehmite
alumina) nano additives of various shapes (i.e. cylindrical, brick, blade, and
platelet) are dispersed in water as the base fluid. The influence of the Reynolds
number and nano additive volume fraction on the nusselt number, pressure drop is
numerically studied for different nano additive shapes. It is revealed that, among
the considered nano additive shapes, the platelet shape represents the highest heat
transfer performance, while the worst performance belongs to the brick shape nano
additives.
In addition, the findings reveal that for all states, enhancing the Reynolds
number intensifies the nusselt number, pressure drop, and of the γ-AlOOH nano-
fluid. Moreover, it is found that boosting the nano additive fraction leads to an
enhancement in the nusselt number and of the examined nano-fluids. Furthermore,
the pressure drop of all the considered nano-fluids enhances with augmenting the
Reynolds number.
14 | P a g e
CHAPTER-2
PREVIOUS STUDIES
2.1 EIAMSA-ARD ET AL
Eiamsa-ard et al. studied the influence of three-start spirally twisted
tube combined with triple channel twisted tube insert on heat transfer
enhancement, pressure loss and thermal performance behaviours with Reynolds
number of 4000–20,000. Their results indicated that heat transfer and friction
factor increased with tape width ratio. They also found that the thermal
performance increased with decreasing Reynolds number.
2.2 TANG ET AL
Tang et al. investigated the influence of geometrical parameters on
heat transfer performance and flow characteristics of twisted tri-lobed tube and
twisted oval tube with Reynolds number of 8000–21,000. Their results showed
that twisted tri-lobed tube provided better heat transfer performance and higher
friction factor than twisted oval tube, and the heat transfer performance and
friction factor increased with the reduction of twisted pitch. They also found
that the heat transfer enhancement of twisted tri-lobed tubes was attributed to
the helical flow and secondary flow induced by twisted carved tube wall.
2.3 BHADOURIYA ET AL
Bhadouriya et al. studied heat transfer and friction factor
characteristics of air flow inside twisted square duct with Reynolds number of
600–70,000. Their results indicated that the maximum value for product of
friction factor and Reynolds number was observed for a twisted ratio of 2.5 and
a Reynolds number of 3000. They also revealed that twisted duct performed
well in laminar and also to some extent in turbulent flow region due to strong
presence of secondary flow.
2.4 SAJADI ET AL
Sajadi et al. investigated the heat transfer and flow resistance of
oil flow in alternating elliptical axis tubes. The working fluid was heat transfer
oil, and the flow’s Reynolds number ranged from 300 to 2000. Their results
indicated that decreasing the flattening and pitch length, increased heat transfer
15 | P a g e
and flow resistance. Moreover, Sajadi et al. proposed new tube geometry called
alternating flattened tube and experimentally and numerically studied the heat
transfer and flow resistance of alternating flattened tube. Their results revealed
that the Alternating flattened tube had the best performance among the studied
tube sand could be an advantageous alternative for circular tube. The work of
Tan on twisted tube is an example of a comprehensive study of an enhancement
technique in turbulent flows for a wide range of flow conditions. They studied
convective heat transfer and fluid flow in twisted oval tubes. Their results
showed that the heat transfer coefficient and friction factor both increased with
the increasing of axis ratio, while both decreased with the increase of twisted
pitch length. They also found that the synergy angle between velocity vector
and temperature gradient was reduced and the heat transfer process was
enhanced.
2.5 HE ET AL
He et al. numerically investigated heat transfer enhancement and
pressure loss penalty for fin-and-tube heat exchangers with rectangular winglet
pairs in a relatively low Reynolds number flow. Their results revealed that the
rectangular winglet pairs could significantly improve the heat transfer
performance of the fin and tube heat exchangers with a moderate pressure loss
penalty.
2.6 ZHANGET AL
Zhan get al. studied the heat transfer characteristics of steam
condensation on horizontal twisted elliptical tubes with different structural
parameters. Their results indicated that the condensation heat transfer
coefficients for all the tubes reduced with increase of wall sub cooling, while
the enhancement factor of each twisted elliptical tube was almost constant.
They also found that a smaller twist pitch led to a lower condensation heat
transfer coefficient.
2.7 JUNLIN CHENG, ZUOQIN QIAN, QIANG WANG
Junlin Cheng , Zuoqin Qian, Qiang Wang studied heat transfer
characteristics of water flow inside twisted oval tube (TOT) for Reynolds number
in the range of 50–2000 by employing the low Reynolds k-e model. Their results
16 | P a g e
revealed that twisted oval performs better when compared to smooth circular and
smooth oval tube.
Graph-1 Graph-2
Above shown graphs is Junlin Cheng, Zuoqin Qian, Qiang Wang studies.
One of the key findings of their studies was laminar to turbulent conversion point which
was found at Reynolds number 500. Flow is in laminar when the Reynolds number
ranges from 50-250, flow is in transition state when the Reynolds number ranges from
250-500 and the flow is in turbulent state when the Reynolds number ranges from 500-
2000.
Based their results they suggested formulas for nusselt number and friction factor
for twisted oval tube in low Reynolds number region.
The above mentioned formulas are suggested by Junlin Cheng, Zuoqin Qian, and
Qiang Wang which are valid only when the flow is laminar.
17 | P a g e
CHAPTER-3
MODEL DESCRIPTION
The present work deals mainly with thermal performance and heat transfer
enhancement of twisted tube in the low Reynolds number ranging from 50 to 2000.
(1) To measure the heat transfer and flow resistance of twisted oval tubes of low
Reynolds number flow;
(2) To measure the transition point from laminar flow to turbulence flow;
(3) To understand heat transfer mechanism by giving the local distribution of velocity
and temperature.
18 | P a g e
Fig.1 Detail view of twisted oval tube.
(a) Cross section;
(b) iso-view of tube.
3.2 MATHEMATIC MODEL AND BOUNDARY CONDITIONS:
The working fluid is assumed incompressible fluid and physical
parameters are constant. The model governing equations in Cartesian
coordinate of fully development turbulence fluid flow as follows:
𝜕𝜌 𝜕(𝜌𝑢𝑗 )
Continuity equation: + =0 (1)
𝜕𝑡 𝜕𝑥𝑗
19 | P a g e
Where
𝜌 Is the density
𝜇 Is the dynamic viscosity and
𝜆 Is the thermal conductivity
Two-equation model is one of the most widely used turbulence models,
which mainly includes the high Reynolds k-𝜀 model, the RNG k-𝜀 model, and
the realizable k-𝜀 model, etc. The high Reynolds k-𝜀 model is also known as
the standard-𝜀 model.The high Reynolds k-e model is created for fully
developed turbulent flow of high Reynolds number. The governing equations
of the high Reynolds k-𝜀 model as follows:
The k equation of high k-𝜀model:
𝜕𝑘 𝜕(𝑢𝑖 𝑘) 𝜕 𝜇 𝜕𝑘 𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑢𝑗
𝜌
𝜕𝑡
+𝜌
𝜕𝑥𝑗
=
𝜕𝑥𝑗
[(𝜇 + 𝜎𝑡 ) 𝜕𝑥 ] + 𝜂𝑡 𝜕𝑥 𝑖 (𝜕𝑥 𝑖 + 𝜕𝑥 ) − 𝜌𝜀 (4)
𝑘 𝑗 𝑗 𝑗 𝑖
𝑘2
Where 𝜇𝑡 = 𝑐𝜇 𝜌 , C1= 1.44, C2 = 1.92, Cμ = 0.09, 𝜎𝑘 = 1.0, 𝜎𝜀 = 1.3.
𝜀
Where
𝑘2
𝜇𝑡 = 𝐶𝜇 𝑓𝜇 𝜌 (8)
𝜀
𝑓1 = 1.0 (9)
𝑓2 = 1.0 − 0.3 exp(−𝑅2 ) (10)
2.5
𝑓𝜇 = exp[− 𝑅 ] (11)
(1+ }
50
21 | P a g e
Outlet boundary conditions:
𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑣 𝜕𝑤 𝜕𝑇
= = =0, = 0, 𝑝 = 0 (13)
𝜕𝑧 𝜕𝑧 𝜕𝑧 𝜕𝑧
22 | P a g e
Fig.2 Detail view of computational mesh of twisted oval tube.
ℎ 𝐷ℎ
Nu = (16)
𝜆
∆𝑝
f = 𝜌 𝑣𝑚 2 𝐿 (17)
2 𝐷ℎ
Where Dh is the hydraulic diameter, Vi is the inlet velocity and Vm is the mean
velocity in the minimum flow cross-section of the flow channel. Δ𝑝 Is the
pressure drop, h is the heat transfer coefficient,𝜆 is the fluid thermal
conductivity and 𝜇 is the fluid dynamicviscosity.
The mean temperature and pressure of a cross-section are defined as:
𝑇̅ = ∬𝐴 𝑢𝑇𝑑𝐴 / ∬𝐴 𝑢𝑑𝐴 (18)
24 | P a g e
𝑝̅ = ∬𝐴 𝑝𝑑𝐴 / ∬𝐴 𝑑𝐴 (19)
As the pressure dropΔ𝑝, the total heat transfer Q, the logarithmic mean
temperature difference Δ𝑇 and the heat transfer coefficienth are defined as:
∆𝑝 = ̅̅̅̅
𝑝𝑖𝑛 − ̅̅̅̅̅̅
𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑡 (20)
̅̅̅̅̅
Q = 𝑚̇𝑐𝑝 (𝑇 ̅̅̅̅
𝑜𝑢𝑡 − 𝑇𝑖𝑛 ) (21)
(𝑇𝑤 −𝑇̅𝑖𝑛 )−(𝑇𝑤 −𝑇̅𝑜𝑢𝑡 )
∆𝑇 = (22)
ln[(𝑇𝑤 −𝑇̅𝑖𝑛 )/(𝑇𝑤 −𝑇̅𝑜𝑢𝑡 )]
𝑄
h= (23)
𝐴ℎ𝑡 ∆𝑇
Where 𝑚̇ is the inlet mass flow rate, Aht is the area of heated wall.
25 | P a g e
CHAPTER-4
ANSYS CFD PROCEDURE
Fig.5
26 | P a g e
ANSYS Workbench with a New Fluent-Based Fluid Flow Analysis System
Fig.6
For the geometry of your fluid flow analysis, you can create geometry in ANSYS
Design Modeler, or import the appropriate geometry file
Fig.7
Files->import external geometry->select external geometry->generate
27 | P a g e
Fig .8
Close geometry.
Fig 9
In order to simplify your work later on in ANSYS Fluent, you should label
each boundary in the geometry by creating named selections for the pipe inlets, the
outlet, and the symmetry surface (the outer wall boundaries are automatically
detected by ANSYS Fluent).
28 | P a g e
Fig.10
Fig.11
General-> check->ok
29 | P a g e
General
Check mesh
Domain Extents:
X-coordinate: min (m) = -2.000000e-01, max (m) = 2.000000e-01
Y-coordinate: min (m) = -2.250000e-01, max (m) = 2.000000e-01
Z-coordinate: min (m) = 0.000000e+00, max (m) = 5.000000e-02
Volume statistics:
Minimum volume (m3): 1.144763e-10
Maximum volume (m3): 5.871098e-08
Total volume (m3): 2.511309e-03
Face area statistics:
Minimum face area (m2): 2.051494e-07
Maximum face area (m2): 3.429518e-05
Checking mesh..........................
Done.
Fig.12
Models
Energy ->ON
30 | P a g e
Fig.13
Fig.14
Materials-> Water
31 | P a g e
Fig.15
Fig.16
Solution Initialization
32 | P a g e
Fig.17
Run calculation
Fig.18
33 | P a g e
CHAPTER-5
SIMULATION RESULTS
In order to validate the independent of the numerical results on the grid
system, five different grid systems from very coarse mesh to very fine mesh of
twisted oval tube are investigated. It can be observed that the relative difference of
Nusselt number and friction factor both decrease with the increasing of total
element number. The relative difference between fine mesh and very mesh is much
smaller than the difference between coarse mesh and very coarse mesh. The
difference of the averaged Nu number is less than 3% among the five grid systems,
and the difference of the friction factor is less than 10%. It means that any further
increase of in the number of grids will not influence the numerical results
significantly. Therefore, the grid system of 189644 cells is chosen in numerical
simulation. Similar grid independence tests are also conducted for other cases. In
order to have a reliable grid, the velocity and the thermal boundary layers have to
be captured by the grid. According to the fluent user’s guide, the value of non-
dimensional y+ parameter should be less than one. In the present work, the value
of y+ varies from 0.021 at Re = 50 to 0.536 at Re = 2000, and the distance of the
nearest node to the tube’s wall is 0.048 mm. It reveals that the grid captures the
velocity boundary layer. To investigate the grid captures the thermal boundary
layer; the local convection coefficient and the Nusselt number are calculated and
compared with to those of the smaller grids. Preliminary tests show that the local
convection coefficient and the Nusselt number remain constant with the refinement
of the grid.
5.1 RESULTS
In this twisted oval tube, smooth oval tube and smooth circular tube are
investigated to study heat transfer enhancement characteristics of twisted oval tube.
Geometrical parameters of the studied tubes are illustrated in table.2. The cross
sections of twisted oval tube and smooth oval tube are the same pattern. The major
axis and minor axis of the cross section are 24.4 mm and 15 mm, respectively. The
twisted pitch length is 200 mm. The diameter of the smooth circular tube is 17.44
mm. The cross sectional areas of these studied tubes are the same. The length of
heated tube is 600 mm.
34 | P a g e
Table-2.
The heat transfer performance of the twisted oval tube and the smooth
oval tube are studied by using a computational fluid dynamics code (Fluent).
Moreover, the heat transfer performance is compared to those of smooth circular
tube. The Reynolds number based on the hydraulic diameter ranges from 50 to
2000.
Graph-1 presents the comparison of heat transfer and fig.20 presents flow
resistance between smooth and twisted tubes at low Reynolds number flow.Graph-
1(a) illustrates the relation between Nusselt number and Reynolds number of
twisted oval tube, smooth oval tube and smooth circular tube for nano fluids and
graph-1(b) illustrates for water. It can be seen clearly in graph-1(a) and graph-1(b)
that the Nusselt number trends of three type tubes is accordant. The Nusselt
number increases with the increasing of the Reynolds number. Moreover, the
correlation of the Nusselt number and Reynolds number is linear with the
Reynolds number of 750–2000. In addition, the Nusselt number of twisted oval
tube is larger than that of the smooth oval tube at the same Reynolds number,
which means the heat transfer capacity of twisted oval tube has been enhanced
compared to the smooth oval tube. What’s more, the larger the Reynolds number
is, the larger difference of the Nusselt number between twisted oval tube and
smooth oval tube is. The Nusselt number of smooth circular tube is smallest.
35 | P a g e
30
25
20
15 oval
ellipse
10 circle
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Graph-1(a) Reynolds number vs. Nusselt number comparison for nano fluids
25
20
15
oval
10 ellipse
circle
5
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
36 | P a g e
Graph-2 shows the connection between the friction factor and the Reynolds
number of twisted tubes for both water and nano fluids. The friction factor of
twisted tubes trends are the same. With the Reynolds number increased from 50 to
400, the friction factor decreases. But the friction factor increases when the
Reynolds number increases from 400 to 550 then decreases and again increases
from 600 to 700. When the Reynolds number comes to the range of 700–2000, the
friction factor decreases again. The change rule of friction factor interpreted above
shows that in the low Reynolds model discussed in this article, the fluid is in
laminar flow when the Reynolds number is in the range of 50–400. When the
Reynolds number is range of 400–700, the fluid is in the transition states from
laminar flow to turbulent flow. While the fluid is in turbulent flow when the
Reynolds number comes to 700–2000. Just like the Nusselt number, at the same
Reynolds number, the friction factor of twisted tube is larger than that of the
smooth tube, and the difference of friction factor between twisted and smooth
tubes becomes larger with the Reynolds number increased for nano fluids.
The friction factor of twisted tubes trends are the same. With the
Reynolds number increased from 50 to 400, the friction factor decreases. But the
friction factor increases when the Reynolds number is 1000 then decreases and for
water. When the Reynolds number comes to the range of 1000–2000, the friction
factor decreases. The change rule of friction factor interpreted above shows that in
the low Reynolds model discussed in this article, the fluid is in laminar flow when
the Reynolds number is in the range of 1000–400. When the Reynolds number is
of 1000, the fluid is in the transition states from laminar flow to turbulent flow.
While the fluid is in turbulent flow when the Reynolds number comes to 1000–
2000. Just like the Nusselt number, at the same Reynolds number, the friction
factor of twisted tube is larger than that of the smooth tube, and the difference of
friction factor between twisted and smooth tubes becomes larger with the Reynolds
number increased.
37 | P a g e
COMPARISION OF FRICTION FACTOR FOR TWISTED OVAL
TUBES
REYNOLDS NUMBER VS FRICTION FACTOR
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.05
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Graph-2 Reynolds number vs. Nusselt number for water and nano fluids
38 | P a g e
5.2 GRAPHS
Graph-3 shows the comparison of Reynolds number vs. temperature for nano
fluids
320
318
316
314 Series1
Series2
312
Series3
310
308
306
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
39 | P a g e
Graph-4 shows the comparison of Reynolds number vs. temperature for water
322
320
318
316
Series1
314
Series2
312 Series3
310
308
306
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
40 | P a g e
Graph-5 shows the comparison of Reynolds number vs. pressure comparison for
nano fluids
45
40
35
30
25 Series1
20 Series2
15 Series3
10
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
41 | P a g e
Graph-6 shows the comparison of Reynolds number vs. pressure comparison for
water
60
50
40
Series1
30
Series2
20 Series3
10
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
42 | P a g e
5.3 CONTOURS
FOR TWISTED OVAL TUBE NANO FLUIDS
PRESSURE
Re 250
Re 450
Re 1000
Pressure distributions on the middle cross-section of twisted with different
Reynolds numbers at z = 0.39 m.
43 | P a g e
TEMPERATURE
Re-250
Re-450
Re-1000
44 | P a g e
VELOCITY
Re-250
Re-450
Re-1000
Secondary flow distributions on the middle cross-section of twisted oval tube with
different Reynolds numbers at z = 0.39 m
45 | P a g e
VELOCITY DISTRIBUTIONS AND STREAMLINES
Re-250
Re-450
46 | P a g e
Re-1000
47 | P a g e
CHAPTER-6
CONCLUSION
It can be concluded that compared with smooth tubes the heat transfer
performance of twisted oval tube has been enhanced but also with an increase of
pressure drop. Moreover, the larger the Re is, the larger difference of the Nusselt
number and friction factor between twisted oval tube and smooth tube is. The
numerical results indicate that in low Reynolds model, the fluid flow inside the
twisted oval tube is in laminar states for Re in the range of 50–400, and the fluid is
in the transition states from laminar flow to turbulent flow with the Re ranged of
450-700, while the fluid is in turbulent flow when the Re comes to 700– 2000. The
transition point is located at Re = 400 and 700 for nano fluids.
48 | P a g e
This can be explained that the secondary flow is generated in twisted oval tube and
the angle between the velocity vector and temperature gradient is reduced,
therefore the heat transfer process of twisted oval tube is enhanced.
From the above mentioned results it is observed that twisted oval tube
performs better when compared to other smooth tubes.
When it comes to fluid water shows more laminar range when compared
to nano-fluids but shows less heat transfer rate.
49 | P a g e
CHAPTER-7
REFERENCES
[1] A.S. Dalkilic, S. Wongwises, Intensive literature review of condensation inside
smooth and enhanced tubes, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 52 (2009) 3409–3426.
[2] X.H. Tan, D.S. Zhu, G.Y. Zhou, 3D numerical simulation on the shell side heat
transfer and pressure drop performances of twisted oval tube heat exchanger, Int. J.
Heat Mass Transf. 65 (2013) 244–253.
[3] P.G. Vicente, A. Garcia, A. Viedma, Experimental study of mixed convection
and pressure drop in helically dimpled tubes for laminar and transition flow, Int. J.
Heat Mass Transf. 45 (2002) 5091–5105.
[4] C.Z. Man, J.Y. Yao, C. Wang, The experimental study on the heat transfer and
friction factor characteristics in tube with a new kind of twisted tape insert, Int.
Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 75 (2016) 124–129.
[5] S. Eiamsa-ard, P. Promthaisong, Influence of three-start spirally twisted tube
combined with triple-channel twisted tape insert on heat transfer enhancement,
Chem. Eng. Process. 102 (2016) 117–129.
[6] J.A. Zambaux, J.L. Harion, S. Russeil, The effect of successive alternating wall
deformation on the performance of an annular heat exchanger, Appl. Therm. Eng.
90 (2015) 286–295.
[7] X.Y. Tang, X.F. Dai, D.S. Zhu, Experimental and numerical investigation of
convective heat transfer and fluid flow in twisted spiral tube, Int. J. Heat Mass
Transf. 90 (2015) 523–541.
[8] R. Bhadouriya, A. Agrawal, S.V. Prabhu, Experimental and numerical study of
fluid flow and heat transfer in a twisted square duct, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 82
(2015) 143–158.
[9] A.R. Sajadi, D. Ashtiani, F. Kowsari, Experimental and numerical study on
heat transfer and flow resistance of oil flow in alternating elliptical axis tubes, Int.
J. Heat Mass Transf. 77 (2014) 124–130.
[10] A.R. Sajadi, F. Kowsary, M.A. Bijarchi, S.Y.D. Sorkhabi, Experimental and
numerical study on heat transfer, flow resistance, and compactness of
alternatingflattened tubes, Appl. Therm. Eng. 108 (2016) 740–750.
[11] X.H. Tan, D.S. Zhu, G.Y. Zhou, Experimental and numerical study of
convective heat transfer and fluid flow in twisted oval tubes, Int. J. Heat Mass
Transf. 55 (17–18) (2012) 4701–4710.
50 | P a g e
[12] Y.L. He, P. Chu, W.Q. Tao, Analysis of heat transfer and pressure drop for
finand- tube heat exchangers with rectangular winglet-type vortex generators,
Appl. Therm. Eng. 61 (2) (2013) 770–783.
[13] L. Zhang, S. Yang, H. Xu, Experimental study on condensation heat transfer
characteristics of steam on horizontal twisted elliptical tubes, Appl. Energy 97
(2012) 881–887.
[14] K. Li, T. Li, H. Tao, Numerical investigation of flow and heat transfer
performance of solar water heater with elliptical collector tube, Energy Proc. 70
(2015) 285–292.
[15] M.K. Aliabadi, Z. Arani, F. Rahimpour, Influence of Al2O3-H2O nanofluid
on performance of twisted minichannels, Adv. Power Technol. 27 (2016) 1514
1525.
[16] W.P. Jones, B.E. Launder, The prediction of laminarization with a two-
equation model of turbulence, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 15 (1972) 301–314.
[17] W.P. Jones, B.E. Launder, The calculation of low-Reynolds-number
phenomena with a two-equation model of turbulence, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 16
(6) (1973) 1119–1130.
[18] B.E. Launder, B.I. Sharma, Application of the energy-dissipation model of
turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc, Lett. Heat Mass
Transf. 1 (1974) 131–138.
[19] S. Gorji, M. Seddighi, C. Ariyaratne, A comparative study of turbulence
models in a transient channel flow, Comput. Fluids 89 (2014) 111–123.
[20] S.J. Wang, A.S. Mujumdar, A comparative study of five low Reynolds
number ke models for impingement heat transfer, Appl. Therm. Eng. 25 (2005)
31–44.
[21] Altair Engineering Inc., HyperMesh, Version 13.0, Troy, MI, 2010.
[22] ANSYS Inc., Fluent, Version 6.3, Southpointe, Canonsburg, PA, USA, 2009.
[23] S. Yang, L. Zhang, H. Xu, Experimental study on convective heat transfer and
flow resistance characteristics of water flow in twisted elliptical tubes, Appl.
Therm. Eng. 31 (14–15) (2011) 2981–2991.
[24] E.N. Sieder, G.E. Tate, Heat transfer and pressure drop of liquids in tubes,
Ind. Eng. Chem. 28 (1936) 1429–1435.
[25] T. Haktanır, M. Ardıçlıog˘lu, Numerical modeling of Darcy-Weisbach friction
factor and branching pipes problem, Adv. Eng. Softw. 35 (12) (2004) 773–779.
51 | P a g e
[26] R.L. Webb, N.H. Kim, Principle of Enhanced Heat Transfer, second ed.,
Taylor and Francis Group, New York, 2005.
[27] Z.Y. Guo, D.Y. Li, B.X. Wang, A novel concept for convective heat transfer
enhancement, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 41 (14) (1998) 2221–2225.
[28] W.Q. Tao, Z.Y. Guo, B.X. Wang, Field synergy principle for enhancing
convective heat transfer-its extension and numerical verifications, Int. J. Heat Mass
Transf. 45 (2002) 3849–3856.
[29] Z.Y. Guo, W.Q. Tao, R.K. Shah, The field synergy (coordination) principle
and its applications in enhancing single phase convective heat transfer, Int. J. Heat
Mass Transf. 48 (9) (2005) 1797–1807.
52 | P a g e