2 Planetary Time Scale 2016 A Concise Geologic Time Scale

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

2

PLANETARY TIME SCALE


K.L. Tanaka1, W.K. Hartmann2
1U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ, United States; 2Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ, United States

Northern part of the western hemisphere of Mars. Left half shows a color elevation, shaded-relief view highlighting
the immense volcanic shields of the Tharsis rise. Right half shows a true-color view of the vast Valles Marineris and
Kasei Valles canyon systems, which connect to the dark basin of Chryse Planitia at upper right. From Tanaka et al., 2014;
Image data from National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

Introduction definition of chronologic units. The following


summary is mainly reproduced from Tanaka
Formal stratigraphic systems have been and Hartmann (2008, 2012).
developed for the surfaces of Earth’s Moon, Relative ages of these units in most cases
Mars, and Mercury (Fig. 2.1). The time scales can be confirmed using size–frequency dis-
are based on regional and global geologic tributions and superposed craters. For the
mapping, which establishes relative ages of Moon, the chronologic units and cratering
surfaces delineated by superposition, trans- record are constrained by radiometric ages
action, morphology, and other relations and measured from samples collected from the
features. Referent map units are used to define lunar surface. This allows a calibration of the
the commencement of events and periods for areal density of craters versus age, which
A Concise Geologic Time Scale. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59467-9.00002-9
Copyright © 2016 James G. Ogg, Gabi M. Ogg, and Felix M. Gradstein. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 9
10  Chapter 2  PLANETARY TIME SCALE

$JH
0D
(DUWK $JH
0D
0RRQ
 &HQR]RLF
3KDQHUR]RLF

&UDWHU7\FKRIRUPHGE\

0HVR]RLF PHWHRULWHLPSDFW

 3DOHR]RLF )LUVWDSSHDUDQFHRI/DQG$QLPDOV


DPSKLELDQVDWa0D

(GLDFDUDQ )LUVWDSSHDUDQFHRI0HWD]RDQV
SURWHUR]RLF SURWHUR]RLF


&U\RJHQLDQ PXOWLFHOODQLPDOVDWa0D
1HR

 &RSHUQLFDQ &UDWHU&RSHUQLFXVIRUPHGE\


7RQLDQ 3HULRG PHWHRULWHLPSDFW
  3UHVHUYDWLRQRIEULJKWUD\HG
6WHQLDQ FUDWHUV

0HVR

(FWDVLDQ
3URWHUR]RLF

 &RSHUQLFXV
&UDWHU
&DO\PPLDQ

6WDWKHULDQ
3DOHRSURWHUR]RLF



2URVLULDQ
 
)LUVW(XNDU\RWHV FRPSOH[
5K\DFLDQ VLQJOHFHOORUJDQLVPVDWa0D


<RXQJHUPDUHEDVDOW
 6LGHULDQ *UHDW2[LGDWLRQHYHQW 0D (UDWRVWKHQLDQ HPSODFHPHQW
3HULRG
DUFKHDQ DUFKHDQ DUFKHDQ DUFKHDQ


3DOHR 0HVR 1HR

 6XUJHLQFRQWLQHQWIRUPDWLRQ
a0D &UDWHU(UDWRVWKHQHVIRUPHGE\
  PHWHRULWHLPSDFW


,PEULDQ3HULRG

 /DWH,PEULDQ
$UFKHDQ

$SSHDUDQFHRIODUJH&\DQREDFWHULD 2OGHUPDUHEDVDOW
PDWV VWURPDWROLWHVRIa0D (SRFK HPSODFHPHQW

(R

 (DUO\,PEULDQ(SRFK )RUPDWLRQRI,PEULXPDQG


2ULHQWDOHEDVLQVE\JLDQWLPSDFWV
1HFWDULDQ3HULRG
 $FDVWD*QHLVVRI0D 
,QWHQVHPHWHRULWHERPEDUGPHQW
/DWH+HDY\%RPEDUGPHQWRILQQHU IRUPDWLRQRILPSDFWFUDWHUV

VRODUV\VWHPE\PHWHRULWHV a0D  LQFOXGLQJGR]HQVRIEDVLQV
+DGHDQ !NPLQGLDPHWHU
LQIRUPDO (DUWK¶VROGHVWUHF\FOHGPLQHUDOJUDLQV SUH1HFWDULDQ

]LUFRQVRI0D 0RRQIRUPHGSUREDEO\IURPGHEULV
 (DUWKIRUPHGIURPVRODUQHEXOD MHWWHGLQWRRUELWE\FRORVVDOLPSDFW
RID0DUVVL]HGERG\ZLWK(DUWK

Figure 2.1  (Continued)


Chapter 2  PLANETARY TIME SCALE   11

$JH
0D
0DUV $JH
0D
9HQXV

/DWH )RUPDWLRQRISRODUOD\HUHGGHSRVLWV
 $PD]RQLDQ <RXQJHVWYROFDQLVPLQ7KDUVLVDQG 9ROFDQLFUHVXUIDFLQJDQG
(O\VLXPUHJLRQV H[WHQVLYHWHFWRQLVP
(SRFK


$YHUDJHVXUIDFHDJH


7HVVHUDWHUUDLQVIRUP

0LGGOH &RQWLQXHGYROFDQLVPLQ7KDUVLV 9HQXV
$PD]RQLDQ DQG(O\VLXPUHJLRQV

0HUFXU\
$PD]RQLDQ3HULRG

  7KHHDUOLHUKLVWRU\RI9HQXV


(SRFK ZDVFRPSOHWHO\HUDVHGE\
ODWHUYROFDQLVP



.XLSHULDQ
 3HULRG
3UHVHUYDWLRQRIUD\HG
 FUDWHUV

(DUO\
 
$PD]RQLDQ
&RQWLQXHGDFWLYLW\RI7KDUVLV
 (SRFK YROFDQRHVDQGHPSODFHPHQWRI
0HGXVDH)RVVDHPDWHULDOV
 0DQVXULDQ
:LGHVSUHDGLQILOOLQJDQGUHZRUNLQJ 3HULRG
 RIQRUWKHUQORZODQGV
&KU\VHRXWIORZFKDQQHOGLVVHFWLRQ
(O\VLXPULVHYROFDQLVP
+HVSHULDQ3HULRG

 0HUFXU\
/DWH +LJKODQGSDWHUDHYROFDQLVP
 +HVSHULDQ 

(SRFK &HVVDWLRQRIODYDSODLQV
 HPSODFHPHQW
+LJKODQGORZODQGERXQGDU\
GHJUDGDWLRQ

(+HVSHULDQ(SRFK 0DMRUULIWLQJLQ9DOOHV0DULQHULV
1RFWLV/DE\ULQWKLV &DORULDQ3HULRG /DYDSODLQVHPSODFHPHQW

:LGHVSUHDGYDOOH\QHWZRUN
/1RDFKLDQ(SRFK
1RDFKLDQ3HULRG

IRUPDWLRQ
 (DUO\JURZWKRIWKH7KDUVLVULVH )RUPDWLRQRI&DORULVEDVLQ
01RDFKLDQ(SRFK
,QWHQVHPHWHRULWHERPEDUGPHQW IRUPDWLRQ 7ROVWRMDQ3HULRG ,QWHQVHPHWHRULWHERPEDUG
 RILPSDFWFUDWHUVLQFOXGLQJ+HOODVDQG  PHQWDQGIRUPDWLRQRILPSDFW
(1RDFKLDQ(SRFK $UJ\UHEDVLQV FUDWHUVDQGEDVLQV
)RUPDWLRQRIQRUWKHUQORZODQGV


'\QDPRDFWLYHDQGJHRPDJQHWLF SUH7ROVWRMDQ
 SUH1RDFKLDQ ILHOGSUHVHQW

 0DUVIRUPHGIURPVRODUQHEXOD 0HUFXU\9HQXVIRUPHGIURP


VRODUQHEXOD

Figure 2.1  Planetary time scale with selected major events.  Thick dashed line separates the Venus and Mercury
time scales. Diagram revised by G. Ogg from Tanaka and Hartmann (2012).
12  Chapter 2  PLANETARY TIME SCALE

permits model ages to be measured from cra- orbits of asteroids indicate that they have
ter data for other lunar surface units. Model been the prime contributor to the lunar cra-
ages for other cratered planetary surfaces are tering record.
constructed by two methods: (1) estimating The materials of the early crust and the
relative cratering rates with Earth’s Moon and emplacement of extensive lava flows that
(2) estimating cratering rates directly based make up the lunar maria were dated by
on surveys of the sizes and trajectories of geologic inferences and by radiometric
asteroids and comets (e.g., Hartmann, 2005). methods on samples returned by the Apollo
missions (e.g., Wilhelms, 1987; Stöffler and
Ryder, 2001). Attempts were also made
The Moon to use the samples to date certain lunar
basin-forming impacts and the large cra-
The first formal extraterrestrial strati- ters, Copernicus and Tycho. Two processes
graphic system and chronology was developed have mainly accomplished resurfacing:
for Earth’s Moon beginning in the 1960s, first impacts and volcanism. Analogous to vol-
based on geologic mapping using telescopic canism, impact heating can generate flow-
observations (Shoemaker and Hackman, like deposits of melted debris that can infill
1962). These early observations showed that crater floors or terrains near crater rims. As
the rugged lunar highlands are densely cra- on Earth, the broadest time intervals are
tered, whereas the maria (Latin for “seas”) designated “Periods” and their subdivisions
form relatively dark, smooth plains consisting are “Epochs” (if not meeting formal strati-
of younger deposits that cover the floors of graphic criteria, these unit categories are
impact basins and intercrater plains. Resolv- not capitalized).
ing power of the lunar landscape improved From oldest to youngest, lunar chrono-
greatly with the Lunar Orbiter spacecraft logic units and their referent surface materials
(Fig. 2.2), which permitted also the first map- and events include:
ping of the farside of the Moon. By the end of 1. pre-Nectarian period, earliest materials
the decade and into the 1970s, manned and dating from solidification of the crust (a
unmanned exploration of lunar sites by the suite of anorthosite, norite, and troctolite)
Apollo and Luna missions brought return of until just before formation of the Nectaris
samples. The majority of early exploration basin;
involved the lunar nearside (facing Earth), 2. Nectarian Period, mainly impact melt and
and the stratigraphic system and chronology ejecta associated with Nectaris basin and
follow geologic features and events primarily later impact features;
expressed on the nearside (see Fig. 2.3). 3. Early Imbrian Epoch, consisting mostly of
The cratering rate was initially very basin-related materials associated at the
high; uncertain is whether the lunar crater- beginning with Imbrium basin and ending
ing rate records a relatively brief period of with Orientale basin;
catastrophic “Late Heavy Bombardment” 4. Late Imbrian Epoch, characterized by
in the inner solar system at ∼4.0 Ga, possi- mare basalts post-dating Orientale basin;
bly spawned by perturbations in the orbits 5. Eratosthenian Period, represented by
of the giant outer planets (e.g., Strom et al., dark, modified ejecta of Eratosthenes cra-
2005). Alternatively, the dense population of ter; and
highland craters records the gradual trailing 6. Copernican Period, characterized by rela-
off of the accretionary period itself. Tele- tively fresh bright-rayed ejecta of Coperni-
scopic surveys of the numbers, sizes, and cus crater.
Chapter 2  PLANETARY TIME SCALE   13

Figure 2.2  Lunar stratigraphy: (A) Photograph of the Moon. Provided by Gregory Terrance (Finger Lakes
Instrumentation, Lima, New York; www.fli-cam.com).
14  Chapter 2  PLANETARY TIME SCALE

Figure 2.2 (Continued) (B) Copernicus region of the Moon. Approximate location of this region is shown on
a photograph of the Moon. Copernicus crater (C) is 93 km in diameter and centered at latitude (lat) 9.7°N, longitude
(long) 20.1°W. Copernicus is representative of bright-rayed crater material formed during the lunar Copernican
Period. Its ejecta and secondary craters overlie Eratosthenes crater (E), which is characteristic of relatively dark
crater material of the Eratosthenian Period. In turn, Eratosthenes crater overlies relatively smooth mare materials (M)
of the Late Imbrian Epoch. The oldest geologic unit in the scene is the rugged rim ejecta of Imbrium basin (I), which
defines the base of the Early Imbrian Epoch (Lunar Orbiter IV image mosaic; north at top; illumination from right; cour-
tesy of US Geological Survey (USGS) Astrogeology Team).

Mars the Moon (Fig. 2.4). Beginning in the 1970s


with the Mariner 9 and Viking spacecraft, and
The Red Planet has a geologic character sim- continuing with a flotilla of additional orbiters
ilar to the Moon, with vast expanses of cratered and landers beginning in the 1990s, Mars has
terrain and lava plains, but with the important become a highly investigated planet. Geologic
addition of features resulting from the activity mapping led to characterization of periods
of wind and water over time. This results in a and epochs as on the Moon (e.g., reviews in
geologically complex surface history; geologic Tanaka, 1986; Kallenbach et al., 2001; Nimmo
mapping has assisted in unraveling it, follow- and Tanaka, 2005; Tanaka et al., 2014)
ing the approaches developed for studies of (Fig. 2.1).
Chapter 2  PLANETARY TIME SCALE   15

(UDWRVWKHQLDQ &RSHUQLFDQ
6\VWHP
&P &F
0DUH FUDWHU
EDVDOW PDWHULDO

(P (F

6\VWHP
0DUH FUDWHU
EDVDOW PDWHULDO

,P ,Y ,F

8SSHU
0DUH 9ROFDQLF FUDWHU
EDVDOW SURYLQFH PDWHULDO

,PEULDQ6\VWHP
,R
2ULHQWDOH
EDVLQPDWHULDO

/RZHU
,S ,F
3ODLQV &UDWHUPDWHULDO
PDWHULDO LQFOXGLQJ6FKU|GLQJHU
EDVLQ

,L
,PEULXPEDVLQ
PDWHULDO

:HVW/RQJLWXGH (DVW/RQJLWXGH
1E\

1HFWDULDQ6\VWHP
\RXQJHU
EDVLQPDWHULDO
1S 1F
3ODLQV 1ER FUDWHU
PDWHULDO PDWHULDO
2OGHU
EDVLQPDWHULDO

3UH1HFWDULDQ6\VWHP
S1E
%DVLQPDWHULDO
LQFOXGLQJ0LOQH

S1X
8QGLYLGHG
PDWHULDO

(DVW/RQJLWXGH :HVW/RQJLWXGH

Figure 2.3  Generalized geologic map of Earth’s Moon.


16  Chapter 2  PLANETARY TIME SCALE

90° N
Boreum
Va s t i t a s B o r e a l i s
60° N

Acidalia Deuteronilus
Utopia Alba Tempe
Arcadia
30° N
Olympus Arabia
Elysium Chryse
Amazonis Lunae
Isidis Syrtis
Tharsis Xanthe Major
0° N 120° 180° 240° 300° 0° E 60°
Valles Margaritifer
Marineris Sabaea
Tyrrhena
Daedalia S y r i a
Hesperia Cimmeria Thaumasia
30° S
Noachis
Promethei Sirenum Hellas
Argyre
Aonia Malea
60° S
Australe
90° S

GEOLOGIC UNITS
A polar layered deposits H materials N-EH volcanic materials
EA Vastitas Borealis unit LN-EH knobby materials N materials
LH-LA volcanic materials LN-EH materials EN massif material

Figure 2.4  Global geologic map of Mars.  Generalized geologic map of Mars showing distribution of major
material types and their ages. Chronologic unit abbreviations: N, Noachian; H, Hesperian; A, Amazonian; E, Early; L,
Late. (Adapted from Nimmo and Tanaka (2005).) Terrain names shown without descriptor terms. Mollweide projection,
using east longitudes, centered on 260°E, Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) shaded-relief base illuminated from
the East. On Mars, 1° latitude = 59 km.

The pre-Noachian period represents the extensive volcanism, particularly during the
age of the early crust and is not represented Early Hesperian Epoch. Mars Express and
in known outcrops, but a Martian meteorite, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter data indicate
ALH84001, was crystallized at ∼4.5 Ga. that clay minerals occur in some Noachian
Heavily cratered terrains formed during strata, whereas hydrated sulfates are mostly
the Noachian Period. These include large in Hesperian rocks. A thick permafrost zone
impact basins of the Early Noachian Epoch, developed as the surface cooled, and much of
vast cratered plains of the Middle Noachian, the fluvial activity during the Late Hesperian
and intercrater plains resurfaced by fluvial Epoch occurred as catastrophic flood out-
and possibly volcanic deposition during the bursts through this frozen zone, perhaps initi-
Late Noachian when the atmosphere appar- ated by magmatic activity.
ently was thicker and perhaps warmer and The Amazonian Period began with expan-
heat flow was higher. sive resurfacing of the northern lowlands,
Hesperian Period rocks are much less cra- perhaps by sedimentation within a large
tered and record waning fluvial activity but body of water. Much lower levels of volcanism
Chapter 2  PLANETARY TIME SCALE   17

and fluvial discharges, coupled with aeolian Tolstojan (Nectarian)


deposition and erosion continued into the Calorian (Imbrian)
Middle and Late Amazonian Epochs. Contin- Mansurian (Eratosthenian)
ued weathering has led to iron oxidation of Kuiperian (Copernican)
surface materials. Absolute ages for these periods are much
The polar plateaus, covered by bright more uncertain than for the Moon and Mars.
deposits of residual ice as well as seasonally
waxing and waning meter-thick CO2 frost, are
among the youngest features on the planet. Venus
Ice-rich mantles and glacial-like deposits at
The Venusian surface has been investi-
middle and equatorial latitudes signal climate
gated extensively with orbiters and landers,
oscillations in the relatively recent geologic
most recently by the Magellan orbiter with
record.
its mapping radar in the 1990s. Impact cra-
The NASA rover, Curiosity, is investigat-
ter densities are low. Statistics of nearly 1000
ing Gale Crater, which formed toward the end
impact craters on its surface indicate that
of the Noachian Period (Le Deit et al., 2012).
Venus has an average surface age of hundreds
This crater was partly filled by fluvial, deltaic,
of millions of years. Despite its spectacular
and lacustrine sediments over a few hundred
volcanic surface dotted with thousands of
million years during the early part of the Hes-
volcanoes and broad fields of lava flows, all of
perian Period. These deposits were partially
which has been tectonically disrupted to vary-
exhumed by wind erosion during the middle
ing degrees, the details of the global geologic
Hesperian (ca. 3.3 to 3.1 billion years ago) to
evolution of this Earth’s twin planet in size
form the massive Aeolis Mons (Mount Sharp)
are not well constrained. Possibilities range
of cyclic sediment deposits up to 5-km thick
from local to regional events driven by mantle
and 6000 km2 in area within the Gale crater
plumes to global volcanic and tectonic evolu-
(e.g., Grotzinger et al., 2015). There has been
tion driven by atmospheric greenhouse-heat-
only very slow eolian erosion since the middle
ing effects on Venusian climate (e.g., Bougher
Hesperian.
et al., 1997).

Mercury Other solar system bodies


The innermost planet was partly imaged The solid surfaces of asteroids and sat-
by flybys of the Mariner 10 spacecraft in 1974 ellites of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Nep-
and 1975, enabling stratigraphic studies that tune show varying degrees of cratering that
reveal a remarkably similar surface history to reflect surface ages (e.g., Schenk et al., 2004).
that of Earth’s Moon (e.g., Spudis and Guest, Although asteroids are commonly saturated
1988). Consequently, a Mercurian chronol- with craters, indicating their primordial ori-
ogy was developed based on impact basins gin, some asteroids, comet nuclei, and other
and craters that may have similar histories to bodies demonstrate later resurfacing as their
comparable lunar features (Fig. 2.1). rocky or icy crusts evolved. Dating these sur-
Thus, five major periods have been pro- faces relies on inferences of the populations
posed that correspond to those of the Moon, as of projectiles across time and space. Absolute
follows: dates are very poorly constrained. Complica-
pre-Tolstojan (equivalent to the lunar tions in estimates of cratering rates include
pre-Nectarian) the relative importance of asteroids in the
18  Chapter 2  PLANETARY TIME SCALE

inner solar system versus that of comets and Strom, R.G., Malhotra, R., Ito, T., Yoshida, F., Kring, D.A.,
other icy materials of the Kuiper Belt. 2005. The origin of planetary impactors in the inner
solar system. Science 309: 1847–1850.
Tanaka, K.L., 1986. The stratigraphy of Mars. Proceedings
of the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 17,
Selected publications Part 1. Journal of Geophysical Research 91: E139–E158.
Tanaka, K.L., Hartmann, W.K., 2008. 2 planetary time
and websites scale. In: Ogg, J.G., Ogg, G., Gradstein, F.M. (Eds.),
The Concise Geologic Time Scale. Cambridge
Cited publications University Press, pp. 13–22.
Bougher, S.W., Hunten, D.M., Phillips, R.J., 1997. Venus II: Tanaka, K.L., Hartmann, W.K., 2012. The planetary time
Geology, Geophysics, Atmosphere, and Solar Wind scale. In: Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., Schmitz, M., Ogg,
Environment. The University of Arizona Press, G., (Coordinators). The Geologic Time Scale 2012.
Tucson. 1362 pp. Elsevier Publisher, pp. 275–298. (An overview on the
Grotzinger, et al., 2015. Deposition, exhumation, and geologic history of all inner planets, Earth’s Moon,
paleoclimate of an ancient lake deposit, Gale crater, and briefly on the moons of Mars and Jupiter.).
Mars (47 authors total) Science 350: 177. http:// Tanaka, K.L., Skinner Jr., J.A., Dohm, J.M., Irwin III, R.P.,
dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7575 summary; full Kolb, E.J., Fortezzo, C.M., Platz, T., Michael, G.G.,
version (12 pp.) at. Hare, T.M., 2014. Geologic Map of Mars: U.S.
Hartmann, W.K., 2005. Martian cratering 8: isochron Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3292,
refinement and the chronology of Mars. Icarus 174: Scale 1:20,000,000, Pamphlet 43. http://dx.doi.
294–320. org/10.3133/sim3292. http://pubs.usgs.gov/
Kallenbach, R., Geiss, J., Hartmann, W.K., 2001. Chronol- sim/3292/.
ogy and Evolution of Mars. Kluwer Academic Wilhelms, D.E., 1987. The geologic history of the Moon.
Publishers, Dordrecht. 498 pp. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1348 302
Le Deit, L., Hauber, E., Fueten, F., Mangold, N., Pondrelli, pp., 12 plates.
M., Rossi, A., Jaumann, R., 2012. Model age of Gale
Crater and origin of its layered deposits. In: Third Selected further reading
International Conference on Early Mars: Geologic and
Basaltic Volcanism Study Project, 1981. Basaltic
Hydrological Evolution, Physical and Chemical
Volcanism on the Terrestrial Planets. Houston: Lunar
Environments, and the Implications for Life (Lake
and Planetary Institute, Houston. 1286 pp.
Tahoe, Nevada, 21–25 May 2012): 7045.pdf. http://
Melosh, H.J., 2011. Planetary Surface Processes.
www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/earlymars2012/
Cambridge University Press. 500 pp.
pdf/7045.pdf.
Nimmo, F., Tanaka, K., 2005. Early crustal evolution of
Mars. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences Websites (selected)
33: 133–161. US Geological Survey Astrogeology Research
Schenk, P.M., Chapman, C.R., ZahnIe, K., Moore, J.M., Program—astrogeology.usgs.gov/, especially:
2004. Ages and interiors: the cratering record of the Astropedia: astrogeology.usgs.gov/search/.
Galilean satellites. In: Bagenal, F., Dowling, T.E., Solar System Exploration (NASA)—solarsystem.nasa.
McKinnon, W.B. (Eds.), Jupiter: The Planet, Satellites gov.
and Magnetosphere. Cambridge University Press, Welcome to the Planets (JPL, NASA)—pds.jpl.nasa.gov/
Cambridge, pp. 427–456. planets/.
Shoemaker, E.M., Hackman, R.J., 1962. Stratigraphic Mars Exploration Program (NASA)—marsprogram.jpl.
basis for a lunar time scale. In: Kopal, Z., Mikhailov, nasa.gov/.
Z.K. (Eds.), The Moon. Academic Press, London, Wikipedia—Lunar Geologic Timescale—en.wikipedia.
pp. 289–300. org/wiki/Lunar_geologic_time_scale; and Geologic
Spudis, P.D., Guest, J.E., 1988. Stratigraphy and geologic history or Mars: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
history of Mercury. In: Vilas, F., Chapman, C.R., Geological_history_of_Mars.
Matthews, M.S. (Eds.), Mercury. The University of
Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 118–164.
Stöffler, D., Ryder, G., 2001. Stratigraphy and isotope ages
of lunar geologic units: chronological standards for
the inner solar system. Space Science Reviews 96: 9–54.

You might also like