Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Third- and fourth-order elasticities of biological soft tissues

Michel Destrade, Michael D. Gilchrist, and Raymond W. Ogden

Citation: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127, 2103 (2010); doi: 10.1121/1.3337232
View online: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3337232
View Table of Contents: https://asa.scitation.org/toc/jas/127/4
Published by the Acoustical Society of America

ARTICLES YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Third- and fourth-order constants of incompressible soft solids and the acousto-elastic effect
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127, 2759 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3372624

Acoustoelasticity in soft solids: Assessment of the nonlinear shear modulus with the acoustic radiation force
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122, 3211 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2793605

Separation of compressibility and shear deformation in the elastic energy density (L)
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116, 41 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1736652

On the third- and fourth-order constants of incompressible isotropic elasticity


The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128, 3334 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3505102

Modeling of nonlinear shear waves in soft solids


The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116, 2807 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1802533

Fourth-order shear elastic constant assessment in quasi-incompressible soft solids


Applied Physics Letters 93, 101912 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2979875
Third- and fourth-order elasticities of biological soft tissues (L)
Michel Destrade and Michael D. Gilchrist
School of Electrical, Electronic, and Mechanical Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin
4, Ireland

Raymond W. Ogden
Department of Mathematics, University of Glasgow, University Gardens, Glasgow G12 8QW, Scotland,
United Kingdom

共Received 13 October 2009; revised 3 February 2010; accepted 4 February 2010兲


In the theory of weakly nonlinear elasticity, Hamilton et al. 关J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 41–44 共2004兲兴
identified W = ␮I2 + 共A / 3兲I3 + DI22 as the fourth-order expansion of the strain-energy density for
incompressible isotropic solids. Subsequently, much effort focused on theoretical and experimental
developments linked to this expression in order to inform the modeling of gels and soft biological
tissues. However, while many soft tissues can be treated as incompressible, they are not in general
isotropic, and their anisotropy is associated with the presence of oriented collagen fiber bundles.
Here the expansion of W is carried up to fourth order in the case where there exists one family of
parallel fibers in the tissue. The results are then applied to acoustoelasticity, with a view to
determining the second- and third-order nonlinear constants by employing small-amplitude
transverse waves propagating in a deformed soft tissue.
© 2010 Acoustical Society of America. 关DOI: 10.1121/1.3337232兴
PACS number共s兲: 43.25.Ba, 43.25.Zx, 43.25.Ed 关ROC兴 Pages: 2103–2106

I. INTRODUCTION order elasticity since the stress is second order in the strain; a
similar comment applies to fourth-order versus third-order
Due to their high fluid content, many soft biological tis- elasticity.兲 In fourth-order elasticity theory, terms linear in i41,
sues and gels exhibit nearly incompressible behavior: they i22, i1i3, and i21i2 共or, equivalently, I41, I22, I1I3, and I21I2兲 are also
are constrained to undergo essentially volume-preserving de- retained; thus, nine elastic constants are required to describe
formations and motions. This has long been known and, in fourth-order solids. Now, however, it is slightly more com-
fact, can be traced back to the experiments of Swam- plicated to enforce incompressibility because the constraint
merdam1,2 in 1758. Mathematically, the internal constraint of involves a combination of invariants of E, rather than a
incompressibility is expressed by imposing the condition single invariant of C. Nevertheless, this can be achieved be-
det F = 1 at all times, where F is the deformation gradient. In cause of obvious connections between the sets 共1兲–共3兲. This
exact nonlinear isotropic elasticity theory, the strain-energy was done long ago by Rivlin and Saunders5 in 1951 and by
density W is written in fullest generality as a function of I, II, Ogden6 in 1974, for third- and fourth-order incompressible
and III, the first three principal invariants of the right solids, respectively. In particular, these authors showed that
Cauchy–Green strain tensor C = FTF, which are defined by the number of elastic constants drops from 5 to 2 for third-
I = tr C, II = 21 关共tr C兲2 − tr共C2兲兴, III = det C = 共det F兲2 . order solids, and from 9 to 3 for fourth-order solids com-
pared with the compressible case.
共1兲
Recently, Hamilton et al.,7 unaware of these previous
It is then easy to enforce incompressibility, which requires contributions, rediscovered the latter result, and wrote W in
that III = 1 at all times and hence that W = W共I , II兲 only. the form
In weakly nonlinear isotropic elasticity theory, W is ex- A
panded in terms of invariants of the Green–Lagrange strain W = ␮I2 + I3 + DI22 , 共4兲
3
tensor E = 21 共C − I兲, either using the set
i1 = tr E, i2 = 21 关共tr E兲2 − tr共E2兲兴, i3 = det E 共2兲 where ␮, A, and D are the respective second, third-, and
fourth-order elasticity constants of weakly nonlinear incom-
共this is the choice of Murnaghan3兲 or the set pressible isotropic elasticity. Subsequently, several papers8–23
have been devoted to the study of the theoretical and experi-
I1 = tr E, I2 = tr E2, I3 = tr E3 共3兲
mental implications of this expansion for linearized and non-
共this is the choice of Landau and Lifshitz4兲. In each case the linear waves and vibrations in incompressible solids. Experi-
respective terms are of orders 1, 2, and 3 in E. ments have been conducted on isotropic gels and phantoms
Then, in third-order elasticity theory, W is expanded as a to measure the nonlinear elastic coefficients, and good
linear combination of i1, i2, i3, i1i2, and i31 共or, equivalently, progress has been achieved in the understanding and imple-
I1, I2, I3, I1I2, and I31兲 and higher-order terms are neglected; mentation of elastographic techniques.12–14,16,17
thus, five elastic constants are required to describe third- Now, the ultimate goal of elastography is the imaging of
order solids. 共Note that some authors refer to this as second- biological soft tissues, and it is therefore important to be able

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127 共4兲, April 2010 0001-4966/2010/127共4兲/2103/4/$25.00 © 2010 Acoustical Society of America 2103
to evaluate ␮, A, and D experimentally. At the same time, it order 4: I22, I2I24, I2I5, I44, I25, I3I4 , 共8兲
must be kept in mind that soft tissues are anisotropic solids,
in contrast to gels and phantoms. This anisotropy is due to which are associated with 13 elastic constants in toto.
the presence of oriented collagen fiber bundles, which are For third-order, transversely isotropic, incompressible,
three orders of magnitude stiffer than the surrounding tissue nonlinear elastic solids, for example, the strain-energy den-
in which they are embedded 共this surrounding tissue consists sity is thus expressible in the form
of a network of elastin fibers, smooth muscle cells, and pro- A
teoglycans, inter alia, which collectively form an essentially W = ␮I2 + I3 + ␣1I24 + ␣2I5 + ␣3I2I4 + ␣4I34 + ␣5I4I5 , 共9兲
3
isotropic “matrix”兲. The natural conclusion of this consider-
ation is that there is a need for expansions of W up to the where ␮, ␣1, and ␣2 are second-order elastic constants and
third or, depending on the context, fourth order for incom- A, ␣3, ␣4, ␣5, and ␣6 are third-order elastic constants. A
pressible anisotropic solids. For the particular application lengthier expansion is required at fourth order, which re-
considered in Sec. III of the present paper, however, it suf- quires a linear combination of the six additional terms listed
fices to pursue the analysis only up to the third order. in Eq. 共8兲. We do not include these here. Indeed, it suffices
for our present purposes to restrict attention to second- and
third-order terms in W since at this order the speed of infini-
II. FOURTH-ORDER TRANSVERSELY ISOTROPIC tesimal plane waves depends linearly on the strain through
SOLIDS the third-order constants, even for the specialization to an
isotropic material.
Here we consider soft tissues with one preferred direc-
tion, associated with a family of parallel fibers of collagen.
We denote by A the unit vector in that direction when the
solid is unloaded and at rest. The theory of Spencer24 tells us III. ACOUSTOELASTICITY
that in all generality, W is a function of at most five invari-
ants in exact nonlinear compressible elasticity theory. One We now consider the propagation of small-amplitude
valid choice for these quantities is plane body waves in a deformed soft tissue with one family
of parallel fibers. We assume that the solid has been pre-
W = W共I1, I2, I3, I4, I5兲 where I4 ⬅ A · EA, I5 ⬅ A · E2A. stressed by the application of the Cauchy stress ␴, say, giv-
共5兲 ing rise to a predeformation with corresponding deformation
gradient F.
Now we expand W up to terms of order 4 in the Green– Let u = u共x , t兲 denote the mechanical displacement asso-
Lagrange strain. This involves a linear combination of the ciated with the wave motion, ␳ the 共constant兲 mass density,
following quantities: and p the incremental Lagrange multiplier due to the incom-
order 2: I21, I2, I24, I5, I1I4 , pressibility constraint. Then the incremental equations of
motion and of incompressibility read25
order 3: I31, I1I2, I3, I1I24, I1I5, I21I4, I2I4, I34, I4I5 , A0piqju j,pq − p,i = ␳⳵2ui/⳵ t2 , 共10a兲
order 4: I41, I21I2, I1I3, I22, I1I34, I21I5, I21I24, I31I4, I2I24,
ui,i = 0, 共10b兲
I2I5, I44, I25, I1I2I4, I1I4I5, I3I4 . 共6兲
respectively, where the comma signifies partial differentia-
Note that the first-order terms are omitted from the list be- tion with respect to the current coordinates x ⬅ xi and A0 is
cause they give rise to constant stresses. Hence there are 29 the fourth-order tensor of instantaneous moduli, with compo-
elastic constants for fourth-order, transversely isotropic, nents
compressible solids.
⳵W ⳵ 2W
In incompressible solids, however, the isotropic invari- A0piqj = F p␣Fq␤␦ij + F p␣F q␤F j ␯F i␥ .
ants are not independent. They are connected by the incom- ⳵ E␣␤ ⳵ E␣␥ ⳵ E␤␯
pressibility condition, which can be written in terms of the 共11兲
invariants 共2兲 exactly as6 i1 = −2i2 − 4i3, or equivalently, in
terms of the invariants 共3兲, as This expression is exact, while to compute the derivatives of
W with respect to Eq. 共9兲, the following quantities are
4 2 needed:
I1 = I2 − I3 − I21 + 2I1I2 − I31 , 共7兲
3 3
⳵ I2 ⳵ 2I 2
= 2E␣␤, = ␦␣␤␦␥␯ + ␦␣␯␦␥␤ ,
so that the number of independent quantities in Eq. 共6兲 is ⳵ E␣␤ ⳵ E␣␥ ⳵ E␤␯
greatly reduced. For instance, I21 is of fourth order, and I1I2
= I22 and I31 = 0 at fourth order. This allows the list to be short- ⳵ I3
ened to = 3E␣␥E␥␤ ,
⳵ E␣␤
order 2: I2, I24, I5 ,
⳵ 2I 3 3
I3, I2I4, I34, I4I5 , = 共␦␣␤E␯␥ + ␦␣␯E␤␥ + ␦␥␯E␣␤ + ␦␥␤E␣␯兲,
order 3: ⳵ E␣␥ ⳵ E␤␯ 2

2104 J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 127, No. 4, April 2010 Destrade et al.: Letters to the Editor
⳵ I4 ⳵ 2I 4 ␥ = A02121 . 共18兲
= A ␣A ␤, = 0,
⳵ E␣␤ ⳵ E␣␥ ⳵ E␤␯ Lengthy, but straightforward, calculations reveal that
⳵ I5 2␤ − ␣ − ␥ = 2␣1 + 2共4␣1 + 3␣2 + 3␣3 + 3␣4 + 2␣5兲e,
= A␣A␥E␤␥ + A␤A␥E␣␥ ,
⳵ E␣␤
2共␤ − ␥兲 = 2␣1 + 共3␮ + 10␣1 + 8␣2 + 6␣3 + 6␣4 + 4␣5兲e,
⳵ 2I 5 1
= 共A␣A␯␦␤␥ + A␣A␤␦␥␯ + A␤A␥␦␣␯ 4␥ = 4␮ + 2␣2 + 共A + 2␣2 + 4␣3 + 2␣5兲e. 共19兲
⳵ E␣␥ ⳵ E␤␯ 2
Clearly, Eq. 共17兲 provides a direct means of evaluating the
+ A␥A␯␦␣␤兲. 共12兲 elastic constants by measuring the transverse wave speed for
Let us now consider the propagation of homogeneous a variety of e and ␪ combinations.
plane body waves, in the form
IV. CONCLUSION
u = aeik共n·x−vt兲, p = ikPeik共n·x−vt兲 , 共13兲
We have shown that seven elastic constants are required
where a is the unit vector in the direction of linear polariza-
to describe third-order incompressible solids with one family
tion, k is the wave number, v is the phase speed, and P is a
of parallel fibers, and we have indicated that these constants
scalar. Then the incremental incompressibility condition
may be determined by using the acoustoelastic effect. We
共10b兲 gives a · n = 0, and the wave is thus transverse. The
have also noted that 13 constants are needed for fourth-order
incremental equations of motion 共10a兲 can be written in the
solids.
form
In closing this letter, we remark that although many bio-
Q共n兲a − Pn = ␳v2a, where 关Q共n兲兴ij = A0piqjn pnq . logical soft tissues exhibit transverse isotropy 共one family of
parallel fibers兲, many more must be modeled as orthotropic
共14兲
materials 共two families of parallel fibers兲. Then, the list of
Taking the dot product of this equation with n gives an ex- invariants is increased from 4 共I1 , I2 , I4 , I5兲 to 7, with the
pression for P. Substituting this back into Eq. 共14兲 and using following three additions:
the orthogonality of the propagation and polarization vectors, I6 ⬅ B · EB, I7 ⬅ B · E2B, I8 ⬅ 共A · EB兲A · B, 共20兲
we end up with the symmetric eigenvalue problem,
where B is the unit vector in the direction of the second
关I − n 丢 n兴Q共n兲关I − n 丢 n兴a = ␳v2a 共15兲 family of parallel fibers. In that case, an expansion of W up
for the wave speed and polarization for any given direction to third or fourth order yields such a large number of elastic
of propagation. The wave speed v is given simply by ␳v2 constants to be determined, that it defeats its own usefulness.
= A0piqjn pnqaia j. We would argue that it is more advantageous to turn to the
As a simple example of the application of the above exact nonlinear theory, where constitutive anisotropic models
equations, consider the case where a sample of soft tissue is have been successfully evaluated against experimental test
under uniaxial tension or compression with the direction of data to capture well the mechanics of orthotropic soft tissues.
tension parallel to the fibers. We denote by e the elongation For instance, the Holzapfel–Gasser–Ogden model for
of the sample in the direction 共x1, say兲 of the uniaxial stress arteries27 is now implemented in many finite element analy-
and discard all terms equal to or higher than e2 in the expan- sis software packages. It requires the experimental determi-
sions. In particular, we obtain the approximations nation of only three elastic constants per layer of arterial
wall.
F = diag关1 + e,1 − e/2,1 − e/2兴,
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
E = diag关e,− e/2,− e/2兴. 共16兲
This work is supported by a Senior Marie Curie Fellow-
Also, we find that there are only 15 nonzero components of
ship awarded by the Seventh Framework Programme of the
A0 in the 共x1 , x2 , x3兲 coordinate system because, in this spe-
European Commission to the first author and by an E.T.S.
cial case, the principal axes of stress and strain are aligned.
Walton Award, given to the third author by Science Founda-
Now let ␪ be the angle between the direction of propagation
tion Ireland. This material is based on works supported by
and the x1 axis. Then the secular equation, which gives the
the Science Foundation Ireland under Grant No. SFI 08/W.1/
wave speed in terms of the elastic moduli, has the same form
B2580.
as in the isotropic case,26 with the difference that the moduli
depend not only on the isotropic elastic constants ␮ and A 1
J. Swammerdam, The Book of Nature II 共Seyffert, London, 1758兲, pp.
but also on the anisotropic elastic constants ␣1, ␣2, ␣3, ␣4, 122–132.
and ␣5. It reads26
2
M. Cobb, “Exorcizing the animal spirits: Jan Swammerdam on nerve func-
tion,” Nature 共London兲 3, 395–400 共2002兲.
␳v2 = 共␣ + ␥ − 2␤兲cos4 ␪ + 2共␤ − ␥兲cos2 ␪ + ␥ , 共17兲 3
F. D. Murnaghan, Finite Deformation of an Elastic Solid 共Wiley, New
York, 1951兲.
4
where L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed. 共Pergamon,
New York, 1986兲.
␣ = A01212, 2␤ = A01111 + A02222 − 2A01122 − 2A01221 , 5
R. S. Rivlin and D. W. Saunders, “Large elastic deformations of isotropic

J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 127, No. 4, April 2010 Destrade et al.: Letters to the Editor 2105
materials. VII. Experiments on the deformation of rubber,” Philos. Trans. Royer, and M. Fink, “Measurement of shear elastic moduli in quasi-
R. Soc. London, Ser. A 243, 251–288 共1951兲. incompressible soft solids,” Nonlinear Acoustics Fundamentals and Appli-
6
R. W. Ogden, “On isotropic tensors and elastic moduli,” Proc. Cambridge cations, Book Series, 18th International Symposium on Nonlinear Acous-
Philos. Soc. 75, 427–436 共1974兲. tics, Stockholm, Sweden, 7–10 July 2008 关AIP Conf. Proc. 1022, 303–306
7
M. F. Hamilton, Y. A. Ilinskii, and E. A. Zabolotskaya, “Separation of 共2008兲兴.
18
compressibility and shear deformation in the elastic energy density,” J. M. S. Wochner, M. F. Hamilton, Y. A. Ilinskii, and E. A. Zabolotskaya,
Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 41–44 共2004兲. “Nonlinear torsional wave beams,” Nonlinear Acoustics Fundamentals
8
E. A. Zabolotskaya, Y. A. Ilinskii, M. F. Hamilton, and G. D. Meegan, and Applications, Book Series, 18th International Symposium on Nonlin-
“Modeling of nonlinear shear waves in soft solids,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. ear Acoustics, Stockholm, Sweden, 07–10 July 2008 关AIP Conf. Proc.
116, 2807–2813 共2004兲. 1022, 335–338 共2008兲兴.
9 19
E. A. Zabolotskaya, Y. A. Ilinskii, and M. F. Hamilton, “Nonlinear surface M. Mironov, I. Konopatskaya, P. Pyatakov, G. Clement, and N. Vykhodt-
waves in soft, weakly compressible elastic media,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. seva, “Parametric excitation of shear waves in soft solids,” Nonlinear
121, 1873–1878 共2007兲. Acoustics Fundamentals and Applications, Book Series, 18th International
10
L. Ostrovsky, A. Sutin, Y. Il’inskii, O. Rudenko, and A. Sarvazyan, “Ra- Symposium on Nonlinear Acoustics, Stockholm, Sweden, 07–10 July
diation force and shear motions in inhomogeneous media,” J. Acoust. Soc. 2008 关AIP Conf. Proc. 1022, 448–451 共2008兲兴.
Am. 121, 1324–1331 共2007兲. 20
W. Domański, “Propagation and interaction of non-linear elastic plane
11
C. Vanhille and C. Campos-Pozuelo, “Numerical analysis of strongly non- waves in soft solids,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 44, 494–498 共2009兲.
21
linear extensional vibrations in elastic rods,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferro- L. A. Ostrovsky, “Radiation force in nonlinear, focused beams,” J. Acoust.
electr. Freq. Control 54, 96–106 共2007兲. Soc. Am. 124, 1404–1407 共2008兲.
12 22
J.-L. Gennisson, M. Rénier, S. Catheline, C. Barrière, J. Bercoff, M. Tan- M. A. Mironov, P. A. Pyatakov, I. I. Konopatskaya, G. T. Clement, and N.
ter, and M. Fink, “Acoustoelasticity in soft solids: Assessment of the non- I. Vykhodtseva, “Parametric excitation of shear waves in soft solids,”
linear shear modulus with the acoustic radiation force,” J. Acoust. Soc. Acoust. Phys. 55, 567–574 共2009兲.
Am. 122, 3211–3219 共2007兲. 23
E. A. Zabolotskaya, Y. A. Ilinskii, and M. F. Hamilton, “Weakly nonlinear
13
M. Rénier, J.-L. Gennisson, M. Tanter, S. Catheline, C. Barrière, D. oscillations of a compliant object buried in soil,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125,
Royer, and M. Fink, “Nonlinear shear elastic moduli in quasi- 2035–2040 共2009兲.
incompressible soft solids,” Proc.-IEEE Ultrason. Symp. 554–557 共2007兲. 24
A. J. M. Spencer, Deformations of Fibre-Reinforced Materials 共University
14
X. Jacob, S. Catheline, J.-L. Gennisson, C. Barrière, D. Royer, and M. Press, Oxford, 1972兲.
25
Fink, “Nonlinear shear wave interaction in soft solids,” J. Acoust. Soc. R. W. Ogden, Non-Linear Elastic Deformations 共Ellis Horwood, Chiches-
Am. 122, 1917–1926 共2007兲. ter, 1984兲.
15 26
M. S. Wochner, M. F. Hamilton, Y. A. Ilinskii, and E. A. Zabolotskaya, R. W. Ogden, “Incremental statics and dynamics of pre-stressed elastic
“Cubic nonlinearity in shear wave beams with different polarizations,” J. materials,” in Waves in Nonlinear Pre-Stressed Materials, CISM Lecture
Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 2488–2495 共2008兲. Notes Vol. 495, edited by M. Destrade and G. Saccomandi 共Springer, New
16
M. Rénier, J.-L. Gennisson, C. Barrière, D. Royer, and M. Fink, “Fourth- York, 2007兲.
27
order shear elastic constant assessment in quasi-incompressible soft sol- G. A. Holzapfel, T. C. Gasser, and R. W. Ogden, “A new constitutive
ids,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 101912 共2008兲. framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material
17
M. Renier, J.-L. Gennisson, C. Barriere, S. Catheline, M. Tanter, D. models,” J. Elast. 61, 1–48 共2000兲.

2106 J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 127, No. 4, April 2010 Destrade et al.: Letters to the Editor

You might also like