Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module2 Stiffness S PDF
Module2 Stiffness S PDF
Module2 Stiffness S PDF
Stiffness Method
Dr. Rajesh K. N.
Associate Professor in Civil Engineering
Govt. College of Engineering, Kannur
1
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Module II
Stiffness method
2
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
FUNDAMENTALS OF STIFFNESS METHOD
Introduction
• Displacement components are the primary unknowns
3
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Stiffness method (displacements of the joints are the primary
unknowns): kinematic indeterminacy
• kinematic indeterminacy
4
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• in a truss, the joint rotation is not regarded as a degree
of freedom. joint rotations do not have any physical
significance as they have no effects in the members of the
truss
5
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Stiffness coefficients
•Example 1: Stiffness and flexibility coefficients of a beam
Unit action
Unit displacement
A = SD { A} = [ S ]{D}
•Action matrix, Stiffness matrix, Displacement matrix
{ A} = [ F ] {D} ⇒ [ S ] = [ F ]
−1 −1
[F ] = [S ]
−1
8
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Stiffness method (Direct approach: Explanation using principle
of superposition)
Example: Propped cantilever (Kinematically indeterminate to
first degree)
• Required to get θ B
•degrees of freedom: one
9
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Restraint at B causes a reaction of MB as shown.
wL2
MB = −
12
(Note the sign convention:
anticlockwise positive)
The actual rotation at B is θ B
Hence it is required to induce a rotation of θ B
wL2 4 EI MB wL3
− + θB = 0 ∴θ B = − =
12 L mB 48EI
12
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member stiffness matrix for prismatic beam member with
rotations at the ends as degrees of freedom
A
B
2 EI ⎡2 1⎤
[ SMi ] = ⎢1 2⎥
L ⎣ ⎦
Verification:
−1
⎡ L −L ⎤ −1
⎢ 3EI 6 EI ⎥ ⎛ L ⎡ 2 −1⎤ ⎞ 6 EI ⎡ 2 1 ⎤ 2 EI ⎡ 2 1 ⎤
[ S Mi ] = [ FMi ] = ⎢
−1
⎥ = ⎜ ⎢ −1 2 ⎥ ⎟ = ⎢ ⎥ =
L ⎢⎣ 1 2 ⎥⎦
⎢ −L L ⎥ ⎝ 6 EI ⎣ ⎦⎠ L(3) ⎣ 1 2 ⎦
⎢⎣ 6 EI 3EI ⎥⎦
13
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member stiffness matrix for prismatic beam member with
deflection and rotation at one end as degrees of freedom
⎡ S M 11 S M 12 ⎤
[ SMi ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎣ M 21
S S M 22 ⎦
⎡ 12 EI 6 EI ⎤
⎢ L3 − 2 ⎥
L
=⎢ ⎥
⎢ − 6 EI 4 EI ⎥
⎢⎣ L2 L ⎥⎦
14
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Verification:
−1 ⎡ 12 EI 6 EI ⎤
⎡ L3 L2 ⎤ −
⎢ 3EI
−1 6 EI ⎡ 6 −3L ⎤ ⎢ L3 L2 ⎥
2 EI ⎥ ⎛ L ⎡ 2 L2 3L ⎤ ⎞ = 2 ⎢ 2 ⎥
=⎢ ⎥
[ S Mi ] = [ FMi ] = ⎢ 2 L ( 3L ) ⎣
−1
⎥ =⎜ ⎢ ⎥⎟ −
⎢ L L ⎥ ⎜ 6 EI
⎣ 3L 6 ⎦ ⎟⎠
3 L 2 L ⎦ ⎢ − 6 EI 4 EI ⎥
⎝
⎢⎣ 2 EI EI ⎦⎥ ⎣⎢ L2 L ⎦⎥
•Truss member
EA
[ S Mi ] =
L
2
L,E,I
6EI
L2
6EI
L2
⎡ 12 EI −6 EI ⎤
⎢ L3 L2 ⎥
∴ [ SM ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢ −6 EI 4 EI ⎥
⎢⎣ L2 L ⎥⎦
17
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 2
1
L,E,I
2
6EI 12EI
L2 L3
⎡ 4 EI 6 EI ⎤
⎢ L L2 ⎥
∴ [ SM ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 6 EI 12 EI ⎥
⎢⎣ L2 L3 ⎥⎦
19
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member stiffness matrices for a few other cases
•Plane frame member
⎡ S M 11 S M 12 S M 13 ⎤
[ S Mi ] = ⎢⎢ S M 21 S M 22 S M 23 ⎥
⎥
⎢⎣ S M 31 S M 32 S M 33 ⎥⎦
⎡ EA ⎤
⎢ L 0 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
12 EI 6 EI ⎥
=⎢ 0 − 2
⎢ L3 L ⎥
⎢ 6 EI 4 EI ⎥
⎢ 0 − 2 ⎥
⎣ L L ⎦
20
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Grid member
⎡ 12 EI 6 EI ⎤
⎢ L3 0 −
L2 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
GJ
[ S Mi ] = ⎢⎢ 0 0 ⎥
⎥
L
⎢ 6 EI 4 EI ⎥
⎢− 2 0 ⎥
⎣ L L ⎦
21
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Space frame member
⎡ EA ⎤
⎢ L 0 0 0 0 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 12 EI Z 6 EI Z ⎥
0 0 0 − 2
⎢ L3 L ⎥
⎢ 12 EI Y 6 EI Y ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 ⎥
L3 L2
[ S Mi ] = ⎢⎢ ⎥
⎥
GJ
⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 ⎥
⎢ L ⎥
⎢ 0 0
6 EI Y
0
4 EI Y
0 ⎥⎥
⎢ L2 L
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 6 EI Z 4 EI Z ⎥
− 0 0 0
⎣⎢ L2 L ⎦⎥
22
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Formalization of the Stiffness method
(Explanation using principle of complimentary virtual work)
{ AMi } = [ S Mi ]{DMi }
Here {DMi } contains relative displacements of the k end with respect
to j end of the i-th member
AM = SM DM
23
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
{ AM } = [ S M ]{DM }
[S M ] is the unassembled stiffness matrix of the entire structure
24
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Relative end-displacements in {DM } will be related to a vector of joint
{DM } = [C MJ ]{DJ }
[CMJ ] displacement transformation matrix (compatibility matrix)
⎧{DF }⎫
• Hence, {DM } = [C MJ ]{DJ } = ⎡⎣[C MF ] [C MR ]⎤⎦ ⎨ ⎬
{ D
⎩ R ⎭}
25
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Elements in displacement transformation matrix,
[CMF ] {DF }
and relate {DM } to and respectively
[CMR ] { DR }
⎧{δ D F }⎫
{δ DM } = [C MJ ]{δ D J } = ⎣⎡[C MF ] [ MR ]⎤⎦ ⎨
C ⎬
⎩{ R } ⎭
δ D
27
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Internal virtual work produced by the virtual (relative) end
displacements {δ DM } and actual member end actions { AM } is
δ U = { AM } {δ DM }
T
{ AJ } {δ DJ } = { AM } {δ DM }
T T
{ AJ } = [ S J ]{DJ }
28
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Where, [ S J ] = [CMJ ] [ S M ][CMJ ] , the assembled stiffness matrix for the
T
entire structure.
⎧{ AF }⎫ ⎡[ S FF ] [ S FR ]⎤ ⎧{DF }⎫
{ AJ } = [ S J ]{DJ } ⇒ ⎨ ⎬=⎢
⎩{ AR }⎭ ⎣[ S RF ] [ S RR ]⎥⎦ ⎩⎨{DR }⎭⎬
29
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
{ AF } = [ S FF ]{DF } + [ S FR ]{DR } { AR } = [ S RF ]{DF } + [ S RR ]{DR }
• Support reactions
30
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Member end actions are obtained adding member end actions
calculated as above and initial fixed-end actions
31
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Important formulae:
32
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Relationship between force transformation matrix and
displacement transformation matrix
{δ AS } {DS } = {δ AM } {DM }
T T
{ AM } = [ BMS ]{ AS }
{δ AM } = [ BMS ]{δ AS }
{δ AM } = {δ AS } [ BMS ]
T T T
{DM } = [C MJ ]{DJ }
{D J } = {D S }
{ S } { S } ({δ AS } [ BMS ] ) ([CMJ ]{DS })
δ =
T T T
A D
2 EI ⎡2 1⎤
Member stiffness matrix of beam member [ S Mi ] = ⎢1 2⎥
L ⎣ ⎦
⎡4 2 0 0⎤
⎢ 0⎥
2 EI ⎢ 2 4 0
Unassembled stiffness matrix [ S M ] = ⎥
L ⎢0 0 2 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦
34
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Fixed end actions
35
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements
Free (unknown) joint displacements {DF } Restraint displacements {DR }
0 0 0 1
−1 L −1 L 1L 1L 0 0 −1 L −1 L
39
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements
∴{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF }
−1
⎡4 2 0 0⎤ ⎡0 0⎤
⎢ 4 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0⎥
⎡ 0 1 1 0⎤ 2 EI ⎢ 2
[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T
=⎢ ⎥ L ⎢0
⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 1 ⎦ 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢1 0⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦ ⎣0 1⎦
2 EI ⎡6 1 ⎤
= ⎢1 2 ⎥
L ⎣ ⎦
40
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
−1
PL2 1 ⎧ 0 ⎫ PL2 ⎧0 ⎫
= . ⎨ ⎬= ⎨ ⎬
18 EI 11 ⎩11⎭ 18 EI ⎩1 ⎭
∴{ AR } = − { ARC } + [ S RF ]{DF }
[ S RF ] = [CMR ]T [ S M ][CMF ]
T
⎡1 L −1 0⎤ ⎡4 2 0 0 ⎤ ⎡0 0⎤
⎢ 0 −1 0 ⎥ 2 EI ⎢ 2 4 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0⎥
1 ⎢1 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
=
L ⎢0 0 1 −1⎥ L ⎢ 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢1 0⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 −1⎦ ⎣0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 1⎦
⎡6 0⎤
⎢ ⎥
2 EI ⎢2 L 0 ⎥
= 2
L ⎢ −3 3 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ −3 −3⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
∴{ AR } = − { ARC } + [ S RF ]{DF }
⎧ −2 P ⎫
⎪ − PL ⎪ ⎡6 0⎤
⎪ ⎪ 2 EI ⎢2 L 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ PL2
⎧0 ⎫
= −⎨ 3 ⎬+ 2 ⎨ ⎬
⎪ −3P ⎪ L ⎢ −3 3 ⎥ 18 EI ⎩1 ⎭
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ − 3 − 3⎦
⎩ −P ⎭
⎧ 2P ⎫
⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎪ PL ⎪
⎧ −2 P ⎫ ⎧ 2P ⎫ ⎪
⎪ − PL ⎪ ⎧0⎫ ⎪ ⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎪ PL2 2 EI ⎪⎪ 0 ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ P ⎪
PL ⎪⎪ 3 ⎪⎪
⎪
= −⎨ 3 ⎬+ 2 ⎨ ⎬= ⎨ 3 ⎬+⎨ ⎬ = ⎨10 P ⎬
⎪ −3P ⎪ 18 EI L 3
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ 3P ⎪ ⎪ 3 ⎪ ⎪ 3 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ −3⎪⎭ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ P ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎩ −P ⎭ ⎩ P ⎭ ⎪− ⎪ ⎪ 2 P ⎪
⎩ 3⎭
⎩⎪ 3 ⎭⎪
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member end actions
{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })
⎧3⎫ ⎡4 2 0 0 ⎤ ⎡0 0⎤
⎪ ⎪ ⎢2 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 ⎥ PL2
PL ⎪ −3 ⎪ 2 EI 4 0 ⎧0 ⎫
{ AM } = ⎨ ⎬ + ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬
9 ⎪2⎪ L ⎢0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢1 0 ⎥ 18 EI ⎩1 ⎭
⎪⎩ −2 ⎪⎭ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 1⎦
⎧3⎫ ⎡4 2 0 0 ⎤ ⎧0 ⎫ ⎧3⎫ ⎧0 ⎫ ⎧1 ⎫
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ −3 ⎪ ⎪ 0 ⎪ PL ⎪ − ⎪
PL ⎪ −3 ⎪ 2 EI PL2 ⎢ 2 4 0 0 ⎪ 0 ⎪ PL ⎪ ⎪ PL ⎪ ⎪ = ⎪ ⎪ 1
= ⎨ ⎬+ ⎥⎨ ⎬ = ⎨ ⎬+ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬
9 ⎪2⎪ L 18 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎪0 ⎪ 9 ⎪ 2 ⎪ 9 ⎪1 ⎪ 3 ⎪1 ⎪
⎢ ⎥ ⎪⎩ −2 ⎭⎪ ⎪⎩ 0 ⎭⎪
⎪⎩ −2 ⎭⎪ ⎣0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎩⎪ 1 ⎭⎪ ⎩⎪ 2 ⎭⎪ 44
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Alternatively, if the entire [SJ] matrix is assembled at a time,
⎡0 L L 0⎤
⎢0 0 0 L⎥ 0⎤ ⎡ 0 L −1 0 ⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎡4 2 0 01
⎢2 ⎢ ⎥
1 ⎢ 1 1 0 0 ⎥ 2 EI 4 0 0⎥ 1 ⎢ L 01 0 −1 0 ⎥
[ S J ] = [CMJ ]T [ SM ][CMJ ] = ⎢
L⎢L 0 0 0⎥ L
⎥ ⎢
⎢0 0 2
⎥
1⎥ L ⎢ L 00 0 1 −1⎥
⎢ −1 −1 1 1 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦ ⎣ 0 L0 0 1 −1⎦
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 −1 −1⎦
⎡0 L L 0⎤
⎢0 0 0 L⎥ 6 4 L −6
⎢ ⎥ ⎡2 L 0 0⎤
⎢ 1 1 0 0 ⎥ 2 EI ⎢4 L 0 6 2 L −6 0 ⎥
=⎢ ⎥ 3 ⎢ ⎥
⎢ L 0 0 0 ⎥ L ⎢2 L L 0 0 3 −3⎥
⎢ −1 −1 1 1 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ L 2L 0 0 3 −3⎦
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 −1 −1⎦
Degrees of freedom
46
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2 EI ⎡2 1 ⎤
Member stiffness matrix of beam member [ S Mi ] = ⎢1 2 ⎥
4 ⎣ ⎦
⎡2 1 0 0⎤
⎢ 0⎥
2 EI ⎢ 1 2 0
Unassembled stiffness matrix [SM ] = ⎥
4 ⎢0 0 2 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦
47
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
13.33 kNm 13.33
20 20
B
A C
B
20 kN
20 kN 20 kN
20 kN
Fixed end actions
1 0 0 0
DF2 =1
0 1 1 0
0 0 0 1
∴{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF }
−1
∵{DR} is a null matrix.
T
⎡1 0 0⎤ ⎡2 1 0 0 ⎤ ⎡1 0 0⎤
⎢0 0 ⎥ 2 EI ⎢1 0 ⎥ ⎢0 0⎥
[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T
=⎢
1
⎥ ⎢
2 0
⎥⎢
1
⎥
⎢0 1 0⎥ 4 ⎢0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢0 1 0⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1⎦ ⎣0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1⎦
⎡ 1 0.5 0 ⎤
= EI ⎢0.5 2 0.5⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣ 0 0.5 1 ⎥⎦
51
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
−1
⎛ ⎡ 1 0.5 0 ⎤ ⎞ ⎧ −13.33⎫
Joint displacements {DF } =
1 ⎜⎢ ⎥ ⎟ ⎪ −6.67 ⎪
⎥⎟ ⎨ ⎬
0.5 2 0.5
EI ⎜⎜ ⎢ ⎟ ⎪ −180 ⎪
⎝ ⎢
⎣ 0 0.5 1 ⎥
⎦ ⎠ ⎩ ⎭
⎧ −43.435 ⎫
1 ⎪ ⎪
= ⎨ 60.33 ⎬
EI ⎪ ⎪
⎩ −210.6 ⎭
⎧ 13.33 ⎫ ⎡2 1 0 0 ⎤ ⎡1 0 0⎤
⎪ −13.33 ⎪ ⎢1 ⎧ −43.435 ⎫
⎪ ⎪ 2 EI 2 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1 0⎥ 1 ⎪ ⎪
{ AM } = ⎨ ⎬+ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎨ 60.33 ⎬
⎪ 20 ⎪ 4 ⎢0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢0 1 0 ⎥ EI ⎪ −210.6 ⎪
⎪⎩ −20 ⎪⎭ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎩ ⎭
⎣0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1⎦
⎧ 0 ⎫
⎪ 25 ⎪
⎪ ⎪
=⎨ ⎬kNm
⎪ −25 ⎪
⎪⎩−200⎪⎭
53
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 3:
24 kN 12 kN
5m B 5m C
A
10 m 10 m
DF1
B C
A
Degrees of freedom
54
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2 EI ⎡2 1 ⎤
Member stiffness matrix of beam member [ Mi ]
S = ⎢1 2 ⎥
10 ⎣ ⎦
⎡2 1 0 0⎤
⎢ 0⎥
EI ⎢ 1 2 0
Unassembled stiffness matrix [SM ] = ⎥
5 ⎢0 0 2 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦
55
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
30 kNm 30 15 15
B C
A B
12 kN 6 kN
12 kN 6 kN
15
30kNm 15
B
A
12 kN 18 kN 6kN
∴{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF }
−1
∴{DR} is a null matrix.
T
⎡ ⎤
0 ⎡2 1 0 0 ⎤ ⎡0 ⎤
⎢1 ⎥ ⎢1 2 0 ⎥ ⎢1 ⎥ ⎡ 4 EI ⎤
[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T
=⎢ ⎥
EI ⎢
0
⎥⎢ ⎥ =
⎢⎣ 5 ⎥⎦
⎢1 ⎥ 5 ⎢ 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢1 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣ ⎦
0 ⎣0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 ⎦
5 18.75
Joint displacements {DF } = {15} =
4 EI EI
58
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member end actions
⎧ 30 ⎫ ⎡2 1 0 0 ⎤ ⎡0 ⎤
⎪ −30 ⎪ ⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎢ 1 ⎥ 18.75
⎪ ⎪ EI ⎢ 1 2 0
{ AM } = ⎨ ⎬ + ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎪ 15 ⎪ 5 ⎢ 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢ 1 ⎥ EI
⎪⎩ −15 ⎪⎭ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 ⎦
⎧ 30 ⎫ ⎧ 1 ⎫ ⎧ 33.75 ⎫
⎪ −3 0 ⎪ ⎪ 2 ⎪ ⎪ −22.5 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
=⎨ ⎬ + 3.75 ⎨ ⎬ = ⎨ ⎬
⎪ 15 ⎪ 2
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ 22 .5 ⎪
⎪⎩ −15 ⎭⎪ ⎩⎪ 1 ⎪⎭ ⎪⎩ −11.25 ⎪⎭
59
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Problem 3a 20 kN
9 kN/m 40 kNm
A 4m B 4m C
2EI EI
Kinematic indeterminacy = 2 (Rotation and deflection at B)
(Considering B as a NODE)
2 EI ⎡2 1⎤
Member stiffness matrix of beam member [ Mi ]
S = ⎢1 2⎥
L ⎣ ⎦
⎡4 2 0⎤
0
⎢ 4 0 0⎥
2 EI ⎢ 2
Unassembled stiffness matrix [SM ] = ⎥
4 ⎢0 0 2 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
0 0
12 kNm 12
B
A B C
0 0
18 kN
18 kN
18+20 = 38 kN 0
18 kN
DF1 =1
0 1 1 0
DF1 DF2
=1 =1
DF2 =1
⎡ 0 −1⎤
⎢ 4 −1⎥
1⎢
[CMF ] = ⎥
4 ⎢4 1 ⎥
−1 4 −1 4 14 14 ⎢ ⎥
⎣0 1 ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
DR1 DR2 DR3 DR4
=1 =1 =1 =1
⎡1 4 1 0 0⎤
⎢1 4 0 0 0⎥
[CMR ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 −1 4 0⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 −1 4 1⎦
{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF }
−1
since there are no support displacements.
[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T
⎡4 2 0 0 ⎤ ⎡ 0 −1⎤
⎢ 4 0 0 ⎥ 1 ⎢ 4 −1⎥
1 ⎡ 0 4 4 0 ⎤ 2 EI ⎢ 2 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
= ⎢
4 ⎣ −1 −1 1 1 ⎥⎦ 4 ⎢ 0 0 2 1⎥ 4 ⎢4 1 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦ ⎣0 1 ⎦
⎡ 8 −6 ⎤
⎢ ⎥
EI ⎡ 0 4 4 0 ⎤ ⎢16 −6 ⎥ EI ⎡ 96 −12 ⎤
= =
32 ⎣ −1 −1 1 1 ⎦ ⎢ 8 3 ⎥ 32 ⎢⎣ −12 18 ⎥⎦
⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
⎣ 4 3 ⎦ Dr.RajeshKN
32 1 ⎡18 12 ⎤ ⎧ 52 ⎫ 1 ⎧ 9.70 ⎫
∴ {DF } = ⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬= ⎨ ⎬
EI 1584 ⎣12 96 ⎦ ⎩ −38 ⎭ EI ⎩ −61.09 ⎭
⎧ 12 ⎫ ⎡4 2 0 0⎤ ⎡0 −1⎤
⎪ − 12 ⎪ ⎢ 0⎥ 1 ⎢4 −1⎥ 1
⎪ ⎪ 2 EI ⎢ 2 4 0
⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎧ 9.70 ⎫
=⎨ ⎬+ ⎨ ⎬
⎪ 0 ⎪ 4 ⎢0 0 2 1⎥ 4 ⎢4 1 ⎥ EI ⎩ − 61.09 ⎭
⎪⎩ 0 ⎪⎭ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦ ⎣0 1⎦
[ S RF ] = [CMR ]T [ S M ][CMF ]
⎡1 4 1 4 0 0 ⎤ ⎡4 2 0 0 ⎤ ⎡ 0 −1⎤
⎢ 1 0 0 0 ⎥ 2 EI ⎢2 4 0 0 ⎥ 1 ⎢ 4 −1⎥
=⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 −1 4 − 1 4 ⎥ 4 ⎢0 0 2 1⎥ 4 ⎢4 1 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 1 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1 2⎦ ⎣0 1 ⎦
⎡1 4 1 4 0 0 ⎤ ⎡ 8 −6 ⎤ ⎡6 −3 ⎤
⎢ 1 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢8 − ⎥
EI ⎢ 0 0 0 16 −6 = EI ⎢
6
⎥
= ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
8 ⎢ 0 0 −1 4 −1 4 ⎥ ⎢ 8 3 ⎥ 8 ⎢ −3 −1.5⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 1 ⎦⎣ 4 3 ⎦ ⎣ 4 3 ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
∴{ AR } = − { ARC } + [ S RF ]{DF }
⎧ −18 ⎫ ⎡6 −3 ⎤
⎪ −12 ⎪ ⎢8 − ⎥
⎪ ⎪ EI ⎢
6
⎥ 1 ⎧ 9.70 ⎫
= −⎨ ⎬+ ⎨ ⎬
⎪ 0 ⎪ 8 ⎢ −3 −1.5⎥ EI ⎩ −61.09 ⎭
⎪⎩ 0 ⎪⎭ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 4 3 ⎦
2 EI ⎡2 1 ⎤
Member stiffness matrix of beam member [ S Mi ] = ⎢1 2 ⎥
L ⎣ ⎦
⎡4 2 0 0 0 0⎤
⎢2 4 0 0 0 0⎥
⎢ ⎥
2 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0⎥
Unassembled stiffness matrix [ S M ] = ⎢ ⎥
6 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥
⎢0 0 0 0 4 2⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 0 0 2 4⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
25 25
A 30mm DR1 D
C
B
Support settlements (Restraint displacements) {DR }
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[CMF ]and [CMR ] consist of member displacements due to unit
displacements on the restrained structure.
DF 1 = 1
A B C D
0 1 1 0 0 0
71
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
A DR1 = 1 D
C
B
−1 3 −1 3 16 16 0 0
DF 1 DF 2 DF 3 DR1
=1 =1 =1 =1
⎡0 0 0 −1 3⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎢1 0 0 −1 3⎥
[CMJ ] = ⎣⎡[CMF ] [CMR ]⎦⎤ = ⎢1 0 0 16⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢0 1 0 16⎥
⎢0 1 0 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣0 0 1 0 ⎥⎦
72
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements
{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦
−1
[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T
T
⎡0 0 0⎤ ⎡4 2 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎡0 0 0⎤
⎢1 0 0⎥ ⎢2 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎡6 1 0⎤
⎢1 0 0 ⎥ EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0 ⎥ = EI ⎢1 6 2 ⎥
=⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ 3 ⎢ ⎥
⎢0 1 0⎥ 3 ⎢ 0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0⎥ ⎢⎣ 0 2 4 ⎥⎦
⎢0 1 0⎥ ⎢0 0 0 0 4 2 ⎥ ⎢0 1 0⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1⎦ ⎣0 0 0 0 2 4 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1⎦
73
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[ S FR ] = [CMF ] [ S M ][CMR ]
T
T
⎡0 0 0⎤ ⎡4 2 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡ −1 3⎤
⎢1 0 0⎥ ⎢2 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ −1 3⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎧ −3 2 ⎫
⎢1 0 0 ⎥ EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ 1 6 ⎥ = EI ⎪ 1 2 ⎪
=⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬
3 ⎪ ⎪
⎢0 1 0⎥ 3 ⎢ 0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢ 1 6 ⎥
⎩ 0 ⎭
⎢0 1 0⎥ ⎢0 0 0 0 4 2 ⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1⎦ ⎣0 0 0 0 2 4⎦ ⎣ 0 ⎦
−1
⎛ ⎡6 1 0⎤ ⎞ ⎡ ⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎡− 3 2⎤ ⎤
⎜ EI
=⎜ ⎢ 1 6 2 ⎥ ⎟ ⎢ ⎪ −25 ⎪ − EI ⎢ 1 2 ⎥ {−0.03}⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎟ ⎢⎨ ⎬ ⎢ ⎥ ⎥
⎜ 3 ⎪ ⎪
⎢⎣ 0 2 4 ⎥⎦ ⎟⎠ ⎢⎣ ⎩ 25 ⎭
3
⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎥⎦
⎝
⎡ 20 −4 2 ⎤ ⎡⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎧ 0.045 ⎫ ⎤
3 ⎢ ⎥ ⎢⎪ ⎪ 5600 ⎪ ⎪⎥
= −4 24 −12 ⎢ ⎨ −25 ⎬ − ⎨ −0.015 ⎬ ⎥
116 EI ⎢ ⎥
⎪ ⎪ 3 ⎪ ⎪
⎢⎣ 2 −12 35 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ ⎩ 25 ⎭ ⎩ 0 ⎭ ⎥⎦
⎡ 20 −4 2 ⎤ ⎡ ⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎧ 84 ⎫ ⎤
3 ⎢ ⎢⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎥
= −4 24 −12 ⎥ ⎢ ⎨ −25 ⎬ − ⎨ −28 ⎬ ⎥
116 EI ⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣ 2 −12 35 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ ⎩⎪ 25 ⎭⎪ ⎩⎪ 0 ⎭⎪ ⎥⎦
⎧ −1642 ⎫ ⎧ −0.007583⎫
3 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
= ⎨ 108 =
⎬ ⎨ 0.0005 ⎬
116 × 5.6 × 103 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎩ 671 ⎭ ⎩ 0.0031 ⎭
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Support reactions
[ S RF ] = [CMR ] [ S M ][CMF ]
T
⎡4 2 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎡0 0 0⎤
⎢2 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0⎥
= [ − 1 3 −1 3 1 6 1 6 0 0 ] ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
3 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0⎥
⎢0 0 0 0 4 2⎥ ⎢0 1 0⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 0 0 2 4⎦ ⎣0 0 1⎦
EI
= [ −3 2 1 2 0 ]
3
76
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[ S RR ] = [CMR ] [ S M ][CMR ]
T
⎡4 2 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡ −1 3⎤
⎢2 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ −1 3⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0⎥ ⎢ 1 6 ⎥
= [ −1 3 −1 3 1 6 1 6 0 0 ] ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
3 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢ 1 6 ⎥
⎢0 0 0 0 4 2⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎡ EI ⎤ ⎣0 0 0 0 2 4⎦ ⎣ 0 ⎦
=⎢ ⎥
⎣ 2 ⎦
⎧ −0.007583⎫
⎪ ⎪ EI
{ AR } = −{0} + [ −3 2 1 2 0] ⎨ 0.0005 ⎬ + ⎡⎢ ⎤⎥ {−0.03}
EI
3 ⎪ 0.0031 ⎪ ⎣ 2 ⎦
⎩ ⎭
EI EI
= ( 0.0116 − 0.045) = −0.0334 = −62.35
3 3
⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎡4 2 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎛ ⎡0 0 0⎤ ⎡ − 1 3⎤ ⎞
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢2 ⎜ ⎟
4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎜ ⎢1 0 0⎥ ⎢ − 1 3⎥
⎟
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎧ −0.007583 ⎫ ⎢ ⎥
⎪ 0 ⎪ 2 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎜ ⎢1 0 0⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢16⎥ ⎟
{ AM } = ⎨ ⎬ + ⎢ ⎥⎜⎢ ⎥ ⎨ 0.0005 ⎬ + ⎢ ⎥ {−0.03} ⎟
⎪ 0 ⎪ 6 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0 ⎥ ⎜ ⎢0 1 0⎥ ⎪ 1 6 ⎟
⎩ 0.0031 ⎪⎭ ⎢ ⎥
⎪ 25 ⎪ ⎢0 0 0 0 4 2 ⎥ ⎜ ⎢0 1 0⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎟
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎜⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎟⎟
⎩ − 25 ⎭ ⎣0 0 0 0 2 4 ⎦ ⎝⎜ ⎣ 0 0 1⎦ ⎣ 0 ⎦ ⎠
⎧ 83.7 ⎫
⎪ 55.4 ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎪ −55.4 ⎪
=⎨ ⎬
⎪ −40.3 ⎪
⎪ 40.3 ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎩ 0 ⎭ 78
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Alternatively, if the entire [SJ] matrix is assembled at a time,
[ S J ] = [CMJ ]T [ SM ][CMJ ]
⎡4 2 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎡0 0 0 −1 3⎤
⎢2 ⎢ ⎥
⎡ 0 1 1 0 0 0⎤ 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0 −1 3⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 ⎥
1 1 0 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0 16⎥
=⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 1⎥ 3 ⎢ 0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0 16⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ − 1 3 −1 3 1 6 1 6 0 0 ⎦ ⎢0 0 0 0 4 2⎥ ⎢0 1 0 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 0 0 2 4 ⎦ ⎣⎢ 0 0 1 0 ⎦⎥
⎡2 0 0 −2 ⎤
⎡ 0 1 1 0 0 0⎤ ⎢ 4 0 0 −2 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥
0 ⎢2 0 1 2⎥
EI ⎢ 0 0 0 1 1
⎥⎢
1
= ⎥
3 ⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 1⎥ ⎢1 2 0 1 2⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ −1 3 −1 3 1 6 1 6 0 0⎦ ⎢ 0 4 2 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 2 4 0 ⎦
⎡ 6 1 0 −3 2⎤
⎢ 1 2 ⎥
=
EI ⎢ 1 6 2
⎥ ⎡[ S ] [ S FR ]⎤
= ⎢ FF
3 ⎢ 0
⎢
2 4 0 ⎥
⎥ ⎣[ S RF ] [ S RR ]⎥⎦
⎣−3 2 1 2 0 3 2 ⎦
79
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Alternatively, if ALL possible support settlements are accounted for,
⎡0 0 0 1 3 1 −1 3 0 0 ⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎢1 0 0 1 3 0 −1 3 0 0 ⎥
⎢1 −1 6 0 ⎥
[CMJ ] = ⎣⎡[CMF ] [CMR ]⎦⎤ = ⎢0
0 0 0 0 16
⎥
⎢ 1 0 0 0 16 −1 6 0 ⎥
⎢0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 −1 3⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 −1 3⎥⎦
[ S J ] = [CMJ ] [ SM ][CMJ ]
T
T
⎡0 0 01 3 1 −1 3 0 0 ⎤ ⎡4 2 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎡0 0 01 3 1 −1 3 0 0 ⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎢2 ⎢ ⎥
⎢1 0 01 3 0 −1 3 0 0 ⎥ 4 0 0 0 0⎥ ⎢1 0 01 3 0 −1 3 0 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢1 0 0 0 0 16 −1 6 0 ⎥ EI ⎢0 0 2 1 0 0⎥ ⎢1 0 0 0 0 16 −1 6 0 ⎥
=⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢0 1 0 0 0 16 −1 6 0 ⎥ 3 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0 0 0 16 −1 6 0 ⎥
⎢0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 −1 3⎥ ⎢0 0 0 0 4 2⎥ ⎢0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 −1 3⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 −1 3⎥⎦ ⎣0 0 0 0 2 4⎦ ⎢⎣0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 −1 3⎥⎦
80
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
⎡ 0 1 1 0 0 0 ⎤
⎢ 0 0 0 1 1 0 ⎥ ⎡2 0 0 2 4 −2 0 0⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 1 ⎥ ⎢4 0 0 2 2 −2 0 0⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
EI ⎢ 1 3 13 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢2 1 0 0 0 1 2 −1 2 0 ⎥
= ⎢ ⎥
3 ⎢ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 2 0 0 0 1 2 −1 2 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ − 1 3 − 1 3 1 6 1 6 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 4 2 0 0 0 2 −2 ⎥
⎢ 0 ⎢ ⎥
0 −1 6 −1 6 1 3 1 3 ⎥ ⎣0 2 4 0 0 0 2 −2 ⎦
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 0 − 1 3 − 1 3 ⎦
⎡ 6 1 0 2 2 − 3 2 −1 2 0 ⎤
⎢ 1 6 2 0 0 12 32 −2 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 2 4 0 0 0 2 −2 ⎥
⎢
EI ⎢ 2 0 0 4 3 2 −4 3 0 0 ⎥
⎥ ⎡[ S FF ] [ SFR ]⎤
= =⎢ ⎥
3 ⎢ 2
⎢
0 0 2 4 −2 0 0 ⎥
⎥
⎣[ S RF ] [ RR ]⎦
S
⎢ − 3 2 1 2 0 − 4 3 −2 3 2 − 1 6 0 ⎥
⎢ −1 2 3 2 2 0 0 −1 6 3 2 − 4 3⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 − 2 −2 0 0 0 − 4 3 4 3 ⎦
81
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements
⎡ ⎧ 0 ⎫⎤
−1 ⎢ ⎪ ⎪⎥
⎛ ⎡6 1 0⎤ ⎞ ⎢ ⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎡ 2 2 −3 2 −1 2 0 ⎤ ⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎥
⎜ EI ⎢1 6 ⎟ ⎪ ⎪ EI ⎢ ⎪ ⎪
=⎜ 2 ⎥ ⎟ ⎢ ⎨ −25 ⎬ − 0 0 12 3 2 −2 ⎥ ⎨ −0.03⎬ ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ 3 ⎢ ⎥ ⎥
⎜ 3 ⎢⎣ 0 2 ⎟ ⎪
4 ⎥⎦ ⎠ ⎢ ⎩ 25 ⎭ ⎪ ⎢⎣ 0 0 0 2 −2 ⎥⎦ ⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎥
⎝ ⎪ ⎪
⎢⎣ ⎩⎪ 0 ⎭⎪ ⎥⎦
⎡ 20 −4 2 ⎤ ⎡⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎧ 0.045 ⎫ ⎤
3 ⎢ ⎢⎪ ⎪ 5600 ⎪ ⎪⎥
= −4 24 −12 ⎥ ⎢ ⎨ −25 ⎬ − ⎨ −0.015 ⎬ ⎥
116 EI ⎢ ⎥ 3 ⎪
−12 35 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ ⎩ 25 ⎭ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎢⎣ 2 ⎩ 0 ⎭ ⎥⎦
⎡ 20 −4 2 ⎤ ⎧ −84 ⎫ ⎧ −1642 ⎫ ⎧ −0.007583⎫
3 ⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎪ = 3 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
= −4 24 −12 ⎨ 3 ⎬ 116 EI ⎨ 108 ⎬ = ⎨ 0.0005 ⎬
116 EI ⎢ ⎥ ⎪ 671 ⎪ ⎪ 0.0031 ⎪
⎢⎣ 2 −12 35 ⎥⎦ ⎪⎩ 25 ⎪⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
82
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Support reactions
⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎡ 2 0 0⎤ ⎡43 2 −4 3 0 0 ⎤⎧ 0 ⎫
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢ 2 0 0 ⎥ ⎧ −0.007583⎫ ⎢ 2 4 −2 0 0 ⎥⎪ 0 ⎪
⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ EI ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ EI ⎢ ⎥ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪
{ R} ⎨ ⎬
A = − 0 + ⎢ − 3 2 1 2 0 ⎥ ⎨ 0.0005 ⎬ + ⎢ − 4 3 − 2 3 2 − 1 6 0 ⎥ ⎨ − 0.03 ⎬
⎪ −50 ⎪ 3 ⎢ ⎥ 3 ⎢ ⎥
⎢ −1 2 3 2 2 ⎥ ⎪⎩ 0.0031 ⎪⎭ ⎢ 0 0 −1 6 3 2 − 4 3⎥ ⎪ 0 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪⎩ − 50 ⎭⎪ ⎢
⎣ 0 − 2 − 2 ⎥
⎦ ⎢
⎣ 0 0 0 − 4 3 4 3 ⎥
⎦ ⎩⎪ 0 ⎭⎪
⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎡4 2 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎛ ⎡0 0 0⎤ ⎡1 3 1 −1 3 0 0 ⎤ ⎞
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢2 ⎜ ⎧ ⎫ ⎟
0 ⎥ ⎜ ⎢1 0 0⎥ ⎢1 3 0 ⎥⎪
0
4 0 0 0 0 −1 3 0 ⎪ ⎟
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎧ −0.007583 ⎫ ⎢ ⎥ 0
⎪ 0 ⎪ 2 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎜ ⎢1 0 0⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 16 −1 6 0 ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪⎟
{ AM } = ⎨ ⎬ + ⎢ ⎥⎜⎢ ⎥ ⎨ 0.0005 ⎬ + ⎢ ⎥ ⎨ −0.03 ⎬ ⎟
0 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎜ ⎢0 1 0⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 16 −1 6 0 ⎥⎪
0 ⎪⎟
⎪ ⎪ 6
⎩ 0.0031 ⎭ ⎢
⎪ 25 ⎪ ⎢0 0 0 0 4 2⎥ ⎜ ⎢0 1 0⎥ 0 0 0 13 − 1 3⎥ ⎪ ⎪⎟
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎜⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎩⎪ 0 ⎭⎪ ⎟⎟
⎩ −25 ⎭ ⎣0 0 0 0 2 4 ⎦ ⎜⎝ ⎣ 0 0 1⎦ ⎣ 0 0 0 13 − 1 3⎦ ⎠
⎧ 83.7 ⎫
⎪ 55.4 ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎪ −55.4 ⎪
{ AM } = ⎨ ⎬
⎪ − 40.3 ⎪
⎪ 40.3 ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎩ 0 ⎭
84
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 5 85.33
1 3
2
KI = 2
(Rotations at A, B)
42.67
Equivalent joint loads
⎡2 4 14 0 0 0 ⎤0
⎢1 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
Unassembled ⎢ 0 0 6 4.8 3 4.8 0 0 ⎥
stiffness matrix [ S M ] = 2 EI ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 3 4.8 6 4.8 0 0 ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 4 8 2 8⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 0 2 8 4 8⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• [CMF ] consists of member displacements due to unit displacements on
the restrained structure.
DF 1 = 1
DF 2 = 1
DF1 DF2
=1 =1
⎡1 0⎤
⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢0 0⎥
[CMF ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢0 1⎥
⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0⎦ 86
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements
{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF }
−1
since there are no support displacements.
[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T
⎡2 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡1 0⎤
⎢1 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎡1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎢ 0 0 6 4.8 3 4.8 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 0⎥
=⎢ ⎥ 2 EI ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 1 0 1 1 0 ⎦ ⎢ 0 0 3 4.8 6 4.8 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 4 8 2 8 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 0 2 8 4 8 ⎦ ⎣0 0⎦
87
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
⎡8 4 ⎤
⎢4 8 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
EI ⎡1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎢0 20 ⎥ EI ⎡2 1 ⎤
= = ⎢1 9 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
8 ⎢⎣0 1 0 1 1 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢0 10 ⎥ 2 ⎣ ⎦
⎢0 8 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 4 ⎦
−1
⎛ EI ⎡ 2 1 ⎤ ⎞ ⎧ 0 ⎫
∴ {DF } = [ S FF ] { AF } = ⎜ = ⎢
−1
⎥ ⎟ ⎨85.333⎬
⎝ 2 ⎣ 1 9 ⎦⎠ ⎩ ⎭
8 ⎡ 36 −4 ⎤ ⎧ 0 ⎫ 1 ⎧ −341.332 ⎫ 1 ⎧ −10.039 ⎫
= =
⎢ −4 8 ⎥ ⎨85.333⎬ 34 EI ⎨ ⎬= ⎨ ⎬
272 EI ⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭ ⎩ 682.664 ⎭ EI ⎩ 20.078 ⎭
88
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member end actions
{DR} is a null matrix
{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })
⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎡2 4 14 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡1 0⎤
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢1 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎪ 42.667 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 6 4.8 3 4.8 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥ 1 ⎧ −10.039 ⎫
=⎨ ⎬ + 2 EI ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬
⎪ −85.333 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 3 4.8 6 4.8 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 0 ⎥ EI ⎩ 20.078 ⎭
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 0 0 4 8 2 8 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎩ 0 ⎭ ⎣ 0 0 0 0 2 8 4 8 ⎦ ⎣0 0⎦
⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎧ 0 ⎫
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎪ 120.47 ⎪ ⎪ 15.059 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪ 42.667 ⎪ 1 ⎪ 200.78 ⎪ ⎪ 67.765 ⎪
=⎨ ⎬+ ⎨ ⎬ =⎨ ⎬
⎪ − 85.333 ⎪ 8 ⎪ 401.56 ⎪ ⎪ − 35.138 ⎪
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎪160.624 ⎪ ⎪ 20.078 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ 89
⎩ of CE,
Dept. ⎭
0 GCE Kannur ⎩ 80.312 ⎭ ⎩ 10.039 ⎭ Dr.RajeshKN
•Homework 2:
80kNm
20kN m
B
C D
6m 3m 3m
2 3
4m
1
90
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Problem 6
60kN
20 kN m B
A C
6m 3m 3m
4m 60 60 − 45 = 15
45
D 1 3
⎡2 6 1 6 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡2 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 ⎤
⎢1 6 2 6 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 2 4 14 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ 0 0 1 12 0 0 ⎥
= 2 EI ⎢ ⎥ = EI ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 14 2 4 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 2 6 1 6⎥ ⎢ 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 3⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 0 1 6 2 6⎦ ⎣ 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 3⎦
1 3
DF1 DF2
=1 =1
⎡1 0⎤
⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢0 0⎥
[CMF ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢0 1⎥
⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T
⎡2 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡1 0⎤
⎢1 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎡1 0 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎢ 0 0 1 12 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 0⎥
=⎢ ⎥ EI ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 1 0 1 1 0 ⎦ ⎢ 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 3 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 3⎦ ⎣ 0 0⎦
⎡2 3 1 3⎤
⎢1 3 2 3⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎡1 0 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎢ 0 1 2⎥ ⎡ 2 3 1 3 ⎤ EI ⎡ 2 1 ⎤
= EI ⎢ ⎥⎢ 0 ⎥ = EI ⎢ ⎥ = ⎢1 7⎥
⎣ 0 1 0 1 1 0 ⎦⎢ 1 ⎥ ⎣ 1 3 7 3 ⎦ 3 ⎣ ⎦
⎢ 0 2 3⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 1 3⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements
{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF }
−1
since there are no support displacements.
−1
⎛ EI ⎡ 2 1 ⎤ ⎞ ⎧ −60 ⎫
=⎜ ⎢ 1 7 ⎥ ⎟ ⎨ 15 ⎬
⎝ 3 ⎣ ⎦⎠ ⎩ ⎭
95
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member end actions
{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR }) {DR} is a null matrix
⎧ 60 ⎫ ⎡2 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡1 0⎤
⎪ − 60 ⎪ ⎢1 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 1 12 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 0 ⎥ 1 ⎧ − 100.385 ⎫
=⎨ ⎬ + E I ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 12 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1 ⎥ E I ⎩ 20.769 ⎭
⎪ 45 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 3 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎩ − 45 ⎭ ⎣ 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 3⎦ ⎣ 0 0⎦
⎧ 60 ⎫ ⎡ 2 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎧ − 100.385 ⎫
⎪ − 60 ⎪ ⎢ 1 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎪ 20.769 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 1 12 0 0 ⎥⎪ 0 ⎪
=⎨ ⎬+⎢ ⎥⎨ ⎬
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 12 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎪ 20.769 ⎪
⎪ 45 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 3 ⎥ ⎪ 20.769 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪
⎩ − 45 ⎭ ⎣ 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 3⎦ ⎩ 0 ⎭ 96
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
⎧ 60 ⎫ ⎧ − 60 ⎫ ⎧ 0 ⎫
⎪ − 60 ⎪ ⎪ − 19.616 ⎪ ⎪ − 79.616 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎪ 10.385 ⎪ ⎪ 10.385 ⎪
=⎨ ⎬+⎨ ⎬= ⎨ ⎬
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎪ 20.769 ⎪ ⎪ 20.769 ⎪
⎪ 45 ⎪ ⎪ 13.846 ⎪ ⎪ 58.846 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎩ − 45 ⎭ ⎩ 6.923 ⎭ ⎩ − 38.077 ⎭
⎡2 1 0 0 0⎤
0
⎢1 2 0 0 0⎥
0
⎢ ⎥
2 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0⎥
Unassembled stiffness matrix [ M ]
S = ⎢ ⎥
L ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥
⎢0 0 0 0 2 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 0 0 1 2⎦
⎡2 1 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎡0 0 1 L⎤
⎢1 2 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 1 L⎥
⎡ 0 1 1 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥ 2 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0 ⎥
= 0
⎥ L ⎢0 ⎥⎢ ⎥
0 0 1 1 0
⎢ 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0 ⎥
⎢⎣1 L 1 L 0 0 1 L 1 L ⎥⎦ ⎢
⎢0 0 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢0 1 1 L⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 0 0 1 2⎦ ⎣0 0 1 L⎦
⎡1 0 3 L⎤
⎢2 0 3 L⎥
⎡ 0 1 1 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥ 2 EI ⎢ 2 1 0 ⎥ ⎡ 4 1 3L ⎤
= 0 ⎥ = 2 EI ⎢ 1 ⎥
⎥ L ⎢1
0 0 1 1 0
⎢ 2 0 ⎥ 4 3 L
⎢⎣1 L 1 L 0 0 1 L 1 L ⎥⎦ ⎢ L ⎢ ⎥
⎢0 2 3 L⎥ ⎢⎣3 L 3 L 12 L ⎥⎦
2
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 1 3 L⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements
{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦
−1
−1
⎛ ⎡ 4 1 3 L ⎤⎞ ⎧0 ⎫
⎜ 2 EI ⎢ 1 ⎟ ⎪ ⎪
{ F} ⎜
D = 4 3 L ⎥⎟ ⎨0⎬
⎢ ⎥
⎜ L 2 ⎟ ⎪ ⎪
⎢⎣ 3 L 3 L 12 L ⎥⎦ ⎠ ⎩ P ⎭
⎝
⎡ 13 −3 −3L ⎤ ⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎧ −3 ⎫
L ⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎪ PL 2
⎪ ⎪
= −3 13 −3L ⎨ 0 ⎬ = ⎨ −3 ⎬
84 EI ⎢ ⎥
2 ⎪ ⎪ 84 EI
⎢⎣ −3L −3L 5L ⎥⎦ ⎩ P ⎭ ⎪5 L ⎪
⎩ ⎭
101
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member end actions
{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })
{ AM } = [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }
⎡2 1 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡0 0 1 L⎤
⎢1 2 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 1 L⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎧ −3 ⎫
2 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0 ⎥ PL2 ⎪ ⎪
{ AM } = ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎨ −3 ⎬
L ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0 ⎥ 84 EI ⎪ ⎪
⎢0 ⎩5L ⎭
0 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢0 1 1 L⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1 L⎦
⎡2 1 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎧5⎫ ⎧ 12 ⎫ ⎧4⎫
⎢1 2 0 0 0 0⎥ ⎪2⎪ ⎪9⎪ ⎪3⎪
⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
2 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ PL2 ⎪ −3⎪ 2
⎪ −9 ⎪ PL ⎪ −3 ⎪
= ⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬ = 2 EI PL ⎨ ⎬ = ⎨ ⎬
L ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0 ⎥ 84 EI ⎪ −3 ⎪ L 84 EI ⎪ −9 ⎪ 14 ⎪ −3 ⎪
⎢0 0 0 0 2 1⎥ ⎪2⎪ ⎪9⎪ ⎪3⎪
⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎣0 0 0 0 1 2⎦ ⎩5⎭ ⎩ 12 ⎭ ⎩4⎭
102
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 8 30kN m
B
C
6m
60kN
6m
3m
A D
EI is constant. ⎡2 1 0 0 0 0⎤
⎢1 2 0 0 0 0⎥
⎢ ⎥
EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥
Unassembled stiffness matrix [ S M ] = ⎢ ⎥
3 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥
⎢0 0 0 0 2 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 0 1 2 ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
90 90
B
45 C 0
90 90
B 30 C
A 30
D
45 Fixed end actions 0
D D
A A
Equivalent joint loads DOF
⎧ −45 ⎫
⎪ ⎪
{ F} ⎨ ⎬
A = 90
⎪ 30 ⎪
⎩ ⎭
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2
1 3
[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T
⎡2 1 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎡0 0 1 6⎤
⎢1 2 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 1 6⎥
⎡ 0 1 1 0 0 0⎤ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥ EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0⎥
= 0
⎥ 3 ⎢0 ⎥⎢ ⎥
0 0 1 1 0
⎢ 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0⎥
⎢⎣1 6 1 6 0 0 1 6 1 6 ⎥⎦ ⎢
⎢0 0 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢0 1 1 6⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1 6⎦ 107
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
⎡1 0 3 6⎤
⎢2 0 3 6⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎡ 4 1 36 ⎤
⎡0 1 1 0 0 0⎤
⎢ ⎥ EI ⎢ 2 1 0 ⎥ = EI ⎢ 1 4 36 ⎥
= 0 ⎢ ⎥
⎥ 3 ⎢1 ⎥
0 0 1 1 0
⎢ 2 0 ⎥ 3
⎢⎣3 6 3 6 12 6 ⎥⎦
2
⎢⎣1 6 1 6 0 0 1 6 1 6⎥⎦ ⎢
⎢0 2 3 6⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 1 3 6⎦
−1
⎛ ⎡ 4 1 3 6 ⎤ ⎞ ⎧ −45 ⎫
⎜ EI ⎢ 1 ⎟ ⎪ ⎪
{ DF } = ⎜ 4 3 6 ⎥ ⎟ ⎨ 90 ⎬
⎢ ⎥
⎜ 3 ⎢⎣ 3 6 3 6 12 6 ⎥⎦ ⎠ ⎩ 30 ⎭⎪
2 ⎟ ⎪
⎝
⎡2 1 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡0 0 1 6⎤ ⎧ 70.6 ⎫
⎢1 2 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 1 6⎥ ⎪ −48.3 ⎪
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎧−86.9 ⎫ ⎪ ⎪
EI ⎢0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0⎥ 1 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ 48.3 ⎪
{ AM } = ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎨ 48.2 ⎬ = ⎨ ⎬
3 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0 ⎥ EI ⎪ 329 ⎪ ⎪ −86.7 ⎪
⎢0 ⎩ ⎭ ⎪ 86.7 ⎪
0 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢0 1 1 6⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎪
⎣0 0 0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1 6⎦ ⎩ 70.6 ⎭
109
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 9:
5m
3m
1
50 kN
3 5m
3m 80 kN
5m 2
4m 4m
DF1 DF2
=1 =1
⎡0.8 -0.6 ⎤
⎢-0.8 0.6⎥
[ MF ] ⎢
C = ⎥
⎢⎣0.8 0.6 ⎥⎦
[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]= ⎡ 0.384
T
⎢ -0.096
-0.096 ⎤
⎣ 0.216 ⎥⎦
= [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }
⎧17.708 ⎫
⎪ ⎪
= ⎨ −17.708 ⎬
⎪ −97.917 ⎪
⎩ ⎭
1 3
114
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
6
=0.
3
3 .1
s5
cco
oss 3
c o 366.
.887 1
7==0
0..8
8
8
1
0.
0.
m
6
36.870
m
5
5
53.13
53.130
DF1 DF2
=1 =1
⎡0.600 0.800 ⎤
⎢0.000 -1.000 ⎥
[C MF ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣-0.600 0.800⎥⎦
[ FF ] [ MF ] [ M ][ MF ] =
S = C S
T
C ⎡0.144 0.000⎤
⎢0.000 0.756⎥⎦
⎣
116
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member Forces:
{ AM } = [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }
0. 5
0.
0.8
1
66
DF1 DF2
=1 =1
⎡0.866 0.500 ⎤
⎢1.000 0.000 ⎥
[C MF ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣0.500 -0.866 ⎥⎦
120
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member Forces:
{ AM } = [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }
⎡ 0.866 0.000 0.000⎤⎡0.866 0.500⎤
⎧2.887 ⎫
{ AM } = ⎢⎢ 0.000 1.000 0.000⎥⎢1.000
⎥⎢
⎥
0.000 ⎨
⎥ ⎩-0.773⎭⎬
⎢⎣ 0.000 0.000 0.500⎥⎢
⎦⎣0.500 -0.866⎥⎦
⎧1.830 ⎫
⎪ ⎪
= ⎨ 2.887 ⎬
⎪1.057 ⎪
⎩ ⎭
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 12:
B C D
AE/L is a constant 1 2 3
450
A
450
300
50 kN
⎡1 0 0⎤
AE ⎢ ⎥
Unassembled stiffness matrix [ M]
S = 0 1 0
L ⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣ 0 0 1 ⎥⎦
0.7
A A 07
45 0
450 1
7 07
0. 1 0.
70
0.
70
7
7
DF1 DF2
=1 =1
⎡0.707 0.707 ⎤
⎢1.000 0.000 ⎥
[C MF ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣0.707 -0.707 ⎥⎦
⎡1 0 0⎤ ⎡0.707 0.707 ⎤
⎡0.707 1 0.707 ⎤ AE ⎢ ⎥⎢ 1 ⎥
=⎢ ⎥ L ⎢ 0 1 0 0
⎣0.707 0 −0.707⎦ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣0 0 1⎥⎦ ⎢⎣0.707 −0.707⎥⎦
AE ⎡2 0⎤
=
L ⎢⎣0 1⎥⎦
L ⎡1 0 ⎤ ⎧ 25 ⎫ L ⎧12.5 ⎫
{ DF } = ⎢ 0 2 ⎥ ⎨ 43.308 ⎬ = AE ⎨ 43.308 ⎬
2 AE ⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
125
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member Forces:
{ AM } = [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }
⎡1 0 0⎤⎡0.707 0.707 ⎤
AE ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ L ⎧12.5 ⎫
{ AM } = ⎢0 1 0⎥⎢ 1 0
⎥ AE ⎨⎩43.308⎭⎬
L
⎢⎣0 0 1⎥⎦ ⎢⎣0.707 −0.707⎥⎦
⎧ 39.456 ⎫
⎪ ⎪
= ⎨12.5 ⎬
⎪ -21.781⎪
⎩ ⎭
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 13: AE is constant.
A 0. 9
m
B
0.5m
0.8m
C D
0.75m
10 kN
⎡ 1.11 0 0 ⎤
Unassembled stiffness matrix [ S M ] = AE ⎢⎢ 0 1.25 0 ⎥⎥
⎢⎣ 0 0 1.33⎥⎦
127
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
A
0. ∠ ADC = 33.69 0
9m
B
0.5m
DF1 DF2
DF2
=1 =1
0.8m 13.330
⎡0.832 −0.555⎤
D
C 20.360 [CMF ] = ⎢⎢0.938 −0.348⎥⎥
0.75m DF1
⎢⎣ 1 0 ⎥⎦
128
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements
{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF }
−1
{ AM } = [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }
⎡ 1.11 0 0 ⎤⎡0.832 −0.555⎤
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ 1 ⎧−12.634⎫
{AM } = AE ⎢ 0 1.25 0 ⎥⎢0.938 −0.348⎥ ⎨ ⎬
AE ⎩−43.882⎭
⎢⎣ 0 0 1.33⎥⎢
⎦⎣ 1 0 ⎦⎥
AE is constant.
A B C
1 2 3
1m
D 450
600
20 kN
131
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Summary
Stiffness method
132
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN