Module2 Stiffness S PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 132

Structural Analysis - III

Stiffness Method

Dr. Rajesh K. N.
Associate Professor in Civil Engineering
Govt. College of Engineering, Kannur

1
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Module II
Stiffness method

• Development of stiffness matrices by physical approach –


stiffness matrices for truss,beam and frame elements –
displacement transformation matrix – development of total
stiffness matrix - analysis of simple structures – plane
truss beam and plane frame- nodal loads and element
loads – lack of fit and temperature effects.

2
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
FUNDAMENTALS OF STIFFNESS METHOD
Introduction
• Displacement components are the primary unknowns

• Number of unknowns is equal to the kinematic indeterminacy

• Redundants are the joint displacements, which are


automatically specified

• Choice of redundants is unique

• Conducive to computer programming

3
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Stiffness method (displacements of the joints are the primary
unknowns): kinematic indeterminacy

• kinematic indeterminacy

• joints: a) where members meet, b) supports, c) free ends


• joints undergo translations or rotations

• in some cases joint displacements will be known, from the


restraint conditions

• the unknown joint displacements are the kinematically


indeterminate quantities

o degree of kinematic indeterminacy: number of degrees


of freedom

4
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• in a truss, the joint rotation is not regarded as a degree
of freedom. joint rotations do not have any physical
significance as they have no effects in the members of the
truss

• in a frame, degrees of freedom due to axial


deformations can be neglected

5
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Stiffness coefficients
•Example 1: Stiffness and flexibility coefficients of a beam

Unit action

Unit displacement

F11, F21, F12 , F22


S11 , S21 , S12 , S22 Forces due to unit dispts Dispts due to unit forces
– stiffness coefficients – flexibility coefficients
6
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Example 2: Action-displacement equations for a beam subjected to
several loads

A1 = A11 + A12 + A13

A1 = S11 D1 + S12 D2 + S13 D3

A2 = S21 D1 + S22 D2 + S23 D3

A3 = S31D1 + S32 D2 + S33 D3


7
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Stiffness matrix A1 = S11 D1 + S12 D2 + S13 D3 + ... + S1n Dn
A2 = S21 D1 + S22 D2 + S23 D3 + ... + S2 n Dn
............................................................
An = S n1 D1 + S n 2 D2 + S n 3 D3 + ... + S nn Dn

oIn matrix form, ⎧⎪ 1 ⎫⎪ ⎧⎪ 11 12


A S S ... S1n ⎫ ⎧ D1 ⎫
⎪ A2 ⎪ ⎪ S21 S22 ... S2 n ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ D2 ⎪⎪
⎨ ⎬=⎨ ⎬⎨ ⎬
⎪... ⎪ ⎪ ... ... ... ... ⎪ ⎪ ... ⎪
⎪⎩ An ⎭⎪ ⎪⎩ Sn1 Sn 2 ... Snn ⎪⎭ ⎪⎩ Dn ⎪⎭
n×1 n×n n×1

A = SD { A} = [ S ]{D}
•Action matrix, Stiffness matrix, Displacement matrix

•Stiffness coefficient Sij

{ A} = [ F ] {D} ⇒ [ S ] = [ F ]
−1 −1
[F ] = [S ]
−1
8
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Stiffness method (Direct approach: Explanation using principle
of superposition)
Example: Propped cantilever (Kinematically indeterminate to
first degree)

• Required to get θ B
•degrees of freedom: one

• Kinematically determinate structure is obtained by restraining


all displacements (all displacement components made zero -
restrained structure)

9
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Restraint at B causes a reaction of MB as shown.

wL2
MB = −
12
(Note the sign convention:
anticlockwise positive)
The actual rotation at B is θ B
Hence it is required to induce a rotation of θ B

•Apply unit rotation corresponding to θ B

Let the moment required for this unit rotation be mB


4 EI
mB = anticlockwise
L 10
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Moment required to induce a rotation of θ B is mBθ B

M B + mBθ B = 0 (Joint equilibrium equation)

wL2 4 EI MB wL3
− + θB = 0 ∴θ B = − =
12 L mB 48EI

mB (Moment required for unit rotation) is the stiffness


coefficient here.

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


Stiffnesses of prismatic members

Stiffness coefficients of a structure are calculated from the


contributions of individual members

Hence member stiffness matrices are to be developed.

12
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member stiffness matrix for prismatic beam member with
rotations at the ends as degrees of freedom

A
B

2 EI ⎡2 1⎤
[ SMi ] = ⎢1 2⎥
L ⎣ ⎦

Verification:
−1
⎡ L −L ⎤ −1
⎢ 3EI 6 EI ⎥ ⎛ L ⎡ 2 −1⎤ ⎞ 6 EI ⎡ 2 1 ⎤ 2 EI ⎡ 2 1 ⎤
[ S Mi ] = [ FMi ] = ⎢
−1
⎥ = ⎜ ⎢ −1 2 ⎥ ⎟ = ⎢ ⎥ =
L ⎢⎣ 1 2 ⎥⎦
⎢ −L L ⎥ ⎝ 6 EI ⎣ ⎦⎠ L(3) ⎣ 1 2 ⎦
⎢⎣ 6 EI 3EI ⎥⎦
13
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member stiffness matrix for prismatic beam member with
deflection and rotation at one end as degrees of freedom

⎡ S M 11 S M 12 ⎤
[ SMi ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎣ M 21
S S M 22 ⎦

⎡ 12 EI 6 EI ⎤
⎢ L3 − 2 ⎥
L
=⎢ ⎥
⎢ − 6 EI 4 EI ⎥
⎢⎣ L2 L ⎥⎦

14
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Verification:
−1 ⎡ 12 EI 6 EI ⎤
⎡ L3 L2 ⎤ −
⎢ 3EI
−1 6 EI ⎡ 6 −3L ⎤ ⎢ L3 L2 ⎥
2 EI ⎥ ⎛ L ⎡ 2 L2 3L ⎤ ⎞ = 2 ⎢ 2 ⎥
=⎢ ⎥
[ S Mi ] = [ FMi ] = ⎢ 2 L ( 3L ) ⎣
−1
⎥ =⎜ ⎢ ⎥⎟ −
⎢ L L ⎥ ⎜ 6 EI
⎣ 3L 6 ⎦ ⎟⎠
3 L 2 L ⎦ ⎢ − 6 EI 4 EI ⎥

⎢⎣ 2 EI EI ⎦⎥ ⎣⎢ L2 L ⎦⎥

•Truss member

EA
[ S Mi ] =
L

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


•Problem 1
Find the member stiffness matrix of the beam shown in figure,
with reference to the co-ordinates shown.
1

2
L,E,I

Unit displacement (vertical Unit displacement (rotation)


translation) w.r.t. DOF 1 w.r.t. DOF 2
(downward, according to the (clockwise, according to the
given co-ordinate) given co-ordinate)
16
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
4EI
12EI
L
L3

6EI
L2
6EI
L2

⎡ 12 EI −6 EI ⎤
⎢ L3 L2 ⎥
∴ [ SM ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢ −6 EI 4 EI ⎥
⎢⎣ L2 L ⎥⎦

17
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 2

Find the member stiffness matrix of the beam shown in figure,


with reference to the co-ordinates shown.

1
L,E,I
2

Unit displacement (vertical


Unit displacement (rotation) translation) w.r.t. DOF 2
w.r.t. DOF 1 (upward, according to the
(clockwise, according to the given co-ordinate)
given co-ordinate)
18
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
4EI 6EI
L L2

6EI 12EI
L2 L3

⎡ 4 EI 6 EI ⎤
⎢ L L2 ⎥
∴ [ SM ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 6 EI 12 EI ⎥
⎢⎣ L2 L3 ⎥⎦

19
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member stiffness matrices for a few other cases
•Plane frame member

⎡ S M 11 S M 12 S M 13 ⎤
[ S Mi ] = ⎢⎢ S M 21 S M 22 S M 23 ⎥

⎢⎣ S M 31 S M 32 S M 33 ⎥⎦
⎡ EA ⎤
⎢ L 0 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
12 EI 6 EI ⎥
=⎢ 0 − 2
⎢ L3 L ⎥
⎢ 6 EI 4 EI ⎥
⎢ 0 − 2 ⎥
⎣ L L ⎦

20
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Grid member

⎡ 12 EI 6 EI ⎤
⎢ L3 0 −
L2 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
GJ
[ S Mi ] = ⎢⎢ 0 0 ⎥

L
⎢ 6 EI 4 EI ⎥
⎢− 2 0 ⎥
⎣ L L ⎦

21
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Space frame member

⎡ EA ⎤
⎢ L 0 0 0 0 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 12 EI Z 6 EI Z ⎥
0 0 0 − 2
⎢ L3 L ⎥
⎢ 12 EI Y 6 EI Y ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 ⎥
L3 L2
[ S Mi ] = ⎢⎢ ⎥

GJ
⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 ⎥
⎢ L ⎥
⎢ 0 0
6 EI Y
0
4 EI Y
0 ⎥⎥
⎢ L2 L
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 6 EI Z 4 EI Z ⎥
− 0 0 0
⎣⎢ L2 L ⎦⎥
22
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Formalization of the Stiffness method
(Explanation using principle of complimentary virtual work)

{ AMi } = [ S Mi ]{DMi }
Here {DMi } contains relative displacements of the k end with respect
to j end of the i-th member

If there are m members in the structure,


⎧ { AM 1 } ⎫ ⎡[ S M 1 ] [0 ] [0] [0 ] [0 ] ⎤ ⎧ {D M 1 } ⎫
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪
⎪{ A M 2 } ⎪ ⎢ [0 ] [SM 2 ] [0] [0] [0 ] ⎥⎪ { D M 2 } ⎪
⎪{ AM 3 }⎪ ⎢ [0 ] [0 ] [ S M 3 ] [0 ] [0 ] ⎥ ⎪{D M 3 } ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪
⎨ ⎬= ⎢ ⎥⎨ ⎬
⎪ {A } ⎪ ⎢ [0 ] [0 ] [0] [ S Mi ] [0 ] ⎥ ⎪⎪ {DMi } ⎪⎪
⎪ Mi ⎪ ⎢ ⎥
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪
⎪{ A }⎪
⎩ Mm ⎭
⎢ [0 ]
⎣ [0 ] [0] [0 ] [ S Mm ]⎥⎦ ⎪⎩{DMm }⎪⎭

AM = SM DM
23
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
{ AM } = [ S M ]{DM }
[S M ] is the unassembled stiffness matrix of the entire structure

24
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Relative end-displacements in {DM } will be related to a vector of joint

displacements for the whole structure, {DJ }

{DM } = [C MJ ]{DJ }
[CMJ ] displacement transformation matrix (compatibility matrix)

free (unknown) joint displacements {DF }


{D J } consists of:
and restraint displacements {DR }

• If there are no support displacements specified,

{ DR } will be a null matrix

⎧{DF }⎫
• Hence, {DM } = [C MJ ]{DJ } = ⎡⎣[C MF ] [C MR ]⎤⎦ ⎨ ⎬
{ D
⎩ R ⎭}
25
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Elements in displacement transformation matrix,

(compatibility matrix) [CMJ ] are found from compatibility conditions.

[CMF ] {DF }
and relate {DM } to and respectively
[CMR ] { DR }

• Each column in the submatrix [CMF ] consists of member


displacements caused by a unit value of an unknown displacement
applied to the restrained structure.

•Each column in the submatrix [CMR ] consists of member


displacements caused by a unit value of a support displacement
applied to the restrained structure.
26
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Suppose an arbitrary set of virtual displacements {δ DM }
is applied on the structure.

⎧{δ D F }⎫
{δ DM } = [C MJ ]{δ D J } = ⎣⎡[C MF ] [ MR ]⎤⎦ ⎨
C ⎬
⎩{ R } ⎭
δ D

• External virtual work produced by the virtual displacements {δ DJ }

and real loads { AJ } is


δD
δ W = { AJ }
T
{δ DJ } = ⎡⎣{ AF }
T
{ AR }
T
⎤ ⎧⎨ F ⎫⎬
⎦ ⎩δ DR ⎭

27
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Internal virtual work produced by the virtual (relative) end
displacements {δ DM } and actual member end actions { AM } is

δ U = { AM } {δ DM }
T

• Equating the above two (principle of virtual work),

{ AJ } {δ DJ } = { AM } {δ DM }
T T

But {DM } = [C MJ ]{DJ } and { AM } = [ S M ]{DM }


Also, {δ DM } = [C MJ ]{δ D J }

Hence, { AJ } {δ DJ } = {DJ } [CMJ ] [ S M ] [CMJ ]{δ DJ }


T T T T

{ AJ } = [ S J ]{DJ }
28
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Where, [ S J ] = [CMJ ] [ S M ][CMJ ] , the assembled stiffness matrix for the
T

entire structure.

• It is useful to partition [ SJ ] into submatrices pertaining to free

(unknown) joint displacements{DF }and restraint displacements {DR }

⎧{ AF }⎫ ⎡[ S FF ] [ S FR ]⎤ ⎧{DF }⎫
{ AJ } = [ S J ]{DJ } ⇒ ⎨ ⎬=⎢
⎩{ AR }⎭ ⎣[ S RF ] [ S RR ]⎥⎦ ⎩⎨{DR }⎭⎬

Where,  [ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ] [ S FR ] = [C MF ]T [ S M ][CMR ]


T

[ S RF ] = [CMR ]T [ S M ][CMF ] [ S RR ] = [CMR ]T [ S M ][CMR ]

29
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
{ AF } = [ S FF ]{DF } + [ S FR ]{DR } { AR } = [ S RF ]{DF } + [ S RR ]{DR }

⇒ {DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦


−1
Joint displacements

• Support reactions

If actual or equivalent joint loads are applied directly to the supports,

{ AR } = − { ARC } + [ S RF ]{DF } + [ S RR ]{DR }


represents combined joint loads (actual and equivalent) applied
{ ARC } directly to the supports.

30
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Member end actions are obtained adding member end actions
calculated as above and initial fixed-end actions

i.e., { AM } = { AML } + [ S M ][C MJ ]{D J }

{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })

where { AML } represents fixed end actions

31
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Important formulae:

{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎦⎤


−1
Joint displacements:

Support reactions: { AR } = − { ARC } + [ S RF ]{DF } + [ S RR ]{DR }

Member end actions:

{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([CMF ]{DF } + [CMR ]{DR })

32
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Relationship between force transformation matrix and
displacement transformation matrix

{δ AS } {DS } = {δ AM } {DM }
T T

{ AM } = [ BMS ]{ AS }
{δ AM } = [ BMS ]{δ AS }
{δ AM } = {δ AS } [ BMS ]
T T T

{DM } = [C MJ ]{DJ }
{D J } = {D S }
{ S } { S } ({δ AS } [ BMS ] ) ([CMJ ]{DS })
δ =
T T T
A D

Hence, [ BMS ] [CMJ ] = [ I ]


T

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


•Problem 1

Kinematic indeterminacy = 2 (Rotations at B and C)

2 EI ⎡2 1⎤
Member stiffness matrix of beam member [ S Mi ] = ⎢1 2⎥
L ⎣ ⎦
⎡4 2 0 0⎤
⎢ 0⎥
2 EI ⎢ 2 4 0
Unassembled stiffness matrix [ S M ] = ⎥
L ⎢0 0 2 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦
34
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Fixed end actions

Equivalent joint loads

35
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements
Free (unknown) joint displacements {DF } Restraint displacements {DR }

•Each column in the submatrix [CMF ] consists of member


displacements caused by a unit value of an unknown displacement
applied to the restrained structure.

•Each column in the submatrix [CMR ] consists of member


displacements caused by a unit value of a support displacement
applied to the restrained structure.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
0 1 1 0 DF1 DF2
=1 =1
⎡0 0⎤
⎢1 0⎥
[C M F ]= ⎢ ⎥
⎢1 0⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 1⎦

0 0 0 1

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


1L 1L 0 0 1 0 0 0

−1 L −1 L 1L 1L 0 0 −1 L −1 L

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


DR1 DR2 DR3 DR4
=1 =1 =1 =1
⎡1 L 1 −1 L 0 ⎤
⎢1 L 0 −1 L 0 ⎥
[CMR ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 1 L −1 L⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 1 L −1 L⎦

DF1 DF2 DR1 DR2 DR3 DR4


=1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1
⎡0 0 1 L −1 0⎤
⎢ ⎥
[CMJ ] = ⎣⎡[CMF ] [CMR ]⎦⎤ = 1 ⎢ L 0 1 0 −1 0⎥
L ⎢L 0 0 0 1 − 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 L0 0 1 − 1⎦

39
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements

{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦


−1

{DR} is a null matrix, since there are no support


displacements

∴{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF }
−1

⎡4 2 0 0⎤ ⎡0 0⎤
⎢ 4 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0⎥
⎡ 0 1 1 0⎤ 2 EI ⎢ 2
[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T
=⎢ ⎥ L ⎢0
⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 1 ⎦ 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢1 0⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦ ⎣0 1⎦

2 EI ⎡6 1 ⎤
= ⎢1 2 ⎥
L ⎣ ⎦
40
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
−1

Free (unknown) joint displacements {D


⎛ 2 EI ⎡6 1 ⎤ ⎞ PL ⎧1 ⎫
F}= ⎜ ⎢1 2 ⎥ ⎟ 9 ⎨ 2 ⎬
⎝ L ⎣ ⎦⎠ ⎩ ⎭

PL2 1 ⎧ 0 ⎫ PL2 ⎧0 ⎫
= . ⎨ ⎬= ⎨ ⎬
18 EI 11 ⎩11⎭ 18 EI ⎩1 ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


Support reactions { AR } = − { ARC } + [ S RF ]{DF } + [ S RR ]{DR }
{DR} is a null matrix.

∴{ AR } = − { ARC } + [ S RF ]{DF }

[ S RF ] = [CMR ]T [ S M ][CMF ]
T
⎡1 L −1 0⎤ ⎡4 2 0 0 ⎤ ⎡0 0⎤
⎢ 0 −1 0 ⎥ 2 EI ⎢ 2 4 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0⎥
1 ⎢1 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
=
L ⎢0 0 1 −1⎥ L ⎢ 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢1 0⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 −1⎦ ⎣0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 1⎦
⎡6 0⎤
⎢ ⎥
2 EI ⎢2 L 0 ⎥
= 2
L ⎢ −3 3 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ −3 −3⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
∴{ AR } = − { ARC } + [ S RF ]{DF }

⎧ −2 P ⎫
⎪ − PL ⎪ ⎡6 0⎤
⎪ ⎪ 2 EI ⎢2 L 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ PL2
⎧0 ⎫
= −⎨ 3 ⎬+ 2 ⎨ ⎬
⎪ −3P ⎪ L ⎢ −3 3 ⎥ 18 EI ⎩1 ⎭
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ − 3 − 3⎦
⎩ −P ⎭
⎧ 2P ⎫
⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎪ PL ⎪
⎧ −2 P ⎫ ⎧ 2P ⎫ ⎪
⎪ − PL ⎪ ⎧0⎫ ⎪ ⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎪ PL2 2 EI ⎪⎪ 0 ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ P ⎪
PL ⎪⎪ 3 ⎪⎪

= −⎨ 3 ⎬+ 2 ⎨ ⎬= ⎨ 3 ⎬+⎨ ⎬ = ⎨10 P ⎬
⎪ −3P ⎪ 18 EI L 3
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ 3P ⎪ ⎪ 3 ⎪ ⎪ 3 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ −3⎪⎭ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ P ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎩ −P ⎭ ⎩ P ⎭ ⎪− ⎪ ⎪ 2 P ⎪
⎩ 3⎭
⎩⎪ 3 ⎭⎪
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member end actions
{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })

{DR} is a null matrix ∴ { AM } = { AML } + [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }

⎧3⎫ ⎡4 2 0 0 ⎤ ⎡0 0⎤
⎪ ⎪ ⎢2 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 ⎥ PL2
PL ⎪ −3 ⎪ 2 EI 4 0 ⎧0 ⎫
{ AM } = ⎨ ⎬ + ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬
9 ⎪2⎪ L ⎢0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢1 0 ⎥ 18 EI ⎩1 ⎭
⎪⎩ −2 ⎪⎭ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 1⎦

⎧3⎫ ⎡4 2 0 0 ⎤ ⎧0 ⎫ ⎧3⎫ ⎧0 ⎫ ⎧1 ⎫
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ −3 ⎪ ⎪ 0 ⎪ PL ⎪ − ⎪
PL ⎪ −3 ⎪ 2 EI PL2 ⎢ 2 4 0 0 ⎪ 0 ⎪ PL ⎪ ⎪ PL ⎪ ⎪ = ⎪ ⎪ 1
= ⎨ ⎬+ ⎥⎨ ⎬ = ⎨ ⎬+ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬
9 ⎪2⎪ L 18 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎪0 ⎪ 9 ⎪ 2 ⎪ 9 ⎪1 ⎪ 3 ⎪1 ⎪
⎢ ⎥ ⎪⎩ −2 ⎭⎪ ⎪⎩ 0 ⎭⎪
⎪⎩ −2 ⎭⎪ ⎣0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎩⎪ 1 ⎭⎪ ⎩⎪ 2 ⎭⎪ 44
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Alternatively, if the entire [SJ] matrix is assembled at a time,
⎡0 L L 0⎤
⎢0 0 0 L⎥ 0⎤ ⎡ 0 L −1 0 ⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎡4 2 0 01
⎢2 ⎢ ⎥
1 ⎢ 1 1 0 0 ⎥ 2 EI 4 0 0⎥ 1 ⎢ L 01 0 −1 0 ⎥
[ S J ] = [CMJ ]T [ SM ][CMJ ] = ⎢
L⎢L 0 0 0⎥ L
⎥ ⎢
⎢0 0 2

1⎥ L ⎢ L 00 0 1 −1⎥
⎢ −1 −1 1 1 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦ ⎣ 0 L0 0 1 −1⎦
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 −1 −1⎦

⎡0 L L 0⎤
⎢0 0 0 L⎥ 6 4 L −6
⎢ ⎥ ⎡2 L 0 0⎤
⎢ 1 1 0 0 ⎥ 2 EI ⎢4 L 0 6 2 L −6 0 ⎥
=⎢ ⎥ 3 ⎢ ⎥
⎢ L 0 0 0 ⎥ L ⎢2 L L 0 0 3 −3⎥
⎢ −1 −1 1 1 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ L 2L 0 0 3 −3⎦
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 −1 −1⎦

⎡ 6L2 L2 6L 2L2 −3L −3L⎤


⎢ 2 ⎥
⎢L 2L2 0 0 3L −3L⎥
2EI ⎢ 6L 0 12 6L −12 0 ⎥ ⎡[ SFF ] [ SFR ]⎤
= 3 ⎢ 2 ⎥=⎢
L ⎢ 2L 0 6L 4L −6L 0 ⎥ ⎣[ SRF ] [ SRR ]⎥⎦
⎢−3L 3L −12 −6L 18 −6 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣−3L −3L 0 0 −6 6 ⎦ 45
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 2:
10 kN/m 40 kN 100 kN
B C D
A 2m
4m 4m 2m

Kinematic indeterminacy = 3 (Rotations at A, B, C)(Not


considering joint D in the overhanging portion)

DF1 DF2 DF3


B C D
A

Degrees of freedom
46
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2 EI ⎡2 1 ⎤
Member stiffness matrix of beam member [ S Mi ] = ⎢1 2 ⎥
4 ⎣ ⎦

⎡2 1 0 0⎤
⎢ 0⎥
2 EI ⎢ 1 2 0
Unassembled stiffness matrix [SM ] = ⎥
4 ⎢0 0 2 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦

47
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
13.33 kNm 13.33
20 20
B
A C
B

20 kN
20 kN 20 kN
20 kN
Fixed end actions

13.33 kNm 6.67 2x100 – 20 = 180 kNm


B
A

20 kN 20 +20 = 40 kN 20 +100 = 120 kN

Equivalent joint loads + actual joint loads


48
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
DF1 =1

1 0 0 0

DF2 =1

0 1 1 0

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


DF3 =1

0 0 0 1

DF1 DF2 DF3


=1 =1 =1
⎡1 0 0⎤
⎢0 1 0⎥
[C M F ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢0 1 0⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1⎦
50
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements

∴{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF }
−1
∵{DR} is a null matrix.

T
⎡1 0 0⎤ ⎡2 1 0 0 ⎤ ⎡1 0 0⎤
⎢0 0 ⎥ 2 EI ⎢1 0 ⎥ ⎢0 0⎥
[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T
=⎢
1
⎥ ⎢
2 0
⎥⎢
1

⎢0 1 0⎥ 4 ⎢0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢0 1 0⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1⎦ ⎣0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1⎦

⎡ 1 0.5 0 ⎤
= EI ⎢0.5 2 0.5⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣ 0 0.5 1 ⎥⎦

51
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
−1
⎛ ⎡ 1 0.5 0 ⎤ ⎞ ⎧ −13.33⎫
Joint displacements {DF } =
1 ⎜⎢ ⎥ ⎟ ⎪ −6.67 ⎪
⎥⎟ ⎨ ⎬
0.5 2 0.5
EI ⎜⎜ ⎢ ⎟ ⎪ −180 ⎪
⎝ ⎢
⎣ 0 0.5 1 ⎥
⎦ ⎠ ⎩ ⎭

⎧ −43.435 ⎫
1 ⎪ ⎪
= ⎨ 60.33 ⎬
EI ⎪ ⎪
⎩ −210.6 ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


Member end actions

{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })

{DR} is a null matrix ∴ { AM } = { AML } + [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }

⎧ 13.33 ⎫ ⎡2 1 0 0 ⎤ ⎡1 0 0⎤
⎪ −13.33 ⎪ ⎢1 ⎧ −43.435 ⎫
⎪ ⎪ 2 EI 2 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1 0⎥ 1 ⎪ ⎪
{ AM } = ⎨ ⎬+ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎨ 60.33 ⎬
⎪ 20 ⎪ 4 ⎢0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢0 1 0 ⎥ EI ⎪ −210.6 ⎪
⎪⎩ −20 ⎪⎭ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎩ ⎭
⎣0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1⎦

⎧ 0 ⎫
⎪ 25 ⎪
⎪ ⎪
=⎨ ⎬kNm
⎪ −25 ⎪
⎪⎩−200⎪⎭
53
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 3:
24 kN 12 kN

5m B 5m C
A
10 m 10 m

Kinematic indeterminacy = 1 (Rotation at B)

DF1
B C
A

Degrees of freedom
54
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2 EI ⎡2 1 ⎤
Member stiffness matrix of beam member [ Mi ]
S = ⎢1 2 ⎥
10 ⎣ ⎦

⎡2 1 0 0⎤
⎢ 0⎥
EI ⎢ 1 2 0
Unassembled stiffness matrix [SM ] = ⎥
5 ⎢0 0 2 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦

55
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
30 kNm 30 15 15
B C
A B

12 kN 6 kN
12 kN 6 kN

Fixed end actions

15
30kNm 15
B
A

12 kN 18 kN 6kN

Equivalent joint loads


56
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
DF1 =1
DF1
=1
⎡0 ⎤
0 ⎢1 ⎥
0 1 1
[C MF ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢1 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


Joint displacements

∴{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF }
−1
∴{DR} is a null matrix.

T
⎡ ⎤
0 ⎡2 1 0 0 ⎤ ⎡0 ⎤
⎢1 ⎥ ⎢1 2 0 ⎥ ⎢1 ⎥ ⎡ 4 EI ⎤
[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T
=⎢ ⎥
EI ⎢
0
⎥⎢ ⎥ =
⎢⎣ 5 ⎥⎦
⎢1 ⎥ 5 ⎢ 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢1 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣ ⎦
0 ⎣0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 ⎦

5 18.75
Joint displacements {DF } = {15} =
4 EI EI

58
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member end actions

{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }

⎧ 30 ⎫ ⎡2 1 0 0 ⎤ ⎡0 ⎤
⎪ −30 ⎪ ⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎢ 1 ⎥ 18.75
⎪ ⎪ EI ⎢ 1 2 0
{ AM } = ⎨ ⎬ + ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎪ 15 ⎪ 5 ⎢ 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢ 1 ⎥ EI
⎪⎩ −15 ⎪⎭ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 ⎦

⎧ 30 ⎫ ⎧ 1 ⎫ ⎧ 33.75 ⎫
⎪ −3 0 ⎪ ⎪ 2 ⎪ ⎪ −22.5 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
=⎨ ⎬ + 3.75 ⎨ ⎬ = ⎨ ⎬
⎪ 15 ⎪ 2
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ 22 .5 ⎪
⎪⎩ −15 ⎭⎪ ⎩⎪ 1 ⎪⎭ ⎪⎩ −11.25 ⎪⎭

59
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Problem 3a 20 kN

9 kN/m 40 kNm

A 4m B 4m C
2EI EI
Kinematic indeterminacy = 2 (Rotation and deflection at B)
(Considering B as a NODE)

2 EI ⎡2 1⎤
Member stiffness matrix of beam member [ Mi ]
S = ⎢1 2⎥
L ⎣ ⎦

⎡4 2 0⎤
0
⎢ 4 0 0⎥
2 EI ⎢ 2
Unassembled stiffness matrix [SM ] = ⎥
4 ⎢0 0 2 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
0 0
12 kNm 12
B
A B C
0 0
18 kN
18 kN

Fixed end actions

12 kNm 12+40=52 kNm 0


B
A
C

18+20 = 38 kN 0
18 kN

Equivalent joint loads + actual joint loads


Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• [CMF ] consists of member displacements due to unit displacements on
the restrained structure.

DF1 =1

0 1 1 0

DF1 DF2
=1 =1
DF2 =1
⎡ 0 −1⎤
⎢ 4 −1⎥
1⎢
[CMF ] = ⎥
4 ⎢4 1 ⎥
−1 4 −1 4 14 14 ⎢ ⎥
⎣0 1 ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
DR1 DR2 DR3 DR4
=1 =1 =1 =1
⎡1 4 1 0 0⎤
⎢1 4 0 0 0⎥
[CMR ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 −1 4 0⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 −1 4 1⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦
−1
Joint displacements

{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF }
−1
since there are no support displacements.

[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T

⎡4 2 0 0 ⎤ ⎡ 0 −1⎤
⎢ 4 0 0 ⎥ 1 ⎢ 4 −1⎥
1 ⎡ 0 4 4 0 ⎤ 2 EI ⎢ 2 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
= ⎢
4 ⎣ −1 −1 1 1 ⎥⎦ 4 ⎢ 0 0 2 1⎥ 4 ⎢4 1 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦ ⎣0 1 ⎦

⎡ 8 −6 ⎤
⎢ ⎥
EI ⎡ 0 4 4 0 ⎤ ⎢16 −6 ⎥ EI ⎡ 96 −12 ⎤
= =
32 ⎣ −1 −1 1 1 ⎦ ⎢ 8 3 ⎥ 32 ⎢⎣ −12 18 ⎥⎦
⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
⎣ 4 3 ⎦ Dr.RajeshKN
32 1 ⎡18 12 ⎤ ⎧ 52 ⎫ 1 ⎧ 9.70 ⎫
∴ {DF } = ⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬= ⎨ ⎬
EI 1584 ⎣12 96 ⎦ ⎩ −38 ⎭ EI ⎩ −61.09 ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


Member end actions
{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR }) {DR} is a null matrix

∴ { AM } = { AML } + [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }

⎧ 12 ⎫ ⎡4 2 0 0⎤ ⎡0 −1⎤
⎪ − 12 ⎪ ⎢ 0⎥ 1 ⎢4 −1⎥ 1
⎪ ⎪ 2 EI ⎢ 2 4 0
⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎧ 9.70 ⎫
=⎨ ⎬+ ⎨ ⎬
⎪ 0 ⎪ 4 ⎢0 0 2 1⎥ 4 ⎢4 1 ⎥ EI ⎩ − 61.09 ⎭
⎪⎩ 0 ⎪⎭ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦ ⎣0 1⎦

⎧ 12 ⎫ ⎡4 2 0 0⎤ ⎧ 61.09 ⎫ ⎧ 12 ⎫ ⎧ 444.14 ⎫ ⎧ 67.52 ⎫


⎪−12⎪ ⎢2 4 0 0⎥ ⎪⎪ 99.89 ⎪⎪ ⎪ − 12 ⎪ ⎪ 521.74 ⎪ ⎪ 53.22 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ 1 ⎪ ⎪ 1 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
=⎨ ⎬+ ⎢ ⎥⎨ ⎬ = ⎨ ⎬ + ⎨ ⎬= ⎨ ⎬
⎪ 0 ⎪ 8 ⎢0 0 2 1⎥ ⎪−22.29⎪ ⎪ 0 ⎪ 8 ⎪ −105.67 ⎪ ⎪ − 13.21 ⎪
⎪⎩ 0 ⎪⎭ ⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 2⎦ ⎪⎩−61.09⎪⎭ ⎪⎩ 0 ⎭⎪ ⎩⎪ −144.47 ⎭⎪ ⎩⎪ −18.06 ⎭⎪
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Support reactions { AR } = − { ARC } + [ S RF ]{DF } + [ S RR ]{DR }
{DR} is a null matrix.
∴{ AR } = − { ARC } + [ S RF ]{DF }

[ S RF ] = [CMR ]T [ S M ][CMF ]
⎡1 4 1 4 0 0 ⎤ ⎡4 2 0 0 ⎤ ⎡ 0 −1⎤
⎢ 1 0 0 0 ⎥ 2 EI ⎢2 4 0 0 ⎥ 1 ⎢ 4 −1⎥
=⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 −1 4 − 1 4 ⎥ 4 ⎢0 0 2 1⎥ 4 ⎢4 1 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 1 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1 2⎦ ⎣0 1 ⎦

⎡1 4 1 4 0 0 ⎤ ⎡ 8 −6 ⎤ ⎡6 −3 ⎤
⎢ 1 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢8 − ⎥
EI ⎢ 0 0 0 16 −6 = EI ⎢
6

= ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
8 ⎢ 0 0 −1 4 −1 4 ⎥ ⎢ 8 3 ⎥ 8 ⎢ −3 −1.5⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 1 ⎦⎣ 4 3 ⎦ ⎣ 4 3 ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
∴{ AR } = − { ARC } + [ S RF ]{DF }

⎧ −18 ⎫ ⎡6 −3 ⎤
⎪ −12 ⎪ ⎢8 − ⎥
⎪ ⎪ EI ⎢
6
⎥ 1 ⎧ 9.70 ⎫
= −⎨ ⎬+ ⎨ ⎬
⎪ 0 ⎪ 8 ⎢ −3 −1.5⎥ EI ⎩ −61.09 ⎭
⎪⎩ 0 ⎪⎭ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 4 3 ⎦

⎧18 ⎫ ⎧ 241.47 ⎫ ⎧ 48.18 ⎫


⎪12 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪ ⎪ 1 ⎪ 444.14 ⎪ ⎪ 67.52 ⎪
= ⎨ ⎬+ ⎨ ⎬=⎨ ⎬
⎪ 0 ⎪ 8 ⎪ 62.535 ⎪ ⎪ 7.82 ⎪
⎪⎩ 0 ⎪⎭ ⎪⎩ −144.47 ⎪⎭ ⎪⎩ −18.06 ⎪⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


•Problem 4
Analyse the beam. Support B has a downward settlement
of 30mm. EI=5.6×103 kNm2

Kinematic indeterminacy = 3 (Rotations at B, C, D)

2 EI ⎡2 1 ⎤
Member stiffness matrix of beam member [ S Mi ] = ⎢1 2 ⎥
L ⎣ ⎦
⎡4 2 0 0 0 0⎤
⎢2 4 0 0 0 0⎥
⎢ ⎥
2 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0⎥
Unassembled stiffness matrix [ S M ] = ⎢ ⎥
6 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥
⎢0 0 0 0 4 2⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 0 0 2 4⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
25 25

Fixed end moments


25 25

Equivalent joint loads

DF1 DF2 DF3

Free (unknown) joint displacements {D F }

A 30mm DR1 D
C
B
Support settlements (Restraint displacements) {DR }
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[CMF ]and [CMR ] consist of member displacements due to unit
displacements on the restrained structure.

DF 1 = 1

A B C D

0 1 1 0 0 0

71
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
A DR1 = 1 D
C
B

−1 3 −1 3 16 16 0 0

DF 1 DF 2 DF 3 DR1
=1 =1 =1 =1
⎡0 0 0 −1 3⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎢1 0 0 −1 3⎥
[CMJ ] = ⎣⎡[CMF ] [CMR ]⎦⎤ = ⎢1 0 0 16⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢0 1 0 16⎥
⎢0 1 0 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣0 0 1 0 ⎥⎦
72
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements
{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦
−1

[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T

T
⎡0 0 0⎤ ⎡4 2 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎡0 0 0⎤
⎢1 0 0⎥ ⎢2 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎡6 1 0⎤
⎢1 0 0 ⎥ EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0 ⎥ = EI ⎢1 6 2 ⎥
=⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ 3 ⎢ ⎥
⎢0 1 0⎥ 3 ⎢ 0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0⎥ ⎢⎣ 0 2 4 ⎥⎦
⎢0 1 0⎥ ⎢0 0 0 0 4 2 ⎥ ⎢0 1 0⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1⎦ ⎣0 0 0 0 2 4 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1⎦

73
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[ S FR ] = [CMF ] [ S M ][CMR ]
T

T
⎡0 0 0⎤ ⎡4 2 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡ −1 3⎤
⎢1 0 0⎥ ⎢2 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ −1 3⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎧ −3 2 ⎫
⎢1 0 0 ⎥ EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ 1 6 ⎥ = EI ⎪ 1 2 ⎪
=⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬
3 ⎪ ⎪
⎢0 1 0⎥ 3 ⎢ 0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢ 1 6 ⎥
⎩ 0 ⎭
⎢0 1 0⎥ ⎢0 0 0 0 4 2 ⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1⎦ ⎣0 0 0 0 2 4⎦ ⎣ 0 ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦
−1

−1
⎛ ⎡6 1 0⎤ ⎞ ⎡ ⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎡− 3 2⎤ ⎤
⎜ EI
=⎜ ⎢ 1 6 2 ⎥ ⎟ ⎢ ⎪ −25 ⎪ − EI ⎢ 1 2 ⎥ {−0.03}⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎟ ⎢⎨ ⎬ ⎢ ⎥ ⎥
⎜ 3 ⎪ ⎪
⎢⎣ 0 2 4 ⎥⎦ ⎟⎠ ⎢⎣ ⎩ 25 ⎭
3
⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎥⎦

⎡ 20 −4 2 ⎤ ⎡⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎧ 0.045 ⎫ ⎤
3 ⎢ ⎥ ⎢⎪ ⎪ 5600 ⎪ ⎪⎥
= −4 24 −12 ⎢ ⎨ −25 ⎬ − ⎨ −0.015 ⎬ ⎥
116 EI ⎢ ⎥
⎪ ⎪ 3 ⎪ ⎪
⎢⎣ 2 −12 35 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ ⎩ 25 ⎭ ⎩ 0 ⎭ ⎥⎦
⎡ 20 −4 2 ⎤ ⎡ ⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎧ 84 ⎫ ⎤
3 ⎢ ⎢⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎥
= −4 24 −12 ⎥ ⎢ ⎨ −25 ⎬ − ⎨ −28 ⎬ ⎥
116 EI ⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣ 2 −12 35 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ ⎩⎪ 25 ⎭⎪ ⎩⎪ 0 ⎭⎪ ⎥⎦

⎧ −1642 ⎫ ⎧ −0.007583⎫
3 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
= ⎨ 108 =
⎬ ⎨ 0.0005 ⎬
116 × 5.6 × 103 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎩ 671 ⎭ ⎩ 0.0031 ⎭
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Support reactions

{ AR } = − { ARC } + [ S RF ]{DF } + [ S RR ]{DR }

[ S RF ] = [CMR ] [ S M ][CMF ]
T

⎡4 2 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎡0 0 0⎤
⎢2 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0⎥
= [ − 1 3 −1 3 1 6 1 6 0 0 ] ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
3 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0⎥
⎢0 0 0 0 4 2⎥ ⎢0 1 0⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 0 0 2 4⎦ ⎣0 0 1⎦
EI
= [ −3 2 1 2 0 ]
3

76
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[ S RR ] = [CMR ] [ S M ][CMR ]
T
⎡4 2 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡ −1 3⎤
⎢2 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ −1 3⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0⎥ ⎢ 1 6 ⎥
= [ −1 3 −1 3 1 6 1 6 0 0 ] ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
3 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢ 1 6 ⎥
⎢0 0 0 0 4 2⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎡ EI ⎤ ⎣0 0 0 0 2 4⎦ ⎣ 0 ⎦
=⎢ ⎥
⎣ 2 ⎦

⎧ −0.007583⎫
⎪ ⎪ EI
{ AR } = −{0} + [ −3 2 1 2 0] ⎨ 0.0005 ⎬ + ⎡⎢ ⎤⎥ {−0.03}
EI
3 ⎪ 0.0031 ⎪ ⎣ 2 ⎦
⎩ ⎭

EI EI
= ( 0.0116 − 0.045) = −0.0334 = −62.35
3 3

(Support reaction corresponding to DR . i.e., reaction at B)


Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member end actions
{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })

⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎡4 2 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎛ ⎡0 0 0⎤ ⎡ − 1 3⎤ ⎞
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢2 ⎜ ⎟
4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎜ ⎢1 0 0⎥ ⎢ − 1 3⎥

⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎧ −0.007583 ⎫ ⎢ ⎥
⎪ 0 ⎪ 2 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎜ ⎢1 0 0⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢16⎥ ⎟
{ AM } = ⎨ ⎬ + ⎢ ⎥⎜⎢ ⎥ ⎨ 0.0005 ⎬ + ⎢ ⎥ {−0.03} ⎟
⎪ 0 ⎪ 6 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0 ⎥ ⎜ ⎢0 1 0⎥ ⎪ 1 6 ⎟
⎩ 0.0031 ⎪⎭ ⎢ ⎥
⎪ 25 ⎪ ⎢0 0 0 0 4 2 ⎥ ⎜ ⎢0 1 0⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎟
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎜⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎟⎟
⎩ − 25 ⎭ ⎣0 0 0 0 2 4 ⎦ ⎝⎜ ⎣ 0 0 1⎦ ⎣ 0 ⎦ ⎠

⎧ 83.7 ⎫
⎪ 55.4 ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎪ −55.4 ⎪
=⎨ ⎬
⎪ −40.3 ⎪
⎪ 40.3 ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎩ 0 ⎭ 78
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Alternatively, if the entire [SJ] matrix is assembled at a time,

[ S J ] = [CMJ ]T [ SM ][CMJ ]
⎡4 2 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎡0 0 0 −1 3⎤
⎢2 ⎢ ⎥
⎡ 0 1 1 0 0 0⎤ 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0 −1 3⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 ⎥
1 1 0 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0 16⎥
=⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 1⎥ 3 ⎢ 0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0 16⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ − 1 3 −1 3 1 6 1 6 0 0 ⎦ ⎢0 0 0 0 4 2⎥ ⎢0 1 0 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 0 0 2 4 ⎦ ⎣⎢ 0 0 1 0 ⎦⎥

⎡2 0 0 −2 ⎤
⎡ 0 1 1 0 0 0⎤ ⎢ 4 0 0 −2 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥
0 ⎢2 0 1 2⎥
EI ⎢ 0 0 0 1 1
⎥⎢
1
= ⎥
3 ⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 1⎥ ⎢1 2 0 1 2⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ −1 3 −1 3 1 6 1 6 0 0⎦ ⎢ 0 4 2 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 2 4 0 ⎦
⎡ 6 1 0 −3 2⎤
⎢ 1 2 ⎥
=
EI ⎢ 1 6 2
⎥ ⎡[ S ] [ S FR ]⎤
= ⎢ FF
3 ⎢ 0

2 4 0 ⎥
⎥ ⎣[ S RF ] [ S RR ]⎥⎦
⎣−3 2 1 2 0 3 2 ⎦
79
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Alternatively, if ALL possible support settlements are accounted for,

⎡0 0 0 1 3 1 −1 3 0 0 ⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎢1 0 0 1 3 0 −1 3 0 0 ⎥
⎢1 −1 6 0 ⎥
[CMJ ] = ⎣⎡[CMF ] [CMR ]⎦⎤ = ⎢0
0 0 0 0 16

⎢ 1 0 0 0 16 −1 6 0 ⎥
⎢0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 −1 3⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 −1 3⎥⎦
[ S J ] = [CMJ ] [ SM ][CMJ ]
T

T
⎡0 0 01 3 1 −1 3 0 0 ⎤ ⎡4 2 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎡0 0 01 3 1 −1 3 0 0 ⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎢2 ⎢ ⎥
⎢1 0 01 3 0 −1 3 0 0 ⎥ 4 0 0 0 0⎥ ⎢1 0 01 3 0 −1 3 0 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢1 0 0 0 0 16 −1 6 0 ⎥ EI ⎢0 0 2 1 0 0⎥ ⎢1 0 0 0 0 16 −1 6 0 ⎥
=⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢0 1 0 0 0 16 −1 6 0 ⎥ 3 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0 0 0 16 −1 6 0 ⎥
⎢0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 −1 3⎥ ⎢0 0 0 0 4 2⎥ ⎢0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 −1 3⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 −1 3⎥⎦ ⎣0 0 0 0 2 4⎦ ⎢⎣0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 −1 3⎥⎦

80
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
⎡ 0 1 1 0 0 0 ⎤
⎢ 0 0 0 1 1 0 ⎥ ⎡2 0 0 2 4 −2 0 0⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 1 ⎥ ⎢4 0 0 2 2 −2 0 0⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
EI ⎢ 1 3 13 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢2 1 0 0 0 1 2 −1 2 0 ⎥
= ⎢ ⎥
3 ⎢ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 2 0 0 0 1 2 −1 2 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ − 1 3 − 1 3 1 6 1 6 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 4 2 0 0 0 2 −2 ⎥
⎢ 0 ⎢ ⎥
0 −1 6 −1 6 1 3 1 3 ⎥ ⎣0 2 4 0 0 0 2 −2 ⎦
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 0 − 1 3 − 1 3 ⎦

⎡ 6 1 0 2 2 − 3 2 −1 2 0 ⎤
⎢ 1 6 2 0 0 12 32 −2 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 2 4 0 0 0 2 −2 ⎥

EI ⎢ 2 0 0 4 3 2 −4 3 0 0 ⎥
⎥ ⎡[ S FF ] [ SFR ]⎤
= =⎢ ⎥
3 ⎢ 2

0 0 2 4 −2 0 0 ⎥

⎣[ S RF ] [ RR ]⎦
S
⎢ − 3 2 1 2 0 − 4 3 −2 3 2 − 1 6 0 ⎥
⎢ −1 2 3 2 2 0 0 −1 6 3 2 − 4 3⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 − 2 −2 0 0 0 − 4 3 4 3 ⎦
81
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements

{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦


−1

⎡ ⎧ 0 ⎫⎤
−1 ⎢ ⎪ ⎪⎥
⎛ ⎡6 1 0⎤ ⎞ ⎢ ⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎡ 2 2 −3 2 −1 2 0 ⎤ ⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎥
⎜ EI ⎢1 6 ⎟ ⎪ ⎪ EI ⎢ ⎪ ⎪
=⎜ 2 ⎥ ⎟ ⎢ ⎨ −25 ⎬ − 0 0 12 3 2 −2 ⎥ ⎨ −0.03⎬ ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ 3 ⎢ ⎥ ⎥
⎜ 3 ⎢⎣ 0 2 ⎟ ⎪
4 ⎥⎦ ⎠ ⎢ ⎩ 25 ⎭ ⎪ ⎢⎣ 0 0 0 2 −2 ⎥⎦ ⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎥
⎝ ⎪ ⎪
⎢⎣ ⎩⎪ 0 ⎭⎪ ⎥⎦
⎡ 20 −4 2 ⎤ ⎡⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎧ 0.045 ⎫ ⎤
3 ⎢ ⎢⎪ ⎪ 5600 ⎪ ⎪⎥
= −4 24 −12 ⎥ ⎢ ⎨ −25 ⎬ − ⎨ −0.015 ⎬ ⎥
116 EI ⎢ ⎥ 3 ⎪
−12 35 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ ⎩ 25 ⎭ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎢⎣ 2 ⎩ 0 ⎭ ⎥⎦
⎡ 20 −4 2 ⎤ ⎧ −84 ⎫ ⎧ −1642 ⎫ ⎧ −0.007583⎫
3 ⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎪ = 3 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
= −4 24 −12 ⎨ 3 ⎬ 116 EI ⎨ 108 ⎬ = ⎨ 0.0005 ⎬
116 EI ⎢ ⎥ ⎪ 671 ⎪ ⎪ 0.0031 ⎪
⎢⎣ 2 −12 35 ⎥⎦ ⎪⎩ 25 ⎪⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭

82
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Support reactions

{ AR } = − { ARC } + [ SRF ]{DF } + [ S RR ]{DR }

⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎡ 2 0 0⎤ ⎡43 2 −4 3 0 0 ⎤⎧ 0 ⎫
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢ 2 0 0 ⎥ ⎧ −0.007583⎫ ⎢ 2 4 −2 0 0 ⎥⎪ 0 ⎪
⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ EI ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ EI ⎢ ⎥ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪
{ R} ⎨ ⎬
A = − 0 + ⎢ − 3 2 1 2 0 ⎥ ⎨ 0.0005 ⎬ + ⎢ − 4 3 − 2 3 2 − 1 6 0 ⎥ ⎨ − 0.03 ⎬
⎪ −50 ⎪ 3 ⎢ ⎥ 3 ⎢ ⎥
⎢ −1 2 3 2 2 ⎥ ⎪⎩ 0.0031 ⎪⎭ ⎢ 0 0 −1 6 3 2 − 4 3⎥ ⎪ 0 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪⎩ − 50 ⎭⎪ ⎢
⎣ 0 − 2 − 2 ⎥
⎦ ⎢
⎣ 0 0 0 − 4 3 4 3 ⎥
⎦ ⎩⎪ 0 ⎭⎪

⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎧ −28.373⎫ ⎧74.667 ⎫ ⎧ 46.294 ⎫


⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎪ −28.373⎪ ⎪ 112 ⎪ ⎪ 83.627 ⎪
⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪
{ AR } = − ⎨ 0 ⎬ + ⎨ 21.653 ⎬ + ⎨ −84 ⎬ = ⎨ −62.347 ⎬
⎪ −50 ⎪ ⎪ 19.973 ⎪ ⎪ 9.333 ⎪ ⎪ 79.31 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪⎩ −50 ⎪⎭ ⎪⎩ −13.44 ⎪⎭ ⎪⎩ 0 ⎪⎭ ⎪⎩ 36.56 ⎭⎪
83
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member end actions

{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })

⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎡4 2 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎛ ⎡0 0 0⎤ ⎡1 3 1 −1 3 0 0 ⎤ ⎞
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢2 ⎜ ⎧ ⎫ ⎟
0 ⎥ ⎜ ⎢1 0 0⎥ ⎢1 3 0 ⎥⎪
0
4 0 0 0 0 −1 3 0 ⎪ ⎟
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎧ −0.007583 ⎫ ⎢ ⎥ 0
⎪ 0 ⎪ 2 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎜ ⎢1 0 0⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 16 −1 6 0 ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪⎟
{ AM } = ⎨ ⎬ + ⎢ ⎥⎜⎢ ⎥ ⎨ 0.0005 ⎬ + ⎢ ⎥ ⎨ −0.03 ⎬ ⎟
0 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎜ ⎢0 1 0⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 16 −1 6 0 ⎥⎪
0 ⎪⎟
⎪ ⎪ 6
⎩ 0.0031 ⎭ ⎢
⎪ 25 ⎪ ⎢0 0 0 0 4 2⎥ ⎜ ⎢0 1 0⎥ 0 0 0 13 − 1 3⎥ ⎪ ⎪⎟
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎜⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎩⎪ 0 ⎭⎪ ⎟⎟
⎩ −25 ⎭ ⎣0 0 0 0 2 4 ⎦ ⎜⎝ ⎣ 0 0 1⎦ ⎣ 0 0 0 13 − 1 3⎦ ⎠

⎧ 83.7 ⎫
⎪ 55.4 ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎪ −55.4 ⎪
{ AM } = ⎨ ⎬
⎪ − 40.3 ⎪
⎪ 40.3 ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎩ 0 ⎭

84
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 5 85.33

1 3

2
KI = 2
(Rotations at A, B)
42.67
Equivalent joint loads

⎡2 4 14 0 0 0 ⎤0
⎢1 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
Unassembled ⎢ 0 0 6 4.8 3 4.8 0 0 ⎥
stiffness matrix [ S M ] = 2 EI ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 3 4.8 6 4.8 0 0 ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 4 8 2 8⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 0 2 8 4 8⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• [CMF ] consists of member displacements due to unit displacements on
the restrained structure.

DF 1 = 1
DF 2 = 1

DF1 DF2
=1 =1
⎡1 0⎤
⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢0 0⎥
[CMF ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢0 1⎥
⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0⎦ 86
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements

{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦


−1

{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF }
−1
since there are no support displacements.

[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T

⎡2 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡1 0⎤
⎢1 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎡1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎢ 0 0 6 4.8 3 4.8 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 0⎥
=⎢ ⎥ 2 EI ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 1 0 1 1 0 ⎦ ⎢ 0 0 3 4.8 6 4.8 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 4 8 2 8 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 0 2 8 4 8 ⎦ ⎣0 0⎦
87
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
⎡8 4 ⎤
⎢4 8 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
EI ⎡1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎢0 20 ⎥ EI ⎡2 1 ⎤
= = ⎢1 9 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
8 ⎢⎣0 1 0 1 1 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢0 10 ⎥ 2 ⎣ ⎦
⎢0 8 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 4 ⎦

−1
⎛ EI ⎡ 2 1 ⎤ ⎞ ⎧ 0 ⎫
∴ {DF } = [ S FF ] { AF } = ⎜ = ⎢
−1
⎥ ⎟ ⎨85.333⎬
⎝ 2 ⎣ 1 9 ⎦⎠ ⎩ ⎭

8 ⎡ 36 −4 ⎤ ⎧ 0 ⎫ 1 ⎧ −341.332 ⎫ 1 ⎧ −10.039 ⎫
= =
⎢ −4 8 ⎥ ⎨85.333⎬ 34 EI ⎨ ⎬= ⎨ ⎬
272 EI ⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭ ⎩ 682.664 ⎭ EI ⎩ 20.078 ⎭
88
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member end actions
{DR} is a null matrix
{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })

⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎡2 4 14 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡1 0⎤
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢1 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎪ 42.667 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 6 4.8 3 4.8 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥ 1 ⎧ −10.039 ⎫
=⎨ ⎬ + 2 EI ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬
⎪ −85.333 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 3 4.8 6 4.8 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 0 ⎥ EI ⎩ 20.078 ⎭
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 0 0 4 8 2 8 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎩ 0 ⎭ ⎣ 0 0 0 0 2 8 4 8 ⎦ ⎣0 0⎦

⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎧ 0 ⎫
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎪ 120.47 ⎪ ⎪ 15.059 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪ 42.667 ⎪ 1 ⎪ 200.78 ⎪ ⎪ 67.765 ⎪
=⎨ ⎬+ ⎨ ⎬ =⎨ ⎬
⎪ − 85.333 ⎪ 8 ⎪ 401.56 ⎪ ⎪ − 35.138 ⎪
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎪160.624 ⎪ ⎪ 20.078 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ 89
⎩ of CE,
Dept. ⎭
0 GCE Kannur ⎩ 80.312 ⎭ ⎩ 10.039 ⎭ Dr.RajeshKN
•Homework 2:

80kNm
20kN m
B
C D
6m 3m 3m
2 3

4m
1

90
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Problem 6
60kN
20 kN m B
A C
6m 3m 3m

4m 60 60 − 45 = 15
45
D 1 3

Equivalent joint loads


Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Unassembled stiffness matrix [SM ]

⎡2 6 1 6 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡2 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 ⎤
⎢1 6 2 6 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 2 4 14 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ 0 0 1 12 0 0 ⎥
= 2 EI ⎢ ⎥ = EI ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 14 2 4 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 2 6 1 6⎥ ⎢ 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 3⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 0 1 6 2 6⎦ ⎣ 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 3⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


• [CMF ] consists of member displacements due to unit displacements on
the restrained structure.
DF 1 = 1
DF 2 = 1

1 3

DF1 DF2
=1 =1
⎡1 0⎤
⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢0 0⎥
[CMF ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢0 1⎥
⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T

⎡2 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡1 0⎤
⎢1 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎡1 0 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎢ 0 0 1 12 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 0⎥
=⎢ ⎥ EI ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 1 0 1 1 0 ⎦ ⎢ 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 3 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 3⎦ ⎣ 0 0⎦

⎡2 3 1 3⎤
⎢1 3 2 3⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎡1 0 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎢ 0 1 2⎥ ⎡ 2 3 1 3 ⎤ EI ⎡ 2 1 ⎤
= EI ⎢ ⎥⎢ 0 ⎥ = EI ⎢ ⎥ = ⎢1 7⎥
⎣ 0 1 0 1 1 0 ⎦⎢ 1 ⎥ ⎣ 1 3 7 3 ⎦ 3 ⎣ ⎦
⎢ 0 2 3⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 1 3⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements

{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦


−1

{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF }
−1
since there are no support displacements.

−1
⎛ EI ⎡ 2 1 ⎤ ⎞ ⎧ −60 ⎫
=⎜ ⎢ 1 7 ⎥ ⎟ ⎨ 15 ⎬
⎝ 3 ⎣ ⎦⎠ ⎩ ⎭

3 1 ⎡ 7 −1⎤ ⎧ −60 ⎫ 3 ⎧ −435 ⎫ 1 ⎧ −100.385 ⎫


= ⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬ = ⎨ ⎬= ⎨ ⎬
EI 13 ⎣ −1 2 ⎦ ⎩ 15 ⎭ 13EI ⎩ 90 ⎭ EI ⎩ 20.769 ⎭

95
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member end actions
{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR }) {DR} is a null matrix

⎧ 60 ⎫ ⎡2 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡1 0⎤
⎪ − 60 ⎪ ⎢1 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 1 12 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 0 ⎥ 1 ⎧ − 100.385 ⎫
=⎨ ⎬ + E I ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 12 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢0 1 ⎥ E I ⎩ 20.769 ⎭
⎪ 45 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 3 ⎥ ⎢0 1⎥
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎩ − 45 ⎭ ⎣ 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 3⎦ ⎣ 0 0⎦

⎧ 60 ⎫ ⎡ 2 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎧ − 100.385 ⎫
⎪ − 60 ⎪ ⎢ 1 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎪ 20.769 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 1 12 0 0 ⎥⎪ 0 ⎪
=⎨ ⎬+⎢ ⎥⎨ ⎬
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 12 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎪ 20.769 ⎪
⎪ 45 ⎪ ⎢ 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 3 ⎥ ⎪ 20.769 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪
⎩ − 45 ⎭ ⎣ 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 3⎦ ⎩ 0 ⎭ 96
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
⎧ 60 ⎫ ⎧ − 60 ⎫ ⎧ 0 ⎫
⎪ − 60 ⎪ ⎪ − 19.616 ⎪ ⎪ − 79.616 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎪ 10.385 ⎪ ⎪ 10.385 ⎪
=⎨ ⎬+⎨ ⎬= ⎨ ⎬
⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎪ 20.769 ⎪ ⎪ 20.769 ⎪
⎪ 45 ⎪ ⎪ 13.846 ⎪ ⎪ 58.846 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎩ − 45 ⎭ ⎩ 6.923 ⎭ ⎩ − 38.077 ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


•Problem 7

⎡2 1 0 0 0⎤
0
⎢1 2 0 0 0⎥
0
⎢ ⎥
2 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0⎥
Unassembled stiffness matrix [ M ]
S = ⎢ ⎥
L ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥
⎢0 0 0 0 2 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 0 0 1 2⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


2
1 3

DF1 DF2 DF3


=1 =1 =1
⎡0 0 1 L⎤
⎢1 0 1 L⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢1 0 0 ⎥
[C MF ] = ⎢ 0 1

0 ⎥

⎢0 1 1 L⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 L⎦
99
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T

⎡2 1 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎡0 0 1 L⎤
⎢1 2 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 1 L⎥
⎡ 0 1 1 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥ 2 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0 ⎥
= 0
⎥ L ⎢0 ⎥⎢ ⎥
0 0 1 1 0
⎢ 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0 ⎥
⎢⎣1 L 1 L 0 0 1 L 1 L ⎥⎦ ⎢
⎢0 0 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢0 1 1 L⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 0 0 1 2⎦ ⎣0 0 1 L⎦
⎡1 0 3 L⎤
⎢2 0 3 L⎥
⎡ 0 1 1 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥ 2 EI ⎢ 2 1 0 ⎥ ⎡ 4 1 3L ⎤
= 0 ⎥ = 2 EI ⎢ 1 ⎥
⎥ L ⎢1
0 0 1 1 0
⎢ 2 0 ⎥ 4 3 L
⎢⎣1 L 1 L 0 0 1 L 1 L ⎥⎦ ⎢ L ⎢ ⎥
⎢0 2 3 L⎥ ⎢⎣3 L 3 L 12 L ⎥⎦
2

⎢ ⎥
⎣0 1 3 L⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements
{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦
−1

{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF } , since there are no support displacements.


−1

−1
⎛ ⎡ 4 1 3 L ⎤⎞ ⎧0 ⎫
⎜ 2 EI ⎢ 1 ⎟ ⎪ ⎪
{ F} ⎜
D = 4 3 L ⎥⎟ ⎨0⎬
⎢ ⎥
⎜ L 2 ⎟ ⎪ ⎪
⎢⎣ 3 L 3 L 12 L ⎥⎦ ⎠ ⎩ P ⎭

⎡ 13 −3 −3L ⎤ ⎧ 0 ⎫ ⎧ −3 ⎫
L ⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎪ PL 2
⎪ ⎪
= −3 13 −3L ⎨ 0 ⎬ = ⎨ −3 ⎬
84 EI ⎢ ⎥
2 ⎪ ⎪ 84 EI
⎢⎣ −3L −3L 5L ⎥⎦ ⎩ P ⎭ ⎪5 L ⎪
⎩ ⎭

101
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member end actions
{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })

{ AM } = [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }
⎡2 1 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡0 0 1 L⎤
⎢1 2 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 1 L⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎧ −3 ⎫
2 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0 ⎥ PL2 ⎪ ⎪
{ AM } = ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎨ −3 ⎬
L ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0 ⎥ 84 EI ⎪ ⎪
⎢0 ⎩5L ⎭
0 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢0 1 1 L⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1 L⎦

⎡2 1 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎧5⎫ ⎧ 12 ⎫ ⎧4⎫
⎢1 2 0 0 0 0⎥ ⎪2⎪ ⎪9⎪ ⎪3⎪
⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
2 EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ PL2 ⎪ −3⎪ 2
⎪ −9 ⎪ PL ⎪ −3 ⎪
= ⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬ = 2 EI PL ⎨ ⎬ = ⎨ ⎬
L ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0 ⎥ 84 EI ⎪ −3 ⎪ L 84 EI ⎪ −9 ⎪ 14 ⎪ −3 ⎪
⎢0 0 0 0 2 1⎥ ⎪2⎪ ⎪9⎪ ⎪3⎪
⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎣0 0 0 0 1 2⎦ ⎩5⎭ ⎩ 12 ⎭ ⎩4⎭
102
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 8 30kN m
B
C
6m
60kN
6m
3m
A D

EI is constant. ⎡2 1 0 0 0 0⎤
⎢1 2 0 0 0 0⎥
⎢ ⎥
EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥
Unassembled stiffness matrix [ S M ] = ⎢ ⎥
3 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥
⎢0 0 0 0 2 1⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 0 1 2 ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
90 90
B
45 C 0
90 90
B 30 C

A 30
D
45 Fixed end actions 0

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


90 90 DF 2 DF 3
45
B 90 B
30 C DF1 C

D D
A A
Equivalent joint loads DOF

⎧ −45 ⎫
⎪ ⎪
{ F} ⎨ ⎬
A = 90
⎪ 30 ⎪
⎩ ⎭
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2
1 3

DF1 DF2 DF3


=1 =1 =1
⎡0 0 1 6⎤
⎢1 0 1 6⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢1 0 0 ⎥
[C MF ] = ⎢ 0 1

0 ⎥

⎢0 1 1 6⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 1 6⎦
106
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements

{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦


−1

{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF } , since there are no support displacements.


−1

[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]
T

⎡2 1 0 0 0 0⎤ ⎡0 0 1 6⎤
⎢1 2 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 1 6⎥
⎡ 0 1 1 0 0 0⎤ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥ EI ⎢ 0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0⎥
= 0
⎥ 3 ⎢0 ⎥⎢ ⎥
0 0 1 1 0
⎢ 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0⎥
⎢⎣1 6 1 6 0 0 1 6 1 6 ⎥⎦ ⎢
⎢0 0 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢0 1 1 6⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎣0 0 0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1 6⎦ 107
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
⎡1 0 3 6⎤
⎢2 0 3 6⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎡ 4 1 36 ⎤
⎡0 1 1 0 0 0⎤
⎢ ⎥ EI ⎢ 2 1 0 ⎥ = EI ⎢ 1 4 36 ⎥
= 0 ⎢ ⎥
⎥ 3 ⎢1 ⎥
0 0 1 1 0
⎢ 2 0 ⎥ 3
⎢⎣3 6 3 6 12 6 ⎥⎦
2
⎢⎣1 6 1 6 0 0 1 6 1 6⎥⎦ ⎢
⎢0 2 3 6⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣0 1 3 6⎦

−1
⎛ ⎡ 4 1 3 6 ⎤ ⎞ ⎧ −45 ⎫
⎜ EI ⎢ 1 ⎟ ⎪ ⎪
{ DF } = ⎜ 4 3 6 ⎥ ⎟ ⎨ 90 ⎬
⎢ ⎥
⎜ 3 ⎢⎣ 3 6 3 6 12 6 ⎥⎦ ⎠ ⎩ 30 ⎭⎪
2 ⎟ ⎪

⎡ 0.93 −0.0703 −1.29 ⎤ ⎧ −45 ⎫ ⎧ −86.9 ⎫


1 ⎢ ⎪ ⎪
= −0.0703 0.93 −1.29 ⎥ ⎨ 90 ⎬ = 1 ⎪⎨ 48.2 ⎪⎬
EI ⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣ −1.29 −1.29 12.9 ⎥⎦ ⎪⎩ 30 ⎭⎪ EI ⎪ ⎪
⎩ 329 ⎭
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member end actions
{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })
{ AM } = [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }

⎡2 1 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡0 0 1 6⎤ ⎧ 70.6 ⎫
⎢1 2 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 1 6⎥ ⎪ −48.3 ⎪
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎧−86.9 ⎫ ⎪ ⎪
EI ⎢0 0 2 1 0 0 ⎥ ⎢1 0 0⎥ 1 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ 48.3 ⎪
{ AM } = ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎨ 48.2 ⎬ = ⎨ ⎬
3 ⎢0 0 1 2 0 0⎥ ⎢0 1 0 ⎥ EI ⎪ 329 ⎪ ⎪ −86.7 ⎪
⎢0 ⎩ ⎭ ⎪ 86.7 ⎪
0 0 0 2 1 ⎥ ⎢0 1 1 6⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎪
⎣0 0 0 0 1 2 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1 6⎦ ⎩ 70.6 ⎭

109
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 9:

5m
3m
1

50 kN
3 5m
3m 80 kN
5m 2

4m 4m

⎡ 0.2 0.0 0.0 ⎤


⎢ 0.0 ⎥
Unassembled stiffness matrix [ S M ] = ⎢ 0.0 0.2

⎢⎣ 0.0 0.0 0.2 ⎥⎦
110
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
=0.8
7 .6
1 3 6.8 3=
0
s .1
co 53
0 .6 1 s
co
0. 1
8
53.13
3
2
36.87

DF1 DF2
=1 =1
⎡0.8 -0.6 ⎤
⎢-0.8 0.6⎥
[ MF ] ⎢
C = ⎥
⎢⎣0.8 0.6 ⎥⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


Joint displacements

{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦


−1

{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF } , since there are no support displacements.


−1

[ S FF ] = [C MF ] [ S M ][C MF ]= ⎡ 0.384
T
⎢ -0.096
-0.096 ⎤
⎣ 0.216 ⎥⎦

⎡ 2.930 1.302 ⎤ ⎧-50 ⎫ ⎧-250.651⎫


{ DF } = ⎢ ⎨ ⎬ =⎨
⎣1.302 5.208 ⎥⎦ ⎩-80 ⎭ ⎩ -481.771


112
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member Forces:

{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })

= [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }

⎡0.2 0.0 0.0⎤⎡0.8 -0.6 ⎤


⎧−250.651⎫
= ⎢0.0 ⎥⎢
0.0 -0.8 0.6 ⎨⎥
⎥ ⎩−481.771⎬⎭
0.2
⎢ ⎥⎢
⎢⎣0.0 0.0 0.2⎥⎢
⎦⎣0.8 0.6 ⎥⎦

⎧17.708 ⎫
⎪ ⎪
= ⎨ −17.708 ⎬
⎪ −97.917 ⎪
⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


•Problem 10:
2

1 3

⎡ 0.2 0.0 0.0 ⎤


⎢ 0.0 ⎥
Unassembled stiffness matrix [ S M ] = ⎢ 0.0 0.5

⎢⎣ 0.0 0.0 0.2 ⎥⎦

114
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
6
=0.
3
3 .1
s5
cco
oss 3
c o 366.
.887 1
7==0
0..8
8

8
1

0.
0.
m

6
36.870

m
5

5
53.13

53.130

DF1 DF2
=1 =1
⎡0.600 0.800 ⎤
⎢0.000 -1.000 ⎥
[C MF ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣-0.600 0.800⎥⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


Joint displacements

{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦


−1

{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF } , since there are no support displacements.


−1

[ FF ] [ MF ] [ M ][ MF ] =
S = C S
T
C ⎡0.144 0.000⎤
⎢0.000 0.756⎥⎦

⎡6.944 0.000 ⎤ ⎧15.000 ⎫ ⎧104.167 ⎫


{DF } = ⎢ ⎨ ⎬ =⎨
⎣0.000 1.323 ⎥⎦ ⎩-10.000 ⎭ ⎬
⎩-13.228 ⎭

116
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member Forces:

{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })

{ AM } = [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }

⎡0.2 0.0 0.0⎤ ⎡0.600 0.800 ⎤ ⎧10.4 ⎫


⎧ ⎫ ⎪
{ AM } = ⎢⎢0.0 0.0⎥ ⎢0.000 ⎥ 104.167 ⎪
-1.000 ⎨
⎥ ⎩-13.228 ⎭⎬ ⎨
= ⎬
0.5 6.6
⎥⎢
⎢⎣0.0 0.2⎥⎦ ⎢⎣-0.600 0.800⎥⎦ ⎪ -14.6 ⎪
0.0 ⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


•Problem 11 (Homework):

⎡ 0.866 0.000 0.000 ⎤


Unassembled stiffness matrix [ S M ] = ⎢⎢ 0.000 1.000 0.000 ⎥

⎢⎣ 0.000 0.000 0.500 ⎥⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


1
66
5 0. 8

0. 5
0.

0.8
1

66
DF1 DF2
=1 =1
⎡0.866 0.500 ⎤
⎢1.000 0.000 ⎥
[C MF ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣0.500 -0.866 ⎥⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


Joint displacements

{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦


−1

{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF } , since there are no support displacements.


−1

[ SFF ] = [CMF ] [ SM ][CMF ] = ⎡⎢1.774


T 0.158⎤
⎣0.158 0.591⎥⎦

⎡0.577 -0.155 ⎤ ⎧5 ⎫ ⎧2.887 ⎫


{DF } = ⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬ =⎨ ⎬
⎣-0.155 1.732 ⎦ ⎩0 ⎭ ⎩ -0.773 ⎭

120
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member Forces:

{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })

{ AM } = [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }
⎡ 0.866 0.000 0.000⎤⎡0.866 0.500⎤
⎧2.887 ⎫
{ AM } = ⎢⎢ 0.000 1.000 0.000⎥⎢1.000
⎥⎢

0.000 ⎨
⎥ ⎩-0.773⎭⎬
⎢⎣ 0.000 0.000 0.500⎥⎢
⎦⎣0.500 -0.866⎥⎦

⎧1.830 ⎫
⎪ ⎪
= ⎨ 2.887 ⎬
⎪1.057 ⎪
⎩ ⎭
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 12:

B C D
AE/L is a constant 1 2 3

450
A
450
300
50 kN

⎡1 0 0⎤
AE ⎢ ⎥
Unassembled stiffness matrix [ M]
S = 0 1 0
L ⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣ 0 0 1 ⎥⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


B C D B C D
1 2 3 1 2 3

0.7
A A 07
45 0
450 1
7 07
0. 1 0.
70

0.
70
7

7
DF1 DF2
=1 =1

⎡0.707 0.707 ⎤
⎢1.000 0.000 ⎥
[C MF ] = ⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣0.707 -0.707 ⎥⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


[ SFF ] = [CMF ] [ SM ][CMF ]
T

⎡1 0 0⎤ ⎡0.707 0.707 ⎤
⎡0.707 1 0.707 ⎤ AE ⎢ ⎥⎢ 1 ⎥
=⎢ ⎥ L ⎢ 0 1 0 0
⎣0.707 0 −0.707⎦ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣0 0 1⎥⎦ ⎢⎣0.707 −0.707⎥⎦

AE ⎡2 0⎤
=
L ⎢⎣0 1⎥⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN


Joint displacements

{DF } = [ S FF ] ⎡⎣{ AF } − [ S FR ]{DR }⎤⎦


−1

{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF } , since there are no support displacements.


−1

L ⎡1 0 ⎤ ⎧ 25 ⎫ L ⎧12.5 ⎫
{ DF } = ⎢ 0 2 ⎥ ⎨ 43.308 ⎬ = AE ⎨ 43.308 ⎬
2 AE ⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭

125
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member Forces:

{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })

{ AM } = [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }
⎡1 0 0⎤⎡0.707 0.707 ⎤
AE ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ L ⎧12.5 ⎫
{ AM } = ⎢0 1 0⎥⎢ 1 0
⎥ AE ⎨⎩43.308⎭⎬
L
⎢⎣0 0 1⎥⎦ ⎢⎣0.707 −0.707⎥⎦

⎧ 39.456 ⎫
⎪ ⎪
= ⎨12.5 ⎬
⎪ -21.781⎪
⎩ ⎭
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Problem 13: AE is constant.

A 0. 9
m
B

0.5m
0.8m
C D
0.75m
10 kN

⎡ 1.11 0 0 ⎤
Unassembled stiffness matrix [ S M ] = AE ⎢⎢ 0 1.25 0 ⎥⎥
⎢⎣ 0 0 1.33⎥⎦

127
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
A
0. ∠ ADC = 33.69 0
9m
B
0.5m

DF1 DF2
DF2
=1 =1
0.8m 13.330
⎡0.832 −0.555⎤
D
C 20.360 [CMF ] = ⎢⎢0.938 −0.348⎥⎥
0.75m DF1
⎢⎣ 1 0 ⎥⎦

128
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Joint displacements
{DF } = [ S FF ] { AF }
−1

[ SFF ] = [CMF ] [ SM ][CMF ]


T

⎡0.832 −0.555⎤ 0 ⎤ ⎡0.832 −0.555⎤


T
⎡ 1.11 0
= ⎢0.938 −0.348⎥ AE ⎢ 0 1.25 0 ⎥ ⎢0.938 −0.348⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣ 1 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0 0 1.33⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 1 0 ⎥⎦
−1
1 ⎡ 3.199 −0.921⎤ ⎧ 0 ⎫
∴ {D F } = ⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬
AE ⎣ −0.921 0.493 ⎦ ⎩ −10 ⎭

1 1 ⎡0.493 0.921⎤ ⎧ 0 ⎫ 1 ⎧ −12.634 ⎫


= ⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬ = ⎨ ⎬
AE 0.729 ⎣ 0.921 3.199 ⎦ ⎩ −10 ⎭ AE ⎩ −43.882 ⎭
129
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member Forces:

{ AM } = { AML } + [ S M ] ([C MF ]{DF } + [C MR ]{DR })

{ AM } = [ S M ][C MF ]{DF }
⎡ 1.11 0 0 ⎤⎡0.832 −0.555⎤
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ 1 ⎧−12.634⎫
{AM } = AE ⎢ 0 1.25 0 ⎥⎢0.938 −0.348⎥ ⎨ ⎬
AE ⎩−43.882⎭
⎢⎣ 0 0 1.33⎥⎢
⎦⎣ 1 0 ⎦⎥

⎡ 1.11 0 0 ⎤ ⎧ 13.843 ⎫ ⎧15.38 ⎫


⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
= ⎢ 0 1.25 0 ⎥ ⎨ 3.42 ⎬ = ⎨4.275⎬
⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣ 0 0 1.33⎥⎦ ⎩⎪−12.634⎭⎪ ⎩⎪−16.8⎭⎪
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Homework 4:

AE is constant.

A B C
1 2 3

1m
D 450
600
20 kN
131
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Summary
Stiffness method

• Development of stiffness matrices by physical approach –


stiffness matrices for truss, beam and frame elements –
displacement transformation matrix – development of total
stiffness matrix - analysis of simple structures – plane truss
beam and plane frame- nodal loads and element loads – lack of
fit and temperature effects.

132
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

You might also like