Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4 Data Analysis and Interpretetion
4 Data Analysis and Interpretetion
CHAPTER 4
Net working capital refers to the difference between current assets and current liabilities.
Net working capital is a qualitative concept. It indicates the liquidity position of the firm and
suggests the extent to which working capital needs may be financed by permanent source of
funds. Net working capital can be negative or positive. A negative working capital means a
negative liquidity and may be harmful for the company’s reputation.
TABLE NO 4.1
24
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
INFERENCE
The net working capital of the company is showing a fluctuating trend for the period
2015-2016 to 2016-2017 In the year 2016-2017 company has the net working capital of 18.57
TABLE NO 4.2
25
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
INFERENCE
The above table no.2 deals with current ratio. The minimum standard for current ratio is
2:1. Though this company records a fluctuating trend in its current ratio, the ratios are near to the
ideal level. The company has not achieved the standard ratio of 2:1 in any of the years. The
average current ratio is 1.80. The ratio is highest in the year 2015-2016 (2.93) and lowest in the
INFERENCE
The quick ratio of the company is fluctuating over the years. The average quick ratio is
1.10.The company has achieved the industry standard of 1:1 in the every year .In 2016-2017 it
is 1.02 indicating company’s liquidity position is vary good . If this condition is continued
company will improve and will not face any liquidity crisis in future.
26
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
C) CASH RATIO
Since Cash is the most liquid form of asset, so examination of cash ratio and its
equivalent to current liabilities is very important. Analysis of cash with current liability shows
that whether the company has the ability to pay its current liability on due date.
TABLE NO 4.4
CASH RATIO(RS. IN CORE)
CURRENT RATIO
YEAR CASH
LIABILITIES (No. of times)
2015-2016 1.15 4.76 0.24
2016-2017 1.20 29.72 0.04
AVERAGE 1.17 17.24 0.06
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
The average cash ratio is 0.06 during the study period which is also showing a increasing
trend, in the year 2015-16 cash in hand has decreased to the lowest extent of 0.04 times. The
cash position of the company is not satisfactory. This may be due to the utilization of cash for
setting down its creditors.
27
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
It is also called stock turnover ratio. This ratio indicates the number of times inventory
or stock replaced during the year. It measures the relationship between good sold and inventory
level. It indicates whether investment in inventory is efficiently used or not. A right inventory
turnover indicates of good inventory management.
TABLE NO 4.5
INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO(RS. IN CORE)
INVENTORY
AVG RATIO HOLDING
YEAR SALES
INVENTORY (No. of times) PERIOD
(Days)
2015-2016 31.27 0.98 31.90 11.63
2016-2017 84.13 5.78 14.55 24.74
Average 57.7 3.38 17.07 21
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
The inventory turnover ratio is fluctuating over the year. The average ratio is 17.07.The
average inventory holding period is 21 days..The ratio is maximum (24.74) in the year 2016-
2017 with a minimum inventory holding period of 11 days and the ratio is minimum (31.90)in
the year 2015-2016 with the maximum inventory holding period of 24.74 days.
28
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TABLE NO 4.6
DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO (RS. IN CORE)
AVERAGE
RATIO COLLECTION
YEAR SALES DEBTORS
(No. of times) PERIOD
(Days)
2015-2016 31.27 3.51 8.90 40.44
2016-2017 84.13 21.94 3.83 93.66
AVERAGE 57.7 12.72 4.53 79.47
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
The debtor’s turnover ratio is varying over the study period. The average ratio is 4.53.
The debtors turnover ratio in 2016-2017 indicates the credit policy of the company is not liberal.
29
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
It is the ratio between net credit purchase and the amount of creditors outstanding during
the year. A low turnover ratio reflects liberal credit terms granted by suppliers. The extent to
which trade creditors are willing to wait for payment can be approximated by the creditors
turnover ratio.
Creditors Turnover ratio = Purchases/Creditors
Average collection period = 360/Creditors turnover ratio
TABLE NO 4.7
CREDITORS TURNOVER RATIO(RS. IN CORE)
AVERAGE
RATIO
YEAR PURCHASES CREDITORS COLLECTION
(No. of times)
PERIOD (Days)
2015-2016 29.16 4.75 6.13 58.72
2016-2017 79.57 29.72 2.67 134.83
AVERAGE 54.36 17.23 3.15 114.2
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
The creditor’s turnover ratio indicates that there is more difference over the year. The
average creditor’s turnover ratio is 3.15. In 2015-2016 it is 6.13 and in 2016-2017 it is decreased
to 2.67. The lower ratio indicates that company enjoys a greater credit period to repay the
liability. And by which company will not face any problem in future from its creditor
30
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
INFERENCE
The working capital turnover ratio indicates a fluctuating trend in the study period. In 2015-2016
it is 3.38 and in 2016-2017 it is 4.53, there is a increasing trend and it indicates that even though
there is a increase in net working capital it is utilized well. The average ratiois 4.15 and the
company having more then the average in the year 2016-2017 which shows that the company
having a very god financial position for maintaining its working capital requirement.
This ratio denotes the amount of working capital employed per rupee of sales. The lower
ratio means more efficient use of funds and vise versa. This is also known as current asset to
sales ratio.
31
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TABLE NO 4.9
GROSS WORKING CAPITAL RATIO(RS. IN CRORE)
CURRENT RATIO
YEAR SALES
ASSETS (No. of times)
2015-2016 13.99 31.27 0.45
2016-2017 48.29 84.13 0.57
AVERAGE 31.14 57.7 0.53
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
Gross working capital ratio is fluctuating over the year. The average gross working
capital ratio is 0.53 this shows efficient usage of current asset for each rupee of sales
The raw material turnover ratio indicates the efficiency with which the company converts
raw material into work in process. A high ratio indicates efficient usage of raw material.
32
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TABLE NO 4.10
RAWMATERIAL TURNOVER RATIO(RS. IN CRORE)
RAW
AVERAGE MATERIAL
RAW
RAW RATIO INVENTORY
YEAR MATERIAL
MATERIAL (No. of times) HOLDING
CONSUMED
INVENTORY PERIOD
(Days)
2015-2016 28.00 0.98 28.57 12.60
2016-2017 72.08 5.78 12.47 28.86
AVERAGE 50.04 3.38 14.80 24.32
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
The raw materials turnover shows a fluctuating trend. The average raw material turnover
ratio is 14.80 in the year 2015-16 and 2016-17 indicates inventory of raw material is holding
12.60 days and 28.86 days respectively. High raw material holding period means unnecessary
tie-up of fund. the raw material holding of the remaining years are also fluctuating because of the
same reason. But here we can see that the company having varied minimum Raw material
holding period which is less then one month every year. It showing that company is effectively
using its raw material and with a good timing of holding that.
SOLVENCY RATIO
Solvency ratio is used to test the solvency of a firm. Solvency means the ability to meet
the outside liabilities consisting of long term debt and current liability. Total asset stands for total
of fixed assets and current asset.
33
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TABLE NO 4.11
SOLVENCY RATIO(RS. IN LAKHS)
TOTAL OUT
RATIO
YEAR TOTAL ASSETS SIDE
(No. of times)
LIABILITIES
2015-2016 40.56 30.67 1.32
2016-2017 80.03 62.73 1.27
AVERAGE 120.59 93.40 1.29
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
The solvency position of the company is declining over the year. The average solvency
ratio is 1.29. In the year 2015-16 it is 1.32. its happening due to increase pressure of sale in
market the company increasing the liabilities in market .but as the ratio in the year 2016-17 went
below the average ration by .7
The company will soon get over it and make a stable ratio of solvency that will ensure the
company ability to set of its liabilities in any emergency time.
Profitability reflects the final result of business operations. There are two types of
profitability ratios- profit margin ratios and rate of return ratios. Profit margin ratios show the
relationship between profit and sales. Popular profit margin ratios are gross profit margin and net
profit margin ratio. Rate of return ratio reflects the relationship between profit and investment.
The important rates of return measures are: rate of return on total assets and rate in equity.
a) NET PROFIT RATIO
This ratio shows the earnings left for shareholders as a percentage of net sales i.e., profit per
rupee of sales. It measures the overall efficiency, production, administration, selling, financing
and pricing and tax management.
Net profit ratio = (Net profit / Sales) x 100
34
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TABLE NO 4.12
2015-2016 31.27
0.82 2.62
2016-2017 84.13
1.07 1.27
AVERAGE
0.94 57.7 1.62
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
Since the company is running in profit from 2015-2016 to 2016-2017 the ratio also
reflects a positive indication to the overall performance. And in the current year the company
showing increment in its profit ratio. The above data is already shows that the company is
running above the average ration which is 1.62 and in the year 2016-2017 its achieve the profit
b) RETURN ON INVESTMENT
Return on Investment is also called Return on Capital Employed. The term investment may refer
to total assets or net assets. The funds employed in net assets are known as capital employed.
35
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TABLE NO 4.13
RETURN ON INVESTMENT(RS. IN CORE)
CAPITAL ROI ( % )
YEAR NET PROFIT
EMPLOYED
2015-2016 35.81
0.82 2.28
2016-2017 50.92
1.07 2.10
AVERAGE 43.36
0.94 2.16
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
The net profit of the company from 2015-2016 to 2016-17 is 0.82 & 1.07 (IN CORE)
.The return on investment ratio is also in good position . This shows return from the investment
is positive. And in the year 2015- to -2016 the company making positive return in its first year.
And showing the best return on investment though it decrees in second year by .18.The ration
showing the company performance at high Laval. And the company will earn more profit in forth
coming year
It also explains the relationship between fixed assets and the turnover that means sales
36
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TABLE NO 4.14
INFERENCE
The fixed assets of the company from 2015-2016 to 2016-2017 is fluctuating and
increasing over the year . The FATR ratio is also indicating a fluctuating tendency at a
increasing level . the ratio which is 1.76 in the year 2015-2016 and incensing by o.89 in year
2016-2017, and which is also above from the Average ratio which is 1.97 . Showing that
37
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TABLE NO 4.15
PERFORMANCE OF ARVIND BRAND LIMITED
(Rs. in CORE)
P/L P/L
TOTAL PROVISION
YEAR TURNOVER BEFORE AFTER
EXPENDITURE FOR TAX
TAX TAX
2015-2016 36.05 35.23 0.82 0 0.56
2016-2017 92.61 91.54 1.07 0 0.51
AVERAGE 64.33 63.38 0.94 0 0.53
Source: annual report
INFERENCE
From the above table one can easily identify that performance of the company
shows a positive trend from 2015-16 to 2016-17. It is mainly because of the high sales margin
compared to low cost of production. And also in the present working year the company showing
a positive performance which is more then the past two year profit
TABLE NO 4.16
I. ANALYSIS OF COMPONENTS OF GROSS WORKING CAPITAL
The various components of current assets and their values of the company from the year 2015-
2016 to 2016-2017 are disclosed in the following table:
38
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
(RS. IN CORE)
2015-16 2016-17
ITEMS
6.09 17.93
Inventories
3.51 21.94
Sundry Debtors
1.14 1.20
Cash and Bank Balance
3.22 7.20
Loans and Advances
13.96 48.27
TOTAL
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
The table shows that current asset of the company. The components of current assets are
fluctuating through out the period of study.
The following bar diagram shows the structure of current assets during the year from 2015-2016
to 2016-2017
The various components of current liabilities and their value during the period of study are given in the
following table:
39
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TABLE NO 4.17
COMPONENTS OF CURRENT LIABILITIES(RS. IN CORE)
2015-16 2016-17
ITEMS
4.72 29.67
Sundry Creditors
0.03 0.05
Other Liabilities
0.0024 NIL
Provisions
TOTAL 4.75 29.72
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
The table shows that current liability of the company shows a gradual flctuations. Ii
should affecting the working capital of the company.
The following bar diagram shows the structure of current liabilities during the year from 2015-
2016 to 2016-2017.
TABLE NO 4.18
TREND ANALYSIS OF WORKING CAPITAL(RS. IN LAKHS)
40
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
y = a + b (x)
TABLE NO 4.19
TABLE SHOWING EXPECTED WORKING CAPITAL
YEAR AMOUNT(CORE)
2018 69.39
2019 92.52
2020 115.65
2021 138.78
2022 161.91
Source: Annual Reports
41
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
INFERENCE
capital.requirement in the forth coming year . Company should take necessary steps to increase
working capital otherwise no fund will be available for the day to day workings
-1 1 -31.27
31.27
2015-2016
0 0 0
84.13
2016-2017
115.4 -1 1 -31.27
TOTAL
a = total (y) /N 115.4/ 2 =57.7
y = a + b (x)
Expected sale for the next five year
Y (2018) =57.7+ 31.27* 3 =151.51
Y (2019) =57.7+ 31.27* 4 =182.78
Y (2020) =57.7+ 31.27* 5 = 214.05
Y (2021) =57.7+ 31.27* 6 = 245.32
Y (2022) =57.7+ 31.27*7 = 276.59
42
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TABLE NO 4.21
TABLE SHOWING EXPECTED SALES
YEAR AMOUNT(LAKS)
2018 151.51
2019 182.78
2020 214.05
2021 245.32
2022 276.59
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
-1 1 -0.82
2015-2016 0.82
0 0 0
2016-2017 1.07
1 1 -0.82
TOTAL 1.89
43
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
y = a + b (x)
Expected profit for the next five year
TABLE NO 4.23
TABLE SHOWING EXPECTED PROFIT
YEAR AMOUNT(LAKS)
2018 1.51
2019 2.33
2020 3.155
2021 3.975
2022 4.79
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
44
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
13.99 -1 1 -13.99
2015-2016
48.29 0 0 0
2016-2017
62.28 1 1 -13.99
TOTAL
y = a + b (x)
45
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TABLE NO 4.25
TABLE SHOWING EXPECTED CURRENT ASSET
YEAR AMOUNT(CORE)
2018 73.11
2019 87.1
2020 101.09
2021 115,08
2022 129.07
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
CHART
TREND ANALYSIS OF CURRENT ASSET (RS.IN CORE)
Chart Title
YEAR AMOUNT IN CORE)
115.08 129.1
87.1 101.1
73.11
1 2 3 4 5
46
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
4.76 -1 1 -4.76
2015-2016
29.72 0 0 0
2016-2017
34.48 -1 1 -4.76
TOTAL
a = total (y) /N 34.48/ 2 = 17.24
y = a + b (x)
Expected current liabilities for the next five year
47
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TABLE NO 4.27
YEAR AMOUNT(LAKS)
2018 31,52
2019 36.30
2020 41.04
2021 45.80
2022 50.56
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
should take necessary steps to reduce current liability. Otherwise it wills harmfully
CORRELATION
The Correlation analysis refers to the techniques used in measuring the closeness of the
relationship between the variables. Correlation is the statistical method relates to the analysis of
variable only. The statistical technique that can be used to study the relationship between two
variables is the correlation analysis.
48
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
Two variables are said to be correlated, if the change in one variable results in a corresponding
change in the other variable. That is when two variables move together we say they are
correlated.
Correlation is defined as “the tendency of two or more groups or series of items to vary together
directly or inversely”. Whenever some definite connection exists between the two or more
groups, classes or series or data there is said to be correlation.
Hence, correlation is an analysis of the co-variation between two or more variable. The word
correlation usually implies cause and effect relationship that is mutual interdependence. That is
there exists casual connection between the two variables. Correlation may be either positive or
negative. When the values of two variables move in the same direction, correlation is said to be
positive. On the other hand, the value of two variables moves in opposite direction, the
TABLE No 4.28
SHOWING
CORRELATION BETWEEN SALES AND PROFIT
SALES PROFIT
YEAR (Rs. in CORE) (Rs. in CORE)
31.27
2015 0.82
84.13
2016 1.07
CORRELATION 0.59
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
49
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The correlation between sales and profit is 0.59 which is positive. Whenever
there is an increase in sales, it increases the profit of the company and vice versa
TABLE No 4.29
SHOWING
CURRENT ASSET
SALES (Rs. in CORE
YEAR (Rs. in CORE) +)
31.27 13.99
2015
84.13 48.29
2016
CORRELATION 0.31
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
The correlation between sales and current asset is 0.31.Hence, there is positive
relationship between sales and current asset. So when sales increases, the current asset will also
50
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TABLE No 4.30
SHOWING
CORRELATION 0.79
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
The correlation between working capital and current asset is 0.79. Hence, there is positive
relationship between working capital and current asset. So when current asset increases, the
51
ATMA COLLEGE
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TABLE No 4.31
SHOWING
9.23 31.27
2015
18.57 84.13
2016
CORRELATION 0.30
Source: Annual Reports
INFERENCE
The correlation between working capital and sales is 0.30 hence; there is positive
relationship between working capital and sales. So when sales increase, the working capitals will
52
ATMA COLLEGE