Proposal Final Draft (2:20:19).

pdf
by Hallie Takenaga

Submission date: 20-Feb-2019 03:12AM (UT C-0800)

Submission ID: 1080803507
File name: Proposal_Final_Draf t_2_20_19_.pdf (82.62K)
Word count: 1411
Character count: 7873
New Paragraph

New Paragraph
Mega Paragraph
don't add space between like paragraphs
Proposal Final Draft (2:20:19).pdf
ORIGINALITY REPORT

11 %
SIMILARIT Y INDEX
8%
INT ERNET SOURCES
6%
PUBLICAT IONS
10%
ST UDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

1
Submitted to 54972
St udent Paper 3%
2
Submitted to University of Alabama
St udent Paper 2%
3
www.annualreviews.org
Int ernet Source 1%
4
Submitted to University of Wales Swansea
St udent Paper 1%
5
Francis McGlone, Francesco Cerritelli,
Susannah Walker, Jorge Esteves. "The role of
1%
gentle touch in perinatal osteopathic manual
therapy", Neuroscience & Biobehavioral
Reviews, 2017
Publicat ion

6
Submitted to Flinders University
St udent Paper 1%
7
Submitted to La Sierra University
St udent Paper 1%
Exclude quotes Of f Exclude matches Of f
Exclude bibliography Of f
Proposal Final Draft (2:20:19).pdf
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

95
Hallie,

T his is a very strong proposal. You started strong

and kept on going. Your f ocus was there throughout
and your sources were on point. T hat said, there are

/100
a f ew times when you needed to split up your
paragraphs. Even if you are continuing on the same
idea, if you are shif ting your f ocus, you need a new
paragraph. Overall though, very nice work, and I look
f orward to reading your next paper.

PAGE 1

Missing "," Review the rules f or using punctuation marks.

PAGE 2

Proof read T his part of the sentence contains an error or misspelling that makes your meaning
unclear.

QM New Paragraph | Organizat ion

Start a New Paragraph Here

QM New Paragraph | Organizat ion

Start a New Paragraph Here

PAGE 3

Article Error You may need to use an article bef ore this word.

Article Error You may need to remove this article.

Article Error You may need to use an article bef ore this word.
 Sp. T his word is misspelled. Use a dictionary or spellchecker when you proof read your work.

QM Mega Paragraph | Organizat ion

T his paragraph has a lot going on. You need to split it up.

Sp. T his word is misspelled. Use a dictionary or spellchecker when you proof read your work.

Missing "," Review the rules f or using punctuation marks.

PAGE 4

Sp. T his word is misspelled. Use a dictionary or spellchecker when you proof read your work.

Conf used You have used either an imprecise word or an incorrect word.

Sp. T his word is misspelled. Use a dictionary or spellchecker when you proof read your work.

Sp. T his word is misspelled. Use a dictionary or spellchecker when you proof read your work.

Run-on T his sentence may be a run-on sentence.

Sp. T his word is misspelled. Use a dictionary or spellchecker when you proof read your work.

Sp. T his word is misspelled. Use a dictionary or spellchecker when you proof read your work.

Prep. You may be using the wrong preposition.

Article Error You may need to use an article bef ore this word.

PAGE 5

Article Error You may need to remove this article.

Sp. T his word is misspelled. Use a dictionary or spellchecker when you proof read your work.

Run-on T his sentence may be a run-on sentence.

PAGE 6

Text Comment. don't add space between like paragraphs

RUBRIC: WRITING ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC

UNIT Y Scale 6

SCALE 6 presents a cogent, thesis-driven analysis of or response to the text

SCALE 5 presents a thoughtf ul, thesis-centered analysis of or response to the text

SCALE 4 presents an appropriate, thesis-based analysis of or response to the text

SCALE 3 presents an inconsistent or illogical thesis-related analysis of or response to the text

which ref lects an incomplete understanding of the text or topic

SCALE 2 presents a simplistic, inappropriate, or incoherent thesis-tangential analysis of or

response to the text, one that may suggest some signif icant misunderstanding of the
text or the topic;

SCALE 1 presents an inadequate, thesis-irrelevant analysis of or response to the text,

ignoring the topic’s demands, unacceptable

DEV/SUP Scale 6

SCALE 6 elaborates that response with well-chosen examples and persuasive reasoning,
excellent

SCALE 5 elaborates that response with appropriate examples and logical reasoning

SCALE 4 elaborates that response with acceptable examples and sensible reasoning

SCALE 3 lacks elaboration with appropriate examples , lacking

SCALE 2 lacks elaboration with appropriate examples or elaborates with inappropriate

examples

SCALE 1 lacks any appropriate pattern of development; may be inappropriately brief ,

unacceptable

ORGANIZ AT ION Scale 5

SCALE 6 conf orms to an organizational pattern that f acilitates reader understanding, using
organizational patterns to demonstrate the relatedness of ideas and enhances the
power of the argument

SCALE 5 conf orms to an organizational pattern that f acilitates reader understanding, using
organizational patterns to convey the argument

SCALE 4 conf orms to an organizational pattern that f acilitates reader understanding, using
organizational patterns to illustrate the argument, f its

SCALE 3 deviates f rom an organizational pattern that f acilitates reader understanding, so that
organizational structures may detract f rom the argument
SCALE 2 lacks an organizational pattern which f acilitates reader understanding, lacking

SCALE 1 lacks any appropriate organizational pattern, unacceptable

ST YLE Scale 6

SCALE 6 displays a sophisticated style that ref lects aptly chosen words and rhetorically
ef f ective sentence variety

SCALE 5 displays a readable style that ref lects well-chosen words and ef f ective sentences

SCALE 4 displays a style that ref lects appropriate words and sentence variety

SCALE 3 displays a style that ref lects imprecise word choice and little sentence variety

SCALE 2 displays a style that ref lects at least one of the f ollowing: simplistic or inaccurate
word choice; monotonous or f ragmented sentence structure, inappropriate

SCALE 1 displays a style which creates a disconnect between sound and sense, one in which
language word choice and syntax obscure meaning, unacceptable

SWE CONV Scale 5

SCALE 6 exhibits mastery of the conventions of Standard Written English, masterf ul

SCALE 5 demonstrates competence in the conventions of Standard Written English,

competent

SCALE 4 observes conventions of Standard Written English, acceptable

SCALE 3 may deviate f rom the conventions of Standard Written English by displaying
occasional major errors in grammar and usage or f requent minor errors

SCALE 2 repeatedly deviates f rom the conventions of Standard Written English by displaying
many repeated errors in grammar and usage

SCALE 1 consistently deviates f rom the conventions of Standard Written English., displaying a
pervasive pattern of errors in word choice, sentence structure, grammar and usage,
unacceptable

FORMAT Scale 6

SCALE 6 exhibits mastery of the conventions of manuscript citation and f ormat. masterf ul

SCALE 5 demonstrates competence in the conventions of manuscript citation and f ormat.

competent

SCALE 4 observes conventions of manuscript citation and f ormat. acceptable

SCALE 3 may deviate f rom the conventions of manuscript citation manuscript citation and
f ormat.
SCALE 2 repeatedly deviates f rom the conventions of manuscript citation and f ormat.

SCALE 1 consistently deviates f rom the conventions of manuscript citation and f ormat.
unacceptable