Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Church History by Warren Carroll
Church History by Warren Carroll
"Lomax, Reconquest of Spain, p. 165; O'Callaghan, Medieval Spain, p. 397; Gaibrois de Ballesteros, Sancho N,
11, 175, 177-184. Gaibrois de Ballesteros argues convincingly in a lengthy footnote (op. cit., II, 194-195) that
the expedition against Tarifa was a purely Castilian enterprise in no way dependent on Granadan aid. Lomax
and O'Callaghan accept Muhammad II's assertion that Sancho had promised him the city, and he may have
believed that such a promise was made; but as early as March 1292 Sancho had stated unequivocally in a
letter to the Bishop of Badajoz that he would never turn Tarifa over to the Moors (op. cit., II, 194), and it
seems most unlikely that in fact he would ever have done so.
threatened. After Sancho's death the next year led to near-chaos and collapse of authority in Castile,
Guzmfin refused an order from its Regent to surrender Tarifa to the Moors. He was loyal to the Reconquest
to the end, and Tarifa remained in Christian hands."
The total fidelity to duty of Alfonso Perez de Guzmfin the Good became a legend in Spain; and 642
years later his deed was re-enacted, in extraordinarily similar circumstances, by a man who must have heard
the tale of Guzmfin the
Good retold many a time. In the terrible summer of 1936, surrounded by an atheist army more alien than
even the Moors had been, Colonel Jose Moscard6, commander of the garrison of the Alcfizar (castle, or
citadel) of Toledo, was ordered by his assailants to surrender as the price of the life of his son Luis, whom
they held captive. They called Moscard6 on the telephone and put Luis on the line, who confirmed their
intention. "Then, my son," Moscard6 said, "commend your soul to God, cry `Long Live Spain!' and die like a
hero, for the Alcazar will never surrender!" And the Alcazar of Toledo held out, and Luis Moscard6 was
slain.l°°
So does the Christian past enlace the present-especially in Spain.
The first major task undertaken by Pope Boniface VIII was to attempt the resolution of the long-
standing Sicilian problem. His approach to it during the year 1295 shows the new pontiff at his best: an able
and ingenious negotiator
who always kept his primary goals in view. His primary goals were to end the conflict in Sicily and the
conflict between France and Aragon about Sicily, and to restore Papal authority there, which had
theoretically been re-established under Charles I of Naples (originally Prince Charles of Anjou in France)
when he overthrew Manfred, the illegitimate son of Frederick II-though in fact Charles had governed and
oppressed Sicily with little reference to the Pope. Boniface VIII's negotiations resulted in the Treaty of
Anagni in June 1295, which provided for Aragon to renounce its claim to Sicily and return it to the Pope, in
return for Sardinia and Corsica. James II of Aragon was to liberate the sons of Charles II of Naples whom he
held hostage and to marry Charles' daughter Blanche, while Frederick of Sicily was to marry Catherine of
Courtenay, heiress to the last Latin Emperor of Constantinople. Aragon was to abandon its claims on Sicily
and France its claims on Aragon. lol
As far as France and Aragon were concerned, the treaty was a success; but Catherine of Courtenay
rejected marriage to Frederick and he in turn refused to submit to the Pope, continued to war against Naples,
and had himself
Gaibrois de Ballesteros, Sancho IV, II, 205, 209, 258-259, 291, 305-306, 326-327, 335-338; Lomax, Reconquest
of Spain, p. 165; O'Callaghan, Medieval Spain, pp. 397, 401; Hillgarth, Spanish Kingdoms, I, 313.
looHugh Thomas, The Spanish Civil War (New York, 1961), pp. 203-204.
lolMann, Popes in the Middle Ages, XIX, 68-73; Boase, Boniface VIII, pp. 70-72; Runciman, Sicilian Vespers, pp.
294-295.