Skip to content

Freedom From Government Official Website

MENU
Convo With A Judge About “Driving”

Me: “Your honor, I’d like to remind you that, according to the Uniform Commercial
Code, that ‘driving’ is an occupational action and a commercial term for someone
who is for hire to provide a service of transportation like a taxi or a person who
is transporting merchandise to be sold, like a truck driver. Since nothing that I
was doing while operating my personal private automobile was considered commercial,
by definition, I was not driving because I was not involved in traffic. Going from
point A to point be, even driving to work, is not considered driving if I’m not
operating in a public commercial status, which is also known as traffic. I was
merely traveling privately. Just because I use the same roadways, doesn’t mean I
was operating in the same capacity. This is federal law, decided by the supreme
court. I was traveling lawfully and need no license to do so. Licensing liberty law
also says that my right to travel cannot be converted into a license and charged
for a fee and that if such a litigation is written, which would be a violation of
my right and infringe on my enjoyment of said right, then it charges no offense for
me to not acquire a licence, ignore the litigation and proceed with impunity. I
have no contract as a driver, no hours logged and am on no corporate payroll as
such.”

Judge: “the definitions of the UCC aren’t valid in this situation, you have to have
a license to operate a motored vehicle in the state of Ohio.”

Me: “what about what I said was unclear? Federal jurisdiction trumps your statutory
jurisdiction as well. A motored vehicle is used for commercial purposes, which I
defined for you previously. My personal automobile is household goods. And how are
they not valid? Do you collect a revenue using federal reserve Notes in this
court?”

Judge: “yes we do.”

Me: “that validates the federal jurisdiction of the UCC over this court. If you use
federal money, then you have to abide by federal law and code… unless, of course,
you’re saying you’re going to break federal law and code to extort me… Does the USC
Title 18 part 1 chapter 13 subsection 241 and 242 apply to you if you infringe upon
my rights and do me harm in the process? Hypothetically speaking of course…”

Judge: “hypothetically if that situation were to occur, yes.

Me: “If that federal code applies, then so does the UCC. You cannot pick and choose
sir. You, yourself, are operating commercially on behalf of the court as an
administrator of this municipality. So the UCC applies to you. I didn’t write the
laws, I just found them. And, if we’re being honest, the officer, who brought this
claim against me, should actually have state plates on his car since he is acting
in a public capacity AND operating commercially to collect a revenue. But he
doesn’t, he has private plates with police decals on them. You are allowing
unlawful litigations to be enforced and do damage upon me financially and infringe
upon my rights. Neither the state, nor the city, this municipality, nor you would
have any standing in a federal court if you passed judgment on me over this while
ignoring and violating federal law causing damage to me. Please have the bondsman
bring forward the proper documents so that I can see who will indemnify me.”

Judge: “I will waive these charges and dismiss this case due to lack of evidence.”

Source: My Facebook buddy Yahhantoqeph Ben Yahuah

Author SYSOP-317Posted on July 23, 2017Categories For The Record, Notices,
StrategyTags commercial, conversation, drive, federal reserve, fraud, judge, note,
notes, right, travel, UCC
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Post navigation
PREVIOUS
Previous post:How to Beat Any Court Case in America
NEXT
Next post:The Right to Travel is NOT a PRIVILEGE
We really need your help to achieve our collective mission. Thank you in advance
for ANY assistance you can provide.

Terrorism – the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
| Terrorist – a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims.

Search for: SEARCH

RECENT POSTS
RIGHT TO TRAVEL: Pulled over by NHP in Reno, Nevada
The Right to Travel is NOT a PRIVILEGE
Convo With A Judge About “Driving”
How to Beat Any Court Case in America
Be Careful Who You Listen to and Trust
ARCHIVES
November 2017
July 2017
May 2017
February 2017
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
May 2015
January 2015
August 2013
May 2013
May 2010
CATEGORIES
Events
For The Record
News
Notices
Strategy
About Us
Statist Delusions
Maxims of Law
SC Research
PSQ
Exercise Your Rights Card
Competency Questionnaire
Tools
Freedom From Government Official Website Proudly powered by WordPress