Study of similar drones.

MTOW (kg) PL (kg) E (min) nRot b R(mm) S(m2) Batt (mAh) Batt (v) Batt(kw) Disc LD vi (m/s) Pi (W)
UAV Draganflyer X4-ES 2,475 0,8 30 4 2 127 0,203 12,21 3,50 84,89
Lockheed Martin Indago 2,2 0,2 50 4 2 127 0,203 11000 13-17 V 10,85 3,30 71,14
Hubsan X4 Pro FPV H109S 1,1 0,65 23 4 2 30 0,011 7000 11,1 77,7 97,26 9,87 106,48
 Aeryon SkyRanger™ sUAS 2,4 50 4 2 127 0,203 11,84 3,44 81,06
GYRO 200 ED 3,1 0,8 35 4 2 38,1 0,018 6200 14,8 91,76 169,94 13,04 396,65
DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ 1,24 0,3 25 4 2 5200 11,1 57,72
MAVIC PRO PLATINUM 0,74 0,01 30 4 2 3830 11,4 43,662
Vantage Robotics Snap 0,57 0,2 20 4 2 85 0,091 3000 14,8 44,4 2,51 14,02
RPAS MCFLY-HELIOS HL 16,7 6 60 4 2

In the table above are reflected the data of the main drones of the market. We used this table to make our first designs, taking into account that we have
the maximum autonomy using a quadcopter structure.

Our main references were the “Lockheed Martin Indago” and specially the Vantage Robotics Snap. This drone has an elongated central structure that give us
some ideas: in the creation process of our drone has always appeared this kind of structure.