Opinion: Brexit enters extra

time, again
In an attempt to push through a "soft" Brexit, the EU has now put the UK on a
long extension leash. But DW's Bernd Riegert wonders — will more time
actually mean less chaos?

The Brexit show is getting more and more absurd. The member state that wants to leave,
but is unable to organize an orderly withdrawal may now be forced to take part in the
European parliamentary elections. Elections for a body that they don't really want to
belong to anymore.
It's no wonder, then, that hard-line Brexiteers came up with the idea to seize this
opportunity and sabotage the European Union from the inside after the election —
throwing sand into an already sluggish gear. The EU is now trying to cover the absurdity
of the situation with a flexible extension that comes with certain conditions.
If the British finally agree to a necessary withdrawal agreement, they can leave the bloc
at the beginning of the following month, but no later than October 31. The question as to
why setting a limit was even necessary at all was no longer raised.
Further extensions possible
With a completely divided Parliament and a prime minister without power or support,
Britain must be well behaved at the EU's table and must not obstruct the EU's work
during these domestically turbulent months until October. "Take back control!" — This
magical promise looked somewhat different during the Brexit referendum campaign.

Long into the night at the EU leaders' summit in Brussels, the EU dictated the conditions
of the extension to British Prime Minister Theresa May — deciding whether the renegade
member state would leave without a treaty on Friday or in a few months' time.
Read more: 'No-deal Brexit would poison EU-UK relations for generations'
Whether or not a withdrawal agreement will be ratified by both sides by the end of the
new extension is by no means certain. It may very well be that the absurd show will drag
on.
It's already clear that, if in doubt, there could be another extension at the end of October,
as the EU does not want to be responsible for a hard Brexit under any circumstances.
The only neat solution without too much absurdity would have been for the British
government to revoke Article 50. Then, Great Britain, as a full member state, would have
had all the time in the world to sort itself out, make a new attempt and negotiate another
withdrawal agreement with the EU.
The cries of the hard Brexiteers would have been great. Theresa May would have had to
resign after the withdrawal of Article 50, but she already offered to do so anyway in order
to bring Parliament in line.
Read more: Should non-EU citizens be worried about a hard Brexit?
Brexit haunting goes on
Uncertainty for citizens and businesses remains. Everything is up in the air, which is
poison for investment decisions.
Until now, the 27 EU member states have been remarkably united when it comes to the
Brexit process. But this unity is now starting to crumble. France fought very hard against
the long extension favored by a large majority of other member states.
Like Theresa May, France wanted an extension until June 30 to avoid the UK's
participation in the European Parliament elections. Germany advocated for a delay until
December or next March to finally get the tiresome Brexit issue out of the headlines.
In the end, a typical compromise arose, which cannot be easily justified from an
objective standpoint. They then had to meet in the middle, at the end of October.
This extension already has a nickname: Halloween Brexit. On the last night of October,
the spirits and ghosts are on the move — a good omen, perhaps?