Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Civil Law - Contracts
Civil Law - Contracts
d. None of above
Question 3
4 out of 4 points
b. Collateral escrow
c. Escrow account
d. All of above
Question 4
0 out of 4 points
c. If you are interested in my house, I will sell it to you for 3 billion dong
d. None of above
Question 9
0 out of 4 points
d. None of above
Question 10
0 out of 4 points
Which of the following have civil act capacity to enter into contracts by themselves?
Selected Answer:
b. An 18 year old girl sells her house
Answers: a. A 25 year old student who has mental problems sells his phone
b. An 18 year old girl sells her house
According to the civil code 2015, who can NOT enter into the following contracts by
themselves?
Selected
Answer: c. A 25 year old drunk man pledges his watch
Answers: a. A 17 year old girl who owns 200 million dong, lends her friend 50
million dong
According to the civil code 2015, which of the following has civil act capacity to enter
into a contract by themselves?
Selected Answer:
d. None of above
Answers: a. An, 4 years old, bought an eraser.
b. Tu, 15 years old, borrowed from his friend 50.000 dong.
c. Hue, 40 years old, lent Ngoc her motorbike when she was half - sleep.
d. None of above
Question 13
0 out of 4 points
"Cuong texted Thuy saying I want to buy your female ox for 15 million dong and I will pay you in cash on
the day you hand the ox over to me"
Selected Answer:
c. Ok. I want you to pay in advance before I hand the ox to you
Answers: a. Ok. The female ox I showed you was sold. If you want I will sell you its female baby
b. Do you really want to buy the one I showed you? If so, I will sell it to you
c. Ok. I want you to pay in advance before I hand the ox to you
d. All of above
Question 14
0 out of 4 points
According to the civil code 2015, a security measure that can be applied to secure entry
into a contract is_________________.
Selected Answer:
d. Mortgage of the property
Answers:
a. Deposit
b. Security collateral
c. Escrow account
d. Mortgage of the property
Question 15
0 out of 4 points
c. A bonsai tree
d. All of above
Question 16
0 out of 4 points
Which of the following remedies can only be applied with an agreement between
parties?
Selected Answer:
d. All of above
Answers:
a. Fines
b. Compensations
c. Cancellation of contracts
d. All of above
Question 17
0 out of 4 points
On 10th July 2017, Hien emailed the company DHL saying I want to ship a parcel containing 50 boxes of
multivitamin from the UK to Vietnam. I would like to know if you are able to ship my parcel and the
shipping fees . On the same day, DHL replied Yes, we can ship your parcel. Each kilogram will cost £9.
However the fee excludes domestic delivery. If you want us to ship your parcel, please let us know before
14th July 2015 . On 11th July 2015, Hien replied Ok. Can you provide me with your company s address in
the UK so I can post my parcel there? . On 12th July 2015, DHL emailed Hien to inform her that the
shipping fee had increased up to £10 per kilogram due to a decrease in exchange rates. Hien replied
immediately that she was not happy with this. Then the company said they will charge Hien £9 only as
discussed in the email on 10th July 2017. On 16th July 2015, DHL called Hien to ask if she shipped her
parcel to their office in the UK. Hien told them that she already used a service of a different company as she
was not happy with the shipping fee.
On 10th July 2017, Hien emailed the company DHL saying I want to ship a parcel containing 50 boxes of
multivitamin from the UK to Vietnam. I would like to know if you are able to ship my parcel and the
shipping fees . On the same day, DHL replied Yes, we can ship your parcel. Each kilogram will cost £9.
However the fee excludes domestic delivery. If you want us to ship your parcel, please let us know before
14th July 2015 . On 11th July 2015, Hien replied Ok. Can you provide me with your company s address in
the UK so I can post my parcel there? . On 12th July 2015, DHL emailed Hien to inform her that the
shipping fee had increased up to £10 per kilogram due to a decrease in exchange rates. Hien replied
immediately that she was not happy with this. Then the company said they will charge Hien £9 only as
discussed in the email on 10th July 2017. On 16th July 2015, DHL called Hien to ask if she shipped her
parcel to their office in the UK. Hien told them that she already used a service of a different company as she
was not happy with the shipping fee.
What is the statement "Ok. Can you provide me with your company s address in the UK so I can post my
parcel there?"? explain
Can DHL change their shipping fee on 12th July 2017? Explain.
On 10th July 2017, Hien emailed the company DHL saying I want to ship a parcel containing 50 boxes of
multivitamin from the UK to Vietnam. I would like to know if you are able to ship my parcel and the
shipping fees . On the same day, DHL replied Yes, we can ship your parcel. Each kilogram will cost £9.
However the fee excludes domestic delivery. If you want us to ship your parcel, please let us know before
14th July 2015 . On 11th July 2015, Hien replied Ok. Can you provide me with your company s address in
the UK so I can post my parcel there? . On 12th July 2015, DHL emailed Hien to inform her that the
shipping fee had increased up to £10 per kilogram due to a decrease in exchange rates. Hien replied
immediately that she was not happy with this. Then the company said they will charge Hien £9 only as
discussed in the email on 10th July 2017. On 16th July 2015, DHL called Hien to ask if she shipped her
parcel to their office in the UK. Hien told them that she already used a service of a different company as she
was not happy with the shipping fee.
Butler Machine Tool Limited Liability Company (hereafter Butler) makes and sells machine tools. They
sent a letter to Ex-Cell-O Joint Stock Company (hereafter Ex-Cell-O) on May 23, 2017 offering Ex-Cell-O
some new machinery for £75,535. With it were Butler's standard contract terms. These included a price
variation clause, so that if their manufacturing costs went up, the price rise would be passed on to Ex-Cell-
O. Ex-Cell-O replied on May 27 and said they would order the machinery, but on Ex-Cell-O's own standard
terms. Ex-Cell-O's standard terms did not have a price variation clause. Butler replied on June 5. It replied
on the tear-off slip from Ex-Cell-O's terms. At the bottom of this slip it read, "We accept your order on the
terms and conditions stated therein." But later on, Butler added a letter reasserting that the deal was being
made under Butler's own terms, from the May 23 letter. A while later, nothing further had been said, and
Butler delivered the machinery. They asked for £75,535, plus £2,892 according to their price variation
clause. Ex-Cell-O refused to pay the extra. Butler sued Ex-Cell-O.
Butler Machine Tool Limited Liability Company (hereafter Butler) makes and sells machine tools. They
sent a letter to Ex-Cell-O Joint Stock Company (hereafter Ex-Cell-O) on May 23, 2017 offering Ex-Cell-O
some new machinery for £75,535. With it were Butler's standard contract terms. These included a price
variation clause, so that if their manufacturing costs went up, the price rise would be passed on to Ex-Cell-
O. Ex-Cell-O replied on May 27 and said they would order the machinery, but on Ex-Cell-O's own standard
terms. Ex-Cell-O's standard terms did not have a price variation clause. Butler replied on June 5. It replied
on the tear-off slip from Ex-Cell-O's terms. At the bottom of this slip it read, "We accept your order on the
terms and conditions stated therein." But later on, Butler added a letter reasserting that the deal was being
made under Butler's own terms, from the May 23 letter. A while later, nothing further had been said, and
Butler delivered the machinery. They asked for £75,535, plus £2,892 according to their price variation
clause. Ex-Cell-O refused to pay the extra. Butler sued Ex-Cell-O.
Butler Machine Tool Limited Liability Company (hereafter Butler) makes and sells machine tools. They
sent a letter to Ex-Cell-O Joint Stock Company (hereafter Ex-Cell-O) on May 23, 2017 offering Ex-Cell-O
some new machinery for £75,535. With it were Butler's standard contract terms. These included a price
variation clause, so that if their manufacturing costs went up, the price rise would be passed on to Ex-Cell-
O. Ex-Cell-O replied on May 27 and said they would order the machinery, but on Ex-Cell-O's own standard
terms. Ex-Cell-O's standard terms did not have a price variation clause. Butler replied on June 5. It replied
on the tear-off slip from Ex-Cell-O's terms. At the bottom of this slip it read, "We accept your order on the
terms and conditions stated therein." But later on, Butler added a letter reasserting that the deal was being
made under Butler's own terms, from the May 23 letter. A while later, nothing further had been said, and
Butler delivered the machinery. They asked for £75,535, plus £2,892 according to their price variation
clause. Ex-Cell-O refused to pay the extra. Butler sued Ex-Cell-O.
Is Butler s letter made after the reply on 5th June 2017 valid? Explain