Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Session 04 Quadragesimo Anno The Reconstruction of The Social Order Pius XI 1931 Interval
Session 04 Quadragesimo Anno The Reconstruction of The Social Order Pius XI 1931 Interval
Experience Real Life Pen Gestures on Your Screen | https://www.flexcil.com - social justice
- subsidiarity 1
- QA- 40th anniversary of RN
* SUBSIDIARITY
Session 04 - refers to the contribution of the
Quadragesimo Anno church to secular society
The Reconstruction of the Social Order - context refers to concentration of
Pius XI economic and political power and
1931 monopoly
-
Interval:
- After Rerum Novarum in 1891, the next major document on CST was issued in 1931, at
the 40th anniversary of RN.
- In between, two popes followed the papacy of Leo XIII: Pius X and Benedict XV.
Pius X
- Lower middle class background.
- His priestly experience was chiefly pastoral and seminary work.
- He had little understanding of modern culture and worldly affairs.
- He had a strongly hierarchical and clerical concept of the Church and of the subordinate
role of the laity within it.
- Pius X was more conservative than Leo XIII on social issues. He was more concerned
about practical religious reform and counter-acting modernism. He was not against
helping the poor but he insisted that the obligation to work for an equitable social order
was not one out of justice but out of charity, and was therefore less compelling.
Benedict XV
- Benedict XV was more liberal on political matters than Pius X. On the socio-political
level, Benedict allowed Catholics to have a more important role in Italian politics.
- World War I dominated the papacy of Benedict and he spent his energy working for
peace and having the Church accepted as a mediator in the conflict. His concern for
national and international political matters meant he spent less energy on economic
questions.
- On economic matters, Benedict XV was similar to Pius X in conservatism. Benedict
believed that capitalism allowed every person the opportunity to advance himself and do
well. In this idealized view, he did not take into consideration the fact that the prevailing
capitalist economic system was biased against the poor and they seldom get the
opportunity to use their talents to rise above poverty. It was a backward step from RN.
Context:
Social issues at that time (1931)
§ Rise of international Communism and persecution of religion in several countries
§ Evolution of socialism into various forms, especially non-revolutionary Social democrats
versus revolutionary Communists
§ Evolution of economic liberalism to monopoly capitalism
§ concentration of wealth in the hands of a few (QA 105)
§ concentration of wealth lead to a concentration of economic and political power (QA 105-8)
§ increasing number of poor industrial and agricultural workers (QA 59)
§ widespread unemployment because of the world-wide economic depression
Contents of encyclical:
Part I: Impact of RN
I. On the Church
A. Doctrine
- RN was adapted and applied by bishops to circumstances in their regions (18)
- It encouraged many priests and lay people to study the Church’s social teaching (19)
- It helped begin a tradition of Catholic social teaching (20)
- It is taught in seminaries and universities (20)
- It was an influential resource of social teaching for non-Catholics and for world leaders and
legislatures (21)
B. Practical Application
- RN help inspire efforts to help the those who are marginalized in society (23)
- There were more charitable works for the poor (24)
- It inspired institutions of mutual support and assistance among workers in various
occupations (24)
B. Property Rights
- Some have falsely accuse the Church of defending the rich against the workers when Leo
XIII defended the right to private property in RN
- Need to for correct interpretation of doctrine on private property
a. The Church has never denied the two-fold aspect of property ownership:
individual and social (concerning the common good) (45). Property was given to
man by God not only for his individual needs but for the welfare of all.
b. need to avoid double dangers of individualism and collectivism (46)
c. The right of property must be distinguished from its use (47)
d. Commutative justice requires respect of other people’s ownership of property.
The use of property is not guided by commutative justice but by other virtues and
therefore is a duty not enforced by judicial courts.
e. It is false to say that misuse or non-use of property forfeits the right to ownership
(48).
f. To destroy the individual character of property is a grievous error (49)
g. Function of government is to define in details the duties of ownership; to specify
what is licit and illicit in the use of property (49)
h. The state has no right to abolish the right to private property since the right
is derived from nature not from man. The government only has the right to
control its use and bring it to harmony with the common good (49)
i. The right use of superfluous income: charity and to create employment (50-51)
(Pius XI gives a fuller definition of social justice in another encyclical, Divini Redemptoris [51]
“In reality, besides commutative justice, there is also social justice with its own set obligations,
from which neither employers nor workingmen can escape. Now it is of the very essence of
social justice to demand for each individual all that is necessary for the common good. But just
as in the living organism it is impossible to provide for the good of the whole unless each single
part and each individual member is given what it needs for the exercise of its proper functions,
so it is impossible to care for the social organism and the good of society as a unit unless each
single part and each individual member - that is to say, each individual man in the dignity of his
human personality - is supplied with all that is necessary for the exercise of his social functions.
If social justice be satisfied, the result will be an intense activity in economic life as a whole,
pursued in tranquility and order. This activity will be proof of the health of the social body, just
as the health of the human body is recognized in the undisturbed regularity and perfect efficiency
of the whole organism.”)
E. Just Wage
a. A just wage must be paid so people can acquire moderate ownership. (63)
b. The wage contract is not necessarily unjust, as held by some. However, it should,
if possible, be modified by a contract of partnership whereby employer and wage
earners become sharers in ownership or management, or else participate in the
profits. (64-65)
c. Social justice demands that wages must support families (71)
d. Women and children should not be abused in the work place (71)
e. Public authorities can help businesses pay a just wage (73)
f. Employment opportunities must be provided for those willing to work (74)
g. Wage level should be arrived at with the public economic welfare in mind.
Wages too low or too high causes unemployment. To lower or raise wages
unduly, for the purpose of private profit, and with no consideration for the
common good is against social justice.
A. Changes in Capitalism
a. Concentration of wealth in the hands of a few has led to a concentration of power
and economic domination (105)
b. Economic dictatorship has replaced the free market (109)
c. The state has become a slave to greed
d. Economic nationalism and economic imperialism have affected the relations
between nations (110)
e. Remedies:
B. Changes in Socialism
a. Socialism has divided between communism and moderate socialism (111)
b. Communism supports class warfare through violence, abolition of private
property, and antagonism toward the Church.
c. Moderate socialism condemns the recourse to violence, moderates class warfare
and abolition of private property.
d. QA acknowledges that some of the programs of moderate socialists approach
the just demands of Christian social reformers
e. Still, there is no compromise possible between Christianity and socialism
f. Socialism conceives the human in a way alien to Christianity, particularly on
the matter of man’s last end
g. No one can be at the same time a sincere Catholic and a true socialist.
h. Invitation for those who defected to socialism to come back to the Church
- Despite harsh criticism of capitalism, Pius XI did not condemn it but believed that
reforms can change it. Pius’ fear of socialism made him condemn it even though he
acknowledged that some socialists come close to Catholic positions on social reform.
C. General Remedies
a. Social reconstruction must be preceded by a profound renewal of the Christian
spirit and return to gospel principles (136)
b. Love and charity must reinforce justice (137)
- Pius XI analyzed the problem of the social order as a moral problem thus his remedy is
not found in social movements or political parties but in a return to Christian moderation,
especially the law of charity. Charity will not replaced justice withheld but it was
necessary to bring stability and unity to humanity
Evaluation of QA
- Generally, QA strengthened Catholic teaching in defense of labor and in its critique of
liberal capitalism. The encyclical was not only concerned about the conditions of workers
but with the whole socio-economic order of society.
- QA introduced the term social justice into official Catholic teaching. The insistence on
social justice and common good set up a norm with which to evaluate economic relations
and institutions.
- QA articulated the principle of subsidiarity as a guide for the proper role of the State in
ensuring right order in society.
- QA focused attention on the basic causes of injustice and poverty. Pius XI was more
willing than Leo XIII to make a structural analysis of society, locating the inadequacies
and built-in injustices in the structures of society.
- Pius XI avoided blaming structures solely for injustice in society and he also avoided a
moralizing approach that blamed all injustices on the sinfulness of individuals. Though
the encyclical treat personal sinfulness and unjust structures separately as parts of the
problem, there are some attempts at showing their inter-relation.
- There is a shift in spirituality from RN of Leo XIII to QA of Pius XI. Leo XIII
encouraged a spirituality of stability which emphasized obedience to authorities and
enduring injustice rather than overthrow regimes, offering a happy reward in the future
for those who endure patiently. Pius XI, on the other hand, was aware of the accusation
made by some that the Church seems to condone injustices by offering happiness in the
afterlife. Pius XI acknowledges that some in the Church do this and he condemns it
(125). There is an emerging spirituality of justice in Pius XI which speak of justice as a
fundamental value in its own right and he speaks encouraging words to those who work
for justice in society (142).
- QA started a tradition for the pope to reconsider the condition of workers periodically
- QA justified the work of those in the Church who have committed themselves to work for
justice and for the poor
Questions:
1. Is the principle of subsidiarity evident in our Church institutions and structures?
2. How are social justice and the common good fundamental norms for our decision-making
as individuals and as a Church?
3. How far are we willing to criticize the abuses of liberal capitalism while at the same time
being influenced and contributing to a capitalist environment?
4. How do we use our property in the light of social justice?
5. Do we pay a family wage?
6. Do we allow charity to replace justice withheld?
7. Do we look at both personal sinfulness and unjust structures as related parts of the
problem of injustice in society? Do we focus more on one aspect than the other?