Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scholarship Revision
Scholarship Revision
Ravago, Joseph
HL English Y2
Casady
2019 May 23
Coben Response
happening in the homes of teens across the world. While there are both pros and cons
to adding spyware onto the belongings of teens, Coben argues throughout his article
“The Undercover Parent” that it is not wrong due to the dangerous nature of the
Internet. His utilization of personal anecdotes helps drive every point he makes home as
he taps into his readers’ emotions. Through his use of rhetorical strategies of ethos,
pathos, and logos, Coben aims to convince parents of sharing his mindset that installing
spyware isn’t wrong due to the dangers of the Internet and lose who inhabit it.
Coben uses personal anecdotes throughout his article to build his credibility with
his readers. He starts with an anecdotal piece reading, “Friends of mine confessed over
dinner that they had put spyware in their 15-year-old son’s computer so they could
monitor all he did online.” (Coben, para. 1). Within common society, 15-year-olds are
seen as people who aren’t mature enough to make decisions for themselves yet. While
they have added responsibility, they’re also portrayed to be rebellious and naturally
naive. Coben is able to contrast this young teen with his own credibility when speaking
about this subject. Coben’s addition of this information at the very beginning of the piece
sets a precedent on his knowledge of the situation. By saying that his friends have put
spyware on their son’s stuff, Coben in insinuating that he has seen this happen first
Ravago 2
that is very similar to when there are “experts” brought onto talk shows to speak about
an issue. Coben carries throughout as towards the end of the piece he states, “But text
messages and cell phones don’t offer anonymity and danger of the Internet.” (Coben,
para. 12). Anonymity is most relevant in pop culture when referring to hacking groups
such as “Anonymous” that are synonymous with breaching privacy. This anonymity
statement drives Coben’s point further into the readers’ heads. Immediately preceding
building his credibility by displaying that he’s considered both sides and is able to stand
by his argument. This credibility helps the reader buy into the actual content of what he
is saying due to the trust that comes from his authority. Coben capitalized on this
Coben’s emotional appeal to his audience is his most effectively utilized appeal
throughout the article as he uses extreme examples to scare his readers. Coben
presents dangers such as, “coversing with a pedofile” or somebody being “cyber bullied
to the point where she committed suicide.” (Coben, para. 8). Pedofiles and suicide are
two very serious subjects within everyday society. There are numerous courses and
awareness campaigns about both of these subjects and avoiding them at all costs. By
bringing them up as potential side effects of free usage of the web, Coben is inciting
fear among caring parents. This fear will cause them to innately agree with his
assertions as they will simply be acting according to what they think is best for their
children. Coben also states, “Trust is one thing, but surrendering parental responsibility
to a machine that allows the entire world access to your home is border negligence.”
Ravago 3
(Coben, para.6). Negligence carries a strong denotation within society, especially with
parents. Being called a negligent parent is perhaps the biggest insult that one can
receive as a parent so by insinuating this, Coben is able to cause panic with parents.
Their fear of being negligent will cause them to search for any way to escape this
stigma, thus turning to the spyware. Coben achieves his goal with this as he is now able
to easily convince the parents of his position without much need to do any extra work
himself. Coben’s logical appeal only serves to tie together all arguments and really drive
them home.
Coben’s use of logic is a simple appeal that allows him to continually become
with his refutation, “Am I suggesting eavesdropping on every conversation? No. With
new technology comes new responsibility.” (Coben, para. 11). The statement echos the
common phrase “With great power comes great responsibility.” This statement is
subliminal message that the parents are acting superhero-like. Not explicitly, but his
refutation gives parents the inclination that failing to act even in the slightest with new
dictatorships within homes, but improved parenting techniques to stay with the times.
Coben also states, “Now after a fair amount of research, I get it.” (Coben, para. 1).
Research has often become synonymous with knowledge and credibility. This is a
rather simple statement made by Coben, but it holds great value for the reader. He is
boosting his credibility by showing that he did research, but also doing so with his
addressing of the other side. He is offering a sort of sentiments to the other side that,
Ravago 4
once again, shows that the author isn’t skewed by his opinion and can’t see the other
side. He acknowledges the other side and still sticks by his, giving the reader the logical
Coben’s utilization of ethos, pathos, and logos helped raise his credibility with
every statement he made. By doing so, he was able to effectively convince parents and
his readers that his side was the right one to be on. His support for installing spyware
was enhanced by the reader’s trust in him due to his utilization of these techniques.
While the outcomes of installing the spyware are yet to be seen, Coben was able to
craft more aware and caring parents in relation to their child’s internet usage.
Scholarship Reflection
format immediately as it was not consistent with the requirements of a MLA formatted
essay. For instance, my quotation citations were incorrect and my header was aligned
Ravago 5
to the right rather than the left. Partly through my revision I also realized that as a
freshman I was unaware of how to use headers and page numbering so I had manually
done so, so I switched that into the header of my essay as well. The most dramatic
change was in my analysis of the quotes I chose. My entire structure of analysis was
simple and surface level at best as I was showing rather than giving detailed analysis of
what the piece was actually doing. I focused solely on what the author was doing on a
very basic level, so I first began by adding more of the “how?” aspect to my analysis.
that through simple statements about the author’s purpose with my utilization of “why?”
Finally, my conclusion was weak and lacked actual substance so I reworked the entire
piece to be an actual reflection of what I had written and what lasting impressions the
article would have on audiences. Overall, my essay needed to be taken from a surface
level piece to one that provided analysis with substance for the reader.