Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effect of Sintering Atmosphere On Properties of Porous Stainless Steel For Biomedical Applications PDF
Effect of Sintering Atmosphere On Properties of Porous Stainless Steel For Biomedical Applications PDF
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: This study discusses manufacturing of metallic biomaterials by means of powder metallurgy with consideration
Received 11 May 2012 for their unquestionable advantages, i.e. opportunities of obtaining materials with controllable porosity. The
Received in revised form 27 July 2012 paper focuses on properties of 316L stainless steel obtained using the method of powder metallurgy with respect
Accepted 17 September 2012
to compacting pressure and sintering atmosphere. All the specimens were compacted at 700, 400 and 225 MPa,
Available online 25 September 2012
and sintered at 1250 °C. In order to analyze the sintering atmosphere, three different media were used: dissoci-
Keywords:
ated ammonia, hydrogen and vacuum. The study covered sintering density, porosity, microstructure analysis and
Sintered stainless steel corrosion resistance. The proposed method of powder metallurgy allowed for obtaining materials with predict-
Biomaterials able size and distribution of pores, depending on the parameters of sinter preparation (compaction force,
sinter atmosphere). High corrosion resistance of the materials (sintering in the atmosphere of hydrogen
and in vacuum) and high porosity in the sinters studied offer opportunities for using them for medical
purposes.
© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction ingrowth into pores, which provides good stabilization of the implant.
High requirements are set though to ensure proper durability.
Besides unquestionable progress in development of ceramic materials One group of biomaterials which raises great expectations is porous
and composite materials [4–6], there is ongoing search for a broader materials obtained by means of compaction and powder sintering
range of metallic implants, particularly those used in orthopedics and technologies. During the past three decades, powder metallurgy (P/M)
surgical interventions (e.g. joint endoprostheses, bone loss) and dentistry methods have significantly contributed to the development of more
(prosthesis replacements) [1–4]. effective surgical implants. Sintering process is regarded as an important
Long-lasting implants, made typically of metals and their alloys, are procedure in P/M technology because furnace atmosphere affects the
characterized by improved mechanical properties, but their corrosion process and the parameters of the obtained materials. The final properties
resistance and biocompatibility remain at a relatively low level. of the material using P/M technology largely depend on the atmosphere
Development of implants for the purposes of bone surgeries is where sintering is performed [5,6].
considerably determined by the progress in biomaterial engineering. Some investigations have been carried out to fabricate porous 316L
The attempts are being made to obtain biomaterials which would stainless steel [9–12]. Corrosion resistance of the currently used 316L
meet demanding biofunctionality criteria such as mechanical strength, stainless steel depends on their passivation by a thin surface layer of
corrosion resistance or biocompatibility [5–7]. oxide. Studies presented in [13] have demonstrated that corrosion
In recent years, metallic porous materials have attracted much interest resistance decreased with porosity, which was attributed to the
as candidates for biomedical applications. Porosity of materials used is an small, isolated pores that trap ionic species and restricts the access of
essential parameter in implantology since it ensures ingrowth of the oxygen, which in turn limits available oxygen and allows for formation
vascularised soft tissue and in consequence guarantees a firm connection. of corrosion resistant passive layers. In highly porous compacts with an
This concerns mainly the improvement in implant osseointegration with open and interconnected pore morphology, free flow of species resulted
surrounding bone tissue [8]. in a material with increased corrosion resistance.
The porous metallic biomaterials should be considered as very The investigations of opportunities for development of new materials
attractive implant materials due to their elastic modulus which is for medical applications have been a very popular domain of research
similar to this in the bone as well as the opportunities for bone tissue works.
The aim of this paper is to study the effect of compacting pressure,
sintering temperature and sintering atmosphere on the properties of
⁎ Corresponding author. Fax: +48 343250721. porous 316L stainless steel compacted. The microstructure, density and
E-mail address: dudek@wip.pcz.pl (A. Dudek). porosity were comparatively analyzed to understand the mechanisms of
0928-4931/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.09.010
A. Dudek, R. Włodarczyk / Materials Science and Engineering C 33 (2013) 434–439 435
Table 3
Distribution of shape factor and statistical parameters of surface area in 700/DA sinters.
Volumetric share of
Pore surface area, µm2
pores, %
Min 10.62
Mean 232.60
A. Dudek, R. Włodarczyk / Materials Science and Engineering C 33 (2013) 434–439 437
Table 4
Distribution of shape factor and statistical parameters of surface area in 400/DA.
2 3 6 22.85
3 6 10 25.71
4 10 20 17.14
5 20 > 14.3
Volumetric share of
Pore surface area, µm2
pores, %
Min 8.35
11.82
Max 2747.88
Mean 310.82
in either of the curves, the tangents (for partial curves with slopes that H2/25% N2 and in the atmosphere of H2 are characterized by similar
were consistent with the theory of electrode processes) were extrapo- corrosion potential in the environment studied. Corrosion potential of
lated to corrosion potential [7]. the material sintered in the atmosphere of vacuum is shifted towards
Open circuit potential tests were used to measure free corrosion positive values and amounts to −0.187 V vs. SCE (in artificial saliva).
potential in different environments (Ringer solution and artificial The lowest value of corrosion current density was measured in the
solution). sinter obtained in the atmosphere of hydrogen 5 ∙ 10 − 3 mA cm − 2
Regions of active solubilisation and passivation can be observed in (in Ringer solution). The data are presented in Table 7. The lowest values
polarization curves (Fig. 2). Comparison of the registered potentiokinetic were found for the material sintered in hydrogen (0.002 mA cm − 2).
curves reveals that the materials sintered in the atmosphere of 75% As results from the shape of polarization curves, current densities
Table 5
Distribution of shape factor and statistical parameters of surface area in 400/H2.
1 1 3 64.95
2 3 6 19.65
3 6 10 5.13
4 10 20 6.83
5 20 > 3.44
Volumetric share of
Pore surface area, µm2
pores, %
Min 3.79
Mean 381.26
438 A. Dudek, R. Włodarczyk / Materials Science and Engineering C 33 (2013) 434–439
Table 6
Distribution of shape factor and statistical parameters of surface area in 225/V.
Volumetric share of
Pore surface area, µm2
pores, %
Min 0.54
Max 199.11 2.1
Mean 32.15
observed in passive range, regardless of the compaction pressure, are was found for 400/H2 sinter, whereas its highest values were measured
comparable. for 225/V.
Fig. 3 presents the open circuit potential versus time for sintered Tafel curves presented in Figs. 2 and 4 show a particularly long
stainless steel in Ringer solution. Under conditions of open circuit, passivation range in 400/H2 sinter for the potential range from
lowest value of potential was found in a sinter obtained in the atmo- 0.6 ÷ 2 V. Despite the lowest corrosion potential compared to other
sphere of hydrogen. This reflects the effect of compaction pressure. specimens, this sinter is characterized by a stable passive layer and
The material compacted at the pressure of 700 MPa, with higher is resistant to pitting corrosion.
density (6.70 g cm − 3) exhibits lower potential compared to the sin- The effect of structural properties of the material on corrosion resis-
ter compacted at lower pressures (at 400 MPa, sinter density is tance is presented in Fig. 6.
6.19 g cm − 3), with the potential ranging near − 0.1 V. The highest As results from the figure above, in order to obtain the highest cor-
potential in OCP (Open Circuit Potential) conditions was found for rosion resistance, one should optimize the parameters of manufacturing
the specimen 225/V. of 316L sintered steel.
At the next stage, in order to examine the effect of sintering param-
eters and compaction atmosphere on corrosion resistance in materials Table 7
used for implants (e.g. used in dentistry), polarization curves were reg- Electrochemical parameters for polarization curves.
istered in the atmosphere of artificial saliva (Fig. 4). Regardless of the Solution Parameters 700/DA 400/DA 400/H2 225/V
compaction pressure, the potentiokinetic curves recorded for the
Ringer Ecorr [V] −0.444 −0.432 −0.460 −0.158
compacted sinters in the atmosphere of 75% H2/25% N2 have similar solution icorr [mA cm−2] 0.008 0.042 0.005 0.052
shapes. The values of current densities and corrosion potentials differ (ipass) vs. SCE [mA cm−2] 0.065 0.165 0.050 0.100
insignificantly (Table 7). The highest value of corrosion potential is Artificial saliva Ecorr [V] −0.482 −0.456 −0.571 −0.180
observed for 225/V sinter. Fig. 5 shows curves representing potential icorr [mA cm−2] 0.007 0.022 0.002 0.064
−2
(ipass) vs. SCE [mA cm ] 0.042 0.120 0.027 0.088
vs. time in open circuit. Under these conditions, the lowest potential
103 0.2
102 700/DA 0.1
Current density/mA cm-2
10 1 400/DA 0.0
OCP/V vs. SCE
10 0 -0.1
225/V 700/DA
400/DA
-0.2
10-1
-0.3
10-2 400/H2
-0.4
10-3
225/V -0.5 400/H2
10-4
-0.6
-0.8 -0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Potential/ V vs. SCE Time/s
Fig. 2. Potentiokinetic curves obtained for sintered stainless steel obtained in Ringer solution. Fig. 3. Open circuit potential in sintered materials in Ringer solution.
A. Dudek, R. Włodarczyk / Materials Science and Engineering C 33 (2013) 434–439 439
103 60 0.5
Ringer Porosity/%
Current density/mA cm-2 10 2 400/DA Artificial saliva
50
0.4
10 1 700/DA
40
10-4 0 0.0
-0.8 -0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 700/DA 400/DA 400/H2 225/V
Potential/ V vs. SCE
Fig. 6. Relationship of material porosity and passivation current density.
Fig. 4. Potentiokinetic curves obtained for sintered stainless steel obtained in artificial saliva.