4 - Resilience and Biomarkers of Health Risk in Black Smokers and Nonsmokers PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Health Psychology © 2017 American Psychological Association

2017, Vol. 36, No. 11, 1047–1058 0278-6133/17/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000540

Resilience and Biomarkers of Health Risk in Black Smokers


and Nonsmokers

Carla J. Berg, Regine Haardörfer, Aliza P. Wingo


Colleen M. McBride, Varun Kilaru, and Emory University and Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center,
Kerry J. Ressler Decatur, Georgia
Emory University

Nabil F. Saba, Jackelyn B. Payne, and Alicia Smith


This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.

Emory University
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.

Objectives: Blacks are disproportionately affected by tobacco-related illnesses as well as traumatic events
associated with psychiatric conditions and smoking. We examined the potential protective nature of
resilience within this context, hypothesizing resilience differentially moderates the associations of
traumatic experiences to depressive symptoms and to biomarkers of health risk among Black ever versus
never smokers. Method: Measures of resilience, traumatic experiences, depressive symptoms, and
biomarkers (interleukin-6 [IL-6], C-reactive protein [CRP], allostatic load) were obtained among 852
Blacks recruited from Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta. Results: Ever smokers experienced more
trauma (p ⬍ .001) and depressive symptoms (p ⫽ .01). Structural equation modeling indicated that, in
ever smokers, childhood trauma was positively associated with depressive symptoms (p ⬍ .001);
resilience was negatively associated with depressive symptoms (p ⫽ .01). Depressive symptoms were
positively associated with IL-6 (p ⫽ .03), which was positively associated with allostatic load (p ⫽ .01).
Adulthood trauma was associated with higher CRP levels (p ⫽ .03). In never smokers, childhood (p ⬍
.001) and adulthood trauma (p ⫽ .01) were associated with more depressive symptoms. Adulthood
trauma was also associated with higher CRP levels (p ⬍ .001), which was positively associated with
allostatic load (p ⬍ .001). Never smokers with higher resilience had a negative association between
childhood trauma and depressive symptoms whereas those with lower resilience had a positive associ-
ation between childhood trauma and depressive symptoms. Resilience was negatively associated with
CRP levels (p ⬍ .001). Conclusions: Interventions targeting resilience may prevent smoking and adverse
health outcomes.

Keywords: tobacco use, health disparities, trauma, depression, resilience

Health is affected by social environment, health behaviors, and external environments (e.g., dietary habits, tobacco use), and (c)
endogenous biological responses that occur across the life span, a internal biological environments (e.g., metabolic factors, inflamma-
complement that is increasingly referred to as the exposome tion, oxidative stress; Miller & Jones, 2014). These environmental
(Miller & Jones, 2014). The exposome comprises overlapping domains interact with each other to affect health outcomes (Miller &
domains that include (a) general external environments (e.g., ur- Jones, 2014; Wild, 2012). The public health exposome model con-
banicity, social capital, interpersonal relationships), (b) specific ceptualizes these pathways to include environmental exposures, per-

This article was published Online First August 21, 2017. This work was primarily supported by the NationalInstitute of Mental
Carla J. Berg, Regine Haardörfer, and Colleen M. McBride, Department of Health (MH071537, MH100122, MH102890, MH096764) and the Na-
Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, tional Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD071982).
Emory University; Varun Kilaru, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Support also included the Emory and Grady Memorial Hospital General
School of Medicine, Emory University; Kerry J. Ressler, Departments of Clinical Research Center, the National Institute of Health National
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine and Yerkes National Centers for Research Resources (M01 RR00039), the Burroughs Wel-
Primate Research Center, Emory University; Aliza P. Wingo, Departments of
come Fund, and Emory University’s Winship Cancer Institute (co-
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Emory University,
principal investigators: Colleen M. McBride, Carla J. Berg). Aliza P.
and Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia; Nabil F. Saba,
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Wingo is supported by Veterans Affairs Grant IK2CX000601.
Emory University; Jackelyn B. Payne, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Carla J.
Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Alicia Berg, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins
Smith, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Emory School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Northeast,
University. Room 524, Atlanta, GA 30322. E-mail: cjberg@emory.edu

1047
1048 BERG ET AL.

sonal characteristics, and moderating factors that, in turn, are associ- and depression that can result from trauma. Studies have shown an
ated with health disparities among communities at greatest risk increased risk of nicotine dependence among individuals who
(Juarez & 2013). One such community is Blacks in the United report exposure to trauma or adverse events (Al Mamun et al.,
States. Indeed, it is this chronicity of lifetime exposures that 2007; Breslau, Davis, & Schultz, 2003; Hapke et al., 2005), an
Geronimus and colleagues posited in their “weathering hypothe- association that may be particularly unique to smoking. For ex-
sis”: Blacks show higher cumulative risk measurements than ample, Breslau and colleagues (2003) found an association be-
Whites, and these differences are not explained by poverty alone tween trauma exposure and 10-year cumulative incidence of nic-
(Geronimus, Bound, Waidmann, Hillemeier, & Burns, 1996; otine dependence but no association between trauma exposure and
Geronimus, Hicken, Keene, & Bound, 2006). This hypothesis alcohol use. Depressive symptoms also commonly co-occur
provides a framework for examining the impact of exposure fac- among those who have been exposed to a traumatic life event
tors with greater prevalence among Blacks that may together (Fergusson, Horwood, & Lynskey, 1996; O’Donnell, Creamer, &
influence health outcomes. Pattison, 2004). Depressive symptoms are strongly associated with
An important exposure associated with multiple negative nicotine dependence (Breslau et al., 1998; Fergusson et al., 1996;
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.

health outcomes is the experience of traumatic events (e.g., Windle & Windle, 2001).
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.

experiencing, witnessing, or being confronted with death, seri- Resilience is a personal characteristic that may account for
ous injury, or physical threat to self or others; American Psy- differential health outcomes among people with histories of
chological Association [APA], 1994), particularly those that trauma. Definitions of resilience have included positive outcomes
occur in childhood. Such trauma has been associated with the despite serious threats to adaptation and development (Masten,
development of substance abuse and dependence, including 2001), the absence of a particular negative outcome in at-risk
cigarette smoking (Hovdestad, Campeau, Potter, & Tonmyr, populations (e.g., absence of psychiatric disorder or suicidality;
2015; Simpson & Miller, 2002), as well as mental health Collishaw et al., 2007), or a composite score based on indices of
problems (e.g., depression, anxiety, suicidality; Enns et al., functioning reflecting both positive outcomes (e.g., educational
2006; Gilbert et al., 2009; Kessler, Davis, & Kendler, 1997; attainment, employment history) and a lack of negative outcomes
MacMillan et al., 2001; Scott, Smith, & Ellis, 2010), interpersonal (e.g., homelessness, substance use; McGloin & Widom, 2001).
difficulties (Jaffee & Gallop, 2007; Wolfe, Scott, Wekerle, & The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) is a compre-
Pittman, 2001), compromised academic and occupational func- hensive assessment of personal strengths that contribute to positive
tioning (Cicchetti & Rogosch, 1997; Gilbert et al., 2009), aggres- outcomes among individuals faced with adversity. The CD-RISC
sion, violence, and criminal behaviors (Casiano, Mota, Afifi, Enns, is one of few multidimensional measures available for use with
& Sareen, 2009; Gilbert et al., 2009; Ou & Reynolds, 2010). adults and includes personal competence, perseverance, tolerance
Cumulatively, the impact of traumatic experiences on health are of negative affect, acceptance of change, sense of social support,
significant and multidimensional. Blacks are disproportionately trust in one’s instincts, spiritual faith, and an action-oriented ap-
exposed to traumatic events of various types (Breslau, Davis, & proach to solving problems (Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007; Connor
Andreski, 1995; Green, Grace, Lindy, & Leonard, 1990). Com- & Davidson, 2003). Prior research has found that this measure of
pared with Whites, Blacks are more likely to report higher rates of resilience may buffer the effects of traumatic experiences on
childhood trauma, including parental death and severe alcoholism, mental health and cigarette smoking (Campbell-Sills & Stein,
as well as extreme economic deprivation (Breslau et al., 1995; 2007; Goldstein, Faulkner, & Wekerle, 2013). However, no pre-
Green et al., 1990). Blacks experience more traumatic events in vious research has examined the differential role of resilience on
adulthood, such as being attacked or raped, threatened with a depressive symptoms and smoking among Blacks, which is par-
weapon, or witnessing an injury or murder (Breslau et al., 1995). ticularly relevant given the range of sociodemographic and psy-
Blacks also have higher lifetime and current rates of posttraumatic chosocial differences between smokers and nonsmokers (e.g., ed-
stress disorder (Breslau et al., 1995; Green et al., 1990). ucational attainment, income levels, age; Agaku, King, Dube, &
Blacks are disproportionately affected by tobacco-related ill- the CDC, 2014; Agaku, King, Husten, et al., 2014).
nesses. Each year, approximately 45,000 Blacks die from In addition, although resilience has frequently been examined in
smoking-related disease (American Cancer Society [ACS], 2016; terms of mental health outcomes, it has been infrequently exam-
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 1998). ined in relation to the internal environmental component of the
Smoking-related illnesses are the number one cause of death in the exposome, such as physiological biomarkers associated with ill-
Black community, surpassing all other causes of death, including ness or disease (e.g., cancer risk). Such biomarkers might include
AIDS, homicide, diabetes, and accidents (ACS, 2016). Blacks interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and allostatic load.
suffer disproportionate tobacco-related morbidity and mortality IL-6 is an interleukin that acts as both a proinflammatory and
although they tend to smoke fewer cigarettes per day and begin anti-inflammatory cytokine (Ferguson-Smith et al., 1988). It is
smoking later in life (Alexander et al., 2016). This phenomenon secreted by T cells and macrophages to stimulate immune response
remains unexplained but has been attributed to various factors (e.g., during infection and after trauma) and has been found to be
including stress associated with living in conditions of socioenvi- associated with several types of chronic diseases, including car-
ronmental disadvantage. In addition, Blacks are less likely to quit diovascular disease and cancer, as well as increased mortality
smoking than Whites, resulting in sustained exposure to tobacco (Volpato et al., 2001). CRP is a sensitive marker of systemic
smoke for a longer period of their life (Holford, Levy, & Meza, low-grade inflammation and is currently recommended as the
2016). principal inflammatory marker in research and clinical practice
The disproportionate burden of smoking-related diseases among (Pearson et al., 2003). Elevated plasma levels of CRP have been
Blacks is further compounded by the co-occurrence of smoking associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (Koenig
RESILIENCE IN AFRICAN AMERICANS 1049

et al., 1999; Ridker, Rifai, Rose, Buring, & Cook, 2002), ischemic tial for sorting out the complex and interdependent factors that are
stroke (Rost et al., 2001), peripheral artery disease (Ridker, Cush- likely to contribute to health disparities. Characterizing groups for
man, Stampfer, Tracy, & Hennekens, 1998), hypertension (Sesso whom the link between depression and resilience is most pro-
et al., 2003), and any cardiovascular disease (Ridker, Buring, nounced could inform future interventions for tobacco users.
Cook, & Rifai, 2003; Ridker et al., 2002) in individuals who have
no prior cardiovascular disease. CRP has also been found to Method
predict the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction (Ridker, 1998)
and mortality (Lindahl, Toss, Siegbahn, Venge, & Wallentin,
2000) in patients with coronary heart disease and is also associated Participants and Procedures
with cancer risk (Chaturvedi et al., 2010; Trichopoulos, Psalto- This analysis was part of a larger study investigating genetic and
poulou, Orfanos, Trichopoulou, & Boffetta, 2006). Moreover, el- trauma-related risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder and
evated plasma CRP levels have been associated with obesity, depression in a population of urban, low-income, highly trauma-
insulin resistance, the metabolic syndrome, endothelial dysfunc- tized, predominantly Black men and women (Binder et al., 2008;
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.

tion, and an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes (Festa et Bradley et al., 2008). Inclusion criteria included ages 18 –75 years,
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.

al., 2000; Freeman et al., 2002; Ridker et al., 2003; Yudkin, understanding English, and ability to give informed consent. The
Stehouwer, Emeis, & Coppack, 1999). Allostatic load is one study was approved by the Emory University Institutional Review
biomarker that captures the “weathering” the body experiences as Board.
it strives to achieve stability in disruptive environments, and ele- Members of the research team approached adult patients waiting
vated IL-6 and CRP levels may be precursors to increased allo- for their outpatient appointments at the primary medical care or
static load (McEwen, 1998). Allostatic load is commonly concep- obstetrical-gynecological clinics of Grady Memorial Hospital in
tualized as an aggregate measure of disease risk markers, such as Atlanta, Georgia, to solicit for study participation (Binder et al.,
blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and 2008; Bradley et al., 2008). If the first participant that the staff
blood glucose (Barboza Solis et al., 2015; Seeman, Singer, Rowe, approached in the waiting room did not agree to do the study, then
Horwitz, & McEwen, 1997). Having a history of smoking has been the staff approached at least two additional possible participants.
associated with IL-6 (Bermudez, Rifai, Buring, Manson, & Ridker, Of those approached first by staff, 58% agreed, and a cumulative
2002), CRP (Ohsawa et al., 2005), and allostatic load (McEwen, percentage of 84% and 91%, respectively, of the second and third
1998); thus, those with a history of smoking should be examined participants approached agreed if the initial participant approached
separately from those without such a history in terms of other did not participate. Participants gave informed consent and com-
environmental exposures related to these outcomes. pleted a battery of self-report measures. Because of variation
Consistent with the weathering framework, we examined between participants with respect to literacy, all self-report mea-
whether the association of exposure to traumatic experiences with sures were obtained by interview. Blood pressure, weight (kg),
depressive symptoms and, in turn, allostatic load would be mod- height (cm), and waist circumference (cm) were obtained by
erated by resilience in a heterogeneous cohort of Black adults (see trained nursing staff at the Grady Hospital Clinical Research
Figure 1). In addition, we hypothesized that these associations may Center. Current analyses focused on all Black participants with
differ for smokers and nonsmokers. Our assumptions in testing the data available regarding smoking history; traumatic experiences;
models were that childhood traumatic experiences predate tobacco depression; resilience; and measures of IL-6, CRP, and physiolog-
initiation and ongoing use as well as depressive symptoms. How- ical measures used to calculate allostatic load (n ⫽ 852).
ever, the availability of additional measures of adult exposure to
traumatic experiences provides a lifetime exposome indicator that
has not been available in other studies. Given consistent evidence Measures
of positive associations between smoking and trauma exposure as Lifetime history of smoking was assessed using responses from
well as depression, we hypothesized that their joint influences on the Kreek-McHugh-Schluger-Kellogg (KMSK) Scale (Kellogg et
weathering might differ for smokers and nonsmokers. We tested al., 2003). Participants were grouped into “never smokers” and
structural equation models to capture the complexity of the poten- “ever smokers” for structural equation modeling.
tial associations among these factors. Such approaches are essen-
Covariates and Predictors
Sociodemographics included age, sex, education, income, em-
ployment, and disability.
Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Childhood abuse was as-
sessed retrospectively using the 28-item Childhood Trauma Ques-
tionnaire (CTQ; Bernstein & Fink, 1998; Bernstein et al., 2003).
This scale uses a 5-point Likert scale that ranged from 1 (never
true) to 5 (very often true). Reliability for the CTQ is good with
high internal consistency scores. Sexual Abuse, Emotional Ne-
glect, Emotional Abuse, and Physical Abuse have reported coef-
ficients of .93–.95, .88 –.92, .84 –.89, and .81–.86, respectively.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework examining exposures across the expo- Over a 3-month period, the test–retest coefficient was 0.80. Factor
some and impact on health risk biomarkers. analysis on the five-factor CTQ model showed structural invari-
1050 BERG ET AL.

ance, demonstrating good validity (Bernstein & Fink, 1998; Bern- and colleagues’ (1997) seminal measure of allostatic load to in-
stein et al., 2003). clude a culmination of biomarkers known to be linked with various
Traumatic Events Inventory. Adulthood trauma was as- health outcomes. This is a standard way to measure allostatic load
sessed using the Traumatic Events Inventory (TEI; Gillespie et in the literature because sums across physiological systems are
al., 2009; Schwartz, Bradley, Sexton, Sherry, & Ressler, 2005). better indicators of cumulative dysregulation than individual bio-
This instrument screens for lifetime exposure to different cat- marker scores (Geronimus et al., 2006; Karlamangla, Singer, Mc-
egories of trauma, including natural disaster, serious accident or Ewen, Rowe, & Seeman, 2002; Seeman, McEwen, Rowe, &
injury, sudden life-threatening illness, military combat, being Singer, 2001; Seeman et al., 1997). This approach has been studied
attacked with a weapon, witnessing a family member or friend in population-based survey research and indicated that higher
being attacked with a weapon, being attacked without a allostatic load scores were associated with higher morbidity and
weapon, witnessing a family member or friend being attacked mortality (Seeman et al., 1997, 2001). Moreover, lower allostatic
without a weapon, witnessing the murder of a friend or family load scores were associated with higher educational levels and
member, or being sexually assaulted under duress. For each better psychosocial factor scores (Seeman et al., 2004; Seeman,
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.

category of the instrument, having had the exposure was scored


Singer, Ryff, Dienberg Love, & Levy-Storms, 2002).
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.

as 1 and no exposure as 0. Score ranges from 0 to 15 for


The five factors comprising the allostatic load measure were
adulthood trauma, with higher scores reflecting exposure to
cortisol, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, BMI,
more types of trauma. The childhood trauma items in this
and waist-to-hip circumference. We selected these biomarkers
inventory were excluded to avoid overlap with the information
from available data on the basis of their roles as indicators of
collected with the CTQ.
disease risk and use in prior allostatic load research (Doamekpor &
Beck Depression Inventory. Depression was measured with
the 21-item Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), which has a high Dinwiddie, 2015; Mauss, Li, Schmidt, Angerer, & Jarczok, 2015;
degree of reliability and validity (Beck, Ward, Mendelson, Mock, Seeman et al., 1997; Steptoe et al., 2014; Upchurch et al., 2015).
& Erbaugh, 1961). Items were rated on a four-point Likert scale of For each factor, the following dichotomizations were made: (a)
0 to 3; total score ranges from 0 to 63, with higher scores reflecting cortisol ⱖ16.6 mg/dL, which represents the highest quartile of
higher levels of depression. Levels of depression severity are this cohort; (b) systolic blood pressure ⱖ140 mmHg; (c) dia-
suggested by the following score ranges: ⱕ9 reflects no depressive stolic blood pressure ⱖ90 mmHg; (d) BMI ⱖ30 kg/m2; and (e)
symptoms, 10 –18 reflects mild symptoms, and ⱖ19 reflects mod- abdominal obesity based on a waist circumference of ⬎102 cm
erate to severe depressive symptoms (Beck et al., 1961). This for men or ⬎88 cm for women. A point was assigned for each
variable was operationalized as a continuous variable. criterion, yielding scores of 0 to 5, with 5 indicating highest
risk.
Moderator
CD-RISC. Resilience was assessed with the 10-item CD- Data Analysis
RISC (Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007; Connor & Davidson, 2003). Descriptive univariate analyses were conducted to assess distri-
Example items include “can deal with whatever comes” and “think butions and the extent of missing data. Bivariate analyses were
of self as strong person.” In prior research (e.g., Campbell-Sills & used to examine the differences between ever smokers and never
Stein, 2007; Connor & Davidson, 2003), the full CD-RISC was smokers. These were followed by analyses into the patterns of
found to have an unstable structure across two demographically missing data and multivariable regression analyses (including re-
equivalent samples; thus, it was modified into a 10-item scale with sidual analyses) for each of the endogenous constructs (e.g., de-
good internal consistency, construct validity, and excellent psy-
pression, IL-6, allostatic load). Joint normality was assessed.
chometric properties for efficient measurement of resilience (e.g.,
Structural equation modeling was then conducted to examine the
Cronbach’s ␣ ⫽ .91 and item separation reliability ⫽ .98; Gon-
mediating role of depressive symptoms as well as the moderating
zalez, Sierra, Martinez, Martinez-Molina, & Ponce, 2015; high
role of resilience comparing relationships between ever and never
content validity; Windle, Bennett, & Noyes, 2011). Items were
smokers. Age and sex were included as covariates for IL-6, CRP,
rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (not true at all) to
and allostatic load. Estimation for the two-group model used
4 (true nearly all the time). Scores range from 0 to 40, with a
higher score reflecting greater resilience. maximum likelihood with missing values. No auxiliary variables
were included because missingness in the data was due to admin-
istration of different modules at different times independent of
Biomarker Outcomes specific participant characteristics; thus, they were assumed to be
IL-6 and CRP. Whole blood was collected under fasting missing completely at random. Indices used to assess model fit
conditions between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and processed by were ␹2, the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA),
centrifugation to separate the plasma from the buffy coat. Plasma and the comparative fit index (CFI). After structural equation
samples were used to assess IL-6 and CRP as well as cortisol (used modeling, residuals were inspected. Data were cleaned and de-
in the measure of allostatic load described next). scriptive, univariate, bivariate, and multivariable analyses were
Allostatic load. Allostatic load was operationalized as an ag- conducted using SAS 9.4. Structural equation modeling analyses
gregate measure of biomarkers of disease risk. Individual bio- were conducting using Stata 14. Age and sex were included as
marker scores were standardized and summed, creating a cumula- covariates in the structural equation model on the basis of results
tive allostatic load score. We adapted our measure from Seeman from the bivariate analyses.
RESILIENCE IN AFRICAN AMERICANS 1051

Results of health risk (i.e., IL-6, CRP, and allostatic load) among ever and
never smokers, respectively. In ever smokers, childhood trauma
Participant Characteristics was positively associated with depressive symptoms (p ⬍ .001);
resilience was negatively associated with depressive symptoms
Ever smokers and never smokers differed across all sociodemo- (p ⫽ .01). Depressive symptoms were positively associated with
graphic dimensions, with ever smokers being older, more likely to IL-6 (p ⫽ .03), which was positively associated with allostatic
be male, less educated, lower income earners (p ⬍ .001), more load (p ⫽ .01). Adulthood trauma was positively associated
likely to be unemployed (p ⫽ .02), and more likely to receive with CRP levels (p ⫽ .03). Older age was also associated with
disability (p ⫽ .04; Table 1). As the literature would suggest, ever higher IL-6, and being female was associated with higher
smokers also reported experiencing more childhood and adulthood allostatic load.
trauma (p ⬍ .001) and depressive symptoms (p ⫽ .01). In never smokers, childhood and adulthood trauma were positively
associated with depressive symptoms (p ⬍ .001, p ⫽ .01). Adulthood
Structural Equation Model Results trauma was also associated with higher CRP levels (p ⬍ .001), which
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.

The final structural equation model presented had good model was positively associated with allostatic load (p ⬍ .001). Never
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.

fit: ␹2(30) ⫽ 46.501, p ⫽ .03 overall, ␹2(15) ⫽ 8.156, p ⫽ .92 for smokers with higher resilience showed a negative association between
ever smokers, ␹2(15) ⫽ 38.345, p ⫽ .001 for never smokers, childhood trauma and depressive symptoms, whereas those with
RMSEA ⫽ 0.036, CFI ⫽ 0.950. The overall coefficient of deter- lower resilience showed a positive association between childhood
mination (CD) was 0.532, with CD ⫽ 0.426 and 0.683 for ever and trauma and depressive symptoms (see Figure 3). Resilience was
never smokers, respectively. negatively associated with CRP levels (p ⬍ .001). Older age and
Table 2 and Figure 2 display the results of the structural equa- being female was also associated with higher CRP.
tion models examining the impact of childhood and adulthood In comparing coefficients across groups, differences were found
trauma (per the CTQ and TEI, respectively), resilience (per the regarding the interaction of childhood trauma and resilience on
CD-RISC), and depressive symptoms (per the BDI) on biomarkers depressive symptoms (p ⫽ .03), adulthood trauma on CRP levels

Table 1
Participant Characteristics and Bivariate Analyses Examining Differences Between Ever Smokers and Never Smokers

Total Ever smoker Never smoker


Variable M/N SD/% M/N SD/% M/N SD/% p

Sample size 852 100 608 71.36 244 28.64


Sociodemographics
Age 44.32 11.62 44.32 11.62 38.14 13.39 ⬍.0001
Gender ⬍.0001
Male 302 35.53 246 40.53 56 23.05
Female 548 64.47 361 59.47 187 76.95
Education ⬍.0001
Less than 12th grade 207 24.64 172 28.67 35 14.58
12th grade or high school graduate 294 35.00 193 32.17 101 42.08
GED 54 6.43 45 7.50 9 3.75
Some college/tech school 186 22.14 124 20.67 62 25.83
Tech school graduate 32 3.81 24 4.00 8 3.33
College graduate 57 6.79 34 5.67 23 9.58
Graduate degree 10 1.19 8 1.33 2 .83
Monthly household income ⬍.0001
Less than $250 274 33.29 216 36.61 58 24.89
$250–$499 87 10.57 62 10.51 25 10.73
$500–$999 235 28.55 163 27.63 72 30.90
$1000–$1999 163 19.81 108 18.31 55 23.61
$2000 or more 64 7.78 41 6.95 23 9.87
Employment status (no reported) 668 79.43 490 81.53 178 74.17 .02
Received disability (yes reported) 210 25.06 162 27.00 48 20.17 .04
Primary predictors
CTQ 43.62 18.26 45.20 19.32 39.72 14.65 ⬍.0001
TEI 3.59 2.51 3.95 2.55 2.64 2.14 ⬍.0001
CD-RISC 30.88 8.32 30.87 8.15 30.90 8.78 .98
BDI 15.93 12.54 16.69 12.65 13.97 12.06 .01
Outcomes
IL-6 1.35 1.42 1.34 1.32 1.41 1.73 .73
CRP 5.91 8.77 5.70 8.44 6.41 9.52 .47
Allostatic load 2.08 1.34 2.04 1.36 2.18 1.28 .21
Note. CTQ ⫽ Childhood Trauma Questionnaire; TEI ⫽ Traumatic Events Inventory; CRP ⫽ C-reactive protein; BDI ⫽ Beck Depression Inventory;
CD-RISC ⫽ The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.

1052

Table 2
Equation Estimates for Structural Equation Models for Ever Smokers and Never Smokers, Respectively, and Comparisons of Coefficients Across Groups

Ever smokers Never smokers


Unstandardized Standardized Unstandardized Standardized
Variable coefficient SE Z p 95% CI coefficient coefficient SE Z p 95% CI coefficient pa

CTQ ¡ BDI 0.17 0.03 5.66 <.001 0.11 0.23 0.35 0.21 0.06 3.48 <.001 0.09 0.33 0.40 .55
TEI ¡ BDI 0.33 0.22 1.49 .14 ⫺0.10 0.77 0.15 1.05 0.42 2.50 .01 0.23 1.87 0.33 .13
CDR ¡ BDI ⫺0.44 0.18 ⫺2.46 .01 ⫺0.79 ⫺0.09 ⫺0.06 0.22 0.35 0.62 .53 ⫺0.47 0.92 0.67 .10
CTQ ⫻ CDR ¡ BDI 0.06 0.41 0.15 .88 ⫺0.74 0.87 0.33 ⫺2.35 1.00 ⫺2.35 .02 ⫺4.30 ⫺0.39 ⫺0.12 .03
TEI ⫻ CDR ¡ BDI ⫺5.96 3.68 ⫺1.62 .11 ⫺13.18 1.25 0.04 8.43 7.55 1.12 .26 ⫺6.38 23.23 0.45 .09
BDI ¡ CRP ⫺0.10 0.05 ⫺1.91 .06 ⫺0.20 0.00 0.00 ⫺0.08 0.08 ⫺0.97 .33 ⫺0.23 0.08 0.10 .82
TEI ¡ CRP 0.44 0.21 2.12 .03 .003 0.85 0.26 ⫺2.01 0.45 ⫺4.51 <.001 ⫺2.88 ⫺1.13 ⫺0.26 <.001
CDR ¡ CRP ⫺0.05 0.14 ⫺0.38 .71 ⫺0.33 0.23 0.17 ⫺0.99 0.15 ⫺6.64 <.001 ⫺1.29 ⫺0.70 0.40 .07
TEI ⫻ CDR ¡ CRP ⫺1.54 2.92 ⫺0.53 .60 ⫺7.25 4.18 0.22 35.13 6.40 5.49 <.001 22.60 47.67 ⫺0.64 <.001
Age ¡ CRP 0.04 0.04 0.94 .35 ⫺0.04 0.12 0.21 0.17 0.06 2.86 <.001 0.05 0.29 1.13 <.001
Female ¡ CRP 0.77 1.10 0.69 .49 ⫺1.40 2.93 0.17 3.68 1.83 2.01 .04 0.09 7.27 0.31 .17
BDI ¡ IL-6 0.01 0.01 2.16 .03 0.00 0.03 0.27 ⫺0.01 0.01 ⫺0.60 .55 ⫺0.04 0.02 0.14 .15
Age ¡ IL-6 0.02 0.01 2.35 .02 0.00 0.03 0.25 0.04 0.02 2.36 .02 0.01 0.07 0.50 .21
Female ¡ IL-6 0.21 0.16 1.31 .19 ⫺0.10 0.52 0.19 ⫺0.04 0.48 ⫺.08 .94 ⫺0.98 0.91 0.22 .63
BDI ¡ Allostatic load ⫺0.01 0.00 ⫺1.59 .11 ⫺0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.37 .71 ⫺0.01 0.02 0.18 .25
BERG ET AL.

CRP ¡ Allostatic load 0.02 0.01 1.62 .11 0.00 0.04 0.22 0.04 0.01 3.05 <.001 0.01 0.06 0.44 .20
IL-6 ¡ Allostatic load 0.16 0.06 2.68 .01 0.04 0.28 0.27 0.09 0.09 1.06 .29 ⫺0.08 0.26 0.36 .51
Age ¡ Allostatic load 0.00 0.01 0.89 .37 ⫺0.01 0.02 0.13 0.01 0.01 0.85 .40 ⫺0.01 0.02 0.23 .85
Female ¡ Allostatic load 0.55 0.12 4.48 <.001 0.31 0.79 0.28 0.22 0.23 0.94 .35 ⫺0.23 0.67 0.22 .20

Equation-level goodness
of fit r2 mc mc2 r2 mc mc2

BDI .366 .605 .366 .312 .559 .312


CRP .035 .188 .035 .497 .705 .497
IL-6 .042 .205 .042 .083 .288 .083
Allostatic load .082 .286 .082 .110 .331 .110
Overall .426 .683
Note. Bold text indicates significant p-values. mc ⫽ correlation between the dependent variable and its prediction; mc2 ⫽ Bentler Raykov squared multiple correlation coefficient; CI ⫽ confidence
interval; CTQ ⫽ Childhood Trauma Questionnaire; TEI ⫽ Traumatic Events Inventory; CRP ⫽ C-reactive protein; BDI ⫽ Beck Depression Inventory; CD-RISC ⫽ The Connor-Davidson Resilience
Scale.
a
Comparing coefficients across groups.
RESILIENCE IN AFRICAN AMERICANS 1053
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.

Figure 2. Structural equation models examining the impact of trauma, resilience, and depressive symptoms on
biological outcomes among ever smokers and never smokers, respectively. Solid black lines indicate significant
associations whereas gray lines indicate insignificant associations.

(p ⬍ .001), the interaction between adulthood trauma and resil- First, these findings highlight the need for early intervention
ience on CRP (p ⬍ .001), and age on CRP levels (p ⬍ .001). among Blacks experiencing childhood trauma. Our results show
that, among ever smokers, childhood trauma— but not adulthood
Discussion trauma—was associated with higher depressive symptoms. This
finding points to biological embedding (Hertzman, 1999, 2012).
The current study examined the role of resilience in moderating
Biological embedding suggests that long-term and stable differ-
the impact of trauma exposure, depression, and resilience on
ences in experience, under different nurturant conditions, lead to
biomarkers of “weathering” among Black ever versus never smok-
differences in learning and behavior over the life course. These
ers. Examining these groups separately is critical because our
differences can impact the weathering process and ultimately
results and the prior literature (Agaku, King, Dube, et al., 2014;
Agaku, King, Husten, et al., 2014) have demonstrated marked health outcomes (Essex et al., 2013). Our data indicate that child-
differences in the range of exposures across the exposome (e.g., hood trauma leads to higher depressive symptoms. These higher
sociodemographic, sociocontextual, psychological characteristics), depressive symptoms put one at risk for smoking initiation, which,
with smokers experiencing more risk exposures across these di- in turn, can increase depressive symptoms (Windle & Windle,
mensions (Al Mamun et al., 2007; APA, 1994; Breslau et al., 2003; 2001) and consequently reduce the odds of successful cessation
Hapke et al., 2005). As anticipated, resilience served as a buffer (Brody, Hamer, & Haaga, 2005; Catley, Ahluwalia, Resnicow, &
between specific upstream risk factors (i.e., traumatic experiences) Nazir, 2003; Chen, White, & Pandina, 2001; Covey, Glassman, &
and downstream risk factors (i.e., depressive symptoms, health risk Stetner, 1990; Husky, Mazure, Paliwal, & McKee, 2008). This line
biomarkers). In addition, our hypothesis that resilience would of downstream consequences potentially prompted by early child-
differentially moderate the associations among traumatic experi- hood environmental factors—specifically trauma— has long-term
ences, depressive symptoms, and health risk biomarkers among and potentially difficult-to-modify consequences, both in terms of
ever versus never smokers was also supported. depressive symptoms and health risk biomarkers, specifically IL-6
1054 BERG ET AL.

30 less vulnerable in terms of sociodemographics and psychosocial


experiences, were differentially affected by childhood trauma.
However, our cross-sectional data did not allow us to test this
20 assumption. The impact of childhood traumatic events on depres-
sive symptoms may have been mitigated by higher resilience.
Another finding that is interesting to note is that the two groups
Impact on depression score

10
showed different associations between experiencing traumatic
1SD above mean
resilience
events in adulthood and CRP levels, such that experiencing greater
0
adulthood traumatic events was associated with higher CRP levels
Mean resilience
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 in smokers whereas less adulthood trauma was associated with
1SD below mean higher CRP levels in never smokers. These findings warrant rep-
-10 resilience lication to ensure that these were not spurious findings and, if
replicated, additional research to understand the differential mech-
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.

anisms affecting the relationship between adulthood trauma and


This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.

-20 CRP levels in ever versus never smokers.


These findings collectively suggest that increasing resilience
may buffer the impact of environmental risk factors. Further pro-
-30
Childhood trauma quesonnaire (CTQ) score spective study designs will be needed to confirm this. This re-
search could take the form of randomized intervention trials that
Figure 3. Resilience moderating the relationship between childhood vary resilience-building activities in groups at high risk of accel-
trauma and depression among never smokers. No relationship among ever erated weathering. Limited research has examined the utility of
smokers (figure not shown). interventions targeting resilience to prevent or treat substance use,
specifically smoking or nicotine dependence. Although there is
some controversy regarding whether resilience is a personality trait
and allostatic load. However, resilience was associated with de- or a characteristic amenable to intervention (Yilmaz, Unal, Gencer,
creased depressive symptoms in ever smokers. This suggests the Aydemir, & Selcuk, 2015), some research indicates the promise of
potential importance of promoting resilience as a construct among intervening on resilience. For example, some intervention research
young people who have experienced traumatic events to prevent has shown that attempts to increase resilience in young adults have
biological embedding that may directly lead to depression and been effective in not only increasing resilience but also increasing
indirectly to smoking initiation and progression (Brody et al., coping skills and protective factors (e.g., positive affect, self-
2005; Catley et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2001; Covey et al., 1990; esteem) and decreasing symptoms of depression, stress, and neg-
Husky et al., 2008). ative affect (Steinhardt & Dolbier, 2008). Other research using a
Among never smokers, both childhood and adulthood trauma family-based resilience intervention has documented reductions in
were associated with higher depressive symptoms. Whereas resil- alcohol use among adolescents (Toumbourou, Gregg, Shortt,
ience was not significantly associated with depressive symptoms Hutchinson, & Slaviero, 2013). Indeed, there have been recent
(as with ever smokers), it did serve as a moderator between calls for social policies that promote resilience to decrease sub-
childhood trauma and depressive symptoms in never smokers. stance use and related costs (Luthar, Cicchetti, & Becker, 2000)
Specifically, those with greater resilience demonstrated a negative and for interventions to increase resilience among youth that are
association between levels of childhood trauma and depressive multilevel, coordinated, continuous over time, and shown to be
symptoms, whereas those with less resilience demonstrated a pos- effective to meet the long-term needs of youth facing the cumu-
itive association between levels of childhood trauma and depres- lative disadvantages of family, community, school, and individual
sive symptoms. It is interesting to note that resilience was nega- challenges (Ungar, Liebenberg, Landry, & Ikeda, 2012).
tively associated with CRP levels among never smokers, indicating
that resilience may particularly serve as a buffer for disease risk
Limitations
among Blacks who have never smoked.
The distinct roles of resilience among ever versus never smokers Several study limitations are worth noting. First, the cross-
are difficult to interpret. One explanation is that relative to non- sectional nature of this study and the use of retrospective self-
smokers, smokers have a complement of interdependent vulnera- reports prohibits us from making causal attributions and is vulner-
bilities (e.g., less educated, lower income, unemployed; Al Mamun able to bias. Prospective, longitudinal studies are required to
et al., 2007; APA, 1994; Breslau et al., 2003; Hapke et al., 2005) examine the temporality of trauma in relation to smoking, depres-
along with their experiences of depression and trauma history. As sive symptoms, and resulting health outcomes as well as the
such, the earlier childhood experiences of this group may have impact of resilience on these outcomes. Another limitation is that
shaped their subsequent behaviors (e.g., substance use, academic our sample was disproportionately female and low income, and we
performance). Those with higher levels of childhood trauma may do not yet have the data to demonstrate if these findings would
have engaged in these damaging behaviors, which resulted in apply in other segments of the Black population. However, this
poorer quality of life. However, a higher resilience within this weakness is counterbalanced by the public health importance of
high-risk group may contribute to lower levels of depressive studying these variables in an often underresearched and under-
symptoms despite these vulnerabilities. On the other hand, indi- served population with disproportionally high rates of trauma
viduals who never engaged in cigarette smoking, and who were exposure as well as mental and physical health problems. In
RESILIENCE IN AFRICAN AMERICANS 1055

addition, this is a study exclusively of Blacks. Thus, it is not physiological wear-and-tear in midlife: Findings from the 1958 British
possible to infer from the current analyses whether the documented birth cohort. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 112,
associations would also be demonstrated within other racial or E738 –E746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417325112
ethnic groups. Finally, it is important to note that several of our Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961).
hypothesized associations were not significant. The strongest as- An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry,
4, 561–571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004
sociations were found in the model representing never smokers,
Bermudez, E. A., Rifai, N., Buring, J., Manson, J. E., & Ridker, P. M.
particularly the moderating effect of resilience on the relationship (2002). Interrelationships among circulating interleukin-6, C-reactive
between childhood trauma experiences and depressive symptoms. protein, and traditional cardiovascular risk factors in women. Arterio-
The model representing ever smokers showed less robust associ- sclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 22, 1668 –1673. http://dx
ations, with the strongest associations being those between adult- .doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000029781.31325.66
hood traumatic events and CRP levels as well as between resil- Bernstein, D., & Fink, L. (1998). Childhood Trauma Questionnaire man-
ience and depressive symptoms. As such, these analyses warrant ual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
replication in similar samples and in other more representative Bernstein, D. P., Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., Walker, E., Pogge, D.,
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.

samples to establish which relationships are most robust, both in Ahluvalia, T., . . . Zule, W. (2003). Development and validation of a
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.

this population and in others. brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child
Abuse & Neglect, 27, 169 –190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134
(02)00541-0
Conclusions Binder, E. B., Bradley, R. G., Liu, W., Epstein, M. P., Deveau, T. C.,
The current findings point to the distinct role of resilience in Mercer, K. B., . . . Ressler, K. J. (2008). Association of FKBP5
buffering the impact of environmental stressors in Black ever polymorphisms and childhood abuse with risk of posttraumatic stress
versus never smokers. Although resilience did not moderate the disorder symptoms in adults. Journal of the American Medical Associ-
ation, 299, 1291–1305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.11.1291
association between trauma and depressive symptoms in ever
Bradley, R. G., Binder, E. B., Epstein, M. P., Tang, Y., Nair, H. P., Liu, W.,
smokers, it was directly related to lower levels of depressive
. . . Ressler, K. J. (2008). Influence of child abuse on adult depression:
symptoms. In contrast, resilience was not directly related to de- Moderation by the corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor gene. Ar-
pressive symptoms in never smokers but rather buffered the impact chives of General Psychiatry, 65, 190 –200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/
of traumatic experiences on depressive symptoms. In addition, archgenpsychiatry.2007.26
resilience directly affected specific health risk biomarkers in never Breslau, N., Davis, G. C., & Andreski, P. (1995). Risk factors for PTSD-
smokers but only indirectly affected specific health risk biomark- related traumatic events: A prospective analysis. The American Journal
ers in smokers via depressive symptoms. Ultimately, this study of Psychiatry, 152, 529 –535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/ajp.152.4.529
highlights the importance of resilience in preventing adverse Breslau, N., Davis, G. C., & Schultz, L. R. (2003). Posttraumatic stress
health outcomes and provides a basis for understanding the mech- disorder and the incidence of nicotine, alcohol, and other drug disorders
anisms of change that might result from interventions targeting in persons who have experienced trauma. Archives of General Psychi-
atry, 60, 289 –294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.60.3.289
resilience in Black ever versus never smokers.
Breslau, N., Kessler, R. C., Chilcoat, H. D., Schultz, L. R., Davis, G. C.,
& Andreski, P. (1998). Trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in the
References community: The 1996 Detroit Area Survey of Trauma. Archives of
Agaku, I. T., King, B. A., Dube, S. R., & the Centers for Disease Control General Psychiatry, 55, 626 – 632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc
and Prevention (CDC). (2014). Current cigarette smoking among .55.7.626
adults—United States, 2005–2012. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Brody, C. L., Hamer, D. H., & Haaga, D. A. (2005). Depression vulnera-
Weekly Report, 63, 29 –34. bility, cigarette smoking, and the serotonin transporter gene. Addictive
Agaku, I. T., King, B. A., Husten, C. G., Bunnell, R., Ambrose, B. K., Hu, Behaviors, 30, 557–566.
S. S., . . . the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2014). Campbell-Sills, L., & Stein, M. B. (2007). Psychometric analysis and
Tobacco product use among adults—United States, 2012–2013. MMWR. refinement of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Val-
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63, 542–547. idation of a 10-item measure of resilience. Journal of Traumatic Stress,
Alexander, L. A., Trinidad, D. R., Sakuma, K. L., Pokhrel, P., Herzog, 20, 1019 –1028. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jts.20271
T. A., Clanton, M. S., . . . Fagan, P. (2016). Why we must continue to Casiano, H., Mota, N., Afifi, T. O., Enns, M. W., & Sareen, J. (2009).
investigate menthol’s fole in the African American smoking paradox. Childhood maltreatment and threats with weapons. Journal of Nervous
Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 18(Suppl. 1), S91–S101. http://dx.doi and Mental Disease, 197, 856 – 861. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NMD
.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv209 .0b013e3181be9c55
Al Mamun, A., Alati, R., O’Callaghan, M., Hayatbakhsh, M. R., Catley, D., Ahluwalia, J. S., Resnicow, K., & Nazir, N. (2003). Depressive
O’Callaghan, F. V., Najman, J. M., . . . Bor, W. (2007). Does childhood symptoms and smoking cessation among inner-city African Americans
sexual abuse have an effect on young adults’ nicotine disorder (depen- using the nicotine patch. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 5, 61– 68.
dence or withdrawal)? Evidence from a birth cohort study. Addiction, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1462220021000060464
102, 647– 654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01732.x Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1998). Tobacco use among
American Cancer Society. (2016). Cancer facts and figures, 2016. Atlanta, U.S. racial/ethnic minority groups—African Americans, American In-
GA: Author. Retrieved from https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/ dians and Alaska Natives, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, His-
cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and- panics. A Report of the Surgeon General. Executive summary. MMWR:
figures/2016/cancer-facts-and-figures-2016.pdf Recommendations and Reports, 47(RR-18), v–xv, 1–16.
American Psychological Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical Chaturvedi, A. K., Caporaso, N. E., Katki, H. A., Wong, H. L., Chatterjee,
manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. N., Pine, S. R., . . . Engels, E. A. (2010). C-reactive protein and risk of
Barboza Solis, C., Kelly-Irving, M., Fantin, R., Darnaudery, M., Torrisani, lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28, 2719 –2726. http://dx.doi
J., Lang, T., & Delpierre, C. (2015). Adverse childhood experiences and .org/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.0454
1056 BERG ET AL.

Chen, P. H., White, H. R., & Pandina, R. J. (2001). Predictors of smoking Gillespie, C. F., Bradley, B., Mercer, K., Smith, A. K., Conneely, K.,
cessation from adolescence into young adulthood. Addictive Behaviors, Gapen, M., . . . Ressler, K. J. (2009). Trauma exposure and stress-related
26, 517–529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00142-8 disorders in inner city primary care patients. General Hospital Psychi-
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1997). The role of self-organization in the atry, 31, 505–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.05
promotion of resilience in maltreated children. Development and Psy- .003
chopathology, 9, 797– 815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S09545794 Goldstein, A. L., Faulkner, B., & Wekerle, C. (2013). The relationship
97001442 among internal resilience, smoking, alcohol use, and depression symp-
Collishaw, S., Pickles, A., Messer, J., Rutter, M., Shearer, C., & Maughan, toms in emerging adults transitioning out of child welfare. Child Abuse
B. (2007). Resilience to adult psychopathology following childhood & Neglect, 37, 22–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.08.007
maltreatment: Evidence from a community sample. Child Abuse & Gonzalez, V. B. A., Sierra, M. T. C., Martinez, B. A., Martinez-Molina, A.,
Neglect, 31, 211–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.02.004 & Ponce, F. P. (2015). An in-depth psychometric analysis of the Connor-
Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. (2003). Development of a new resilience Davidson Resilience Scale: Calibration with Rasch-Andrich model.
scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13, 154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/
and Anxiety, 18, 76 – 82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/da.10113 s12955-015-0345-y
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.

Covey, L. S., Glassman, A. H., & Stetner, F. (1990). Depression and Green, B. L., Grace, M. D., Lindy, J. D., & Leonard, A. C. (1990). Race
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.

depressive symptoms in smoking cessation. Comprehensive Psychiatry, differences in response to combat stress. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 3,
31, 350 –354. 379 –393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jts.2490030307
Doamekpor, L. A., & Dinwiddie, G. Y. (2015). Allostatic load in foreign- Hapke, U., Schumann, A., Rumpf, H. J., John, U., Konerding, U., &
born and US-born blacks: Evidence from the 2001–2010 National Meyer, C. (2005). Association of smoking and nicotine dependence with
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. American Journal of Public trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in a general population sample.
Health, 105, 591–597. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302285 Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193, 843– 846. http://dx.doi
Enns, M. W., Cox, B. J., Afifi, T. O., De Graaf, R., Ten Have, M., & .org/10.1097/01.nmd.0000188964.83476.e0
Sareen, J. (2006). Childhood adversities and risk for suicidal ideation Hertzman, C. (1999). The biological embedding of early experience and its
and attempts: A longitudinal population-based study. Psychological effects on health in adulthood. Annals of the New York Academy of
Medicine, 36, 1769 –1778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003329170 Sciences, 896, 85–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999
6008646 .tb08107.x
Essex, M. J., Boyce, W. T., Hertzman, C., Lam, L. L., Armstrong, J. M., Hertzman, C. (2012). Putting the concept of biological embedding in
Neumann, S. M. A., & Kobor, M. S. (2013). Epigenetic vestiges of early historical perspective. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of
developmental adversity: Childhood stress exposure and DNA methyl- Sciences of the United States of America, 109(Suppl. 2), 17160 –17167.
ation in adolescence. Child Development, 84, 58 –75. http://dx.doi.org/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202203109
10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01641.x Holford, T. R., Levy, D. T., & Meza, R. (2016). Comparison of smoking
Ferguson-Smith, A. C., Chen, Y. F., Newman, M. S., May, L. T., Sehgal, history patterns among African American and White cohorts in the
P. B., & Ruddle, F. H. (1988). Regional localization of the interferon- United States born 1890 to 1990. Nicotine & Tobacco Research,
beta 2/B-cell stimulatory factor 2/hepatocyte stimulating factor gene to 18(Suppl. 1), S16 –S29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv274
human chromosome 7p15-p21. Genomics, 2, 203–208. http://dx.doi.org/ Hovdestad, W., Campeau, A., Potter, D., & Tonmyr, L. (2015). A system-
10.1016/0888-7543(88)90003-1 atic review of childhood maltreatment assessments in population-
Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Lynskey, M. T. (1996). Childhood representative surveys since 1990. PLoS ONE, 10, e0123366. http://dx
sexual abuse and psychiatric disorder in young adulthood: II. Psychiatric .doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123366
outcomes of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of the American Academy Husky, M. M., Mazure, C. M., Paliwal, P., & McKee, S. A. (2008). Gender
of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 1365–1374. http://dx.doi.org/10 differences in the comorbidity of smoking behavior and major depres-
.1097/00004583-199610000-00024 sion. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 93, 176 –179. http://dx.doi.org/10
Festa, A., D’Agostino, R., Jr., Howard, G., Mykkänen, L., Tracy, R. P., & .1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.07.015
Haffner, S. M. (2000). Chronic subclinical inflammation as part of the Jaffee, S. R., & Gallop, R. (2007). Social, emotional, and academic
insulin resistance syndrome: The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis competence among children who have had contact with child protective
Study (IRAS). Circulation, 102, 42– 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01 services: Prevalence and stability estimates. Journal of the American
.CIR.102.1.42 Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 757–765. http://dx.doi
Freeman, D. J., Norrie, J., Caslake, M. J., Gaw, A., Ford, I., Lowe, G. D., .org/10.1097/chi.0b013e318040b247
. . . the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. (2002). C-reactive Juarez, P., & Hood, D. B. (2013). Sequencing the public health genome.
protein is an independent predictor of risk for the development of Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 24, 114 –120.
diabetes in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Diabetes, http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2013.0035
51, 1596 –1600. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.51.5.1596 Karlamangla, A. S., Singer, B. H., McEwen, B. S., Rowe, J. W., & Seeman,
Geronimus, A. T., Bound, J., Waidmann, T. A., Hillemeier, M. M., & T. E. (2002). Allostatic load as a predictor of functional decline Mac-
Burns, P. B. (1996). Excess mortality among blacks and whites in the Arthur studies of successful aging. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55,
United States. The New England Journal of Medicine, 335, 1552–1558. 696 –710.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199611213352102 Kellogg, S. H., McHugh, P. F., Bell, K., Schluger, J. H., Schluger, R. P.,
Geronimus, A. T., Hicken, M., Keene, D., & Bound, J. (2006). “Weath- LaForge, K. S., . . . Kreek, M. J. (2003). The Kreek-McHugh-Schluger-
ering” and age patterns of allostatic load scores among blacks and whites Kellogg scale: A new, rapid method for quantifying substance abuse and
in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 826 – 833. its possible applications. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 69, 137–150.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.060749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00308-3
Gilbert, R., Widom, C. S., Browne, K., Fergusson, D., Webb, E., & Janson, Kessler, R. C., Davis, C. G., & Kendler, K. S. (1997). Childhood adversity
S. (2009). Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high- and adult psychiatric disorder in the US National Comorbidity Survey.
income countries. Lancet, 373, 68 – 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140- Psychological Medicine, 27, 1101–1119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/
6736(08)61706-7 S0033291797005588
RESILIENCE IN AFRICAN AMERICANS 1057

Koenig, W., Sund, M., Fröhlich, M., Fischer, H. G., Löwel, H., Döring, A., Ridker, P. M., Cushman, M., Stampfer, M. J., Tracy, R. P., & Hennekens,
. . . Pepys, M. B. (1999). C-reactive protein, a sensitive marker of C. H. (1998). Plasma concentration of C-reactive protein and risk of
inflammation, predicts future risk of coronary heart disease in initially developing peripheral vascular disease. Circulation, 97, 425– 428. http://
healthy middle-aged men: Results from the MONICA (Monitoring dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.97.5.425
Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease) Augsburg Cohort Ridker, P. M., Rifai, N., Rose, L., Buring, J. E., & Cook, N. R. (2002).
Study, 1984 to 1992. Circulation, 99, 237–242. http://dx.doi.org/10 Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein choles-
.1161/01.CIR.99.2.237 terol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. The New
Lindahl, B., Toss, H., Siegbahn, A., Venge, P., & Wallentin, L. (2000). England Journal of Medicine, 347, 1557–1565. http://dx.doi.org/10
Markers of myocardial damage and inflammation in relation to long- .1056/NEJMoa021993
term mortality in unstable coronary artery disease. FRISC Study Group. Rost, N. S., Wolf, P. A., Kase, C. S., Kelly-Hayes, M., Silbershatz, H.,
Fragmin during Instability in Coronary Artery Disease. The New Eng- Massaro, J. M., . . . Wilson, P. W. (2001). Plasma concentration of
land Journal of Medicine, 343, 1139 –1147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/ C-reactive protein and risk of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic
NEJM200010193431602 attack: The Framingham study. Stroke, 32, 2575–2579. http://dx.doi.org/
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resil- 10.1161/hs1101.098151
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.

ience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child De- Schwartz, A. C., Bradley, R. L., Sexton, M., Sherry, A., & Ressler, K. J.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.

velopment, 71, 543–562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164 (2005). Posttraumatic stress disorder among African Americans in an
MacMillan, H. L., Fleming, J. E., Streiner, D. L., Lin, E., Boyle, M. H., inner city mental health clinic. Psychiatric Services, 56, 212–215. http://
Jamieson, E., . . . Beardslee, W. R. (2001). Childhood abuse and lifetime dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.56.2.212
psychopathology in a community sample. The American Journal of Scott, K. M., Smith, D. R., & Ellis, P. M. (2010). Prospectively ascertained
Psychiatry, 158, 1878 –1883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.11 child maltreatment and its association with DSM–IV mental disorders in
.1878 young adults. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 712–719. http://dx
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic. Resilience processes in develop- .doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.71
ment. American Psychologist, 56, 227–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ Seeman, T. E., Crimmins, E., Huang, M. H., Singer, B., Bucur, A.,
0003-066X.56.3.227 Gruenewald, T., . . . Reuben, D. B. (2004). Cumulative biological risk
and socio-economic differences in mortality: MacArthur studies of suc-
Mauss, D., Li, J., Schmidt, B., Angerer, P., & Jarczok, M. N. (2015).
cessful aging. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 1985–1997. http://dx.doi
Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: A systematic review. Indus-
.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00402-7
trial Health, 53, 5–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2014-0122
Seeman, T. E., McEwen, B. S., Rowe, J. W., & Singer, B. H. (2001).
McEwen, B. S. (1998). Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and
Allostatic load as a marker of cumulative biological risk: MacArthur
allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840,
studies of successful aging. Proceedings of the National Academy of
33– 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x
Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 4770 – 4775. http://dx.doi
McGloin, J. M., & Widom, C. S. (2001). Resilience among abused and
.org/10.1073/pnas.081072698
neglected children grown up. Development and Psychopathology, 13,
Seeman, T. E., Singer, B. H., Rowe, J. W., Horwitz, R. I., & McEwen, B. S.
1021–1038. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S095457940100414X
(1997). Price of adaptation—Allostatic load and its health consequences.
Miller, G. W., & Jones, D. P. (2014). The nature of nurture: Refining the
MacArthur studies of successful aging. Archives of Internal Medicine,
definition of the exposome. Toxicological Sciences, 137, 1–2. http://dx
157, 2259 –2268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1997.004404001
.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kft251
11013
O’Donnell, M. L., Creamer, M., & Pattison, P. (2004). Posttraumatic stress
Seeman, T. E., Singer, B., Ryff, C., Dienberg Love, G., & Levy-Storms, L.
disorder and depression following trauma: Understanding comorbidity.
(2002). Social relationships, gender, and allostatic load across two age
The American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 1390 –1396. http://dx.doi.org/ cohorts. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 395– 406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/
10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1390 00006842-200205000-00004
Ohsawa, M., Okayama, A., Nakamura, M., Onoda, T., Kato, K., Itai, K., Sesso, H. D., Buring, J. E., Rifai, N., Blake, G. J., Gaziano, J. M., &
. . . Hiramori, K. (2005). CRP levels are elevated in smokers but Ridker, P. M. (2003). C-reactive protein and the risk of developing
unrelated to the number of cigarettes and are decreased by long-term hypertension. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290, 2945–
smoking cessation in male smokers. Preventive Medicine, 41, 651– 656. 2951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.22.2945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.02.002 Simpson, T. L., & Miller, W. R. (2002). Concomitance between childhood
Ou, S. R., & Reynolds, A. J. (2010). Childhood predictors of young adult sexual and physical abuse and substance use problems. A review.
male crime. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1097–1107. http:// Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 27–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.02.009 S0272-7358(00)00088-X
Pearson, T. A., Mensah, G. A., Alexander, R. W., Anderson, J. L., Cannon, Steinhardt, M., & Dolbier, C. (2008). Evaluation of a resilience interven-
R. O., III, Criqui, M., . . . American Heart Association. (2003). Markers tion to enhance coping strategies and protective factors and decrease
of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: Application to clinical and symptomatology. Journal of American College Health, 56, 445– 453.
public health practice: A statement for healthcare professionals from the http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JACH.56.44.445-454
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Steptoe, A., Hackett, R. A., Lazzarino, A. I., Bostock, S. L. A., Marca, R.,
Association. Circulation, 107, 499 –511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01 Carvalho, L. A., & Hamer, M. (2014). Disruption of multisystem re-
.CIR.0000052939.59093.45 sponses to stress in type 2 diabetes: Investigating the dynamics of
Ridker, P. M. (1998). Inflammation, infection, and cardiovascular risk: allostatic load. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
How good is the clinical evidence? Circulation, 97, 1671–1674. http:// of the United States of America, 111, 15693–15698. http://dx.doi.org/10
dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.97.17.1671 .1073/pnas.1410401111
Ridker, P. M., Buring, J. E., Cook, N. R., & Rifai, N. (2003). C-reactive Toumbourou, J. W., Gregg, M. E., Shortt, A. L., Hutchinson, D. M., &
protein, the metabolic syndrome, and risk of incident cardiovascular Slaviero, T. M. (2013). Reduction of adolescent alcohol use through
events: An 8-year follow-up of 14 719 initially healthy American wom- family-school intervention: A randomized trial. Journal of Adolescent
en. Circulation, 107, 391–397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR Health, 53, 778 –784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07
.0000055014.62083.05 .005
1058 BERG ET AL.

Trichopoulos, D., Psaltopoulou, T., Orfanos, P., Trichopoulou, A., & Windle, M., & Windle, R. C. (2001). Depressive symptoms and cigarette
Boffetta, P. (2006). Plasma C-reactive protein and risk of cancer: A smoking among middle adolescents: Prospective associations and intrap-
prospective study from Greece. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and ersonal and interpersonal influences. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Prevention, 15, 381–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05- Psychology, 69, 215–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.2
0626 .215
Ungar, M., Liebenberg, L., Landry, N., & Ikeda, J. (2012). Caregivers, Wolfe, D. A., Scott, K., Wekerle, C., & Pittman, A. L. (2001). Child
young people with complex needs, and multiple service providers: A maltreatment: Risk of adjustment problems and dating violence in ado-
study of triangulated relationships. Family Process, 51, 193–206. http:// lescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent
dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01395.x Psychiatry, 40, 282–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-
Upchurch, D. M., Stein, J., Greendale, G. A., Chyu, L., Tseng, C. H., 200103000-00007
Huang, M. H., . . . Seeman, T. (2015). A longitudinal investigation of Yilmaz, E. D., Unal, O., Gencer, G. G., Aydemir, O., & Selcuk, Z. (2015).
race, socioeconomic status, and psychosocial mediators of allostatic load Static/unchangeable and dynamic/changeable nature of personality ac-
in midlife women: Findings from the Study of Women’s Health Across cording to the nine types temperament model: A proposal. International
the Nation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 77, 402– 412. http://dx.doi.org/10 Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience, 17, 298 –
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.

.1097/PSY.0000000000000175 303.
Volpato, S., Guralnik, J. M., Ferrucci, L., Balfour, J., Chaves, P., Fried, Yudkin, J. S., Stehouwer, C. D., Emeis, J. J., & Coppack, S. W. (1999).
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.

L. P., & Harris, T. B. (2001). Cardiovascular disease, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein in healthy subjects: Associations with obesity, insulin
risk of mortality in older women: The Women’s Health and Aging resistance, and endothelial dysfunction: A potential role for cytokines
Study. Circulation, 103, 947–953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103 originating from adipose tissue? Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vas-
.7.947 cular Biology, 19, 972–978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.19.4.972
Wild, C. P. (2012). The exposome: From concept to utility. International
Journal of Epidemiology, 41, 24 –32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr236
Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review Received December 26, 2016
of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Revision received March 28, 2017
9, 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-8 Accepted June 4, 2017 䡲

You might also like