INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
School: DOMINGO LACSON NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2018-2019

Highest Score that can be claimed by the Ratee in

Key Performance Indicator Actual Result Equivalent Weight Score Total Score
each Performance Indicator under each KRA
1. Academic Performance
50%
(Number of Section with Grand Average of 75%)
2. Number of Dropouts
25%
3. Number of Failures
25%

RATING
KRAs OBJECTIVES WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS SCORE
Q E T TOTAL Ave.
Content Applied knowledge 7.5% 5-Showed knowledge of content and its integration within and across subject areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7
Knowledge of content within and 4-Showed knowledge of content and its integration within and across subject areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
3-Showed knowledge of content and its integration within and across subject areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5
and across the 2-Showed knowledge of content and its integration within and across subject areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4
Pedagogy curriculum. 1-No acceptable evidence was shown
5-Submitted at least 4 lessons using MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV
4-Submitted 3 lessons using MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV
3-Submitted 2 lessons using MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV
2-Submitted any 1 of the given MOV
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
Used a range of 7.5% 5-Facilitated using different teaching strategies that promote reading, writing and/or numeracy skills as shown in MOV 1
teaching strategies with a rating of 7
4-Facilitated using different teaching strategies that promote reading, writing and/or numeracy skills as shown in MOV 1
that enhance learner with a rating of 6
achievement in 3-Facilitated using different teaching strategies that promote reading, writing and/or numeracy skills as shown in MOV 1
literacy and with a rating of 5
numeracy skills. 2-Facilitated using different teaching strategies that promote reading, writing and/or numeracy skills as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
5-Submitted at least 4 learner centered lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV
given
4-Submitted 3 learner centered lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Applied a range of 7.5%
teaching strategies
to develop critical
and creative thinking
skills, as well as
higher order thinking
skills.
Learning Managed classroom 7.5%
Environment structure to engage
and Diversity learners, individually
of Learners or in groups, in
meaningful
exploration, within a
range of physical
learning
environments
Used differentiated 7.5%
developmentally
appropriate learning
experiences to
address learners’
gender, need,
strengths, interests,
and experiences.
Managed learner 7.5%
behavior
constructively by
applying positive
and non-violent
discipline to ensure
3-Submitted 2 learner centered lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given
2-Submitted 1 learner-centered lesson as evidently shown in any of the given MOV
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
5-Used different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7
4-Used different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6
3-Used different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5
2-Used different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
5-Submitted at least 4 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV
4-Submitted 3 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV
3-Submitted 2 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV
2-Submitted 1 lesson as evidenced by any 1 of the given MOV
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
5-Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/ tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7
4-Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/ tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
3-Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/ tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5
2-Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/ tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
5-Submitted at least 4 lessons supported by MOV 1 and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
4-Submitted 3 lessons supported by MOV 1 and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
3-Submitted 2 lessons supported by MOV 1 and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
2-Submitted 1 lesson supported by any of the acceptable MOV
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
5-Applied teacher management strategies of learner behavior that promote positive and non-violent discipline as shown
in MOV submitted with a rating of 7
4-Applied teacher management strategies of learner behavior that promote positive and non-violent discipline as shown
in MOV submitted with a rating of 6
3-Applied teacher management strategies of learner behavior that promote positive and non-violent discipline as shown
in MOV submitted with a rating of 5
2-Applied teacher management strategies of learner behavior that promote positive and non-violent discipline as shown
in MOV submitted with a rating of 4
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
5-Submitted at least 4 of the given strategies as observed in at least 4 lessons
4-Submitted at least 4 of the given strategies as observed in 3 lessons
3-Submitted at least 4 of the given strategies as observed in 2 lessons
2-Submitted any 1 of the given strategies as observed in only 1 lesson
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
5-Applied differentiated teaching strategies to address learner diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7
4-Applied differentiated teaching strategies to address learner diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
3-Applied differentiated teaching strategies to address learner diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5
2-Applied differentiated teaching strategies to address learner diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4
1-No acceptable evidence shown
5-Submitted at least 4 differentiated teaching strategies in at least 2 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
4-Submitted 3 differentiated teaching strategies in at least 2 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of
 learning-focused the other acceptable MOV
environments. 3-Submitted 2 differentiated teaching strategies in 2 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the
other acceptable MOV
2-Submitted any 1 differentiated teaching strategy in only
1-No acceptable evidence shown
Curriculum Planned, managed, 7.5% 5-Planned and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating
and and implemented of 7
4-Planned and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating
Planning developmentally of 6
sequenced teaching 3-Planned and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating
and learning of 5
processes to meet 2-Planned and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating
the curriculum of 4
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
requirements and 5-Submitted at least 4 developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as evidently shown in MOV 1 and
varied teaching supported by any 1 of the other given MOV
contexts. 4-Submitted 3 developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported
by any 1 of the other given MOV
3-Submitted 2 developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other given MOV
2-Submitted 1 developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
Participated in 7.5% 5-Consistently participated in LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in
collegial discussions the MOV submitted
4-Frequently participated in LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in
that use teacher and the MOV submitted
learner feedback to 3-Occasionally participated in LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown
enrich teaching in the MOV submitted
practice. 2-Rarely participated in LAC/FGD/ meeting to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in the
MOV submitted
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
5-Participated in at least 4 LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV
4-Participated in 3 LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV
3-Participated in 2 LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV
2-Participated in 1 LAC/FGD/ meeting as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
Selected, 7.5% 5-Developed and used varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address learning goals as shown in
developed, MOV 1 with a rating of 7
4-Developed and used varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address learning goals as shown in
organized, and used MOV 1 with a rating of 6
appropriate teaching 3-Developed and used varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address learning goals as shown in
and learning MOV 1 with a rating of 5
resources including 2-Developed and used varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address learning goals as shown in
ICT to address MOV 1 with a rating of 4
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
learning goals. 5-Submitted at least 4 varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, as evidently shown in MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of the acceptable MOV
4-Submitted 3 varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any
1 of the acceptable MOV
 3-Submitted 2 varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any
1 of the acceptable MOV
2-Submitted any teaching and learning resource, including ICT, as evidently shown in any of the acceptable MOV
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
Assessment Designed, selected, 7.5% 5-Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with
and organized and used curriculum requirements as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7
4-Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with
Reporting diagnostic, curriculum requirements as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
formative, and 3-Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with
summative curriculum requirements as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5
assessment 2-Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with
strategies consistent curriculum requirements as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
with curriculum 5-Submitted at least 4 varied assessment tools as evidently shown in any 1 of the acceptable MOV
requirements. 4-Submitted 3 varied assessment tools as evidently shown in any 1 of the acceptable MOV
3-Submitted 2 varied assessment tools as evidently shown in any 1 of the acceptable MOV
2-Submitted 1 assessment tool as evidently shown in any of the acceptable MOV
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
Monitored and 7.5% 5-Consistently monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data as shown in the
evaluated learner MOV submitted
4-Frequently monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data as shown in the
progress and MOV submitted
achievement using 3-Occasionally monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data as shown in
learner attainment the MOV submitted
data. 2-Rarely monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data as shown in the MOV
submitted
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
5-Submitted a combination of at least 4 of the acceptable MOV
4-Submitted a combination of 3 of the acceptable MOV
3-Submitted a combination of 2 of the acceptable MOV
2-Submitted 1 acceptable MOV
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
5-Submitted MOV were distributed across 4 quarters
4-Submitted MOV were distributed across 3 quarters
3-Submitted MOV were distributed across 2 quarters
2-Submitted MOV was completed in only 1 quarter
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
Communicated 7.5% 5-Consistently showed prompt and clear communication of the learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key
promptly and clearly stakeholders, including parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted
4-Frequently showed prompt and clear communication of the learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key
the learners’ needs, stakeholders, including parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted
progress, and 3-Occasionally showed prompt and clear communication of the learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key
achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted
stakeholders 2-Rarely showed prompt and clear communication of the learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders,
including including parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
parents/guardians. 5-Submitted a combination of at least 4 of the acceptable MOV
4-Submitted a combination of 3 of the acceptable MOV
3-Submitted a combination of 2 of the acceptable MOV
 2-Submitted any 1 of the given MOV
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
5-Submitted MOV were distributed across 4 quarters
4-Submitted MOV were distributed across 3 quarters
3-Submitted MOV were distributed across 2 quarters
2-Submitted MOV was completed in only 1 quarter
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
Plus Factor 10% 5-Consistently performed various related work/activities that contribute to the teaching learning process as shown in the
MOV submitted
4-Frequently performed various related work/activities that contribute to the teaching learning process as shown in the
MOV submitted
3-Occasionally performed various related work/activities that contribute to the teaching learning process as shown in the
MOV submitted
2-Rarely performed various related work/activities that contribute to the teaching learning process as shown in the MOV
submitted
1-No acceptable evidence was shown
5-Submitted at least 4 different kinds of acceptable MOV
4-Submitted 3 different kinds of acceptable MOV
3-Submitted 2 different kinds of acceptable MOV
2-Submitted any 1 of the acceptable MOV
1-No acceptable evidence was shown

OVERALL RATING

DESCRIPTION

Commitment To be signed AFTER the Performance Review and Evaluation

We hereby certify that the Overall Rating of the Ratee reflected herein is product of a careful
I hereby certify that I fully understand what is required of me as Teacher and willingly appraisal of the evidences to support each rating and thorough deliberation between the Ratee and the
commit to implement what have been stipulated and agreed upon in this document to the best of Rater.
my ability.
Ratee: _____________________________________
Teacher I/II/III

___________________________ Rater: ______________________________________

Teacher (I/II/III) Master Teacher (I/II)/ OIC, Head Teacher (III/IV)

Approved: Concurred:
Date: ________________

JOSETTE S. TERRORA
School Head Date:____________________________

Date: __________________________________