Mackinnon’s talk because the book focused on the censoring of
knowledge and Mackinnon talked more about the censoring of free speech. Fahrenheit 451 talked about how the censoring of knowledge can cause people to become ignorant, which is different from Mackinnon who talked more about how government censoring of media can prevent peoples free speech. They described two different sides of censorship in their arguments and how it can potentially affect people. Mackinnon In her talk showed examples that are connected to real life and Fahrenheit 451 rely more on getting readers to visualize what they are saying. These two ways are different because Mackinnon can show a real-life example, while Fahrenheit 451 can’t because it’s a book that focuses on the visualization of their words. Fahrenheit 451 & Mackinnon were different in the end because they talked about different variations of a subject and used two distinct types of examples for their audience to understand the argument.