Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Doctrinal Study - Bibliology: Trailhead
Doctrinal Study - Bibliology: Trailhead
RABBIT TRAIL | Psalm 19; 119; Romans 1:18-32; Hebrews 4:12-16; John 14-17
Page | 9
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
2. God’s Words of Personal Address: Sometimes God communicates with people on earth by
speaking directly to them. Examples are found throughout Scripture, some of them are listed
below for your consideration. In these and several other instances where God spoke words of
personal address to individual people it was clear to the hearers that these were the actual words
of God: they were hearing God’s very voice, and they were therefore hearing words that had
absolute divine authority, and that were absolutely trustworthy. To disbelieve or disobey any of
these words would have been to disbelieve or disobey God, and therefore would have been sin.
Some key texts to orient our thinking: Genesis 2:16, 17; 3:8-19; 22; Exodus 20:1-21; 33:7-11;
Matthew 3:17.
3. God’s Words as Speech through Human Lips: Frequently in Scripture, God raises up prophets
through whom He speaks. It is evident that although these are human words, spoken in ordinary
human language by ordinary human beings, the authority and truthfulness of these words is in no
way diminished – they are still completely God’s words as well. Some key texts to orient our
thinking: Deuteronomy 18:15-22; Jeremiah 1:4-19; Ezekiel 13:1-16.
4. God’s Words in Written Form – The Bible: The first instance where God’s words were put in
written form is found in the narrative of the giving of the two tablets of stone on which were
written the Ten Commandments (Exodus 31:18; 32:16; 34:1, 28). Further writing was done by
Moses (Deuteronomy 31:9-13, 24-26), Joshua (Joshua 24:26), Isaiah (Isaiah 30:8), Jeremiah
(Jeremiah 30:2; 36:1-32; 51:60); Jesus promises that His disciples would be reminded of His
teachings through the work of the Holy Spirit (John 14:25, 26; 16:12-15) and thereby able to write
down the words of God to man.
Page | 10
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
B. An Overview of Bibliology
GOD
The incomprehensible and utterly transcendent God places Himself within our reach by stooping to our
capacity – descending and accommodating His speech to our understanding.
REVELATION
The act of God by which He has made known what was otherwise unknowable. God’s witness to Himself
through creation, history, and the conscience of man (General). God’s disclosure of Himself in salvation
history and in the interpretive word of Scripture (Special).
INSPIRATION
The act of God by which He has revealed Himself to man through creation and by superintending the
human authors of the 66 books of the Bible so that using their own individual personalities they composed
and recorded without error, His revelation to man in the words of the original.
ABSOLUTE TRUTH
Infallibility – Never misleading, reliable in all matters | Inerrancy – Free from mistake/error; entirely true
Authority – Its truthfulness warrants our complete faith | Preservation – Protection of His revelation
RESOURCES
Illumination – The working of God the Spirit upon the hearts and minds to understand revealed truth
Animation – The element of life/energy characteristic of the Bible that makes it unlike any other book
RESPONSIBILITY
Interpretation – The process of determining the biblical author’s intended meaning
Application – The process of determining the current relevance of Scripture and our response
Page | 11
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
A. Definition of Revelation
Revelation means an unveiling, uncovering, or disclosure of truth. Divine revelation is the act of God
by which He has made known to man what was otherwise unknowable. We are incapable of
discovering God without His help.
God introduces Himself on His own terms – when, where, and how he chooses. Strictly speaking, we
do not come to know God – God reveals Himself. In our fallen condition, “None is righteous, no, not
one; no one understands; no one seeks for God” (Romans 3:10-11). Yet God does not wait for the
impossible move on our part. “I revealed myself to those who did not ask for me; I was found by those
who did not seek me” (Isaiah 65:1 NIV). God can be an object of our knowledge only if he has revealed
Himself to us.2
B. General Revelation
By basic definition, general revelation is God’s witness to Himself through creation, history, and the
conscience of man. Through general revelation all humans are exposed to the knowledge of God’s
existence, His divine nature (character and attributes), and moral law.
C. Special Revelation
Special revelation is God’s witness to Himself through salvation history on display in His Son and in
the written word, the Scriptures.
A. Definition of Inspiration
The act of God by which He has revealed Himself to man through creation and by superintending the
human authors of the 66 books of the Bible so that using their own individual personalities they
composed and recorded without error, His revelation to man in the words of the original.
Page | 12
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
In light of the difficult moral condition and persecution of the last days, how does Paul encourage Timothy
to live? (v.14)
Page | 13
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
Since the entirety of the Bible is God-breathed, verse 16 goes on to state that it is also profitable in shaping
how we live out our lives on the horizontal – in our relationships with one another. In what ways does God’s
Word impact how we live and treat one another?
1) Doctrine –
2) Reproof –
3) Correction –
4) Training –
Why does Peter feel compelled to emphasize that the apostles were not following cleverly concocted myths
concerning the gospel of Jesus? (v.16)
What is Peter’s message in verse 16? Power (dynamis) = power; might; strength; ability
Coming (Parousia) = presence; arrival; advent
Majesty (megaleiotetos) = splendor; magnificence; grandeur
What event does Peter claim to be an eyewitness of in verse 17-18? [cf. Matthew 17:1-9; Mark 9:1-9; Luke 9:27-36]
What does Peter claim to be even more reliable than his eyewitness experience? (v.19)
What exhortation does Peter give concerning this “more reliable” source of authority? How should they
respond? (v.19)
Page | 14
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
A. Definition of Inerrancy4
The Scriptures possess the quality of freedom from error. They are exempt from the liability to
mistake, incapable of error. In all their teachings they are in perfect accord with the truth.
The inerrancy of the Bible means simply that the Bible tells the truth. Truth can and does include
approximations, free quotations, language of appearances, and different accounts of the same event
as long as those do not contradict.
Page | 15
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
2. Support of Inerrancy6
a) The nature and character of God – if the Bible is God’s Word and God is a God of truth, the
Bible must be true.
b) The witness of Scripture to itself (Matt. 5:17-18; John 10:35; 2 Tim. 3:16; 2 Pet. 1:21) – the
Bible testifies to its own truthfulness.
c) The analogy of the living Word (Christ) and the written Word (the Bible) – both are fully human
and fully divine; both are perfect.
d) Fulfilled prophecy – there are multiple prophesies concerning Christ alone (over 300).
e) The testimony of Jesus – His view of Scripture must be our view if we are to live under His
Lordship (Matt. 5:17-18; Luke 24:25-27; 44-49; John 10:35; 17:17).
f) The need of a certain word from God (beyond general revelation) – if the Bible contains errors,
it cannot be the word of God.
3. Summary of Inerrancy7
a) The Scriptures are free from mistakes and errors. The Bible does not contradict itself and is
accurate in all that says.
b) Truth can and does include approximations, free quotations, the language of appearance, and
different accounts of the same event as long as these are not contradictory.
c) It only take one error to make an errant Bible. The Bible must be 100% accurate and error-
free if it is to be credible. If God can be mistaken, or if He is unable to clearly communicate
His will, then we cannot depend upon the record of revelation.
As we look at the complete work of Scripture we can see with greater clarity that this Book of books is divinely
inspired, without error, and completely authoritative for our lives. In fact, as we see this drama unfold from
Genesis to the Revelation of Jesus Christ, the Scriptures are completely unified in the Story it tells. This unity is on
full display in its 66 books, with approximately 40 different writers from different cultures and backgrounds,
penned over more than 1600 years, subjects varied and diverse – all with a unity of structure and content evident
throughout.
A. Definition of Canonicity
1. Kaneh (Hebrew) = measuring rod
2. Kanon (Greek) = a rod or ruler “Canonicity is the measurement or test applied
to literature to determine if it is a genuine and
The word canon is derived from the Greek authentic part of God’s inspired Scriptures.”
kanon (a rod, ruler) which in turn comes from
-Sam Choi
the Hebrew kaneh, an Old Testament word
meaning ‘measuring rod.’ Even in pre-
Page | 16
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
Christian usage the word was broadened to indicate a standard or norm other than a literal rod or
rules. The New Testament employs the term in its figurative sense to indicate a rule for conduct. In
early Christian usage the word canon came to mean the ‘rule of faith’ or the normative writings (i.e.,
the authoritative Scriptures).9
B. Description of Canonicity
1. Sacred books (Deut. 31:24-26; 2 Tim. 3:15-16)
2. Prophetic writings (Zech. 7:8-14; Lk. 24:27; 2 Pet. 1:20-21)
3. Apostolic writings (Acts 2:42; Eph. 2:20; 3:5)
C. Discovery of Canonicity
1. Questions for discovering canonicity [cf. Geisler & Nix, From God to Us, p.67-71]
a) Was it written by a prophet, an apostle, or an associate of an apostle? (Heb. 1:1-2; 2 Pet. 1:20-21)
b) Were the writers confirmed by an act of God? (John 3:2; Acts 2:22; Heb. 2:1-4)
c) Does it tell the truth about God? (Deut. 18:22; Gal. 1:8)
d) Does it have the power of God? (Heb. 4:12)
e) Was it accepted by the people of God? (Dan. 9:2; 1 Thess. 2:13; 2 Pet. 3:15)
Page | 17
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
Page | 18
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
Began as Came to
Wrote the
thoughts human
REVELATION INSPIRATION original
in God’s authors’
manuscripts
mind minds
CANONICITY
Modern
Modern Church
Greek and
English collected
TRANSLATION Hebrew TEXTUAL CRITICISM
Versions 66 books
INTERPRETATION
ILLUMINATION &
Bibles
God’s Changes
thoughts in our
APPLICATION COMMUNICATION To others
in our lives
minds personally
Page | 19
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
As early as AD 115 Ignatius, bishop of Antioch, published a list of some of the books that now comprise the New
Testament. This was followed by a similar list prepared by Irenaeus in about AD 180. A historical survey of the
process of the canon of the New Testament reveals that by the year AD 170 most churches were in agreement
independently as to what books made up the New Testament.
In AD 367 Athanasius circulated a letter which listed the twenty-seven books of the New Testament and referred
to them as the well-springs of salvation, from which he who thirsts may take his fill of sacred words. In AD 397
the Third Council of Carthage met and defined the canonical books of the New Testament as the 27 books listed
earlier by Athanasius.
There has been quite a bit of discussion as to the criteria used by the leaders of the early churches to determine
which books would make up the New Testament. This discussion has led to quite a bit of disagreement, but one
factor seems to be consistently mentioned. The writings received by the early churches as authoritative or
scriptural were those that were written by the apostles and their closest companions, and the writings endorsed
by them. The entire Old Testament was received by the implicit endorsement of the apostles. The Gospel of
Matthew was written by an apostle. The Gospel of Mark was written by the apostle Peter’s closest disciple. The
Gospel of Luke was written by Paul’s clos companion. The Gospel of John was written by an apostle. The Acts of
the Apostles was written by Paul’s close companion. Thirteen letters were received from Paul. The epistle to the
Hebrews was received as from Paul. The epistle of James comes from the brother of the Lord, who exercised
authority in Jerusalem with the apostles. The epistle of Jude was from another brother of the Lord. The two
epistles of Peter are from an apostle. The three epistles of John are from an apostle, who also wrote the
Revelation.
Some disagreements arose along with the rise of heresies. The elders of the churches became wary, and even
began to doubt some of the writings they had formerly received as copies from other churches. Writings which
came under question were Hebrews, James, Jude, 2 Peter, 2 and 3 John, and the Revelation of John. The reasons
for doubt were various. The author of Hebrews does not identify himself. James was not an apostle, and his
message seemed to contradict Paul’s message. Jude was not an apostle, and he quotes books which the churches
did not receive as Scripture. 2 Peter, it seems, was not widely distributed at first. The author of 2 and 3 John does
not identify himself plainly. The author of the Revelation identifies himself as John, but does not say that he is the
apostle John, and the style of the book is different from the Gospel of John. Nevertheless, the majority of the
churches received and used these books without questioning them, while vigorously rejecting all others.
By the time of the Council of Carthage in AD 397 these disagreements had been resolved and the New Testament
as we know it had come to be accepted as Scripture alongside of the Old Testament. One thing needs to be
emphatically at this point. The New Testament books did not become authoritative for Christ’s Church because
they were formally included in a canonical list; on the contrary, the Church included them in her canon because
they were already understood to be authoritative. What the Council of Carthage did in AD 397 was not to impose
something new upon the various Christian churches then in existence, but to codify [organize into a system or
code] what was already the general practice of the churches.
Page | 20
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
3. Considering variants
a) Types of variants include: wording used (various synonyms employed); word order; spelling;
omissions; additions
b) Occurrence: unintentionally (most would fall into this category) and intentionally [estimated
number of variants range between 4,000 – 5,000]
c) Groups of variants to consider: 1) variants that are neither meaningful nor viable 2) variants
that are not meaningful but viable 3) variants that are not viable but meaningful 4) variants
that are both meaningful and viable
Page | 21
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
b) Uncials – Uncials are manuscripts made of animal skins and are written in capital letter script.
Of the about three hundred uncials that we have, only one of them has the complete text of
the NT. They date from about the third to the tenth century AD.
c) Minuscules – Minuscules are written in a cursive script that has smaller, connected letters.
This script began to be used in the ninth century to save time and because the letters take
less space than do uncial letters. These manuscripts (about 2,850 of them) are primarily from
the Majority (or Byzantine) text type.
d) Lectionaries – Lectionaries are service books of Scripture for church meetings and liturgy to
be used as part of corporate worship. The text of lectionaries is ‘basically Byzantine’ and least
important of the Greek manuscripts.
The Greek manuscripts of the New Testament are generally grouped into ‘text-types’. This means
that the manuscripts belonging to a particular text-type all reflect the same sort of errors, the
same variants at crucial passages, the same general pattern of development. Of course, because
all of the manuscripts in any one text-type have themselves been hand-copied, no two
manuscripts in any one textual tradition are precisely identical. Nevertheless a manuscript can
often be assigned to one text-type or another; and if a manuscript reflects two or more text-types,
it is said to be mixed.16
a) Alexandrian Text-Type
This ‘family’ of manuscripts is also known as the ‘minority text’ because there are fewer
manuscripts in existence, however, these manuscripts contain the following notable aspects:
They are the oldest known manuscripts in existence (as early as the 2nd century)
Papyri (2nd and 3rd centuries)
Uncials (most notable listed) – Codex Vaticanus (c.325-350); Codex Sinaiticus (c.330-
360); Codex Alexandrius (c.425-450); Codex Ephraemi Resciptus (c.345); Codex
Washingtonianus (4th or early 5th century)
Generally judged to be a superior text-type by most scholarship on the basis of
internal evidence and being closest to the original in date
Page | 22
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
b) Byzantine Text-Type
This ‘family’ of manuscripts is also known as the ‘majority text’ because it contains the most
Greek manuscripts in existence. The most notable aspects are as follows:
These texts were preserved with the Byzantine Empire (Greek was the native or
primary language)
Contains the most Greek manuscripts (approx. 80%)
The vast majority of manuscripts are minuscules dating from the 9th through 15th
centuries
The Textus Receptus comes primarily from this family
Notable uncial available to translation workers at the time was Codex Bezae (c.450 or
550), however, it was used only minimally as the majority of minuscules were given
greater priority
Generally judged to be inferior to other text-types by most scholarship on the basis
of manuscripts being dated from the 4th century or later (most from the 9th through
15th centuries)
Consider the immediate context in which these two verses are found:
1) The focus = entering into the rest of God (eternal/salvation)
2) The problem = an unbelieving heart; hardened by sin; not united by faith
3) The result = unable to experience the rest of God; rejection of God and His Word
Page | 23
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
Read through John 14-17 and note all the references to the Holy Spirit. How is the Spirit described? How
does the Spirit function in the life of believers?
One of the roles of the Holy Spirit in the lives of believers is to “guide them into all truth.” What does this
mean? Why is this important?
Page | 24
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
What did Jesus mean when He indicated that the Spirit would not speak of Himself? Why would this be
necessary? (cf. John 14:26; 2 Peter 1:20-21)
What safeguard or test does verse 14 give us in discerning whether or not something is from the Spirit?
What has God chosen to reveal to us in the greater context of this passage?
How does the Spirit help us engage the text of Scripture? (2:12-13)
Who is the natural man, and why is he unable to understand or accept the spiritual truths of the Scriptures?
(2:14-16)
Page | 25
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
Page | 26
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
Time and Culture – We must consider the following factors of the author and his
recipients if we are to properly understand the Scriptures: the time period in which this
takes place and the geographical aspects – social, political, and topographical.
Occasion and Purpose – We must try to discern who the recipients are, why this was
written to them, how they would have understood it and applied it, and finally, what
genre of literature it is [Genres: narrative history, genealogies, chronicles, laws of all
kinds, various types of poetry, proverbs, prophetic oracles, riddles, drama, biographical
sketches, parables, letters, sermons, and apocalypses].
Grammatical Structure – We must understand that words have meanings within
sentences; the grammar and construction of each sentence is important; sentences have
meaning in relation to surrounding sentences (think paragraphs), and also in relation to
the literary work as a whole.
3. How does the immediate context – the closest passages on both sides of your text – inform the
meaning of your text? [Consider why this passage is in this place. Then, if relevant, consider any parallel texts or key
cross references.]
4. Drawing on your work in structure, emphasis, and context, state the central theme of the text in one
complete sentence. [A theme should reveal the author’s big idea or primary teaching point in the passage.]
5. What are a few ways that your text relates to or anticipates the gospel (i.e. the death and
resurrections of Jesus Christ, repentance, forgiveness of sins)? Which of these ways best fits your text?
[Consider Old Testament citations/allusions as well as different methods of connecting such as typology, analogy, promise-
fulfillment, biblical theological themes, etc.]
6. In one sentence, what is the author’s aim for his audience in this text? Given the aim, what
implication(s) and/or application(s) for your audience would you draw out in your sermon, study, or
lesson?
Page | 27
DOCTRINAL STUDY | BIBLIOLOGY
CONCLUSION
As we wrap up this study of Bibliology, “note that the objective of special revelation was relational. The primary
purpose of this revelation was not to enlarge the general scope of knowledge. The knowledge about was for the
purpose of knowledge of. Information was to lead to acquaintance; consequently, the information revealed was
often quite selective.”18 Therefore, our next leg in the journey is to engage this knowable God in Theology Proper.
DRAMA: As we embark on this adventure in systematic theology, let us keep an eye on how and where
each study fits into the overarching narrative of Scripture. Let us be mindful that Jesus is the centerpiece
of this story and that we have been invited to share in the journey. When it comes to the study of
Bibliology,
1) How do we know that the entire Bible is telling a singular Story?
2) How do we see Jesus as the centerpiece?
3) In what way(s) are we invited to share in the journey?
DOXOLOGY: How does the doctrine of Bibliology shape our worship of God today?
DISCIPLESHIP: How does the doctrine of Bibliology impact life on the horizontal? How does right thinking
overflow into our actions and feelings?
1
Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology,
2
Michael Horton, Pilgrim Theology, p.36
3
Patrick Griffiths, Jesus is Enough – Readings on the Greatness of God, p.5
4
Paul Enns, The Moody Handbook of Theology, p.170-171
5
Geisler and Nix, From God to Us, p.15
6
Daniel Akins, Why Insist on Inerrancy (the full truthfulness of the Bible)? [taken from Pastor Samuel Choi’s notes on Bibliology]
7
Daniel Akins, Why Insist on Inerrancy (the full truthfulness of the Bible)? [taken from Pastor Samuel Choi’s notes on Bibliology]
8
Outline adapted from Daniel Akins, Southeastern Baptist Seminary
9
Geisler and Nix, From God to Us
10
Sgbchapel.com
11
Charles Ryrie, Basic Theology, p.133
12
Sgbchapel.com
13
Beacham and Bauder, One Bible Only?, chapter 3, by W. Edward Glenny, p. 76
14
Beacham and Bauder, One Bible Only?, chapter 3, by W. Edward Glenny, p. 77
15
D.A. Carson, The King James Version Debate, p. 25
16
D.A. Carson, The King James Version Debate, p. 26
17
Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart, How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth, p.18
18
Millard Erickson, Christian Theology, p.176
*The following is a list of works and authors from which this lesson is comprised: 1) Roy Beachem and Kevin Bauder, One Bible Only?;
2) D.A. Carson, The King James Version Debate; 3) Paul Enns, The Moody Handbook of Theology; 4) Millard Erickson, Christian Theology; 5) Gordon Fee and
Douglas Stuart, How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth 6) Norman Geisler and William Nix, From God to Us; 7) Norman Geisler, Systematic Theology;
Patrick Griffiths, Jesus Is Enough; 8) Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology; 9) Michael Horton, Pilgrim Theology 10) Michael Horton, The Christian Faith; 11)
Charles Ryrie, Basic Theology; 12) Sgbchapel.com
Page | 28