PROCEDURE FOR DESIGN OF TALL BUILDING FOR SEISMIC

BY DOING THE SIMPLIFIED NON-LINEAR MODAL PUSHOVER

ANALYSIS

RAUSHAN KUMAR RAVI

(2017CES2369)

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING,

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DELHI,
HAUZ KHAZ, NEW DELHI-110 016, INDIA
NOV 2018
 PROCEDURE FOR DESIGN OF TALL BUILDING FOR SEISMIC
BY DOING THE SIMPLIFIED NON-LINEAR MODAL PUSHOVER
ANALYSIS
A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement of the award of degree of

MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY
in
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

Submitted by

RAUSHAN KUMAR RAVI

(2017CES2369)

Under the guidance of

Dr. DIPTI RANJAN SAHOO
(Associate Professor)

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING,

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (IIT) DELHI,
HAUZ KHAZ, NEW DELHI-110 016, INDIA
JUNE 2018
CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the thesis titled, " PROCEDURE FOR DESIGN OF TALL
BUILDING FOR SEISMIC BY DOING THE SIMPLIFIED NON-LINEAR
MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS" is a bonafide record of the work carried out by
Mr. RAUSHAN KUMAR RAVI (Entry No. 2017CES2369) in fulfillment of the
requirement for the degree of Master of Technology in Structural Engineering,
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, New
Delhi, India. He has fulfilled the requirements for the submission of his project report,
which to the best of my knowledge has reached the required standards. This thesis is
carried out under my supervision and guidance and has not been submitted elsewhere
for the award of any other diploma or degree.

Dr. Dipti Ranjan Sahoo

(Associate Professor)

DATE: ___/___/______ Department of Civil Engineering,

PLACE: New Delhi Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

It is a great privilege for me to express my deep sense of gratitude to my supervisor and

mentor, Dr. Dipti Ranjan Sahoo Civil Engineering Department, IIT DELHI, for his
stimulating guidance and profound assistance. I shall always cherish my association
with him for his constant encouragement and freedom to thought and action that he
rendered to me throughout the project.

Finally, I deem it a great pleasure to thank one and all whose valuable suggestion and
in time cooperation which helped me to carry out this project successfully. Last but not
the least, I am also thankful to my friends and colleagues for their support and help
throughout the project.

Raushan Kumar Ravi

ABSTRACT

The increasing seismic activity in the modern age has led to the constructional features
such as columns and framed structures being severely stressed. In order to resist these
high additional lateral forces, the dimensions of the sections are increased which leads
to a loss in the usable area in a building. Composite structures wherein structural steel
sections are embedded in reinforced concrete provides the required strength at a reduced
cross-sectional area. It is very ductile when compared to the general reinforced concrete
section. Because of this high ductility of the composite section, it is found to be suitable
in the resisting the seismic force which develops. It is capable of absorbing the seismic
energy which develops during an earthquake. In a multistory frame, high axial loads
are applied at the bottom story columns. Due to second-order effects, this axial force
also creates a moment. Apart from these forces the seismic force at the top of the column
also creates a moment.

This is akin to the structure behaving as a single degree of freedom system having a
moment at the top with axial load and a seismic force that creates the lateral shear force.

An isolated system of the column with this configuration of forces is simulated in the
laboratory to study the behavior of the composite column. This complete system
behaves as a single degree of freedom system.
CONTENTS

1 Chapter 1 ...........................................................................................7
1.1 Section 1 ............................................................................................................. 10
1.1.1 ............................................................................................................................ Subs
ection 1 ................................................................................................................. 11

1.1.2 ............................................................................................................................ Subs

ection 2 ................................................................................................................. 11

1.2 Section 2 ............................................................................................................. 11

1.2.1 ............................................................................................................................ Subs
ection 1 ................................................................................................................. 11

2 Chapter 2 .........................................................................................13
2.1 Section 1 ............................................................................................................. 13
2.2 Section 2 ............................................................................................................. 13
3 Chapter 3 .........................................................................................14
3.1 Section 1 ............................................................................................................. 14
LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.1 First Picture ................................................................................................ 10

Figure 1.2 this is 2nd figure .......................................................................................... 11
LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1hoadhljs ......................................................................................................... 13

ABBREVIATIONS

py Yield strength of structure steel

pck Design strength of concrete

psk Yield strength of longitudinal reinforcement

hn Depth of the neutral axis from the middle of the section

Ac Area of concrete

Zps Plastic section modules of longitudinal reinforcement

Zpa Plastic section modules of steel section

Zpc Plastic section modules of concrete

Zpsn Plastic section modules of longitudinal reinforcement about neutral axis

Zpan Plastic section modules of steel section about neutral axis

Zpcn Plastic section modules of concrete about neutral axis

Mp Plastic moment of resistance of the section

bc Width of the section

tw Thickness of web

tf Thickness of flange plate

1 Introduction

Capacity spectrum method

According to Krawinkler7&there are two fundamental flaws that render the

quantitative use of the capacity spectrum method questionable. First, there is no
physical principle that justifies the existence of a stable relationship between the
hysteretic energy dissipation of the maximum excursion and equivalent viscous
damping, particularly for highly inelastic systems. The second flaw is that the period
associated with the intersection of the capacity curve with the highly damped
spectrum may have little to do with the dynamic response of the inelastic system

1.1 Section 1

Nonlinear static analysis procedures (or pushover analyses with an invariant lateral
force pattern) have been developed for routine application in the practice of
performance-based earthquake engineering due to their conceptual simplicity and
computational effectiveness.

Figure 1.1 First Picture

This figure explains this report
1.1.1 Subsection 1

Nonlinear static analysis procedures (or pushover analyses with an invariant lateral
force pattern) have been developed for routine application in the practice of
performance-based earthquake engineering due to their conceptual simplicity and
computational effectiveness.

Figure 1.2 this is 2nd figure

This explains examples

1.1.2 Subsection 2

1.2 Section 2

Nonlinear static analysis procedures (or pushover analyses with an invariant lateral
force pattern) have been developed for routine application in the practice of
performance-based earthquake engineering due to their conceptual simplicity and
computational effectiveness.

1.2.1 Subsection 1

Nonlinear static analysis procedures (or pushover analyses with an invariant lateral
force pattern) have been developed for routine application in the practice of
performance-based earthquake engineering due to their conceptual simplicity and
computational effectiveness. Nonlinear static procedures, however, are limited in their
ability to consider higher mode effects and possible redistribution of inertial forces in
a structure due to yielding. An improved static procedure termed the Modal Pushover
Analysis (MPA).
2 Chapter 2

Nonlinear static analysis procedures (or pushover analyses with an invariant lateral
force pattern) have been developed for routine application in the practice of
performance-based earthquake engineering due to their conceptual simplicity and
computational effectiveness.

Table 2.1hoadhljs

a a gg tsf s
3 1 1 4 1111

2.1 Section 1

Nonlinear static analysis procedures (or pushover analyses with an invariant lateral
force pattern) have been developed for routine application in the practice of
performance-based earthquake engineering due to their conceptual simplicity and
computational effectiveness.

2.2 Section 2

Nonlinear static analysis procedures (or pushover analyses with an invariant lateral
force pattern) have been developed for routine application in the practice of
performance-based earthquake engineering due to their conceptual simplicity and
computational effectiveness.
3 Chapter 3

3.1 Section 1

Nonlinear static analysis procedures (or pushover analyses with an invariant lateral
force pattern) have been developed for routine application in the practice of
performance-based earthquake engineering due to their conceptual simplicity and
computational effectiveness.