Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis of The 2014 Ebola Crisis Through CNN and The Guardian News Organizations
Analysis of The 2014 Ebola Crisis Through CNN and The Guardian News Organizations
Analysis of The 2014 Ebola Crisis Through CNN and The Guardian News Organizations
Jeremy Copeland
Analysis of the 2014 Ebola Crisis Through CNN and The Guardian News Organizations
While living on the opposite side of the world, it is sometimes hard to grasp information
reporting on the margins, which in simpler terms, means reporting on developing countries
from a distance. Obviously, it is not so easy to get the information accurately being so far away,
so the average person may need to do some research to further their knowledge on the news
story. Being a Canadian, the peripheries can stretch all the way across the globe to places like
Africa, or even in the northern parts of our own country. It is up to news organizations to
decide what kind of coverage a story will get, and very often are places on the periphery are not
considered for travel, as resources and budgets can be tight. This makes sense, as in order to
consider something “newsworthy”, there are five factors to take into account. PBS.org Student
Reporting Labs claim that the five factors of newsworthiness are: “timeliness,” “proximity,”
“conflict,” “human interest,” and “relevance.” As we can see here, proximity is the second most
important factor of newsworthiness, making reporting successfully from the periphery very
difficult. Local news, of course, has a higher demand than something international, so unless
there is a crazy story overseas that impacts the local demographic, it is hard to justify investing
into said news story. After performing research, it is safe to say that African news coverage
from North America is minimal compared to other relevant stories. It is fair to question
whether or not countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) or Sierra Leone are
lacking news coverage in the Western world due to the significance of the region on the global
scale. Within this essay, I will being deeply analyzing news coverage of the 2014 Ebola Crisis
through CNN and The Guardian, as a prime example to determine the agenda setting for each
Before discussing the Ebola Crisis, it is important to understand the situation in Africa to
being with and how it is perceived by North America news organizations. First and foremost, an
article by Alexander Wooley suggests that American’s rely on pop-culture and Hollywood to
gain an understanding of African culture. Wooley quotes a famous marketing expert who says
“they [Americans] only picture jungle and savannah, starving people, child soldier” (Wooley,
2018). Wooley’s article is about how the fourth-most searched African country on Google in
2018 was Wakanda, a mythical place invented by Marvel for their hit film, Black Panther. In my
opinion, this is extremely problematic and just shows how uneducated the American populace
is on African culture. In fact, this is apparently due to the fact that the small amount of African
Africa makes a claim that so much of the news that is being given to America about Africa is
“fake news” or is just simply inaccurate, and the media just shows a stereotypical view of the
continent (2019). The article also discusses how the media is what shapes human knowledge
today, that being said, Africa is mostly known for being a high-poverty, disease-infested,
illiterate country that is full of corruption. In order for this preconceived notion to be fixed,
Africa deserves to be shown in a positive light as well – this means that there needs to be more
took it upon myself to research the 2014 Ebola Crisis as a whole. To my understanding, the
Ebola virus disease originated in the DRC at the Ebola River, and is most common in apes, such
as chimpanzees (CDC, 2018). Since the mid-1970’s there have been very few human-infected
cases of the virus, however in 2013, there was an Ebola outbreak originating in Sierra Leone,
but killing thousands of people. It then spread across the world in 2014, and was declared an
epidemic until June 2016 when the virus became controlled and the epidemic was over (CDC,
2019). I took this information and decided to explore the first articles published by both CNN
and The Guardian. The first organization I looked at was The Guardian, and what they have
covered, and it is safe to say that between 2014 and 2019, they have put out hundreds of
articles. The first article I could find within their archives dates back to April 1st, 2014, and it is
called “Guinea's Ebola outbreak: what is the virus and what's being done?”. The article is a
simple, informative piece, explaining to the audience what exactly is going on and giving a brief
background to where the Ebola virus disease comes from. This article was written much before
the disease became a worldwide epidemic and the death count was at about 80 at this point
(Yuhas, 2014). I then decided to look into the CNN archives and try to debunk the first official
article regarding the Crisis. Their first backdated article I could find was from July 1st, 2014,
three months after The Guardian. Now, I am not sure if this is accurate because both news
organizations have extremely unorganized, difficult to navigate archives. This got me thinking
that maybe the United Kingdom news organizations felt more threatened by the disease as the
whole. After diving into the CNN archives, I looked through all of their coverage of the Ebola
Crisis from June 2014 all the way up until June 2015. The first thing I thought when I simply just
read through the headlines was that CNN was truly mainly focused on American’s effected by
the disease, or even people from other Westernized countries, such as Scotland. This got me
thinking to myself, did American’s only cover this epidemic because it is directly impacting their
people? Even though hundreds were dropping dead daily in Sierra Leone and Guinea? Well, this
inspired me to dig even deeper and read through different articles in chronological order.
Before October 2014, the virus was extremely under control and remained in Africa, it had not
started travelling over to other parts of the world. Once the first person in the United States fell
ill from Ebola, there became scares regarding infected flights, discussion of possible
vaccinations, and constant updates on local cases of the disease. This left the audience wanting
more and more, making them extremely invested in the case. On October 28th, 2014, both CNN
and The Guardian came out with their features about “patient zero”, the African toddler who
was the first struck victim of the virus. Finally, both news organizations were able to give a full
breakdown of the situation in Africa. They worked smartly, as at this point in time there was full
investment of the global population into the Ebola epidemic, and people were obsessed with
hearing about it, thus, putting out these types of stories fed the thirst for information.
instilling panic on American’s using journalism (2018). Firstly, the study claims that the due to
the digitalization of journalism, the audience plays a significant role in the success of a story.
This is because of social media, sharing options, and the concept of things going “viral” is in the
hands of the audience now (Kilgo et al., 2018). Now not only do audiences rely on large-scale
news organizations, but they take to social media websites, such as Instagram, Facebook, or
Snapchat, which redirects them to more independent/alternative media sites, like Reddit.
Reddit allows the audience to create their own content by leaving opinions or even credible
news updated within the “discussion” section, making the news more accessible and
conversational. Moreover with regards to the Ebola crisis, the same study uncovers that
American news organizations get much attention during “hot crises” that directly impact their
populace, putting the country into “panic mode” (Kilgo et al., 2018). In 2014, the first death in
the United States caused by Ebola happened to a Liberian citizen, Thomas Eric Duncan. This was
then the rise for concern rose within the Western world, as the disease was now on domestic
soil. The authors claim that “the progression of the 2014 Ebola epidemic in Africa, the transfer
of Ebola patients to the United States for treatment, and the death of Duncan” (Kilgo et al.,
2018), are the reasons why this epidemic instilled panic among Americans. It makes sense that
news organizations, like CNN, takes priority in covering situations that may potentially threaten
lives of the West. Maybe had the coverage been more serious before this point, the disease
might have been under more control in Africa and it may not have travelled over to the United
The Guardian recognized all these issues and took terms into their own hands when
putting out an article called “Let’s be honest. We ignore Congo’s atrocities because it’s in
Africa”. Now, unlike the United States and CNN, The Guardian is at least able to recognize that
there needs to be a change. To summarize, the article discusses how the genocide happening in
the DRC can compare to the Holocaust, as one of the deadliest wars of all time “yet I doubt
most people in the west are even aware of it” (Jones, 2015). As a citizen of Canada, it really
surprised me that all of this was going on in Africa in general. However, we often see
advertisements for villages and countries in need of donations, we also see organized trips for
Me to We in order to build schools and water holes for the people of Africa. Although the news
here does not give much attention to the bigger issues in Africa, we know there is always help
needed, it is just up to us North American’s to demand more news coverage. This is where the
whole “gatekeeping” comes in, as the American agenda setting is to feed the wants of their
viewers. The article from The Guardian touches on the Syrian conflict, and how we are so
invested in that because of the amount people seeking refuge in our corner of the world,
however, “up to 6 million people are believed to have perished in the DRC” (Jones, 2015). Now,
although this is not about the 2014 Ebola Crisis, this article just goes to show that we are not so
concerned about events occurring over there unless it is directly impacting the Western world.
When the outbreak fizzled out, the African corner of the world became almost irrelevant once
again on our news stations, although the African genocide continues still today.
Fast-forward to today, April 2019, Ebola has returned since the 2014 crisis. However,
due to the epidemic that occurred just five years ago, Africa is equipped with the proper
resources to handle the virus. On March 9th, 2019, CNN and The Guardian both reported that
one of the largest Ebola treatment centers in the DRC was attacked in the midst of the local,
smaller-scale outbreak. Personally I can say that until writing this analysis, I had no idea that
there were still cases of Ebola going on in the world, or that there was a civil war going on in the
DRC causing African people to attack on each other. I am a true believe that this is because the
virus has not struck North American’s directly, therefore, the stories that do exist on CNN about
it are not necessarily broadcasted the way more “newsworthy” stories would be. It is not just
the news organizations that are at fault, it is the audience, American’s who simply are not
concerned with the lives of these people. Yes, it is difficult to report on stories that are taking
place across the world, but if the story was of significance to put time and money into
reporting, than the coverage would be similar to that of the Palestine-Israeli conflict in which
How can we fix this problem? Like I said before, it is not just the news organizations that
are at fault. Does it really have to do with how close we are to the location of the story? While
comparing both The Guardian to CNN, I realized that there may be slightly more information in
the United Kingdom compared to North America, but it is nothing to write home about. In
order to make changes here, we as people need to educate ourselves and take interesting in
world events, instead of being selfish. Digging into the archives and reading multiple studies on
the topic has made me realize that the agenda setting of these news organizations is to appeal
to their audiences and feed them what they want to know. It is most important and beneficial
for these organizations to invest their time and money into breaking news that is going to get
significant attention from the audience. We are now the gatekeepers of news, as it is up to us
to decide what is most important. We are not the only ones to blame, I also believe that if the
coverage of the DRC became a priority for stations like CNN, we would become more invested
into the stories. It is a two way street, if we are not given the information it will not get the
desired attention, and if we do not give the story desires attention, it will not succeed in a
wealthy and safe country. It is stories like these that just go to show that it is up to us to help,
we have the money and the resources to help the DRC. The same way the United States has
stepped into the Israeli-Palestine conflict is the help Africa needs to become a stable,
developing country. More effective news coverage of the genocide is needed today the same
way the Ebola crisis of 2014 was covered, and even the same way World War II was covered. It
is embarrassing that as a citizen of North America, who frequently keeps up with CNN, that I
have no idea what is really going on in the other corners of the world.
References
“Analysis of Western Media Negative Coverage of Africa and the Similarity and Disparity of
http://frontpageafricaonline.com/opinion/analysis-of-western-media-negative-coverage-of-
africa-and-the-similarity-and-disparity-of-american-press-and-liberian-media/.
Dellorto, Danielle. “Ebola Virus Outbreak: 'Drastic Action Is Needed'.” CNN, Cable News
africa/index.html.
Jones, Owen. “Let's Be Honest. We Ignore Congo's Atrocities Because It's in Africa | Owen
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/06/ignore-congo-atrocities-africa-drc-horror.
Kilgo, Danielle K., et al. “Spreading Ebola Panic: Newspaper and Social Media Coverage of the
2014 Ebola Health Crisis.” Taylor and Francis Online, Health Communication, 23 Feb. 2018,
www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10410236.2018.1437524?needAccess=true&.
Mark, Monica. “Fear and Ignorance as Ebola 'out of Control' in Parts of West Africa.” The
sp-ebola-out-of-control-west-africa.
Suzanne Beukes for Daily Maverick, part of the Guardian Africa network. “Finding Ebola's
'Patient Zero'.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 28 Oct. 2014,
www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/28/ebola-virus-guinea-first-victim-patient-zero.
“The Ebola Outbreak: Complete Coverage.” CNN, Cable News Network, 15 Oct. 2014,
www.cnn.com/specials/health/ebola.
“What Is Ebola Virus Disease? | Ebola (Ebola Virus Disease) | CDC.” Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Sept. 2018,
www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/about.html.
www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/app/uploads/2013/11/What-is-Newsworthy-Worksheet.pdf.
Wooley, Alexander. “So ... Does American TV Ever Mention Africa?” NPR, 30 Mar. 2019,
www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2019/03/30/708014789/when-it-comes-to-africa-
jeopardy-is-the-exception-to-tvs-rule.
Yan, Holly, and Esprit Smith. “Ebola: Patient Zero Was a Toddler in Guinea.” CNN, Cable News
Yuhas, Alan. “Guinea's Ebola Outbreak: What Is the Virus and What's Being Done?” The
www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/01/guinea-ebola-outbreak-whats-being-done-
explained.