Call out culture on social media allows individuals to publicly shame others for perceived transgressions. This can spread quickly and do irreparable harm to reputations without due process. While perpetrators of injustice should be held accountable, broadly condemning individuals on personal social networks resembles bullying and lynching rather than justice. Proper transparency and accountability are important but must be balanced with fairness and rehabilitation over retribution.
Original Description:
Original Title
Good morning honorable members of the jury and my worthy oponents.docx
Call out culture on social media allows individuals to publicly shame others for perceived transgressions. This can spread quickly and do irreparable harm to reputations without due process. While perpetrators of injustice should be held accountable, broadly condemning individuals on personal social networks resembles bullying and lynching rather than justice. Proper transparency and accountability are important but must be balanced with fairness and rehabilitation over retribution.
Call out culture on social media allows individuals to publicly shame others for perceived transgressions. This can spread quickly and do irreparable harm to reputations without due process. While perpetrators of injustice should be held accountable, broadly condemning individuals on personal social networks resembles bullying and lynching rather than justice. Proper transparency and accountability are important but must be balanced with fairness and rehabilitation over retribution.
Good morning honorable members of the jury and my worthy oponents,
“Call out culture” as that term is currently used is a relatively new
phenomenon, arising from use of electronic social media like Twitter, Facebook, etc., in which a self-identified “social justice” advocate will “call out” — that is, identify publicly — some person known to the other members of their social network, whose behavior falls short of the “ideal” preached by the political movement they all profess to support, in some particular way. And, because of the instant and often viral nature of social networking these days, such an accusation can spread far and wide and run all the way around the world before the truth (as understood by more sober minds) has a chance to put its pants on. This can do irreparable harm to individuals’ reputations, justified or not — and because it happens instantly, without due process, without a chance to respond before social judgment is passed and that person is ostracized from the network, in practice it more resembles a good old- fashioned lynching, or kangaroo-court proceeding. I believe it’s vitally important to properly “call perpetrators to account” for injustices when we see them, and not to brush them under the rug and allow them to fester. That includes everything from instances of personal bullying and abuse (including sexual abuse and assault), on up through institutional racism and sexism and economic exploitation of underprivileged classes, right on through incipient authoritarian tendencies in government and other institutions which limit human rights, all the way to crimes against humanity such as wars of conquest and genocide. That’s why we needed, and got, such healing-sunshine forms of transparency and restoration as the Nuremberg Trials, the South African and Argentine truth-and-reconciliation commissions, and so on. But that is vastly different from pointing the finger at one, particular, individual person on social media and “outing” his or her beliefs and actions to an intimate, personal circle of friends and acquaintances who will thereafter ostracize the target individual. That’s just bullying, by another name. And bullying an alleged bully does not solve the problem of bullying; it just perpetuates it.
The Privacy Imperative in The Information Age Free For All' Address by Hon PJ Keating The Centre For Advanced Journalism University of Melbourne 4 August 2010