RUMAITHA / SHANAYEL FACILITIES PHASE-III Part (A)-SMP WOR

AHEC PROJECT NO: 027

Lessons Learned

Sr Corrective Department
No Description actions proposed responsible
Bidding Mistakes
1 Piping Field Painting
2 Flange to flange bollted joints
3 Full cosmetic painting
4 Pre-commissioning assistance in free
5 Low rates of steel structure modification
6 Toe plate for steel gratings
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Construction problems
1 lack of Material department, warehouse,
2 Improper material control of spools, supports, tagging
3 Lack of quanlity control procedures, pipe supports tracing not implemented
4 Small bore done in shop which resulted in increased re-work
5 Scaffolding job done by AHEC but paid to kaefer on the instruction by PM
6 Stecon bonders not qualified but paid to STEcon on the instruction of PM
7 Improper utilization of manpower by construction department and mob/ demob not done as per required
8 Too many highly paid staff hired for the project which was not required considering the scale of project e.g 04 piping enginee
Mechanical CM, plus structure incharge, and piping incharge till end
9 Unnecessary hiring of subcontractor like prestige, Inhouse manpower performed the fabrication of supports very well when s
10 Lack of meetings for targets for construction team and followups
11 Key persons had their own companies and at the same time working in AHEC, giving more time to their own business, work w
12 Project higher person directed the stecon manager to GS which resulted in no work for AHEC, which would have been given t
13
14
15
16
17
18

Head Office procedure problems

1 Improper contracts preparation by procurement like for Prestige on one page
2 Improper contracts preparation by procurement like for KAEFER on one page for scaffolding paid fully for 06 month irrespecti
3 Lack of involvement of contracts department in Pos, like fitup PO made rather it should have been manpower supply, left eve
4 Lack of implmentation by PM of the project control procedures like DWPR not implemented which resulted in loss of manpow
5 Lack of full time contracts engineer at site which resulted in low quality letters submission to client
6 Lack of cost control procedures and lack of cost control engineer at site
7 Lack of hiring of manpower by HR department, instead they left every thing on the discretion of PM who brought incompete
8 Lack of invoice checking at HO, e.g PO, back up documents
9 Lack of awareness of people about the job description of each department , need to prepare by HR department
10 Mishandling of subcontractor like AMB hertel caused in loss of huge money at the end and distortion of reputation of the com
11 No proper PO preparation and checking of Backup and PO by Procurement causing wastage of time for QS
12 HR job descriptions are not clear, nobody knows what is his JD. HR needs to make JDs and circulate to everyone and give train
rt (A)-SMP WORKS

t e.g 04 piping engineers at a time, one CM,

ports very well when subcontractor left us alone

r own business, work was affected e.g IN and SS

ould have been given to AHEC.
 or 06 month irrespective of the rental period hired
npower supply, left everything on PM's discretion
ulted in loss of manpower and low productivity

ho brought incompetent people on high wages

partment
f reputation of the company
QS
everyone and give training