Pagbibigay Diin:

1.Kahalagahan ng wika- Ito ay talagang napakahalaga sa buhay ng bawat

tao dito sa mundo dahil ito ang nag-uugnay sa ating lahat at ito ang tulay
ng pagkakaintindihan ng bawat isa sa atin, mahalaga ito para magkaroon
ng komunikasyon sa ibang tao dahil naniniwala na ang tao ay panlipunang
nilalang.
2.Katangian ng wika- Ito ay napakahalaga sa atin dahil kung wala ito, hindi
magiging maayos ang komunikasyon mo sa iba pang tao na nakapaligid sa
iyo, hindi lang papel ang binibigyang kulay, pati na rin ang wika, dahil sa
katangian ng wika, nagiging makulay at masining ang mga salitang ating
sinasambit.
3.Kalikasan ng wika- Kailangan din natin ito dahil kung wala ang kalikasan
ng wika, walang laman an gating sasabihin dahil kinakailangang meron
itong kahulugan, hindi rin natin ito maiintindihan dahil dapat mayroon
itong tamang ispeling, hindi rin natin malalaman ang emosyon ng ating
sasabihin o sasabihin ng iba dahil dapat mayroon itong tunog o tono.

4.Terminolohiyang pang wika- Mahalaga rin ito sa atin dahil kung wala ito,
maaaring hindi natin alam ang wika ng iba, mga taong nakatuklas nito, o
mga nag aaral para dito.
5.Ebolusyon ng wika- Mahalaga ito sa atin dahil kung hindi magaganap ang
ebolusyon ng wika ay wala ring pagbabago o sabihin na nating pag-unlad
sa wikang ating nakasanayan.
In the beginning

The first thing to understand is what the Big Bang actually was."The Big Bang is a moment in time, not a point in
space," said Sean Carroll, a theoretical physicist at the California Institute of Technology and author of "The Big
Picture: On the Origins of Life, Meaning and the Universe Itself" (Dutton, 2016).So, scrap the image of a tiny speck of
dense matter suddenly exploding outward into a void. For one thing, the universe at the Big Bang may not have been
particularly small, Carroll said. Sure, everything in the observable universe today — a sphere with a diameter of about
93 billion light-years containing at least 2 trillion galaxies — was crammed into a space less than a centimeter across.
But there could be plenty outside of the observable universe that Earthlings can't see because it's physically
impossible for the light to have traveled that far in 13.8 billion years.Thus, it's possible that the universe at the Big
Bang was teeny-tiny or infinitely large, Carroll said because there’s no way to look back in time at the stuff we can’t
even see today. All we really know is that it was very, very dense and that it very quickly got less dense.As a
corollary, there really isn't anything outside the universe, because the universe is, by definition everything. So, at the
Big Bang, everything was denser and hotter than it is now, but there was no more an "outside" of it than there is today.
As tempting as it is to take a godlike view and imagine you could stand in a void and look at the scrunched-up baby
universe right before the Big Bang, that would be impossible, Carroll said. The universe didn't expand into space;
space itself expanded."No matter where you are in the universe, if you trace yourself back 14 billion years, you come
to this point where it was extremely hot, dense and rapidly expanding," he said.No one knows exactly what was
happening in the universe until 1 second after the Big Bang, when the universe cooled off enough for protons and
neutrons to collide and stick together. Many scientists do think that the universe went through a process of exponential
expansion called inflation during that first second. This would have smoothed out the fabric of space-time and could
explain why matter is so evenly distributed in the universe today.

Before the bang

It's possible that before the Big Bang, the universe was an infinite stretch of an ultrahot, dense material, persisting in
a steady state until, for some reason, the Big Bang occured. This extra-dense universe may have been governed by
quantum mechanics, the physics of the extremely small scale, Carroll said. The Big Bang, then, would have
represented the moment that classical physics took over as the major driver of the universe's evolution. [What Is
Quantum Mechanics?]For Stephen Hawking, this moment was all that mattered: Before the Big Bang, he said, events
are unmeasurable, and thus undefined. Hawking called this the no-boundary proposal: Time and space, he said, are
finite, but they don’t have any boundaries or starting or ending points, the same way that the planet Earth is finite but
has no edge."Since events before the Big Bang have no observational consequences, one may as well cut them out
of the theory and say that time began at the Big Bang," he said in an interview on the National Geographic show
"StarTalk" in 2018.Or perhaps there was something else before the Big Bang that's worth pondering. One idea is that
the Big Bang isn't the beginning of time, but rather that it was a moment of symmetry. In this idea, prior to the Big
Bang, there was another universe, identical to this one but with entropy increasing toward the past instead of toward
the future.Increasing entropy, or increasing disorder in a system, is essentially the arrow of time, Carroll said, so in
this mirror universe, time would run opposite to time in the modern universe and our universe would be in the past.
Proponents of this theory also suggest that other properties of the universe would be flip-flopped in this mirror
universe. For example, physicist David Sloan wrote in the University of Oxford Science Blog, asymmetries in molecules
and ions (called chiralities) would be in opposite orientations to what they are in our universe.A related theory holds
that the Big Bang wasn't the beginning of everything, but rather a moment in time when the universe switched from a
period of contraction to a period of expansion. This "Big Bounce" notion suggests that there could be infinite Big
Bangs as the universe expands, contracts and expands again. The problem with these ideas, Carroll said, is that
there's no explanation for why or how an expanding universe would contract and return to a low-entropy state.Carroll
and his colleague Jennifer Chen have their own pre-Big Bang vision. In 2004, the physicists suggested that perhaps
the universe as we know it is the offspring of a parent universe from which a bit of space-time has ripped off.It's like a
radioactive nucleus decaying, Carroll said: When a nucleus decays, it spits out an alpha or beta particle. The parent
universe could do the same thing, except instead of particles, it spits out baby universes, perhaps infinitely. "It's just a
quantum fluctuation that lets it happen," Carroll said. These baby universes are "literally parallel universes," Carroll
said, and don't interact with or influence one another.If that all sounds rather trippy, it is — because scientists don't
yet have a way to peer back to even the instant of the Big Bang, much less what came before it. There's room to
explore, though, Carroll said. The detection of gravitational waves from powerful galactic collisions in 2015 opens the
possibility that these waves could be used to solve fundamental mysteries about the universes' expansion in that first
crucial second.Theoretical physicists also have work to do, Carroll said, like making more-precise predictions about
how quantum forces like quantum gravity might work."We don't even know what we're looking for," Carroll said, "until
we have a theory."
Timeline- singularity, Inflation and baryogenesis, Cooling, Structure form, cosmic acceleration.