Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Genre Analysis
Genre Analysis
Ashley Grinstead
Writing 1
The beloved cheeseburger. A juicy, thick steak. Southern barbeque. These are typical
American meals that normally don’t raise questions to the consumer. Some of these are meals are
eaten by Americans more than thrice a week. But low and beholdas not many people know, these
meals are actually strainingstraining the Earth and are one of the leading causes of climate
change. The mini documentary “Beef and Climate Change, How Are They Related?” starring
Nick Paton Walsh from CNN, gives a brief overview of the overall challenges this topic holds in
a short video loaded with facts and footage. The narrative article “Have We Hit ‘Peak Beef’?”
written by Tim Lewis, gives insight on the controversies of this topic by telling a story while
delivering facts at the same time. These two genres are similar yet so different in the way they
portray how beef is linked to climate change by by how theyusing different appeals to the
Mini documentaries are made for people who don’t really have the time to watch actual
documentaries but still want to be educated about a subject. The CNN mini documentary is about
seven and a half minutes long and answers the question (which is also the title of the video),
“Beef and Climate Change, How Are They Related?” From just looking at the title, one can
easily identify the main idea of the entire video and see if they are interested in watching it or
not. Unlike documentary titles, the title of the mini documentary isn’t some ominous word or
phrase that makes you question the content because it just gets straight to the point. For
Grinstead 2
reference, “Blackfish” and “Cowspiracy” are titles of documentaries that are about the
mistreatment of Sea World animals and the relation beef has to climate change, respectively. The
titles do not directly inform the audience of the content of the documentary, they are just words
to grab the audience’s attention so that the audience could watch the documentary to learn about
what those words mean. From just looking at the mini documentary title, one can easily identify
the main idea of the entire video and seedecide if they are interested in watching it or not.
that’s allowedthat they can address inside the video. They Mini documentaries normally consist
of an overview of the topic or problem and support it the topic with statistics and facts. There is
sometimes sometimes bias , depending on who produced the video as well as the news source.
Some people are interviewed, but they are mainly featured to help prove a point. Because they’re
mini documentaries are supposed to be short and informative, they are unable to elaborate
formdevelop characters about the people they interview. For example, Nick Paton Walsh
interviews Raymond Butler, the owner of one of the cattle farms, for CNN’s video and asks him
what his opinion is on global warming. Butler states that he “doesn’t believe in it [and that]
…there has to be a drastic change in the weather” for him to change his mind (CNN). According
to Ad Fontes Media’s news bias, CNN gives fair interpretations of the news and leans a little to
the left. With this in consideration, CNN ultimately specifically added that the interview in their
mini documentary there to show prove that ignorance is also a main contributorkey component
Walsh also interviewed people at a barbeque festival in Texas where there werethat had
excessive amounts of different kinds of meat: ribs, steak, sausage links, and more. He asked
them how they felt about the relation of beef has to climate change, and the majority ofmost of
Grinstead 3
the people didn’t want to acknowledge the connection and think about the impacts because they
wanted to enjoy the festival. Again, CNN added this segment to indirectly answer a question
Walsh asked at the beginning of the video, which was “How does the food you love to eat affect
our struggle to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius?” (CNN). CNN didn’t give any
background information about the people they interviewed to avoid the use of pathos since they
ultimately wanted to focus on the ethos of the topiclogos of their argument. The use of only ethos
is a disadvantage of mini documentaries since the video is just spitting straight facts to the
viewer--the audience can’t empathize with the topic without the use of pathos.Mini
documentaries do use pathos to address the viewer through direct questions that are presented
throughout the video. This strategy tries to make people think about their own lives and how
On the other hand, narrative articles are for people who have a lot of time and want a
more detailed perspective of a subject. The article from The Guardian, “Have We Hit ‘Peak
Beef’?” by Tim Lewis, describes the connection beef has with climate change at a much greater
length than what a mini documentary provides. There is a definite theme and main idea running
through the story, putting the question “Is there a way for beef to be ethical?” into the reader’s
Narrative articles go into detail about a topic by starting off with a main story and
referencing it throughout the article. For example, Lewis starts off by telling the story of the
owner origins of Wild Beef, a company that sells “beyond organic” beef. Throughout the rest of
the article, he brings in facts and situations where beef and climate change are controversial,
often referencing back to the story about Wild Beef. Thate story about Wild Beef is used as to
provide a structure to the article so that the reader isn’t just blown away by facts.
Grinstead 4
Lewis also brings in stories that expose different point of views about beef and climate
change. For instance, in one part of the article, Lewis starts off with facts about how beef
contributes to climate change by addressing how “cattle are responsible for an unholy proportion
of agriculture’s greenhouse gases.” He then challenges this statement by bringing in the fact that
the production of avocados hurts the Earth as much as red meat does. Lewis proposes a question
asking the reader “how…can having a small portion of pasture-fed beef…be worse than eating
an avocado, imported from Mexico, picked by low-paid, immigrant workers on land linked to
illegal deforestation?” This rebuttal allows for the carnivorous and vegan readers to be exposed
to the problems both types of categories bring to the Earth. The specific controversy about
avocados is more directed toward the vegan readers as it challenges their beliefs of what is
One significant thing about the narrative article is that Lewis never brings in his own
opinion. His language leaves his piece up for suggestion to the reader and allows for the reader to
formulate their own opinion about the topic. Unlike the CNN video, where Walsh is relaying
facts in a tone that makes the reader feel guilty about their consumption, the strategy Lewis uses
allows for the audience to choose if they want to make a change or not by offering different
perspectives. Mini documentaries often take a clear side to the problemof an issue, depending on
the news source and producer. The limit a narrative article has is dependent on the audience’s the
audience’s time since narrative articles are long reads, while the limit for mini documentaries is
Works Cited
“The Chart, Version 3.0: What, Exactly, Are We Reading?” Ad Fontes Media, 29 Aug. 2018,
Grinstead 5
www.adfontesmedia.com/the-chart-version-3-0-what-exactly-are-we-reading/.
Lewis, Tim. “Have We Hit 'Peak Beef'?” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 16 Mar.
2019, www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/mar/16/peak-beef-ethical-food-climate-
change.
Walsh, Nick Paton. “Beef and Climate Change, How Are They Related? - CNN Video.” CNN,
Cable News Network, 9 Dec. 2018, www.cnn.com/videos/health/2018/12/08/beef-- Formatted: Line spacing: Double
Field Code Changed
industry-price-pkg-paton-walsh-special-report-vpx.cnn.
Formatted: Hyperlink, Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri),
11 pt, Pattern: Clear
Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto
Formatted: Font color: Auto