Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Step 2: Compute For Validation SBM Assessment Score (40%)

    Uploaded by

    Shanks D. Teach
    12 views2 pages
    This document outlines a scoring process for validating schools' implementation of School-Based Management. It involves 3 steps: 1) determining a Performance Improvement score based on indicators of access, efficiency, and quality, 2) computing an SBM Assessment score by rating principles of leadership, curriculum, accountability, and resource management, and 3) calculating a final rating by weighing the Performance and SBM scores. Schools must achieve a "Better" rating on their Performance Improvement to qualify for the full validation assessment. The final rating will classify their SBM implementation as Developing, Maturing, or Advanced.

    Original Description:

    Sbm

    Original Title

    Sbm Level of Practice

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines a scoring process for validating schools' implementation of School-Based Management. It involves 3 steps: 1) determining a Performance Improvement score based on indicators of access, efficiency, and quality, 2) computing an SBM Assessment score by rating principles of leadership, curriculum, accountability, and resource management, and 3) calculating a final rating by weighing the Performance and SBM scores. Schools must achieve a "Better" rating on their Performance Improvement to qualify for the full validation assessment. The final rating will classify their SBM implementation as Developing, Maturing, or Advanced.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    12 views2 pages

    Step 2: Compute For Validation SBM Assessment Score (40%)

    Uploaded by

    Shanks D. Teach
    This document outlines a scoring process for validating schools' implementation of School-Based Management. It involves 3 steps: 1) determining a Performance Improvement score based on indicators of access, efficiency, and quality, 2) computing an SBM Assessment score by rating principles of leadership, curriculum, accountability, and resource management, and 3) calculating a final rating by weighing the Performance and SBM scores. Schools must achieve a "Better" rating on their Performance Improvement to qualify for the full validation assessment. The final rating will classify their SBM implementation as Developing, Maturing, or Advanced.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Step 2: Compute for Validation SBM Assessment Score (40%) CUMULATIVE SCORE OF VALIDATION PER

    PRINCIPLE
    SBM PRINCIPLES WEIGHT
    SCORE WEIGTED SCORE
    Leadership 30% 0
    Curriculum and Instruction 30% 0
    Accountability 25% 0
    Resource Management 15% 0
    SUBTOTAL 100% 0

    Interpretation: ________Good ________Better ________Best

    Numerical Rating Scale: Description


    0.50-1.49 Good
    1.50-2.49 Better
    2.50-3.00 Best

    Step 3: Compute for Final Rating


    Areas Weight Computation Results
    A. Performance Improvement 60%
    B. SBM Assessment Score (DOD) 40%
    TOTAL 100%

    Interpretation: _____Developing (I) _____Maturing (II) _____Advanced (III)

    Prepared by:

    Name of School Head Over Printed Name


    Repubic of the Philippines
    Department of Education
    Region V
    SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE
    Iriga City

    SBM VALIDATION FORM


    Name of School: Division:

    Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)


    Rating and Equivalent Computation Result
    Thematic Area Performance Indicator Points
    ENROLMENT INCREASE % of Increase
    SY 2015-2016 1-Marginal: at least 1%
    ACCESS (45%) SY 2016-2017 increase, 2-Average: at
    least 7% increase, 3-High:
    SY 2017-2018 at least 10% increase
    AVE. % INCREASE %
    DROP-OUT RATE (DR) % of Decrease
    Baseline: 7.06
    SY 2015-2016 1-Marginal: at least 25%
    SY 2016-2017 increase, 2-Average: at
    SY 2017-2018 least 50% increase, 3-High:
    has 0 dropout
    AVE. % DECREASE
    COMPLETION RATE (CR) % of Increase
    Baseline: 75%
    SY 2015-2016 1-Marginal: at least 5%
    increase, 2-Average: at
    EFFICIENCY (25%) SY 2016-2017
    least 7% increase, 3-High:
    SY 2017-2018 at least 10% increase
    AVE. % INCREASE
    COHORT SURVIVAL RATE (CSR) % of Increase
    Baseline: 76%
    SY 2015-2016 1-Marginal: at least 25%
    SY 2016-2017 increase, 2-Average: at
    least 50% increase, 3-High:
    SY 2017-2018 at least 10% increase
    AVE. % INCREASE
    NAT MPS % of Increase
    SY 2015-2016 1-Marginal: 26-50%
    QUALITY (30%) SY 2016-2017 2-Average: 51-75%
    SY 2017-2018 3-High: 76-100%
    AVE. % INCREASE %
    Sub-Total

    Interpretation Good
    Better
    Best

    Legend: Numerical Rating Scale


    0.50-1.49 Good
    1.50-2.49 Better
    2.50-3.00 Best

    Note: Only schools having a Performance of Improvement of "Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation

    You might also like