Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Siemens (NVH)
Siemens (NVH)
Siemens (NVH)
Motors
Vehicle NVH & Acoustic Innovation Area
Electric and hybrid electric vehicles – Challenges
120
70
20
-30
Motor order
Resonance
Motor order
Resonance
3500.00 80.00
Tacho1 (T1)
dB(A)
rpm
Pa
AutoPower mic (A) WF 126 [981.36-3466.8 rpm]
900.00 -20.00
0.00 Hz 2600.00
mic (CH1)
Magnetic simulation
Electric Design
Acoustic characterization
10000.00 20.00
Thermal Model
Tacho_SRM_Filt2 (T3)
dB/Hz
rpm
A2
Phase current 400.00
0.00 Hz 10000.00
-90.00
c urrent1 (CH105)
10000.00 20.00
Tacho_SRM_Filt2 (T3)
dB/Hz
rpm
g2
Acceleration
400.00 -80.00
0.00 Hz 10000.00
Mntl:1_06:+Z (CH3)
10000.00 100.00
Controls Design
Tacho_SRM_Filt2 (T3)
dB/Hz
rpm
Pa2
Vehicle Energy Model Vibro-Acoustic Model
Sound
400.00 0.00
0.00 Hz 10000.00
M1 (CH233)
Electric motors are key to all electric and hybrid-electric automotive propulsion
solutions.
Main advantage of Switched Reluctance (SR) type electric motors
• Cost-effective technology, simple construction
• No rare-earth materials (permanent magnets)
• No electric or magnetic components in rotor
Main drawback in automotive applications
• Control for maximum efficiency leads to high torque ripple
• High torque ripple creates NVH problems.
Electro-magnetic
Current waveforms Stator Forces
FEM
Electro-Magnetic
200
Rpm = 1000
180 Rpm = 2000
Rpm = 3000
160 Rpm = 4000
Rpm = 5000
140 Rpm = 6000
1 120
Rpm = 7000
Rpm = 8000
Current (A)
100
80
60
40
20
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Rotor angle (deg)
Vibro-Acoustic
2
Flux[k-1]
Look-up
Table 1 I[k-1]
Voltage I(Flux, Angle) Torque
Look-up
Table 2 Angle[k-1]
Te(I, Angle)
SRM
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2016
Page 12 16.05.2016 Siemens PLM Software
Noise optimization of an Switched Reluctance motor
SRM Motor Functional Model in LMS Amesim
Electro-magnetic
Current waveforms Stator Forces
FEM
Electro-Magnetic
200
Rpm = 1000
180 Rpm = 2000
Rpm = 3000
160 Rpm = 4000
Rpm = 5000
140 Rpm = 6000
1 120
Rpm = 7000
Rpm = 8000
Current (A)
100
80
60
40
20
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Rotor angle (deg)
Vibro-Acoustic
2
TEST CAE
Stator modelling Freq Freq
• Stator FRFs testing Mode Freq
[Hz] [Hz]
Description
[Hz]
• Stator Modal analysis original updated
• Correlation and updating to identify 2,0b 1342 1295 1343 1st ovalisation (45 deg)
Highest focus on ovalisation modes 4,0 5745 5541 5701 4th ovalisation
• Good match with forcing pattern
• Efficient radiator
Stator FRF test Stator TEST modes Stator CAE modes
Example 1
Linearity and Reciprocity Check on Stator
Z
X
X – X / Radial - Radial Z – Z / Axial - Axial
Z – X / Axial - Radial
MICRO-SCALE
zoom
with groups
Homogenization
Homogenized model using [3] epoxy thickness 183.2 115.7 30.5 71.1
10
1
Acceleration/force (m.s-2.N-1) Log
1e-1
1e-2
1e-3
1e-4
(3,0) (3,1)
1e-5
EXPERIMENT – Synthetized
1e-6 (2,0) (2,1) FE MODEL 1 – Isotropic properties
FE MODEL 2 – Anisotropic hom. properties
1e-7
FE MODEL 3 – Optimized orth. values
1e-8
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2016 Frequency (Hz)
[1] P. Millithaler, E. Sadoulet-Reboul, M. Ouisse, J.-B. Dupont, and N. Bouhaddi, “Structural dynamics of electric machine stators: Modelling guidelines and identification of three- dimensional equivalent material properties for multi-layered
Page 29 16.05.2016
orthotropic laminates,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Mar. 2015.
Siemens PLM Software
Noise optimization of an SR electric motor
Electromagnetic Simulation
Magnetic flux lines Stator forces order 6 Force pattern for order 6,18,…
Optimization of the motor control strategy allows to reduce the torque ripple, but can also be used to
significantly reduce the noise radiated by the SRM
Structural optimization of the motor and its housing allows to further reduce the noise radiated by the SR
motor.
• Simulation allows to understand the reasons behind high noise levels in certain rpm-ranges. Noise peaks
typically occur when a motor order strikes a structural resonance and the stator force pattern matches well
with the mode shape.
• Design changes can be proposed, typically addressing resonance issues by adding damping to the
structural modes.
Effect of Optimized Control Strategy Effect of Structural Modifications
• The Noise and Vibration performance has to be assessed considering the operational
environment of the motor
• In the following example, the noise in the Vehicle is estimated combining the motor
excitation with vehicle FRF characteristics.
. p
Pt arg et Q j .
.
Acoustic transfer Qj
Qj function (measured or
Sound radiation
typical curve)
from motor areas Fj
• Eg structure borne transfer, and if relevant mechanical coupling to the vehicle, through
FRF-based coupling
p
Pt arg et F j .
F j