Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Quantitative Analysis of Anglo Saxon M PDF
A Quantitative Analysis of Anglo Saxon M PDF
Dennis Riley
Background
Brooches of whatever style (quoit, Annular or great square Headed for
example) generally have decoration applied after casting, certain elements are
added at the casting stage, but delicate forms are added afterwards as the casting
process is insufficiently good to reproduce fine elements of a design, since an
individual punch is unique in so far as it is made by hand, each individual stamp
produced from that punch represents a collection of unique stamp sets. When a
punch is redefined by filing or grinding the punch shape will be altered so from
that point onwards the stamp set produced will vary slightly from the previous
stamp set, it is therefore possible to group brooches to a particular workshop by
the matching stamp sets, this is not an easy task, one point being – how long will
a punch last?, a point this paper will attempt to address.
1
Inker, 2000, fig 13
2
Hines, 1993, p85
3
Pollington, 2010, p150
One of the punches used on the Mucking Belt suite (Pl.9C, Fig.8.38)
from grave 117 was also used on the quoit brooch found in grave 12 at
Charlton Plantation5.
4
Hines,1993,p85
5
Davies, Bojko, Crowfoot, Harding & Henderson, 1984, Inker, 2000, p41
Copper/Sn4 75 230
Copper/Sn5 75 230
Copper/Sn6 80 250
Copper/Sn8 85 270
Copper/Zn5 50 125
Copper/Zn10 60 165
Copper/Zn15 65 170
Copper/Zn20 65 170
Copper/Zn28 90 160
Copper/Zn30 65 200
Copper/Zn33 65 160
Copper/Zn36 65 190
6
Copper Development Association Table 10, Davies & Oelmann; hardness of as cast copper
1, Pure Iron
2, Carburised Iron (case hardened)
3, Unhardened High Carbon Steel
4, Hardened High Carbon Steel
The Anglo-Saxon smith was however hindered in his materials choice insofar as
he had little knowledge of the metallurgy of the irons he was using, Iron and
carbon steel look alike and he had no concept of chemical composition or grain
structure, he was fortunately not totally blind as there are easily observed
differences between iron and carbon steel; when high carbon steel is forged it
has an acrid smell to it, you can smell the carbon in it7, secondly – carbon steels
are much harder to forge at the same temperature as low carbon steels or iron8,
the smith therefore had a rough if not totally accurate guide as to the materials
he was working with, minimal research has been carried out on the metallurgy
of punches, we can see however from parallel research carried out on the
metallurgical investigation of knives9 that the smith was aware of the concept of
hardening even though it was applied haphazardly , so the punches he was able
to produced varied in material and state corresponding to the Four outlined
above. The hardness of these various Irons and Steels are outlined in Table 2
below, without going into the complex nature of heat treatment I have included
hardened steels with a high and low tempering temperature (high tempering
temperature gives a lower hardness but makes the steel tougher), the Anglo-
Saxon smith would have been aware of tempering but at what level he could
practice it is unknown. As a small aside I have also included the tensile
strengths in Tons per square inch and MPa (mega pascals {Nmm2}) of Steel
alongside that of As cast and Cold worked Copper as a comparative as there is a
degree of correlation between hardness and tensile strength.
7
Authors own experience
8
Authors own experience
9
Ottoway, Coppergate York AY/6, 1992
From tables one and two we can see the relative differences in hardness of the
Iron based punches set against the Copper alloy artefacts to be punched, Using
this information , allied with experimentation we can now calculate a value for
punch life expectancy in the punching of Copper Alloy Artefacts for a range of
punch types, in the following experiments a hardened steel punch and a dead
mild steel punch (in imitation of forged wrought iron) will be tested, the aim is
to determine the number of strikes that it is possible to make before the punch
shows sufficient wear as to require re working, Once a punch has been re
worked the stamp it produces has been fundamentally altered, it will effectively
be a different stamp, it is possible that an abrupt change in stamp patterns on
extant Brooch Finds (or indeed any find) indicates that a punch has been
reworked, as a secondary experiment a punch will be reworked to show the
alteration in stamping pattern.
10
Table 2 has been derived from a number of sources;- Davies & Oelmann, 1983. Thelning 1984
©Dennis Riley, 2010
Experimental research
Set out here are a series of three experiments to reproduce Anglo-Saxon
punches, one is in a Wrought iron equivalent, the second in a hardened Carbon
Tool Steel and thirdly an experiment charting the changes in a punch during a
progressive series of re-works, the choice of punch materials reflect the high
and low end of Steels available to the Anglo-Saxons so in theory we will be
able to see the life expectancy range of a stamp set.
Experiment 1
To recreate and test a wrought iron equivalent punch
Method
Given the limited availability of wrought iron an equivalent currently produced
steel has been substituted , in this case EN1APb, this steel is a common free
cutting steel that contains a small addition of lead to aid in the machining
process, this steel is ideal in that the lead addition mirrors to a degree the slag
inclusions found in wrought iron, they suffer from similar problems in hot
working11 so it represents an ideal starting point for experimentation, the
chemical composition is outlined below in table 3. The balance of elements is
Iron (Fe).
C Si Mn S P Pb
0.07- 0.1% 0.8- 0.2- 0.07 0.15-
0.15% Max 1.2% 0.3% Max 0.35%
11
Authors own experience
12
This steel has been standardised under BS970 (1991) as 220Mo7
Photograph 1
Due to the high density of stamps per unit area extensive deformation of the
plate occurred, the plate required flattening after every four rows made, this had
the effect of deforming the bottom of the stamps slightly, but not so much as to
alter the shape of the indentation which is the primary objective of the
experiment as best as could be managed equal force was applied to the punch
with the hammer, there is however a degree of variability in this, but this would
have also existed in the Anglo-Saxon punch work.
15
A magnification of less than x10
Photograph 2
Photograph 2 shows the stamp indentations made by the punch, the file marks
on the punch are clearly visible in the bottom of the stamp, the vertex root can
also be seen (refer to fig 3.)
This is however a modern take on how we would view a worn punch, and until
we can reproduce the Anglo-Saxon punch marks in high resolution in 3d we
cannot determine if barrelling was an accepted condition for punches. On the
basis of the results obtained, for a hand forged iron punch it would be safe to
assume that a punch would last at least 1000 strikes, at this point barrelling will
start to be noticed on the punch and it is likely to have gone for re working, this
would alter the size of the triangle formed giving rise to a new set of punch
stamps even though it is the same punch.
Experiment 2
To recreate and test a high carbon steel punch
Method
To recreate the hardened steel punch, a modern high carbon steel punch was
used as a base and converted down by forging at 1000° C to the required shape,
the punch tip form was made by filing and the hardening took place using an
interrupted quenching technique as full quenching would have forced the steel
to crack, the projected carbon content of the steel used was 0.6 -0.8% Carbon
giving a hardness in the 600HV range. As in experiment 1 the stamping took
place on a steel platten with a lead backing to the 1mm Copper sheet being
stamped, the shape of the stamp was an equilateral triangle of approximately
2mm length of each side, stamping took place on a number of Copper sheets
and the experiment terminated when a defect was noticed on either the punch or
stamp impression. The Copper sheet was in the same condition (half hard) as in
experiment 1.
Experiment 3
To determine the number of times a punch may have been re worked during its
lifetime.
Method
The punch used in experiment 1, made of EN1APb (in imitation of wrought
iron) was re ground by filing ten times during this experiment to reproduce the
alteration in tip shape after each re working, common experience with modern
punches show that re working of about 9 times represents the norm, the limiting
factor here is the damage to the shaft by hammering which usually destroys the
punch before the tip wears out.
Results
Photograph 3
As can be seen from photograph 3 the re worked punches are all slightly
different in size, but there are some that are so similar that it is difficult to tell
them apart, the one on the far left represents the punch after 1,306 strikes, so if
each punch is used for that number of strikes before repair the stamps here
represent the change in shape of one punch, repaired 9 times and producing a
theoretical 11,754 stamped impressions in its lifetime
Conclusion
In drawing a coherent conclusion from the experiments undertaken we are faced
with a number of problems, the sample is small, only one of each punch type
tried, the punches are made of modern materials, our conclusion therefore can
only give an indication of likely hood rather than a definitive answer, as part of
that process we must here consider the nature of Iron and Steel, the experiments
undertaken in this paper are separated by 1500 years of steel making technology
from the events they wish to recreate
These results do not take into account loss or damage to a punch caused by mis
strikes or metallic particles on the punch plate (such as Iron or Iron scale and
grit) which will damage a punch, a punch will only have a high life expectancy
in clean conditions, given the high cost of manufacturing some punches (mainly
complex hardened steel ones) one would expect some type of clean conditions
for punching to occur, in comparing extant punch finds for matching punch sets
it is not possible to determine if a punch has been repaired and that the resultant
stamp set represents a continuation of use of the same punch, however if there is
an abrupt change in a punch row from a damaged punch to a cleanly defined
punch one could presume a repair has taken place. Table 6 outlines the possible
maximum number of items produced from a single punch set from a number Of
grave finds from the Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Morning Thorpe, Norfolk, and
shows the maximum level of items that could be in circulation from a single
punch set based on the experimental results obtained here,
16
Morning Thorpe A-S cemetery Norfolk, EAA 36 Volume II
Bibliography
Davies, A.C., The Science and Practice of Welding, Volumes 1 & 2,
Cambridge, 1984
Davies, D.J & Oelmann, L.A, The Structure, Properties and Heat Treatment
of Metals, Bath, 1983
Davies, S.M., Bojko, A-M., Crowfoot, E., Harding, P., & Henderson, J. The
Excavation of an Anglo-Saxon Cemetery (and some prehistoric pits) at Charlton
Plantation near Downtown in Wiltshire, Archaeological and Natural History
Magazine. Vol. 79, Devizes, 1984
Green, B., Rogerson, A., & White, S.G., The Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at
Morning Thorpe, Norfolk, Volume II, Illustrated Grave Goods, Gressenhall,
1987.
Hines, J., Anglo-Scandinavian Clasps of Classes A-C of the 3rd to 6th Centuries
AD, Typology, Diffusion and Function, Stockholm, 1993.
Pollington, S., Kerr, L., & Hammond, B., Wayland’s Work, Anglo-Saxon Art,
Myth & Material Culture from the 4thto 7th Century, Swaffham, 2010