Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Time and Motion Study
Time and Motion Study
Mihir H. Kulkarni
Department of Mechanical Engineering
KIT’S College of Engg,Kolhapur,Maharashtra, India
Abstract- In the present world of competitive business, cost minimization and efficient management of manufacturing
unit is not an easy task. Always in practice when one problem is solved there comes other new or may be old problems
will reoccur with the passage of time. All these problems that are constraints of business utilizing various resources in
different forms without adding any value in the system, can be commonly called bottleneck of manufacturing unit.
Identifying and removing the bottleneck is critical to a business. It is an on-going process which needs to be carried
throughout the year in order to utilize resources of production and maximize profit of the firm. The aim and objective of
this paper is to give a general picture of different types of bottlenecks that can prevail in a manufacturing, ways to find
bottleneck and give possible solution to each of them.
I. INTRODUCTION
Productivity improvement is to do the right things better and make it a part of continuous process. Therefore it
is important to adopt efficient productivity improvement technique so as to ensure individuals and organization’s
growth in productivity. The aim of this paper is to introduce and understand productivity improvement, various
techniques of productivity improvement, work study and its relation with productivity improvement.
Productivity is the ratio between output and input. It is quantitative relationship between what we produce and
what we have spent to produce. Productivity is nothing but reduction in wastage of resources like men, material,
machine, time, space, capital etc. It can be expressed as human efforts to produce more and more with less and less
inputs of resources so that there will be maximum distribution of benefits among maximum number of people.
Productivity denotes relationship between output and one or all associated inputs.
The aim and objectives can be listed as follows:
1. Measuring and controlling the flow of materials.
2. Identify the bottlenecks in the process.
3. Recommending the necessary changes.
4. Speeding up the production (Increasing the production).
· Materials requirement planning (MRP): MRP systems cannot operate properly without accurate work
standards.
· System simulation: simulation models cannot accurately simulate operation unless times for all operations
are known.
Techniques to establish a standard time
The standard time can be determined using the following techniques:
1. Time study,
2. Predetermined motion time system aka PMTS or PTS,
3. Standard data system,
4. Work sampling.
Method of calculation
The Standard Time is the product of three factors:
1. Observed time: The time measured to complete the task.
2. Performance rating factor: The pace the person is working at. 90% is working slower than normal, 110%
is working faster than normal, 100% is normal. This factor is calculated by an experienced worker who is
trained to observe and determine the rating.
3. Personal, fatigue, and delay (PFD) allowance.
The standard time can then be calculated by using:
(STANDARD TIME ) = (OBSERVED TIME)(RATING FACTOR)(1+PFDALLOWANCE)
Work measurement:
Work measurement is the application of techniques designed to establish the time for a qualified worker to
carry out specified jobs at a defined level of performance or at a defined rate of working.
Problem statement –
To minimise cycle time at station no. 1 to 3.
Observations –
During observation period time taken for each operation was –
BEFORE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUGGESTIONS:
AT STATION NO . 2A & 2B
AT STATION NO . 3A & 3B
These observations were recorded for DV0 engine. Also it is seen that worker on station 1A has more
tasks to be done than worker at 1B. So, during extra operations other than 2 common operations, worker at 1B is
idle, due to which man power, cost & productivity decreases so the balancing of line should be done. So, idle time
per person should be reduced by proper management of the work.
V. SUGGESTIONS
Based on above observations following suggestions are suited for reduction of cycle time at station
no. 1 to 3.
ü For oil applying automated oil gun / oil brush can be used.
ü For zealac application solution gun can be used. Also during working on DV2 engine at first only 3
liners are to be applied by zealac & to be fitted & then rest can be fitted to ensure that zealac doesn’t set
before fitting liner.
ü For uniform pressure application on liner, instead of pressing mandrel automate pressure applying
m/c can be used.
ü For liner lifting crane fixture can be made. Since lifting of liner introduces fatigue to workers which
in turn reduces overall productivity.
ü Pulling of liner trolley near assembly station wastes time & manpower hence like other stations liner
sub-assembly trolley can be arranged near assembly station.
ü For picking up & pressing liner into cylinder creates operator fatigue & wastes time which can be
reduced by using suitable fixture & crane.
ü At the time of liner dropping on crank case necessary attention should be given. As the chances of
spoiling or breaking of O-ring are present, this may cause leakage problems.
ü Activity of stud fitment at station 3 should be arranged at station no.4.
ü There should be provision to place removed MB cap on 3A side.
Not all but some of the above suggestions can be employed in practice which will help to reduce
cycle time at station no. 1 to 3 by atleast 5 to 10 minutes.
Conclusion of case study 1
The total cycle time required at station no. 9 can be reduced by atleast 10 to15 minutes by employing
suggestions provided in above section. Also, two sub-assemblies can be done during other operations performed at
station no. 9.The fatigue of operator during operation at station no. 9 can be reduced.
VI. CASE STUDY 2
Company Name: Synergy Green Pvt. Ltd.,Kagal MIDC,Kolhapur
11.07 11.13 CORE BOX MOVEMENT to core making area OPERATING 0.06
MOVING
11.35 11.37 MOVING VACANT VACANT 0.02
12.18 12.22 Moving and placing core grid on bottom part OPERATING 0.04
12.22 12.27 Moving upper part of core making box OPERATING 0.05
MOVING
12.38 12.4 Moving Vacant VACANT 0.02
MOVING
12.52 12.54 Moving Vacant VACANT 0.02
TOTAL 01.57.00
TABLE NO. 2 ACTIVITY STUDY OF CRANE 202
Hence from above studies we got the UTILIZATION PATTERN for specific equipment that is
crane in this case study.
REFERENCES
[1] Ann Hendrich, Marilyn Chow, Boguslaw A. Skierczynski, Zhenqiang Lu A 36 – Hospital Time and Motion Study : How Do Medical
Surgical Nurses Spend Their Time. The Permanente Journal Summer, Vol 12 No.3. Pages25 – 34(2008).
[2] B. Kumar Industrial Engineering. Khanna Publishers, Delhi(1999).
[3] Brian Price Frank and Lillian Gibreth and the Manufacture and Marketing of Motion Study, 1908 – 1924. (1989).
[4] Fred E. Meyers Motion and Time Study – Improving Work Methods and Management. Prentice Hall Inc(1992).
[5] Grace Au, Ray J. Paul Visual Interactive Modelling : A Pictorial Simulation Specification System. European (1993).
[6] Jay Heizer and Barry “Operations Management” Eight Edition. Pearson Education Render (2006).
[7] Jeffrey S. Smith Survey on the Use of Simulation for Manufacturing System Design and Operation. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol.
22 / No 2 2003 Pages 157 – 171(2003).