Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

THE

STUDENT AND THE LAW

the never ending journey of learning the law

BANKING LAWS, CASE DIGESTS, MERCANTILE LAW

Sps. Lipana v. Development Bank of Rizal


(G.R. No. 73884)

0 Comments
Facts:

Petitioners opened and maintained both time and savings deposits with herein respondent bank.
Upon maturity of some of their time deposit certificates, petitioners were not able to cash them but
instead were issued a manager’s check which was dishonored upon presentment. Demands for the
payment of deposits having failed, petitioners moved for the issuance of a writ of preliminary
attachment for collection of a sum of money. Respondent Judge ordered the issuance of a writ and
later, rendered judgment in favor of petitioners. Meanwhile, the Monetary Board finding that
respondent bank was insolvent, decided to place it under receivership. Petitioners then moved for
the execution which was granted, but was subsequently stayed upon reconsideration. Petitioners
moved to lift the stay but were denied. Hence, the instant petition.

Issue:

Whether or not the stay of execution of judgment against a bank placed under receivership is
valid.

Ruling: YES.

In the instant case, the stay of the execution of judgment is warranted by the fact that respondent
bank was placed under receivership. To execute the judgment would unduly deplete the assets of
respondent bank to the obvious prejudice of other depositors and creditors, since, as aptly stated
in Central Bank of the Philippines vs. Morfe, after the Monetary Board has declared that a bank is
insolvent and has ordered it to cease operations, the Board becomes the trustee of its assets for the
equal benefit of all the creditors, including depositors. The assets of the insolvent banking
institution are held in trust for the equal benefit of all creditors, and after its insolvency, one
cannot obtain an advantage or a preference over another by an attachment, execution or otherwise.

The instant petition is hereby DISMISSED.


ATTACHMENT EXECUTION G.R. NO. 73884 RECEIVERSHIP SPS. LIPANA V. DEVELOPMENT BANK OF RIZAL
© 2019 THE STUDENT AND THE LAW

BLOG AT WORDPRESS.COM.

You might also like