Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oxford University Press The American Journal of Comparative Law
Oxford University Press The American Journal of Comparative Law
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Oxford University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to The American Journal of Comparative Law
This content downloaded from 121.52.157.110 on Sun, 16 Jun 2019 11:00:07 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
BOOK NOTICES 629
This content downloaded from 121.52.157.110 on Sun, 16 Jun 2019 11:00:07 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
630 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW
tries in any detail, its value is at once vard University Press, 1957. Pp. xxi,
evident. The approach here is topical 278.
and comparative, rather than country- In this collection of eleven opinions
by-country. A geographical founda- and accompanying commentary, the
tion is first laid, with some of the personal attributes of Mr. Justice
facts of the peoples, land, and re- Brandeis made most manifest are his
sources considered. Then follows a dedication to thoroughness and pre-
series of chapters dealing with the cision, as demonstrated in his opin-
colonial institutions of Spain and ion in Shafer v. Farmers Grain Com-
Portugal and the struggles for inde- pany, where he analyzed the grain
pendence that gave rise to national industry in indescribable detail in
diversity and the quest, not always support of his reluctance to restrict
successful, for identity and stability. state regulatory power; his hostility
The major portion of the remainder to giantism, as shown in his view
of the book is concerned with gov- in Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern
ernmental and constitutional develop- Railway, where he termed a tax for
ments and provisions on a formal the privilege of doing business a mere
level, although with a record of 202 measure of the price of the favor,
different constitutions between 1811 and not, as held by the Court, an
and 1953 among the twenty republics unconstitutional interference with
considered, some of the fictions have commerce; his preoccupation with
necessarily been discarded for the procedural niceties, as evinced in St.
sake of brevity and reality. Chapters Louis, Iron Mountain and Southern
dealing with individual rights, the Railway v. Starbird, where he opined
executive, the legislature, the admin- that the parties, because of a failure
istration of justice, local government, to assert federal law in the state
parties and elections, labor, education, court, had waived a right to appeal
and the economy set forth something to the Supreme Court; his liberal out-
of the basic tenets of the bodies of look and identification with the "peo-
fundamental law, together with en- ple," displayed in the Arizona Em-
lightening interpretative comment ployers' Liability Cases opinion that
that plausibly accounts for the dis- upheld the constitutionality of a
parity between achievement and pro- statute that created employer lia-
fessions. Latin America's relations bility without fault and permitted a
choice of remedy by the employee;
with the rest of the world and the
and his belief in judicial self-restraint,
United States are treated in the final
exhibited in such cases as Atherton
two chapters, by which time an ap-
Mills v. Johnston, Sonneborn Bros.
preciation of some of this area's spe-
v. Cureton, and Railroad Commis-
cial problems and heritage will have
sion v. Southern Pacific Railway, in
been had. Reflecting in large measure
each of which he declined to coun-
an indisputably valid Latin-Ameri-
termand the legislative will. Brandeis'
can point of view, and incorporating
awareness in the realm of policy is
a valuable bibliography of primary similarly inferable from his opinion
sources and a glossary of terms that in the famous antitrust decision in-
throughout the book contribute to its volving a union, United Mine
authenticity, this enriches further the Workers v. Coronado.
literature of political science and This book penetrates to a singular
Latin America. extent the inner life of the Supreme
HILLIARD A. GARDINER
Court during an age of conservatism.
A biographical appendix of the jus-
BICKELj A. M. The Unpublished Opin- tices who sat with Brandeis is an ad-
ions of Mr. Justice Brandeis. Cam- ditional interesting feature.
bridge: The Belknap Press of Har- HILLIARD A. GARDINER
This content downloaded from 121.52.157.110 on Sun, 16 Jun 2019 11:00:07 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms