Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    p1 p2 p3 p4 p5: SUS Calculation Participant q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6 q7 q8

    Uploaded by

    rizqi ar
    This document contains a table with participant IDs and their responses to 10 questions about a system's usability, as part of a System Usability Scale (SUS) calculation. It also includes interpretations of different SUS score ranges, with scores of 80.3 or higher meaning users highly rate the system's usability and will recommend it, scores around 68 meaning the system is okay but could be improved, and scores below 51 meaning usability needs to be prioritized and fixed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    p1 p2 p3 p4 p5: SUS Calculation Participant q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6 q7 q8

    Uploaded by

    rizqi ar
    11 views4 pages
    This document contains a table with participant IDs and their responses to 10 questions about a system's usability, as part of a System Usability Scale (SUS) calculation. It also includes interpretations of different SUS score ranges, with scores of 80.3 or higher meaning users highly rate the system's usability and will recommend it, scores around 68 meaning the system is okay but could be improved, and scores below 51 meaning usability needs to be prioritized and fixed.

    Original Description:

    usability analysis

    Original Title

    Sus Calculation

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains a table with participant IDs and their responses to 10 questions about a system's usability, as part of a System Usability Scale (SUS) calculation. It also includes interpretations of different SUS score ranges, with scores of 80.3 or higher meaning users highly rate the system's usability and will recommend it, scores around 68 meaning the system is okay but could be improved, and scores below 51 meaning usability needs to be prioritized and fixed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    11 views4 pages

    p1 p2 p3 p4 p5: SUS Calculation Participant q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6 q7 q8

    Uploaded by

    rizqi ar
    This document contains a table with participant IDs and their responses to 10 questions about a system's usability, as part of a System Usability Scale (SUS) calculation. It also includes interpretations of different SUS score ranges, with scores of 80.3 or higher meaning users highly rate the system's usability and will recommend it, scores around 68 meaning the system is okay but could be improved, and scores below 51 meaning usability needs to be prioritized and fixed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    SUS Calculation

    Participant q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6 q7 q8
    p1
    p2
    p3
    p4
    p5
    q= question- p = participant-

    q9 q10 SUS Score


    50.0 intrerpret score
    50.0 80.3-100
    50.0 68-80.2
    50.0 <51
    50.0
    is an A. People love your site and will recommend it to their friends
    a C. You are doing OK but could improve
    a big fat F. Make usability your priority now and fix this fast.
    80.3 or higher is an A. People love your site and will recommend it to their friends

    68 or thereabouts gets you a C. You are doing OK but could improve

    51 or under gets you a big fat F. Make usability your priority now and fix this fast.

    You might also like