Legal Notice From the petitioner

K. Chelladurai
659 Mahasakthi Nagar - 8th Street –
Sakkarakottai Ramanathapuram [Town ]
Tamilnadu - pin 623504 ph-9789378065 Petitioner
Mail- ramnaddurai@gmail.com [Party in person]

The address for service of all notices and processes to the petitioner, Stated below.

K.CHELLADURAI c/o SONNU, 180 -A- Hari Nagar, Ashram, New delhi -14

v/s

1-] Attorney General of India,

10 Moti Lal Nehru Marg, New Delhi. 110011 1 st Respondent

2-] The Registrar (GENARAL) High Court of Madras

Chennai - 104 -Tamilnadu 2nd Respondent

3-] The Secretary, State Human Rights Commission of Tamilnadu

143. P.S Kumarasamy Raja Salai, Greenways Road, Chennai – 28

3rd Respondent

4-] The Secretary, Tamilnadu State Legal Service Authority

North Fort Road, High Court, Chennai -104 Tamilnadu
4th Respondent
 -2-

5-] The Registrar, Principal District Court

Court Complex, Collectrate, Ramanathapuram,

Tamilnadu. Pin 623507 5th Respondent

6-] Mr.S.M.M Haja Mohaideen B.A B.L & Mr.S.M.M Pandhey Nivas

S/o Mohamed Ibrahim, Muslim Street, South Street

Kilakarai Town & Taluk, Ramanathapuram, [dist]

Tamilnadu. Pin 623517 6 th Respondent

7-] Mr. Noorul Ammen Power agent from Syed Aiysa Ummal

29. Middle Street, Kilakarai Town & Taluk

Ramanathapuram [dist]
Tamilnadu. Pin 623517 7 th Respondent

IN THE MATTER OF -

{The petitioner will be file Livelihood petition

u/art 32 of the Constitution of India}

{Description of documents relied upon petitioner witness from

Writ Appeal S.R. 16756 & 16758/2016 in the High Court of Madras,

related in the High Court of Madras Registrar Vigilance filed case

no ROC 707/2012/Vc, C.NO 30/2013, in the State Human Right

Commission of Tamilnadu case no 1355 of 2014 order dated on

06/05/2014 and Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority Case

No 446/2016 }
 -3-

Respected Sir
Through the columns of your esteemed attention it is informed that
I will file a suit before the Honorable Supreme Court under Art 32
for violation of his fundamental rights u/A 21 of the Constitution of
India:

The action of the Respondents is in violation of Art 21of the

Constitution {Non Protection of life and personal liberty} besides

also violating the principles of Natural Justice. Since the accused

persons are legal practitioners, they have been dragged on

inside the portion of setting aside order, with view to make

myself to obey and under such planning, in my Writ Appeal

S.R. 16756 & 16758/2016 in the High Court of Madras has not

been subjected to the list of hearing and on the other hand

the same has been kept in the level of S.R stage. since, the

documents submitted into court have not been protected by

the court, and by using the court, since my livelihood has

been damaged & vanished away, the petitioner has been

seeking lawful maintenance to him and by seeking such

reliefs he has been submitting this livelihood petition u/Art

32 of the constitution of India thereof;

 -4-

1-] Over the last seven years, the petitioner has sent lot of

complaints about “Advocate Temper with the Court Records” it

has been habitual offender crime from his own case bundles,

therefore the petitioner has filed his representation to the 2nd

respondent dated on 26/03/2013 & 14/06/2013 lodged his

complaints under Confidental and president of india on 17/10/2014

and 04/08/2014 but did not get any Hon'able reply & action till

date. As against the severe nature of complaint of this petitioner,

since there has been no any case has been filed against the

offenders, either under Administrative Penal Laws [or] under

Criminal Laws of the Country and therefore, the offenders are

freely roaming and they are let off Scot free and that be so, whether

the above type of offenders are above law? Further, when the very

case papers have been mis-used within the four walls of the Court,

without the knowledge of the Presiding Officer of the Court, and

that be so, although there is a Vigilant Officer (Regr. Vig), he is not

in a position to punish the erratic court staff, as well as the errant

criminal advocates, who have indulged in looting the case

properties of the petitioner herein. Therefore, the Petitioner by

loosing away his source of livelihood in the hands of the abvoee

said malpracticing personnels, he has been under very great

sufferances. That so, whether there is any chance to punish the

criminal elements or not?

 -5-

2-] That in the Petitioner’s case, the offenders are purely (1) Court Staff

and (2) Advocates (3) The case filed Land lord 6 & 7 respondent only, by

misusing then court records, without the knowledge of the Learned

Judge, in an illegal manner, the above said offenders have looted my

articles, valuables in his office and they have high handedly and

wrongly sent me to prison. Hence, in this connection, there has been a

complaint petition sent to the Registrar (Vigilance) High Court at

Chennai on 26.03.2013 & 14/06/2013 despite the same, since the

offenders have not yet been summoned before law. As against the

severe nature of complaint of this petitioner, since there has been no

any case has been filed against the offenders, either under

Administrative Penal Laws or under Criminal Laws of the Country and

therefore, the offenders are freely roaming and they are let off Scot free

and that be so, whether the above type of offenders are above law?

Further, when the very case papers have been mis-used within the four

walls of the Court, without the knowledge of the Presiding Officer of the

Court, and that be so, although there is a Vigilant Officer (Regr.

Vigilance), he is not in a position to punish the erratic court staff, as

well as the errant criminal advocates, who have indulged in looting the

case properties of the petitioner herein. Therefore,the Petitioner by

loosing away his source of livelihood in the hands of the above said

malpracticing personnels, he has been under very great sufferances.

That so, whether there is any chance to punsish the criminal elements

or not? Hence, the petitioner has lost his livelihood. Therefore, again

the petitioner has sought for the source of livelihood. By seeking such

reliefs, he has filed the writ petition under Art.32 of the Constitution of

India.
 -6-

3-] Hence, as against the court papers, when mishandlings are found, it

might have been done only at the instance of the concerned Court Staff,

who are in charge of the case bundles. But even after the “malpractices

and official irregularities” of he Curt staff, in collusion with fraudulent

advocates, have been earthed out and complaint to the Registrar (Vig)

what has promoted the Registrar (Vig), High Court, Chennai in not

taking penal action against the culprits concerned. Hence the 2nd

Respondent has been completely keeping silence over the same. The

other respondents in the above case have been mis-directing the

petitioner to contact the Registrar (Vigilance filed case no ROC

707/2012/Vc, C.NO 30/2013), High Court, who is the competent authority

to deal with the above said malpractices in the court case papers, for the

past 6 years, without replying or responding to the complaint of this

petitioner, he has been sleeping over the above complaint matter. Hence,

in the above critical circumstances, the petitioner has lost his peace of

mind, source of livelihood and consequently put to untold sufferings and

innumerable hardships. Hence, he find it very difficult to meet both

ends. Hence, in the above circumstances, the petitioner has been

praying for providing life source of livelihood to them, so that, the justice

could be met with. hence, this petition is filed by the petitioner herein.
 -7-

4-] The petitioner most humbly submits, that the 2nd respondent

herein had registered a case in ROC 707/2012/Vc, C.No 30/2013/Vc. the

facts of the case is that the petitioner, loses his movable/ immovable

assets which are to be kept in his office, in this connection of the matter

the petitioner under deprivation suffered by the rightful person giving

some grievance petition to the respondent for the remedy of the

livelihood under Article 21, the cost incurred by the petitioner, met

heavy damages and heavy loses arises to the petitioner. That is the relief

of livelihood claim by the petitioner under the constitution law of India.

Each and every complaint lodged by the petitioner, has been taken over

to be the Hon'able court and whereby, under proper sections of

offences, the complaints were sought to be registered and on which

what were the lawful acts and proceeding have been conducted by the

enquiry officer wanted to be known by the petitioner herein, the

investigation officer have immediate interests in identifying the

circumstances that led to the error, These interests, however, can be

quite divergent. Citing reasonable concerns over privilege and potential

for future litigation, the investigation officer go to great lengths to

protect information. They typically conduct an in-depth investigation to

assess the liability exposure to the organization and help mitigate any

future loss that may arise. Hence, this type of motivated trends has to

be changed and there must be “the motives of rendering justice” should

prevail there so that the “Holy power of justice should reach to the

hands of really affected & aggrieved persons” thereof, filed writ petition

which was S.R No 69937 and 69939/2015 on 18/11/2015 passed order

non maintainability.