Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development of Mobile-Based Formative Faculty Performance Evaluation of Occidental Mindoro State College
Development of Mobile-Based Formative Faculty Performance Evaluation of Occidental Mindoro State College
Development of Mobile-Based Formative Faculty Performance Evaluation of Occidental Mindoro State College
NIEPRAY R. MENDOZA
Part-time/Full-time Instructor
Rationale
Formative assessment often use by the faculty to conduct in-process evaluations on the
learning of their students. On the study conducted by Susono & Shimomura (2006), teachers
and students both gain advantage when formative assessment is used in evaluating the
performance of the teachers. With formative assessment, faculty can view the result of their
performance before the class ends. Chances for faculty improvement increase when immediate
feedback is given (Neal, 1988).
This general objective of this study is to develop a mobile based formative faculty
performance evaluation of Occidental Mindoro State College.
Project Design
The application provides an interface for faculty and students. The faculty can access
the evaluation result and criteria after they login. The students can evaluate the faculty also
after they successfully login.
Splash Screen
Home
Faculty Student
Login Login
Evaluation Evaluation
Evaluation
Result Criteria
Project Development
The study used Agile model for its project development. It consists of subsequent steps
namely: Planning, Requirement analysis, Designing, Execution, Testing and Evaluation,
Finalizing. These are the steps needed to undergone for the success of the project.
Execution
Testing &
Evaluation Designing
Requirement
Analysis
Planning Finalizing
Evaluation Procedures
1. Preliminary evaluation
a. The mobile application will undergo alpha-testing to ensure its quality and
to resolve the early encountered errors.
2. Project demonstration
a. The mobile application will be presented to the respondents of the study.
The proponents will invite the animal specialists from the Provincial
Veterinarian Office.
b. Demonstrate and allow them to operate the mobile application.
3. Final Evaluation
a. Evaluation instrument will be distributed among the selected respondents.
b. Ask the respondents to rate the mobile application based on the set of criteria
presented and to recommend suggestions or comments for further
enhancement of the system.
4. Statistical Treatment
a. Collect the graded evaluation instruments.
b. Tabulate, calculate and interpret the results using the five-point Likert scale.
Neal, J. (1988). Faculty Evaluation: Its Purposes and Effectiveness. ERIC Digest. ERIC
Clearinghouse on Higher Education Washington DC.
Unr.edu (2007). Academic Faculty Evaluation ToolKit. Retrieved January 28, 2019
https://www.unr.edu/Documents/administration-finance/hr/hr-faculty-
eval/AcademicFacultyEvaluationTOOLKIT.pdf
iNetTutor.com (2018). ). Mobile Based (Android, IOS) Faculty Evaluation with Online Admin
Panel. Retrieved January 28, 2019 https://www.inettutor.com/source-code/mobile-
based-android-ios-faculty-evaluation-with-online-admin-panel/
Trucano, M. (2014). Using mobile phones in data collection: Opportunities, issues and
challenges. Retrieved January 28, 2019, from
https://blogs.worldbank.org/edutech/using-mobile-phones-data-collection-
opportunities-issues-and-challenges