Observations in Criterion 2

Ite Parameter Observations of the Comets of the Institute

m s /sub- Visiting Team
no. parameter
s
2.1 Program Curriculum gaps are not NO,
Curriculu diligently identified. Curricular gaps are diligently identified; the
m Very generic observation POs and PSOs are adequately mapped and
2.1.1 is made. addressed through, enhancement learning
and skill development programs. Since we
are affiliated to State University, we have
little scope to bridge the curriculum gap
beyond the syllabus. However, efforts are
made to address this issue, as shown in table
(Reference: Table B.2.1.2e page 20)
2.1.2 Mapping is not justified NO,
with content beyond Content beyond the syllabus for
syllabus. enhancement of POs and PSOs are
appropriately mapped. The details of such
are available for the assessment period in
Table B.2.1.2a page No.20 to 28)
2.2.1 1) Class room 1) NO,
Teaching- teaching needs Class room teachings are made
Learning interaction with interactive by employing innovative
Processes students. method like through use of ICT,
Google class room, Demonstration of
Concepts, peer learning, mini
projects, simulation based
learning/self learning and online
quizzes. Details available in page no.
183 to 185.

2) NO, Every experiment is evaluated

2) Continuous based on the rubrics available in page
assessment of lab no. 101 to 106.
work is poor.
Files/ lab work
not evaluated on
regular basis.
Action taken not
supported by
documents.
2.2.2 Quality of question paper NO,
is average. CO coverage The internal assessment question papers are
in class test is hardly prepared by course coordinator inline with
 mapped. the COs defined by the course and also
providing due weightage for covering of
COs. The same is verified by the Module
coordinator and program the internals
coordinator before the conduction of internal.

NO,
Students are encouraged to take NPTEL,
Assignments are of MOOC online assignment, projects based
conventional nature; assignment are given for elective subjects.
hardly include design/
applications/ practice
cases.
2.2.3 No due diligence is NO,
applied while finalising The students are educated with regard to
the project title. thrust areas in finalizing the project title.
Well defined rubrics for projects are
followed throughout the project evaluation
process. Reference: page No. 61 & 101.

No prototypes. Prototypes were seen by expert committee

Paper published and Paper publications of the projects needs

awards are not worth to improvements.
mention.

2.2.4 No industry supported NO,

labs; A few training kits “Texas Instruments innovation lab” is an
from IT. Industry embedded system laboratory funded by
involvement is marginal; Texas Instruments. Development boards are
impact analysis and used by faculty and students for projects. The
action taken there upon details are listed in page no. 223.
not supported by
documents. Industry specific VLSI training in
association with Technocarve solutions
MOUs signed with various industries.
2.2.5 Now course curriculum For academic year 2017-18, the internship
effective form 2017-18 was optional. However, the students have
has internship of 4 week done internships in the industry leading to
in 8th sem. Student their final year projects. The evaluation of
feedback and impact the project is done in spirit.
analysis is not being
implemented in letter and
spirit.