Comparative Study of Web 1.

0,
Web 2.0 and Web 3.0
by
UMESHA NAIK
Lecturer
Department of Library and Information Science
Mangalore University
Mangalagangothri 574 199
umeshai@yahoo.com

and
D. SHIVALINGAIAH
Professor
Department of Library and Information Science
Mangalore University
Mangalagangothri 574 199
d_shivaling@yahoo.com
 Introduction
Application Programming Interface
User views web pages
1989 - Sir Tim Berners-Lee,
Web 1.0 - Netscape
Web 2.0 – It is not the software that
enables the web
Web 3.0 - more intelligent and
microcontent
 Web 1.0

 First implementation of the web

 Small number of writers and large
number of User / readers
 Hypertext documents accessed via the
Internet.
 Berners-Lee - read-only web
 Web 2.0
Read-write
Berners-Lee's method
Technologies such as weblogs (blogs),
social book marking, wikis, podcasts, RSS
feeds. social software, web APIs, and online
web services- eBay and Gmail.
Tim O’Reilly popularized web 2.0
web 2.0 services are expected to replace
desktop computing applications for many
purposes
 Audio
Web 2.0 Website Types
 BlogPod  Filesharing
 Blogging  Forums
 Book marking  Games
 Calendars  Images
 Chats  Knowledge Base
 Collaboration  Lists
 Communication  Mapping
 Community  Mashups
 
CRM (Customer Relationship Management) Multi-media
 E-commerce  Portals
 E-learning  RSS (Rich Site Summary)
 E-mail  Wiki
 Web 3.0
 Read-write-execute
 Web into a database
 High quality content & services produced
 Multiple non-browser applications
 Artificial intelligence technologies
 The Semantic web, the Geospatial Web, or
the 3D web
 Tim Berners-Lee coined Giant Global
Graph (GGG) as another facet of Web 3.0
 Web 2.0 based websites
 Flickr
 Orkut
 YouTube
 Blogs
 Google AD sense
 Wikipedia
 Scribd
Comparison between web 1.0,
web 2.0 and web 3.0
Web 1.0 Web 2.0 Web 3.0

1996 2006 2016

The Web The Social Web The Semantic Web

Tim Berners Tim O'Reilly Sir Tim Berners Lee

Lee
Read only web Read and write Read, write and
web execute web
Information Interaction Immersion.
sharing
Million of users Billion of users Trillion of users
Ecosystem Participation Understanding
itself
Connect Connect people Connect
information knowledge
Brain and Eyes Brain, Eyes, Ears, Brain, Eyes, Ears,
(= Information) Voice and Heart Voice, Heart,
(= Passion) Arms and Legs
(= Freedom
The The Community The Semantic
Hypertext/CGI Web (for people: Web (for
Web. (the apps/sites machines).
basics) connecting them).
Companies People publish People build
publish content that other applications that
content people can other people can
that people consume, interact with,
consume companies build companies build
(e.g. CNN) platforms that let platforms that let
people publish people publish
content for other services by
people (e.g. Flickr, leveraging the
YouTube, Adsense, associations between
Wikipedia, people or special
Blogger, MySpace, content (e.g.
RSS, Digg) FaceBook, Google
Maps, My Yahoo!)
Pushed web, Two way web 3D portals, avtar
text/graphics pages, Wikis, representation,
based flash video, pod casts, Interoperable profits,
shading, multi-user virtual
Personal environment
publishing, 2D (MUVEs), Integrated
portals games, education and
business, all media
flows in and out of
virtual Web worlds
Companies People publish People build
publish content that other applications that
content that people can other people can
people consume, interact with,
consume (e.g. companies build companies build
CNN) platforms that let platforms that let
people publish people publish
content for other services (e.g.
people (e.g. Flickr, FaceBook,
YouTube, Adsense, Google Maps,
Wikipedia, Blogger, My Yahoo!)
MySpace, RSS,
Digg)
SE retrieve macro SE retrieve tags SE will
contents. Search with micro hopefully
is very fast but contents. Tags retrieve micro
many times everything: content texts
results are pictures, links, which were
inaccurate or events, news, tagged
more than users Blogs, audio, automatically.
can chew. video, and so on. Billions of
Google Base Web 1.0 macro
even retrieves contents into
micro content micro contents.
texts.
Web 1.0 was all Web 2.0 is more Web 3.0 is
about static about 2 way curiusly
content, one communication undefined. AI and
way publishing through social the web learning
of content networking, what you want
without any real blogging, wikis, and delivering
interaction tagging, user you a
between readers generated content personalized web
or publishers or and video. experience.
each other.
The web in the New advances Thought to be the
beginning when that allow a much future - where the
it was first more web is more
developing web sophisticated user interactive with
1.0 interaction with users, leading to a
web pages – kind of artificial
citizen intelligence web
journalism, social 3.0
networks and
Wikis are all
products of Web
2.0
Personal web Blogs Semantic Blogs:
sites SemiBlog, Haystack,
Semblog, Structured
Blogging
Content Wikis, Semantic Wikis:
Management Wikipedia Semantic MediaWiki,
system SemperWiki, Platypus,
dbpedia, Rhizome

AltaVista, Google Semantic Search:

Google personalized, SWSE, Swoogle,
DumpFind, Intellidimension
(Search Engine for Semantic Web)
Hakia
Citeseer, Google Semantic Digital
Project scholar, Book Libraries: JeromDl,
Gutenberg search BRICKS, Longwell
(Building Resources for Integrated
Cultural Knowledge Services)

Message Community Semantic Forums and

boards portals community portals:
SIOC, OpenLink
DataSpaces
(Semantically-Interlinked Online
Communities)

Buddy Lists, Online social Semantic Social

Address book networks Networks: FOAF,
(Friend of a friend)
People Aggregator
 Conclusion
Web offers so many opportunities

Semantic Web (Web 3.0) promises to

“organize the world’s information”

Web 2.0 are far-reaching- socially, culturally,

and even politically.

Designers and developers

Different forms of language

THANK YOU