Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Crosstab Dila

    Uploaded by

    Adila Yuliani
    5 views3 pages
    This document contains a summary of a crosstab analysis examining the relationship between family support (dukungan keluarga) and compliance (kepatuhan). The analysis found that 84.2% of respondents with good family support were compliant, compared to only 27.8% of those with poor family support. A chi-square test revealed a statistically significant association between the variables (p=0.001). Respondents with good family support had nearly 14 times higher odds of compliance compared to those with poor support.

    Original Description:

    crosstab

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains a summary of a crosstab analysis examining the relationship between family support (dukungan keluarga) and compliance (kepatuhan). The analysis found that 84.2% of respondents with good family support were compliant, compared to only 27.8% of those with poor family support. A chi-square test revealed a statistically significant association between the variables (p=0.001). Respondents with good family support had nearly 14 times higher odds of compliance compared to those with poor support.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    5 views3 pages

    Crosstab Dila

    Uploaded by

    Adila Yuliani
    This document contains a summary of a crosstab analysis examining the relationship between family support (dukungan keluarga) and compliance (kepatuhan). The analysis found that 84.2% of respondents with good family support were compliant, compared to only 27.8% of those with poor family support. A chi-square test revealed a statistically significant association between the variables (p=0.001). Respondents with good family support had nearly 14 times higher odds of compliance compared to those with poor support.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Crosstabs

    Notes

    Output Created 16-JAN-2019 18:22:18


    Comments
    Input Data D:\statistik dila.sav
    Active Dataset DataSet0
    Filter <none>
    Weight <none>
    Split File <none>
    N of Rows in Working Data
    37
    File
    Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are
    treated as missing.
    Cases Used Statistics for each table are based on
    all the cases with valid data in the
    specified range(s) for all variables in
    each table.
    Syntax CROSSTABS
    /TABLES=dkgklg BY kepat
    /FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
    /STATISTICS=CHISQ CORR RISK
    /CELLS=COUNT EXPECTED ROW
    /COUNT ROUND CELL.
    Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00

    Elapsed Time 00:00:00.08

    Dimensions Requested 2

    Cells Available 174734

    Case Processing Summary

    Cases

    Valid Missing Total

    N Percent N Percent N Percent

    dukungan keluarga *
    37 100,0% 0 0,0% 37 100,0%
    kepatuhan
    dukungan keluarga * kepatuhan Crosstabulation

    kepatuhan

    patuh tidak patuh Total

    dukungan keluarga baik Count 16 3 19

    Expected Count 10,8 8,2 19,0

    % within dukungan keluarga 84,2% 15,8% 100,0%

    buruk Count 5 13 18

    Expected Count 10,2 7,8 18,0

    % within dukungan keluarga 27,8% 72,2% 100,0%


    Total Count 21 16 37

    Expected Count 21,0 16,0 37,0

    % within dukungan keluarga 56,8% 43,2% 100,0%

    Chi-Square Tests

    Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


    Value df sided) sided) sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 11,994a 1 ,001


    b
    Continuity Correction 9,805 1 ,002
    Likelihood Ratio 12,771 1 ,000
    Fisher's Exact Test ,001 ,001
    Linear-by-Linear Association 11,669 1 ,001
    N of Valid Cases 37

    a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,78.
    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

    Symmetric Measures

    Asymp. Std.
    Value Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

    Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,569 ,134 4,097 ,000c


    Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,569 ,134 4,097 ,000c
    N of Valid Cases 37

    a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


    b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
    c. Based on normal approximation.
    Risk Estimate

    95% Confidence Interval

    Value Lower Upper

    Odds Ratio for dukungan keluarga (baik /


    13,867 2,778 69,206
    buruk)
    For cohort kepatuhan = patuh
    3,032 1,404 6,547

    For cohort kepatuhan = tidak patuh


    ,219 ,074 ,642

    N of Valid Cases 37

    You might also like