Gonzales, Alyssa Myan A.
Guleng, Alyssa Gellen A.


Lapidario, NicoleQuimson, Darlene Faye

Data No. 1
a.
 H0= There is no correlation between the weight and glucose of the patients.

Hα= There is a correlation between the weight and glucose of the patients.

b.
 Level of significance: α=0.
05
c.
 Test statistics: t-statistic
d.
 Critical Region:
If p-value is less than α, reject H0.

If p-value is greater than α, do not reject H0.

e. Stata Output:
f.
 Statistical Decision: Since p-value is greater than α=0.
05, we accept the H0.

g.
 Conclusion: Thus, weight and glucose of the patients have no linear correlation.

A.
 What is the predicted glucose level for a man who weighs 95 kg?
GIVEN:
Β1= 0.
51
Β0= 61.
88
X= 95 kg
Yglucose = ?
SOLUTION:
Y = Β1X + Β0
Y = 0.
51(95) + 61.
88
Y = 110.33 mg/100mL
Data No.2
Alpha = 0.
05
a.
 Null Hypo= There is no correlation or linear relationship between IgE and Skin test
Alternative Hypo = There is correlation/ linear relationship between IgE and Skin Test
b.
 Level of significance: alpha= 0.
05
c.
 Test statistics: T-statistics
d.
 Critical Region: If p-value is less than alpha, reject null hypothesis.

If p-value is greater than alpha, do not reject null hypothesis
e.
 Stata Output:

f.
 Statistical Decision: P-value of 0.
0973 is greater than alpha of 0.
05, do not reject null
hypothesis.

g.
 Conclusion: Thus, Ig E and Skin Test do not have linear relationship.

h.
 Linear2regression
between variables.
 model and interpretation: Not applicable, there is no relationship
Data No.3
Alpha = 0.
05
a.
 Null Hypo= There is no correlation or linear relationship between Dosage and AZT
Concentration
Alternative Hypo = There is correlation/ linear relationship between Dosage and AZT
Concentration
b.
 Level of significance: alpha= 0.
05
c.
 Test statistics: T-statistics
d.
 Critical Region: If p-value is less than alpha, reject null hypothesis.

If p-value is greater than alpha, do not reject null hypothesis
e.
 Stata Output:

f.
 Statistical Decision:
P-value of 0.
0000 is less than the alpha of 0.
05, reject null hypothesis.

g.
 Conclusion:
dosage is a goodThus,
species).
 Dosage
predictor and Concentration
of AZT AZT Concentration have
among a strong
maternal linear
and fetalrelationship,
baboon (Papioi.
e.

h.
 Linear Regression model and interpretation:
R-squared= 0.
7213 = 72.
13%
72.
13% of the total variability in AZT Concentration can be explained by dosage.

In every unit increase in dosage there is a 0.
0022 ng/mL increase in AZT Concentration.