Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chlor PDF
Chlor PDF
Abstract: Regular coffee consumption significantly lowers the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Coffee contains thousands of
compounds; however, the specific component(s) responsible for this reduced risk is unknown. Chlorogenic acids (CGA)
found in brewed coffee inhibit intestinal glucose uptake in vitro. The objective of this study was to elucidate the mecha-
nisms by which CGA acts to mediate blood glucose response in vivo. Conscious, unrestrained, male Sprague–Dawley rats
were chronically catheterized and gavage-fed a standardized meal (59% carbohydrate, 25% fat, 12% protein), administered
with or without CGA (120 mg·kg–1), in a randomized crossover design separated by a 3-day washout period. Acetamino-
phen was co-administered to assess the effects of CGA on gastric emptying. The incretins glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)
and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) were measured. GLP-1 response in the presence of glucose and CGA
was further examined, using the human colon cell line NCI-H716. Total area under the curve (AUC) for blood glucose was
significantly attenuated in rats fed CGA (p < 0.05). Despite this, no differences in plasma insulin or nonesterified fatty acids
were observed, and gastric emptying was not altered. Plasma GIP response was blunted in rats fed CGA, with a lower peak
concentration and AUC up to 180 min postprandially (p < 0.05). There were no changes in GLP-1 secretion in either the in
vivo or in vitro study. In conclusion, CGA treatment resulted in beneficial effects on blood glucose response, with altera-
For personal use only.
tions seen in GIP concentrations. Given the widespread consumption and availability of coffee, CGA may be a viable pre-
vention tool for T2D.
Key words: Coffee, chlorogenic acid, blood glucose, type 2 diabetes, GIP, GLP-1, incretins.
Résumé : La consommation régulière de café diminue significativement le risque de diabète de type 2 (T2D). On ne connaît
pas le constituant spécifique responsable de la diminution du risque parmi les milliers de constituants contenus dans le café.
L’acide chlorogénique (CGA) présent dans le café infusé inhibe la captation intestinale du glucose in vitro. Cette étude se
propose d’élucider le mécanisme par lequel le CGA intervient dans la réponse du glucose sanguin in vivo. On insère de fa-
çon chronique un cathéter à des rats Sprague–Dawley conscients et sans restriction puis on leur donne par gavage un repas
standard (59 % de sucres, 25 % de gras, 12 % de protéines), avec ou sans CGA (120 mg·kg–1), en se conformant à un devis
aléatoire contrebalancé; entre les traitements, on compte 3 jours d’élimination. En même temps, on administre de l’acétami-
nophène afin d’évaluer les effets du CGA sur la vidange gastrique. On évalue les concentrations des incrétines GLP-1 (pep-
tide-1 semblable au glucagon) et GIP (peptide insulinotrope dépendant du glucose). On étudie plus à fond la réponse du
GLP-1 en présence du glucose et de CGA par l’analyse de la lignée cellulaire NCI-H716. Chez les rats ayant reçu du CGA,
on observe une diminution significative de la surface totale sous la courbe (AUC) de glucose (p < 0,05). Toutefois, on n’ob-
serve aucune différence des concentrations plasmatiques d’insuline et d’acides gras libres; la vidange gastrique n’est pas mo-
difiée. La réponse plasmatique du GIP est émoussée chez les rats ayant reçu du CGA; jusqu’à 180 min après le repas, on
observe une concentration de pointe plus faible et une plus petite AUC (p < 0,05). On n’observe aucune variation de la sé-
crétion de GLP-1 dans les conditions in vivo et in vitro de l’étude. En conclusion, le traitement au CGA procure des effets
bénéfiques sur la réponse sanguine du glucose et sur les modifications des concentrations de GIP. Du fait de la consomma-
tion généralisée et de la disponibilité du café, le CGA apparaît comme un outil de prévention viable du T2D.
Mots‐clés : café, acide chlorogénique, glucose sanguin, diabète de type 2, GIP, GLP-1, incrétines.
[Traduit par la Rédaction]
Received 29 April 2011. Accepted 6 June 2011. Published at www.nrcresearchpress.com/apnm on 6 October 2011.
J.M. Tunnicliffe. Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
L.K. Eller. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4,
Canada.
R.A. Reimer, D.S. Hittel, and J. Shearer. Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada; Department of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Corresponding author: Jasmine Tunnicliffe (e-mail: jmtunnic@ucalgary.ca).
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 36: 650–659 (2011) doi:10.1139/H11-072 Published by NRC Research Press
Tunnicliffe et al. 651
Introduction lower the rate of GIP secretion while increasing GLP-1, ow-
ing to sustained glucose presence in the intestine. Johnston
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is rapidly rising in prevalence. and colleagues (2003) have shown both caffeinated and non-
Characterized by either inadequate insulin production or the caffeinated coffee ingestion to reduce GIP, and decaffeinated
inability to utilize insulin produced, T2D results in elevated coffee to enhance GLP-1 response following a 25 g oral glu-
blood glucose levels (Reaven 1993). Epidemiological studies cose tolerance test in human subjects. Greenberg et al. (2009)
show decaffeinated and caffeinated coffee consumption to be also found GIP to be lower after decaffeinated coffee con-
correlated to reduced risk of T2D in a dose-dependent man- sumption. Coffee consumed prior to nutrient intake may not
ner (Higdon and Frei 2006; Salazar-Martinez et al. 2004; produce the same effect, as neither decaffeinated coffee nor
Soriguer et al. 2004; Yamaji et al. 2004). A systematic re- CGA consumed 30 min before an oral glucose tolerance test
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIV CALGARY on 05/19/15
Table 1. Oral gavage composition. Ku, Osaka, Japan). Acetaminophen levels were determined
using Acetaminophen-SL Assay (Diagnostic Chemicals Lim-
Ingredient g·100 g–1 % kcal
ited, Charlottetown, P.E.I., Canada).
Corn starch 32.41 29.40
Sucrose 29.79 30.03 Cell model
Protein (casein) 13.58 12.32
The NCI-H716 cell line is an enteroendocrine L-cell line
Lard 4.85 11.00
derived from a poorly differentiated human colon adenocarci-
Soybean oil 6.79 15.40
noma; it has been shown to secrete GLP-1 in a regulated
Dyetrose 4.85 0.00
manner (Park et al. 1987). Methods were adapted from Re-
AIN-93M Mineral Mix 3.39 0.72
imer and colleagues (2001). Briefly, identical cell culture
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIV CALGARY on 05/19/15
flushed with heparinized saline (10 U heparin·mL–1) between inson, Franklin Lakes, N.J., USA) to induce endocrine differ-
blood draws to prevent clotting. Baseline blood was collected entiation for GLP-1 secretion (de Bruïne et al. 1993). Media
∼5 min before oral gavage. On each experiment day, rats was simultaneously changed to low-glucose Dulbecco’s
were weighed and a meal dose (4 g·kg–1 body weight (BW)) modified Eagle’s medium (Life Technologies), supplemented
was calculated for the meal tolerance test. The oral gavage with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mmol·L–1 L-glutamine, 100
consisted of 59% carbohydrate, 25% fat, and 12% protein IU·mL–1 penicillin, and 100 µg·mL–1 streptomycin, as de-
(Table 1), with a dry food (1 g)/water ratio of 1.5 mL. Acet- scribed above. Cells were washed, and the differentiation
aminophen (124 mg·kg–1 BW) was added to the mixture to media was replaced with Krebs–Ringer bicarbonate buffer,
track the rate of gastric emptying, as it is minimally absorbed containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin. CGA was added to
in the stomach and rapidly absorbed in the small intestine, the Krebs–Ringer bicarbonate buffer solution, and the pH
and does not require the removal of the stomach for analysis was adjusted to 7.2 with NaOH. Cells were incubated in
(Hatanaka et al. 1994; Porsgaard et al. 2003). Blood was col- six 12-well plates, with treatments in duplicate, of control
lected at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min after meal in- (no test agents, no glucose), positive control (2% meat hy-
gestion. For animals receiving CGA, the meal contained drosylate), and either 100 mmol·L–1 5-CGA with various
120 mg·kg–1 BW CGA (Sigma–Aldrich Canada, Oakville, concentrations of glucose or 5% glucose with various con-
Ont., Canada). centrations of 5-CGA. After the 2 h incubation period,
supernatants and cells were collected separately. Superna-
Plasma measurements tants were removed, and 50 mg·mL–1 anti-protease phenyl-
At each time point, blood glucose was measured with a methylsulfonyl fluoride (Sigma), with 2 µL·mL–1 DPP-IV
whole blood glucose monitor (OneTouch Ultra 2, Milpitas, inhibitor Diprotin A (Calbiochem, Gibbstown, N.J.), was
Calif., USA). Additional samples were collected in a chilled added to the collection to prevent GLP-1 degradation. Cells
EDTA-coated tube, containing 1 µL Diprotin A, a dipeptidyl were scraped with lysis buffer, containing 50 mg·mL–1
peptidase-IV inhibitor to prevent GLP-1 and GIP degradation phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 2 µL·mL–1 Diprotin A.
(Balkan et al. 1999). Immediately after collection, plasma Both cells and supernatants were stored at –80 °C until
was separated by centrifugation and stored at –80 °C until analysis. GLP-1 was measured using the GLP-1 (7–36) Ac-
analysis. Analysis of insulin and total GIP was carried out tive RIA kit (Linco Research, St. Charles, Mo., USA) assay
using the Rat Gut Hormone Panel LINCOplex Kit (Millipore after 10-fold dilution of both cells and supernatants.
Corporation, Billerica, Mass., USA). Samples of plasma
(12.5 mL) were analyzed using antibody-immobilized beads Statistical analysis
specific for these 2 hormones. Analysis of hormone concen- In each of the CGA and no-CGA treatments, differences
tration was determined using Luminex100 (Luminex Corpora- between baseline body mass and blood glucose, GIP, GLP-1,
tion Inc., Austin, Tex.). Active GLP-1 was quantified using insulin, NEFA, and acetaminophen were calculated by sub-
the Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (Active) ELISA kit (Millipore tracting baseline values from the intervention values (Sigma-
Corporation). Nonesterified free fatty acids (NEFA) were Stat for Windows, version 3.5, San Jose, Calif., USA). Total
measured using HR Series NEFA-HR (2) kit (Wako, Chuo- area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using the trape-
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of rats fed placebo or CGA. Fig. 1. Blood glucose in response to mixed-meal gavage with or
without chlorogenic acid (CGA). Results represent the mean ± SE,
Characteristic Placebo CGA
n = 12. *, Significant difference between placebo and CGA at
Body weight, g 266.80±4.90 264.90±4.70 60 min (p = 0.024).
Fasting NEFA, mmol·L–1 0.65±0.04 0.59±0.04
Fasting glucose, mmol·L–1 5.46±0.24 5.18±0.19
Fasting insulin, pg·mL–1 347.50±47.30 364.40±73.40 10 CGA
Fasting GIP, pg·mL–1 51.70±8.30 60.00±4.10
Fasting GLP-1, pmol·L–1 6.06±1.02 5.64±0.93 Placebo
blood samples were obtained from the arterial blood catheter. Data repre-
sent means ± SE, n = 12. There were no significant differences. GIP, glu-
Results
In vivo rat feeding study 5
Baseline measurements
For personal use only.
Table 3. Total area under the curve (AUC) for blood glucose, plasma insulin, NEFA, GIP, GLP-1, and
acetaminophen in rats fed placebo or CGA in a mixed meal.
Note: Data represent mean ± SE, n = 12. Differences are considered statistically significant if p < 0.05.
Fig. 2. Plasma glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), insulin, and nonesterified free fatty acid
(NEFA) in rats fed placebo or CGA with a mixed meal. (A) Plasma GIP response; (B) plasma insulin response; (C) plasma GLP-1 response;
(D) plasma NEFA response. Results represent the mean ± SE, n = 12. *, Difference between placebo and CGA at 30 min (p = 0.036) and
60 min (p = 0.006).
400 1400 B
A
CGA CGA
*
* 1200 Placebo
Placebo
300
1000
800
200
For personal use only.
600
400
100
200
0 0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Time (min) Time (min)
8 1.0
C D
7
Plasma NEFA (mmol·L–1)
0.8
6
Plasma GLP-1 (pmol·L–1 )
5
0.6
3 0.4
CGA
2 CGA Placebo
0.2
Placebo
1
0 0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Time (min) Time (min)
Fig. 3. Blood acetaminophen as a measure of gastric emptying in not been considered in previous studies. In addition, data on
response to mixed-meal gavage with or without CGA. Results repre- polyphenolic intake and gastric emptying are scarce, with one
sent the mean ± SE, n = 12. No significant differences between study finding that ferulic acid, another coffee-related com-
treatments were found. pound, increases the rate of gastric emptying and gastrointes-
60 tinal transit time (Badary et al. 2006). Acetaminophen
administration allows for indirect measure of gastric empty-
CGA
ing, as it is not absorbed in the stomach but is rapidly ab-
50 Placebo sorbed in the small intestine (Hatanaka et al. 1994;
Plasma Acetaminophen (µg·mL –1)
sence or presence of CGA, rather than to alterations in nu- intake of CGA lowers glucose absorption when consumed
trient arrival to the gut. with or close to a meal, reducing the risk of T2D. To exam-
ine the mechanism by which CGA administration lowers
NCI-H716 in vitro study blood glucose response, the incretin hormones GIP and
GLP-1 were assessed. Previous work on the impact of coffee
GLP-1 secretion on these hormones in humans has shown variable results
This experiment indirectly explored the ability of CGA to (Greenberg et al. 2009; Johnston et al. 2003; Olthof et al.
inhibit glucose uptake by measuring GLP-1 secretion without 2011). The lack of consistent findings may stem from indi-
the confounding effect of altered GIP levels. Meat hydrosy- vidual variability, a factor that was minimized with the use
late was used as a positive control, as it has previously been of an isolated coffee component in an animal model in the
shown to promote GLP-1 secretion (Reimer et al. 2001). Our our study.
results corroborate this finding; meat hydrosylate signifi- We observed a large reduction in GIP secretion with CGA
cantly increased GLP-1 secretion, compared with control administration. Conversely, no differences were observed for
(p < 0.05). CGA had no effect on GLP-1 secretion, regard- GLP-1. The reduction in GIP may be one factor that ex-
less of the concentration tested or the amount of glucose plains, in part, the attenuated blood glucose rise observed in
present (Figs. 4A and B). our study with CGA administration. Johnston et al. (2003)
also noted a decrease in GIP and blood glucose following de-
caffeinated coffee consumption by human subjects, compared
Discussion
with controls, following an oral glucose tolerance test. How-
Although the protective effect of coffee on the develop- ever, a subsequent study administering decaffeinated coffee
ment of T2D is well established, the mechanism of action failed to observe differential changes in glucose and insulin
has not been clarified. This study examined the role of levels, compared with placebo, despite a lower total GIP re-
CGA, the main polyphenol found in coffee, in altering glu- sponse (Greenberg et al. 2009). Additionally, the results of
cose concentration and incretin response. Employing a con- this study show no effect of GIP on NEFA levels following
scious animal model, we show that oral CGA (120 mg·kg–1) a meal. It has been speculated that GIP plays a role in post-
intake in combination with a mixed meal has a negligible im- prandial regulation of triglycerides via adipocytes; however,
pact on the rate of gastric emptying, attenuates postprandial no direct effects of GIP on NEFA concentration have been
blood glucose levels with no corresponding decrease in insu- found in humans (Asmar et al. 2010).
lin response, and alters GIP but not GLP-1 secretion in rats. Results of incretin analysis demonstrated an expected de-
Additionally, we found no alteration in GLP-1 release in crease in GIP secretion, whereas no increase in GLP-1 secre-
NCI-H716 colon cells incubated with CGA with or without tion with CGA administration was observed. GLP-1
glucose. production and secretion is chiefly located in distal segments
To understand the mechanisms by which CGA mediates of the gut, as opposed to the more proximal production of
blood glucose response, gastric emptying was evaluated. The GIP (Baggio and Drucker 2007). Although reduced glucose
possibility that CGA delays the rate of gastric emptying has absorption in the proximal gut could result in increased glu-
Fig. 4. (A) Cells incubated with 10–4 mol·L–1 CGA and varying concentrations of glucose for 2 h. (B) Cells incubated with 5% glucose and
varying concentrations of CGA for 2 h. Values shown are means ± SE, expressed as a percentage of control (0 mol·L–1 CGA, 0% glucose).
MH, meat hydrosylate. *, p < 0.05 vs. other treatment groups.
400 A *
GLP-1 secretion (% control)
300
200
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIV CALGARY on 05/19/15
100
0
Control MH 0% glucose 2% glucose 5% glucose 10% glucose
700
600
500
400
300
200
For personal use only.
100
0
Control MH 0 mol·L–1 10–5 mol·L–1 10–4 mol·L–1 10–3 mol·L–1
CGA CGA CGA CGA
5% glucose
cose presence further down in the lumen, nearly all sugars in humans, which showed no differences in insulin AUC
are absorbed in the upper small intestine (Wright et al. after caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee consumption, despite
2003). An increase in glucose presence in the duodenum and differences in GIP levels (Johnston et al. 2003). In contrast,
jejunum may, therefore, not cause a corresponding increase the recent finding that decaffeinated coffee intake was posi-
in GLP-1. Additionally, GIP stimulates GLP-1 secretion (Ro- tively associated with acute insulin response was not sup-
berge and Brubaker 1993); therefore, a reduction in GIP se- ported by our results; however, that was a cross-sectional
cretion following CGA treatment could counteract any study in which neither volume nor timing of coffee ingestion
potential increase in GLP-1. To further explore the role of was recorded (Loopstra-Masters et al. 2011). Insulin is se-
GLP-1 with CGA, a cell line was employed. NCI-H716 cells creted by pancreatic b-cells in response to elevated blood
incubated with CGA showed no alteration in GLP-1 secre- glucose; incretins are thought to be responsible for 50%–70%
tion, even among different glucose concentrations. This is in of the insulin response following a meal (Baggio and
contrast to previous work, which showed that the addition of Drucker 2007; Nauck et al. 1993). The relative contributions
3% and 10% glucose resulted in an approximately 1.5- and of GIP and GLP-1 to the stimulation of insulin secretion are
2.7-fold increase, respectively, in GLP-1 secretion, compared debated, although it is clear that they each contribute (Elahi
with controls (Jang et al. 2007). The results indicate that, at et al. 1994; Fehmann et al. 1989; Siegel et al. 1992). GIP cir-
the concentrations studied, intact CGA may be unable to alter culates in higher concentrations than GLP-1, yet GLP-1 ap-
glucose uptake in GLP-1-secreting cells. Although Welsch et pears to be a more potent stimulator (Nauck et al. 1993;
al. (1989) found a significant decrease in glucose uptake with Vilsbøll et al. 2001). In our study, GLP-1 secretions were
10–3 mol·L–1 5-CGA, they used rat membrane vesicles, which not altered with CGA treatment; however, GIP was signifi-
contain absorptive and enteroendocrine cells. Thus, it may be cantly reduced.
that CGA affects glucose uptake in absorptive cells, rather The in vivo study employed a conscious, unrestrained ani-
than the GLP-1-secreting L-cells, although we did not see mal model for blood collection. This allowed for more phys-
changes in GLP-1 secretion in our in vivo study. iologically relevant data, as stress is known to alter insulin,
Unexpectedly, we could not attribute differences in rat glucose, and free fatty acid concentrations (Cyr et al. 2007;
blood glucose with CGA treatment to changes in plasma in- Remage-Healey and Romero 2001; Sapolsky et al. 2000).
sulin. No differences in insulin were observed between CGA Additionally, we used a mixed-meal gavage, as opposed to
and placebo treatment, suggesting that CGA does not directly an oral glucose tolerance test, as humans typically eat meals
alter insulin secretion. This result substantiates previous work composed of several food groups, not single nutrients, such
as glucose. Although coffee consumption may not always be Balkan, B., Kwasnik, L., Miserendino, R., Holst, J.J., and Li, X.
accompanied by a meal, CGA remains in the small intestine 1999. Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV with NVP-DPP728
for up to 6 h after administration (Azuma et al. 2000). A increases plasma GLP-1 (7–36 amide) concentrations and
dose comparable to that expected from usual daily coffee improves oral glucose tolerance in obese Zucker rats. Diabetolo-
consumption in humans is 500–1000 mg·day–1, or 7– gia, 42(11): 1324–1331. doi:10.1007/s001250051445. PMID:
20 mg·kg–1·day–1 (Clifford 1999). However, studies looking 10550416.
at CGA absorption and bioavailability in rats have used Bassoli, B.K., Cassolla, P., Borba-Murad, G.R., Constantin, J.,
much higher doses, from ∼25 to 285 mg·kg–1·day–1 (Azuma Salgueiro-Pagadigorria, C.L., Bazotte, R.B., et al. 2008. Chloro-
genic acid reduces the plasma glucose peak in the oral glucose
et al. 2000; Dupas et al. 2006; Gonthier et al. 2003). For this
tolerance test: effects on hepatic glucose release and glycaemia.
project, a median dose of 120 mg·kg–1 was used to ensure
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIV CALGARY on 05/19/15
coffee is the main source of CGA, this compound may ex- AID-JSFA256>3.0.CO;2-D.
Cyr, N.E., Earle, K., Tam, C., and Romero, L.M. 2007. The effect of
plain the risk reduction for T2D seen in coffee drinkers.
chronic psychological stress on corticosterone, plasma metabo-
lites, and immune responsiveness in European starlings. Gen.
Acknowledgements
Comp. Endocrinol. 154(1–3): 59–66. doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2007.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical assis- 06.016. PMID:17681504.
tance of Lin Su, Olivia T. Brusselers, and Megan C. Hallam. de Bruïne, A.P., Dinjens, W.N., van der Linden, E.P., Pijls, M.M.,
Funding: J.S. holds salary support awards from the Alberta Moerkerk, P.T., and Bosman, F.T. 1993. Extracellular matrix
Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, the Heart and components induce endocrine differentiation in vitro in NCI-H716
Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the Canadian Diabetes As- cells. Am. J. Pathol. 142(3): 773–782. PMID:8456938.
sociation. Author disclosures: The authors declare no con- Deacon, C.F. 2005. What do we know about the secretion and
flicts of interest. Author contributions: J.M.T. and J.S. degradation of incretin hormones? Regul. Pept. 128(2): 117–124.
designed the research and wrote the paper. L.K.E. assisted doi:10.1016/j.regpep.2004.06.007. PMID:15780431.
with the surgeries and biochemical analysis. R.A.R. assisted Dupas, C.J., Marsset-Baglieri, A.C., Ordonaud, C.S., Ducept, F.M.G.,
with the incretin analysis and edited the manuscript. D.S.H. and Maillard, M.-N. 2006. Coffee antioxidant properties: effects of
milk addition and processing conditions. J. Food Sci. 71(3): S253–
provided technical support and manuscript editing. J.S. had
S258. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.tb15650.x.
primary responsibility for the final content. All authors read
Elahi, D., McAloon-Dyke, M., Fukagawa, N.K., Meneilly, G.S.,
and approved the final manuscript. Sclater, A.L., Minaker, K.L., et al. 1994. The insulinotropic
actions of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and
References glucagon-like peptide-1 (7–37) in normal and diabetic subjects.
Asmar, M., Tangaa, W., Madsbad, S., Hare, K., Astrup, A., Flint, A., Regul. Pept. 51(1): 63–74. doi:10.1016/0167-0115(94)90136-8.
et al. 2010. On the role of glucose-dependent insulinotropic PMID:8036284.
polypeptide in postprandial metabolism in humans. Am. J. Elliott, R.M., Morgan, L.M., Tredger, J.A., Deacon, S., Wright, J.,
Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 298(3): E614–E621. doi:10.1152/ and Marks, V. 1993. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (7–36)amide and
ajpendo.00639.2009. PMID:19996386. glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide secretion in re-
Azuma, K., Ippoushi, K., Nakayama, M., Ito, H., Higashio, H., and sponse to nutrient ingestion in man: acute post-prandial and 24-
Terao, J. 2000. Absorption of chlorogenic acid and caffeic acid in h secretion patterns. J. Endocrinol. 138(1): 159–166. doi:10.1677/
rats after oral administration. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48(11): 5496– joe.0.1380159. PMID:7852887.
5500. doi:10.1021/jf000483q. PMID:11087508. Elrick, H., Stimmler, L., Hlad, C.J., and Arai, Y. 1964. Plasma insulin
Badary, O.A., Awad, A.S., Sherief, M.A., and Hamada, F.M. 2006. In response to oral + intravenous glucose administration. J. Clin.
vitro and in vivo effects of ferulic acid on gastrointestinal motility: Endocrinol. Metab. 24(10): 1076–1082. doi:10.1210/jcem-24-10-
inhibition of cisplatin-induced delay in gastric emptying in rats. 1076. PMID:14228531.
World J. Gastroenterol. 12(33): 5363–5367. PMID:16981269. Falko, J.M., Crockett, S.E., Cataland, S., and Mazzaferri, E.L. 1975.
Baggio, L.L., and Drucker, D.J. 2007. Biology of Incretins: GLP-1 Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) stimulated by fat ingestion in
and GIP. Gastroenterology, 132(6): 2131–2157. doi:10.1053/j. man. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 41(2): 260–265. doi:10.1210/
gastro.2007.03.054. PMID:17498508. jcem-41-2-260. PMID:1159045.
Fehmann, H.C., Goke, B., Goke, R., Trautmann, M.E., and Arnold, 1-(7–36) amide infused at near-physiological insulinotropic
R. 1989. Synergistic stimulatory effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 hormone and glucose concentrations. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
(7–36) amide and glucose-dependent insulin-releasing polypeptide 76(4): 912–917. doi:10.1210/jc.76.4.912. PMID:8473405.
on the endocrine rat pancreas. FEBS Lett. 252(1–2): 109–112. Neff, L.M. 2003. Evidence-based dietary recommendations for
doi:10.1016/0014-5793(89)80899-3. PMID:2668027. patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutr. Clin. Care, 6(2):
Gonthier, M.P., Verny, M.A., Besson, C., Remesy, C., and Scalbert, 51–61. PMID:14692293.
A. 2003. Chlorogenic acid bioavailability largely depends on its Olthof, M.R., Hollman, P.C., Buijsman, M.N., van Amelsvoort, J.M.,
metabolism by the gut microflora in rats. J. Nutr. 133(6): 1853– and Katan, M.B. 2003. Chlorogenic acid, quercetin-3-rutinoside
1859. PMID:12771329. and black tea phenols are extensively metabolized in humans. J.
Graham, T.E., Sathasivam, P., Rowland, M., Marko, N., Greer, F., and Nutr. 133(6): 1806–1814. PMID:12771321.
Battram, D. 2001. Caffeine ingestion elevates plasma insulin Olthof, M.R., van Dijk, A.E., Deacon, C.F., Heine, R.J., and van
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIV CALGARY on 05/19/15
response in humans during an oral glucose tolerance test. Can. J. Dam, R.M. 2011. Acute effects of decaffeinated coffee and the
Physiol. Pharmacol. 79(7): 559–565. doi:10.1139/y01-026. PMID: major coffee components chlorogenic acid and trigonelline on
11478588. incretin hormones. Nutr. Metab. (Lond), 8(1): 10. doi:10.1186/
Greenberg, J.A., Owen, D.R., and Geliebter, A. 2010. Decaffeinated 1743-7075-8-10. PMID:21299855.
coffee and glucose metabolism in young men. Diabetes Care, 33 Park, J.G., Oie, H.K., Sugarbaker, P.H., Henslee, J.G., Chen, T.R.,
(2): 278–280. doi:10.2337/dc09-1539. PMID:19918017. Johnson, B.E., and Gazdar, A. 1987. Characteristics of cell lines
Greer, F., Hudson, R., Ross, R., and Graham, T. 2001. Caffeine established from human colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 47(24
ingestion decreases glucose disposal during a hyperinsulinemic- Pt 1): 6710–6718. PMID:3479249.
euglycemic clamp in sedentary humans. Diabetes, 50(10): 2349– Porsgaard, T., Straarup, E.M., and Hoy, C.E. 2003. Gastric emptying
2354. doi:10.2337/diabetes.50.10.2349. PMID:11574419. in rats following administration of a range of different fats
Halseth, A.E., Bracy, D.P., and Wasserman, D.H. 1998. Limitations measured as acetaminophen concentration in plasma. Ann. Nutr.
to exercise- and maximal insulin-stimulated muscle glucose Metab. 47(3–4): 132–138. doi:10.1159/000070035. PMID:
uptake. J. Appl. Physiol. 85(6): 2305–2313. PMID:9843557. 12743464.
Hatanaka, S., Kondoh, M., Kawarabayashi, K., and Furuhama, K. Reaven, G.M. 1993. Role of insulin resistance in the pathophysiology
1994. The measurement of gastric emptying in conscious rats by of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab. Rev. 9
monitoring serial changes in serum acetaminophen level. J. (Suppl. 1): 5S–12S. doi:10.1002/dmr.5610090503. PMID:
For personal use only.
of women: the E3N/EPIC cohort study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 91(4): and van Dam, R.M. 2009. Acute effects of decaffeinated coffee
1002–1012. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28741. PMID:20147471. and the major coffee components chlorogenic acid and trigonelline
Shearer, J., Sellars, E.A., Farah, A., Graham, T.E., and Wasserman, on glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care, 32(6): 1023–1025. doi:10.
D.H. 2007. Effects of chronic coffee consumption on glucose 2337/dc09-0207. PMID:19324944.
kinetics in the conscious rat. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 85(8): Vilsbøll, T., Krarup, T., Deacon, C.F., Madsbad, S., and Holst, J.J.
823–830. doi:10.1139/Y07-070. PMID:17901893. 2001. Reduced postprandial concentrations of intact biologically
Siegel, E.G., Schulze, A., Schmidt, W.E., and Creutzfeldt, W. 1992. active glucagon-like peptide 1 in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes,
Comparison of the effect of GIP and GLP-1 (7–36amide) on 50(3): 609–613. doi:10.2337/diabetes.50.3.609. PMID:11246881.
insulin release from rat pancreatic islets. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 22(3): Welsch, C.A., Lachance, P.A., and Wasserman, B.P. 1989. Dietary
154–157. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2362.1992.tb01820.x. PMID: phenolic compounds: inhibition of Na+-dependent D-glucose
1582439. uptake in rat intestinal brush border membrane vesicles. J. Nutr.
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIV CALGARY on 05/19/15
Soriguer, F., Rojo-Martinez, G., and de Antonio, I.E. 2004. Coffee 119(11): 1698–1704. PMID:2600675.
consumption and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann. Intern. Med. 141 Wright, E.M., Martin, M.G., and Turk, E. 2003. Intestinal absorption
(4): 321–323, author reply 323–324. PMID:15313753. in health and disease–sugars. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol.
Thom, E. 2007. The effect of chlorogenic acid enriched coffee on 17(6): 943–956. doi:10.1016/S1521-6918(03)00107-0. PMID:
glucose absorption in healthy volunteers and its effect on body 14642859.
mass when used long-term in overweight and obese people. J. Int. Yamaji, T., Mizoue, T., Tabata, S., Ogawa, S., Yamaguchi, K.,
Med. Res. 35(6): 900–908. PMID:18035001. Shimizu, E., et al. 2004. Coffee consumption and glucose
van Dam, R.M., and Hu, F.B. 2005. Coffee consumption and risk of tolerance status in middle-aged Japanese men. Diabetologia, 47
type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. JAMA, 294(1): 97–104. (12): 2145–2151. doi:10.1007/s00125-004-1590-5. PMID:
doi:10.1001/jama.294.1.97. PMID:15998896. 15662555.
van Dijk, A.E., Olthof, M.R., Meeuse, J.C., Seebus, E., Heine, R.J.,
For personal use only.