Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anti-HAV IgM
Anti-HAV IgM
Anti-HAV IgM
IgM antibodies to the hepatitis A virus
REF 11820591 122 100 tests Cal1 Negative calibrator 1 (white cap), 2 bottles of 0.67 mL each:
Human serum, negative for anti-HAV IgM; preservative.
• Indicates analyzers on which the kit can be used
Cal2 Positive calibrator 2 (black cap), 2 bottles of 0.67 mL each:
MODULAR Anti-HAV IgM (human) approx. 5 U/mL (Roche units) in
Elecsys 2010 ANALYTICS cobas e 411 cobas e 601 cobas e 602 human serum; preservative.
E170 b) HEPES = [4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-piperazine]-ethane sulfonic acid
Anti-HAV IgM
IgM antibodies to the hepatitis A virus
Expected values One sample which was positive with the Elecsys Anti-HAV IgM test was
The cutoff is selected such that the anti-HAV IgM concentration is above the negative with the comparison test. This sample from a very early HAV
cutoff index when acute HAV infection is present. In case of a past hepatitis A seroconversion phase was confirmed positive with a third anti-HAV IgM test.
infection, the anti-HAV IgM concentration is usually below the cutoff index of 1.0.
Clinical specificity
In the course of most acute hepatitis A infections, the anti-HAV IgM
Samples from blood donors which had not been selected were used
concentration decreases within 3-4 months after onset of the first symptoms
to determine the specificity. All 1032 samples of these donors were
and can then no longer be detected. Anti-HAV IgM antibodies are persistent
negative with the Elecsys Anti-HAV IgM assay.
only in exceptions and can then be detected beyond this period.3,4,5
280/280 samples from hospitalized patients, pregnant women, dialysis patients
Specific performance data and drug addicts with no indication of an HAV infection were negative with
Representative performance data on the analyzers are given below. both the Elecsys Anti-HAV IgM assay and the comparison test.
Results obtained in individual laboratories may differ. One additional sample of a pregnant woman was weakly positive with both tests.
The specificity in both studies is 100 %. The 95 % confidence
Precision range is 99.7-100 %
Precision was determined using Elecsys reagents, human sera, and controls
(repeatability n = 21, intermediate precision n = 10); intermediate precision References
on MODULAR ANALYTICS E170 analyzer was determined in a modified 1. Robertson BH, Nainan OV. Genetic and antigenetic variants of hepatitis A
protocol (EP5-A) of the CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute): virus. In: Viral Hepatitis and Liver Disease. Eds: Rizzeto M, Purcell RH,
6 times daily for 10 days (n = 60). The following results were obtained: Gerin JL, Verme G, Edizioni Minerva Medica, Turin 1997;14-18.
2. Koff RS. Hepatitis A. Lancet 1998;341:1643-1649.
Elecsys 2010 and cobas e 411 analyzers 3. Stapleton JT. Host Immune Response to Hepatitis A Virus.
Repeatabilityc Intermediate precision JID 1995;171(Suppl 1):9-14.
Sample Mean SD CV Mean SD CV 4. Gust I. Diagnosis. In: Viral Hepatitis. Eds Zuckerman AJ, Thomas HC,
COI d COI % COI COI % Churchill Livingstone, 1995;55-59.
HSe, negative 5. Bower WA, Nainan OV, Han X, Margolis HS. Duration of Viremia
0.28 0.006 2.0 0.21 0.008 3.8
in Hepatitis A Virus Infection. JID 2000;182:12-17.
HS, weakly positive 1.10 0.037 3.4 1.05 0.029 2.8
6. Lemon ML, Days SL. Type A hepatitis. In: Gorbach S,
HS, positive 11.7 0.361 3.1 11.8 0.643 5.4 Bartlett JG, Blacklown NL (eds). Infectious Diseases. Saunders
PCf A-HAVIGM1 0.25 0.005 2.0 0.22 0.006 2.8 WB, Philadelphia, 1992;705-708.
PC A-HAVIGM2 2.30 0.106 4.6 2.21 0.059 2.7 7. Sjogren MH, Hoke CH, Binn LN, Eckels KH, Dubois DR, Lyde L,
c) Repeatability = within-run precision et al. Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Hepatitis A Vaccine.
d) COI = cutoff index
Ann Intern Med 1991;114:470-471.
e) HS = human serum
f) PC = PreciControl 8. Shouval D, Ashur Y, Adler R, Lewis JA, Armstrong ME Davide JP,
et al. Single and booster dosae response to an inactivated
MODULAR ANALYTICS E170, cobas e 601 and cobas e 602 analyzers hepatitis A virus vaccine: comparison with immune serum globulin
Repeatability Intermediate precision prophylaxis. Vaccine 1993;11,Suppl 1:9-14.
Sample Mean SD CV Mean SD CV 9. Occupational Safety and Health Standards: bloodborne pathogens.
COI COI % COI COI % (29 CFR Part 1910.1030). Fed. Register.
Human serum 1 0.31 0.004 1.3 0.31 0.008 2.5 10. Council Directive (2000/54/EC). Official Journal of the European
Communities No. L262 from Oct. 17, 2000.
Human serum 2 0.96 0.020 2.1 0.97 0.049 5.0
Human serum 3 2.54 0.059 2.3 2.55 0.141 5.5 For further information, please refer to the appropriate operator’s manual
PC A-HAVIGM1 0.28 0.006 2.0 0.29 0.008 2.6 for the analyzer concerned, the respective application sheets, the product
PC A-HAVIGM2 1.70 0.071 4.2 1.94 0.154 7.9 information, and the package inserts of all necessary components.
Analytical specificity
No cross-reactions with anti-HAV IgG, HBV, HCV, CMV, EBV, HSV,
Rubella, and Toxoplasma gondii were observed. COBAS, COBAS E, ELECSYS and MODULAR are trademarks of Roche. INTRALIPID is a trademark of
Measurements were performed on each of the pathogens listed above using Fresenius Kabi AB. Other brand or product names are trademarks of their respective holders.
Significant additions or changes are indicated by a change bar in the margin. Changes to reagent barcode
≥ 9 serum or plasma samples which were positive for antibodies to the test parameters which have already been read in should be edited manually.
above-mentioned pathogens or contained autoantibodies (ANA, AMA). © 2010, Roche Diagnostics
Clinical sensitivity
Individual samples of patients during an acute phase of the HAV infection:
Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Sandhofer Strasse 116, D-68305 Mannheim
In 211/211 individual samples of clinically characterized patients with an www.roche.com
acute HAV infection, anti-HAV IgM antibodies were detected with the
Elecsys Anti-HAV IgM test and an anti-HAV IgM comparison test. The
95 % confidence range for the sensitivity is 98.3-100 %.
Samples of monitored patients after an acute HAV infection:
Anti-HAV IgM was measured in a total of 147 samples from 45 monitored
patients after an acute HAV infection using the Elecsys Anti-HAV IgM
test and an anti-HAV IgM comparison test.
122 samples were consistently positive, 14 samples were consistently
negative. 10 out of 11 discrepant samples were from patients in the recovering
phase (> 4 months after the first symptoms showed). 9 of these samples
were negative with the Elecsys Anti-HAV IgM test while they were positive
or showed borderline values with the comparison test.
One sample which was weakly positive with the Elecsys Anti-HAV IgM
test showed a borderline result with the comparison test.