ETABS Modelling

11/12/2016 ETABS Modelling
SlideShare Explore Search You
Upload
Login
Signup
Search
Home
Technology
Education
More Topics
For Uploaders
Get Started
Tips & Tricks
Tools
Search
http://www.slideshare.net/ValentinosNeophytou/procedureoutlineofdevelopingamodel 1/53
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×
39 of 39

Like this document? Why not share!
Share
Email

CSI ETABS & SAFE MANUAL: Slab Analy... by Eur Ing
Valentino... 31289 views
Rc bldg. modeling & analysis by Ramil Artates 8391 views
Book for Beginners, RCC Design by E... by Yousuf Dinar
25929 views
Etabs modeling Design of slab ac... by Eur Ing Valentino...
20198 views
Membrane Plate Shell by neikrof 51398 views
ETABS manual Seismic design of st... by Eur Ing Valentino...
58075 views
ETABS Modelling
20,305 views
Share
Like
Download
Eur Ing Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc, CEng MICE, Chartered
Civil Engineer | Project Engineer at INTERSERVE (DEFENCE) LTD
Follow
28 0 2
Published on Mar 26, 2013
The aim of this manual is to give the design application of the basic
...
Published in: Education
3 Comments
37 Likes
Statistics
Notes
Full Name
Comment goes here.
12 hours ago Delete Reply Spam Block
Are you sure you want to Yes No
Your message goes here
Share your thoughts…
Post
phonoracer
Thanks! it's very helpful!
2 months ago Reply
Hala Hasan
thank you SO MUCH
4 months ago Reply
Farid Ay , Direktur Masa Depan at PT. LAYU
sipp
1 year ago Reply
Cristian Cuevas Zuleta , Asesor tecnico en Sika Bolivia at Sika Bolivia
1 month ago
Tharun Sai at Student
1 month ago
Nader Ali , Technical office manger at Al Manzel Al massi at ALMANZIL ALMASSI LTD CO. ‫ﺷﺮﻛﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺪﻭﺩﺓ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺳﻲ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺰﻝ‬
2 months ago
Muhammad Nouman , M.Sc. student at UET Peshawar at University of Engineering and Technology
Peshawar, Pakistan
3 months ago
U Wunna Aung
3 months ago
Show More
No Downloads
Views
Total views
20,305
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
82
Actions
Shares
28
Downloads
4,233
Comments
3
Likes
37
Embeds 0
No embeds
No notes for slide
ETABS Modelling
1. 1. ETABS MODELLINGAUTHOR: VALENTINOS NEOPHYTOU BEng (Hons), MSc March 2013
2. 2. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES Step by step procedure and methodology of
how you developing a modelusing ETABSStep 1: Specify Material Properties for Concrete 1. Poisson
ratio is equal to v = 0 (cracked concrete) and v = 0.2 (uncracked concrete) as (EN199211,cl.3.1.3) Table
1: Concrete properties (EN 1992, Table 3.1) C16/20 C20/25 C25/30 C30/37Property Data for concrete
(N/mm2) (N/mm2) (N/mm2) (N/mm2)Mass per unit Volume 2,5E09 2,5E09 2,5E09 2,5E09Weight per
unit volume 2,5E05 2,5E05 2,5E05 2,5E05Modulus of Elasticity 29000 30000 31000 33000Poisson’s
Ratio (cracked concrete) 0 0 0 0Coeff. of thermal expansion 10E06 10E06 10E06 10E06Charact.
ConcCyl. Strength, fck 16 20 25 30Bending Reinf. Yield stress, fyk 500 500 500 500Shear Reinf. Yield
stress, fyk 500 500 500 500 Figure 1: Concrete properties Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc
Page: 2 ETABS MANUAL
3. 3. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 2: Add frame section for columns Figure
2: Section properties of concrete columnsValentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 3ETABS
MANUAL
4. 4. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 3: Add frame section for beams Figure 3:
Effective width of beams (EN199211,cl.5.3.2.1)Interior beamInternal beamsupporting aninternal and
anexternal slabExterior beamsupportingcantileverExternal beamno cantilever For practice use beff 1,2 =
0.2lo Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 4 ETABS MANUAL
5. 5. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES Figure 4: Section properties of concrete
beamsNotes: 1. Property modification factors are used to reduce moment and torsion stiffness due to crack
section. Torsional stiffness of the cracked section should be set equal to 10% of the torsional stiffness of
the uncracked section. 2. Unless a more accurate analysis of the cracked elements is performed, the
elastic flexural and shear stiffness properties of concrete and masonry elements may be taken to be equal
to onehalf of the corresponding stiffness of the uncracked elements (EN199811,cl. 4.3.1(7)). 3. These
modification factor only affect the analysis properties, they do not affect the design properties. Column
(Line Beam (Line Slab (Shell element) Wall (Shell element) element) element) I22=I33=0.5 I22=I33=0.5
m11=m12=m22=0.5 m11= m12=m22=0.5 It=0.1 It=0.1 It=0.1 It=0.1Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons),
MSc Page: 5ETABS MANUAL
6. 6. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 4: Add Slabs & Walls Figure 5: Section
properties of concrete slab Figure 6: Section properties of concrete wallValentinos Neophytou BEng
(Hons), MSc Page: 6ETABS MANUAL
7. 7. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 5: Define Response Spectrum function
according to EC8 1. Peak ground acceleration agR=0,25g, 2. Type C or D for building within category of
importance I and II, 3. Define two response spectrum cases if the factor q is different in each direction, 4.
Modify the existing values of elastic response spectrum case in order to change it into the design response
spectrum. Figure 7: Response Spectrum to EC8Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page:
7ETABS MANUAL
8. 8. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES Figure 8: Design spectrum for elastic analysis
data PERIOD ACCELERATION g = 9.81 m/sec2 T Sd(T) β = 0.2 ‐ 0.0000 0.0767
Soil Type = C ‐ 0.0667 0.1150 q = 1.50 ‐ 0.1333 0.1533 αgR = 0.10 ‐ 0.2000
0.1917 S = 1.15 ‐ 0.6000 0.1917 TB = 0.20 sec 0.8333 0.1380 TC = 0.60 sec
1.0667 0.1078 TD = 2.00 sec 1.3000 0.0885 T = 0.50 sec 1.5333 0.0750 1.7667
0.0651 Data for soil type ‐ T ype Spectrum 1 2.0000 0.0575 index Soil Type S TB
TC TD 3.3333 0.0200 1 A 1 0.15 0.4 2 4.6667 0.0200 2 B 1.2 0.15 0.5 2 6.0000
0.0200 3 C 1.15 0.2 0.6 2 7.3333 0.0200 4 D 1.35 0.2 0.8 2 8.6667 0.0200 5 E
1.4 0.15 0.5 2 10.0000 0.0200 Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 8ETABS
MANUAL
9. 9. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 6: Define Load Case Figure 8:
Dead/Live/WindStep 5: Define Equivalent Static AnalysisEquivalent static analysis can be used if the
following case can be met: 1. Ground acceleration: Check seismic zonation map from National Annex 2.
Spectrum type 1: 5.5Hz<M (High seismicity areas) 3. Ground type: Normally type B or C can be used
(see EN 1998,table 3.1) 4. Lower bound factor for the horizontal design spectrum: 0.2 (EN 19981
1,cl.3.2.2.5(4)P) 5. Behavior factor q: See table 6. Correction factor λ (EN199811,cl.4.3.3.2.2(1Ρ))
λ=0.85 if T1≤2TC and more than 2 storey λ=1.0 in all other case Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons),
MSc Page: 9 ETABS MANUAL
10. 10. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES 7. Regular in elevation 8. Regular in
elevation and irregular in plan 9. Fundamental period: T1≤4T_c T1≤2,0s Table 1: Equivalent Static Force
Case Load case name Direction and Eccentricity % Eccentricity EQXA X Dir + Eccen. Y 0.05 EQYA X
Dir – Eccen. Y 0.05 EQXB Y Dir + Eccen. X 0.05 EQYB Y Dir – Eccen. X 0.05Valentinos Neophytou
BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 10ETABS MANUAL
11. 11. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 6: Define Load Combination for
Equivalent lateral force analysisUltimate limit state (ULS)Static case COMBO 1. 1.35DL + 1.5LL
COMBO 2. 1.35DL + 1.5WINDX + 1.5 (0.7LL + 0.5 SNOW) COMBO 3. 1.35DL + 1.5WINDY + 1.5
(0.7LL + 0.5 SNOW) COMBO 4. 1.35DL + 1.5LL + 1.5 (0.7WINDX + 0.5 SNOW) COMBO 5. 1.35DL
+ 1.5LL + 1.5 (0.7WINDY + 0.5 SNOW) COMBO 6. 1.35DL + 1.5LL + 1.5 (0.7SNOW + 0.5WINDX)
COMBO 7. 1.35DL + 1.5LL + 1.5 (0.7SNOW + 0.5WINDY) COMBO 8. 1.35DL + 1.5SNOW + 1.5
(0.7LL+ 0.5WINDX) COMBO 9. 1.35DL + 1.5SNOW + 1.5 (0.7LL+ 0.5WINDY) COMBO 10. 1.35DL
+ 1.5SNOW + 1.5 (0.7WINDX + 0.5LL) COMBO 11. 1.35DL + 1.5SNOW + 1.5 (0.7WINDY + 0.5LL)
COMBO 12. 1.35DL + 1.5WINDX + 0.7*1.5(LL+SNOW) COMBO 13. 1.35DL + 1.5WINDY +
0.7*1.5(LL+SNOW) COMBO 14. 1.35DL + 1.5(LL+SNOW) + 0.7*1.5WINDX COMBO 15. 1.35DL +
1.5(LL+SNOW) + 0.7*1.5WINDYSeismic case COMBO 16. DL + 0.3LL + EQXA + 0.3EQYA COMBO
17. DL + 0.3LL + EQXA – 0.3EQYA COMBO 18. DL + 0.3LL EQXA + 0.3EQYA COMBO 19. DL +
0.3LL EQXA – 0.3EQYA COMBO 20. DL + 0.3LL + EQYA + 0.3EQXA COMBO 21. DL + 0.3LL +
EQYA – 0.3EQXA COMBO 22. DL + 0.3LL EQYA + 0.3EQXA COMBO 23. DL + 0.3LL EQYA –
0.3EQXA COMBO 24. DL + 0.3LL + EQXB + 0.3EQYB COMBO 25. DL + 0.3LL + EQXB – 0.3EQYB
COMBO 26. DL + 0.3LL EQXB + 0.3EQYB COMBO 27. DL + 0.3LL EQXB – 0.3EQYB COMBO
28. DL + 0.3LL + EQYB + 0.3EQXB COMBO 29. DL + 0.3LL + EQYB – 0.3EQXB COMBO 30. DL +
0.3LL EQYB + 0.3EQXB COMBO 31. DL + 0.3LL EQYB – 0.3EQXBServiceability limit state (SLS)
COMBO 32. DL + LL Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 11 ETABS MANUAL
12. 12. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 7: Define Response Spectrum
caseModal Response spectrum 1. Independently in X and Y direction, 2. Define design spectrum, 3. Use
CQC rule for the combination of different modes (EN199811,cl.4.3.3.3.2(3)) 4. Use SRS rule for
combined the results of modal analysis for both horizontal directions (EN199811,cl.4.3.3.5.1(21)). 5.
Accidental eccentricity of each storey cause of uncertainties locatin of masses have been taken into
account 5% (EN199811,cl.4.3.2). 6. Modal Combination: “Complete Quadratic Combination” (CQC)
can be used if the Tj ≤ 0,9 Ti (EN199811,cl.4.3.3.3.2(3)P). Figure 9: Response Spectrum case Data for
EQY& EQXValentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 12ETABS MANUAL
13. 13. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 8: Define Load Combination for modal
analysisUltimate limit state (ULS)Static case COMBO 1. 1.35DL + 1.5LL COMBO 2. 1.35DL +
1.5WINDX + 1.5 (0.7LL + 0.5 SNOW) COMBO 3. 1.35DL + 1.5WINDY + 1.5 (0.7LL + 0.5 SNOW)
COMBO 4. 1.35DL + 1.5LL + 1.5 (0.7WINDX + 0.5 SNOW) COMBO 5. 1.35DL + 1.5LL + 1.5
(0.7WINDY + 0.5 SNOW) COMBO 6. 1.35DL + 1.5LL + 1.5 (0.7SNOW + 0.5WINDX) COMBO 7.
1.35DL + 1.5LL + 1.5 (0.7SNOW + 0.5WINDY) COMBO 8. 1.35DL + 1.5SNOW + 1.5 (0.7LL+
0.5WINDX) COMBO 9. 1.35DL + 1.5SNOW + 1.5 (0.7LL+ 0.5WINDY) COMBO 10. 1.35DL +
1.5SNOW + 1.5 (0.7WINDX + 0.5LL) COMBO 11. 1.35DL + 1.5SNOW + 1.5 (0.7WINDY + 0.5LL)
COMBO 12. 1.35DL + 1.5WINDX + 0.7*1.5(LL+SNOW) COMBO 13. 1.35DL + 1.5WINDY +
0.7*1.5(LL+SNOW) COMBO 14. 1.35DL + 1.5(LL+SNOW) + 0.7*1.5WINDX COMBO 15. 1.35DL +
1.5(LL+SNOW) + 0.7*1.5WINDYSeismic case COMBO 16. DL + 0.3LL + EQX + 0.3EQY COMBO
17. DL + 0.3LL + EQX – 0.3EQY COMBO 18. DL + 0.3LL EQX + 0.3EQY COMBO 19. DL + 0.3LL
EQX – 0.3EQY COMBO 20. DL + 0.3LL + EQY + 0.3EQX COMBO 21. DL + 0.3LL + EQY –
0.3EQX COMBO 22. DL + 0.3LL EQY + 0.3EQX COMBO 23. DL + 0.3LL EQY –
0.3EQXServiceability limit state (SLS) COMBO 24. DL + LL Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc
Page: 13 ETABS MANUAL
14. 14. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES G+0.3Q+Ex+0.3Ey G+0.3Q+Ex0.3Ey
G+0.3QEx+0.3Ey G+0.3QEx0.3Ey G+0.3Q+Ey+0.3Ex G+0.3Q+Ey0.3ExValentinos Neophytou
BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 14ETABS MANUAL
15. 15. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES G+0.3QEy+0.3Ex G+0.3QEy0.3Ex
1.35G+1.5QValentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 15ETABS MANUAL
16. 16. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESValentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc
Page: 16ETABS MANUAL
17. 17. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 9: Meshing of slabAssign > Shell Area
> Area Object Mesh OptionAutomatic meshing option for slab element onlyNotes: 1. The property
assignments to meshed area objectets are the same as the original area object. 2. Load and mass
assignments on the original area object are appropriately broken up onto the meshed area objects.
Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 17 ETABS MANUAL
18. 18. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 10: Meshing/Label of wallEdit>Mesh
shells and click on theMesh/Quads/Triangles at Intersections with visible grid lines:Assign>Shell/Area
>Pier Label or Spandrel Label. Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 18 ETABS MANUAL
19. 19. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 11: Define AutoLine ConstraintSelect
area element (slab)>Assign>Shell Are> AutoLine ConstraintStep 12: Define mass sourceCombination
of the seismic action with other actions (EN 199811,cl.3.2.4): 1. Define the category of building (EN
1991,Table 6.1), 2. Define the reduce factor (EN 199, Table A.1.1). Table 2: Combination of seismic mass
𝑮 𝒌,𝒋 + 𝝍 𝑬𝒊 𝑸 𝒌,𝒊 (ΕΝ199811,Eq. 3.17) Combination coefficient for variable action is: 𝜓!" = 𝜙 ∙ 𝜓!!
(ΕΝ199811,Eq. 4.2) Values of φ for calculating 𝝍 𝑬𝒊 (CYS NA EN199811:2004) Type of Storey φ
Variable action Roof 1,0 Categories A Storeys with correlated occupancies 0,8 C1 Independently
occupied storeys 0,5 Categories A 1.0 F1 Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 19 ETABS
MANUAL
20. 20. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES Table 3: Values of ψ coefficients ψο ψ1 ψ2
Category Specific Use A Domestic and residential 0.7 0.5 0.3 B Office 0.7 0.5 0.3 C Areas for
Congregation 0.7 0.7 0.6 D Shopping 0.7 0.7 0.6 E Storage 1.0 0.9 0.8 F Traffic < 30 kN vehicle 0.7 0.7
0.6 G Traffic < 160 kN vehicle 0.7 0.5 0.3 H Roofs 0.7 0 0 Snow, altitude < 1000 m 0.5 0.2 0 Wind 0.5
0.2 0 Figure 10: Adding seismic mass to ETABSValentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page:
20ETABS MANUAL
21. 21. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 13: Define number of modesNotes: 1.
Minimum number of modes to be taken into account (EN199811,cl.4.3.3.3.1(5)): k ≥ 3.√nk is the
number of modes taken into account.n is the number of storeys above the foundation or the top of a rigid
basement. Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 21 ETABS MANUAL
22. 22. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 14: Define restrains at the baseSelect the
entire base jointsStep 15: Define diaphragms to slab Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 22
ETABS MANUAL
23. 23. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 16: Checking the modelValentinos
Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 23ETABS MANUAL
24. 24. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES MODAL ANALYSIS RESULTSStep 1:
Calculate the effective modal massDisplay> Show Tables > Modal information > Building modal
information > Tablemodal participation mass ratios 1. The sum of the effective modal masses for the
modes taken into account amounts to at least 90% of the total mass of the structure (EN 19981
1,cl.4.3.3.3.1(3)). 2. All modes with effective modal masses greater than 5% of the total mass are taken
into account. Mode 1 (Translation Y direction) Mode 2 (Translation X direction) Valentinos Neophytou
BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 24 ETABS MANUAL
25. 25. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES Mode 3 (Torsional)Step 2: Damage
limitationsValentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 25ETABS MANUAL
26. 26. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESThe damage limitation requirements should
be verified in terms of the interstorey drift (dr)(EN 199811,cl.4.4.3.2) using the equation below: 𝑑! 𝑎 𝑑! ∙
𝑣 ≤ 𝑎 ∙ ℎ => ≤ ℎ 𝑣dr: is the difference of the average lateral displacement ds in CM at the top and
bottom ofstorey.v: is the reduction factor which takes into account the lower return period of the
seismicaction.h: is the storey height Table 4: Damage limitation (EN199811,cl.4.4.3)For nonstructural
elements of brittle material attached to the structure drv≤0.005hFor building having ductile non structural
elements drv≤0.0075hFor building having nonstructural elements fixed in a way so as not to
drv≤0.010hinterfere with structural deformation Tab;e 5: Reduction factor of limitation to interstorey drift
(CYA NA EN19981 1,cl.NA.2.15) Importance class Reduction factor v I 0.5 II 0.5 III 0.4 IV 0.4 1.
Export results from ETABS to ECXEL Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 26 ETABS
MANUAL
27. 27. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES 2. Sort the Larger value on top 3. Record the
value of each storey in the spread sheet below:Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page:
27ETABS MANUAL
28. 28. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESDamage limitation (EN199811,cl.4.4.3)
Displacement Displacement Heigh of each Reduction v*dr v*dr/h X ‐direction Y ‐direction
Drift X Drift Y storey, h factor X direction Y direction dr*v<0,005 ‐0,01 dr*v<0,005 ‐0,01 dr
(m) dr (m) (m) v Storey 2 0,0026 0,0026 3,00 0,50 0,00043 0,00043 OK OK Storey 1 0,0017 0,0017 3,00
0,50 0,00028 0,00028 OK OKStep 3: Second order effects 1. The criterion for taking into account the
second order effect is based on the interstorey drift sensitivity coefficient θ, which is define with equation
(EN 19981 1,cl.4.4.2.2(2)). 𝑃!"! ∙ 𝑑! 𝜃= 𝑉!"! ∙ ℎhr: is the interstorey drift,h: is the storey height,Vtot: is
the total seismic storey shearPtot: is the total gravity load at and above storey considered in the seismic
design situation(G+0.3Q). Table 6: Consequences of value of PΔ coefficient θ on the analysis θ≤0,1 No
need to consider PΔ effects PΔ effects may be taken into account approximately by 0,1≤θ≤0,2 !
amplifying the effects of the seismic actions by !!! PΔ effects must be accounted for by an analysis
including 0,2≤θ≤0,3 second order effects explicity θ≥0,3 Not permitted 1. Explore the results from
ETABS to EXCEL Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 28 ETABS MANUAL
29. 29. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES 2. Select the combo G+0,3Q and record the
highest value from each storey 3. Record the heist value for VtotValentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons),
MSc Page: 29ETABS MANUAL
30. 30. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES 4. Record all values on the spread sheet as
showing belowSecond order effects (EN199811,cl.4.4.2.2) Ptot Heigh of Vtot Vtot Displaceme
Displacement θ θ
(kN) each storey, Xdirection Ydirection nt Drift X Drift Y X ‐direction Y ‐direction
h (m) (kN) (kN) dr (m) dr (m) θ≤0.1 θ≤0.1 Storey 2 709 3,00 220,00 220,00 0,00260 0,00260 OK
OK Storey 1 1426 3,00 334,00 334,00 0,00170 0,00170 OK OKStep 4: Structural regularity plan
31. 31. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES 1. Slenderness ratio of the building
λ=Lmax/Lmin<4 2. A “compact shape”: one in which the perimeter lines is always convex, or at least
encloses not more than 5% reentrant area. 3. The floor diaphragms shall be sufficient stiff inplane not to
affect the distribution of lateral loads between vertical elements. Table 7: Criteria for regularity in plan rx>
3.33eox Lateral torsional rensponse condition: rx> 3.33eoy Torsionally rigidity condition: rx>
IsRegularity in plan (cl. 4.2.3.2)Check 1 slenderness ratio cl.4.2.3.2(5)Slenderness ratio
λ=Lmax/Lmin<4 = 2,80 OKRegularity in plan (cl. 4.2.3.2)Check 2 structural eccentricity & torsional
radius cl.4.2.3.2(6)Length in longitudinal direction = 56 mLength in trasverse direction = 20 mStifness in
X direction Sx=1000/dxStifness in Y direction Sy=1000/dyTorsional stifness Ts=1000/RzTorsional radius
ry=Ts/SxTorsional radius rx=Ts/SyRadius of gyration Is=((Lmax²+Lmin²)12)^0,5Structural eccentricity in
x direction eox=Rz(Fx)/Rz(Mz)Structural eccentricity in y direction eox=Rz(Fy)/Rz(Mz)Table 1: Criteria
for regularity in plan Torsionally rigity condition Displacement Displacement Rotation Z Stifness X
Stifness Y Torsional rx ry X (mm) Y (mm) (radians) (kN/m) (kN/m) Stifness (m) (m) dx dy Rz Sx Sy
(kNm/radian) Ts Storey 2 7,35 7,14 8,18E06 136054 140056 1,22E+08 29,5 30,0 Storey 1 5 6 8,18E06
200000 166667 1,22E+08 27,1 24,7 0.3rx 0.3ry Is Is<rx Is<ry (m) (m) (m) Storey 2 8,9 9,0 17,2 OK OK
Storey 1 8,1 7,4 17,2 OK OKTable 2: Criteria for regularity in plan Lateral torsional respone condition
Rotation Rz Rotation Rz Rotation Rz Eccentricity Eccentricity 3,33eox<rx 3,33eoy<ry for for for eox eoy
Fx=1000kN Fy=1000kN Mx=1000kNm Storey 2 8,18E06 8,18E06 8,18E06 1,00 1,00 OK OK Storey 1
8,18E06 8,18E06 8,18E06 1 1,00E+00 OK OKApply forces as follow: Valentinos Neophytou BEng
(Hons), MSc Page: 31 ETABS MANUAL
32. 32. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES Storeys Load Case Forces FX1 FX1=1000kN
STOREY 1 FY1 FΥ1=1000kN MZ1 MZ1=1000kNm FX2 FX2=1000kN STOREY 2 FY2 FΥ2=1000kN
MZ2 MZ2=1000kNmRepeat this process for all load case in order to obtain the displacement values.
33. 33. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESStep 5: Structural type of the building Table
8: Classification of structural systemWall system Vertical and lateral load: Wall resist
Vb,wall>65%VbtotalFrame system Vertical and lateral load: Vb,frame>65%VbtotalFrameequivalent
dual system Vertical and lateral load: Vb,frame>50%VbtotalWallequivalent dual system Vertical and
lateral load: Vb,wall>50%VbtotalDisplay >Show Tables> Support/Sprint/Reaction 1. Explore the results
from ETABS to EXCEL Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 33 ETABS MANUAL
34. 34. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESFrom load case tick the worstcase seismic
design combination: COMBO 1. DL + 0.3LL + EQX + 0.3EQY COMBO 2. DL + 0.3LL + EQX –
0.3EQY COMBO 3. DL + 0.3LL EQX + 0.3EQY COMBO 4. DL + 0.3LL EQX – 0.3EQY COMBO
5. DL + 0.3LL + EQY + 0.3EQX COMBO 6. DL + 0.3LL + EQY – 0.3EQX COMBO 7. DL + 0.3LL
EQY + 0.3EQX COMBO 8. DL + 0.3LL EQY – 0.3EQX 2. Select the worstcase design combo 3.
Select the nodes for frames only 4. Calculate the sum of the base shear that can be resist by column in X
and Y direction Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 34 ETABS MANUAL
35. 35. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESi.e VTOTAL = 1000KN VFRAMES, X ,Y =
500KN VTOTAL / VFRAME 500/1000*100= 50%Therefore the structural system of building is: Wall
equivalent dual systemHow to checking base shearBase shear can be check as follow: Table 9: Checking
the base shear Direction Lower bound values Upper bound values X direction Fb = %Effective mass(X
dir.)*Mass *Sdx Fb = ∑mass * Sdx Y direction Fb = %Effective mass(Y dir.)*Mass *Sdv Fb = ∑mass *
SdyNote: The base shear should be within those limits NOTE: REPEAT ALL THIS PROCESS FROM
BEGIN WITH THE NEW Q VALUERevised the design spectrum input data with the new q (for example
if q=1.5 adopt at initialstage and the new q=3 then you have to repeat the process with the new q)
36. 36. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES OUTPUT DATAStep 1: Print data for
steel/concrete designFile > Print Tables > Concrete Frame Design Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons),
MSc Page: 36 ETABS MANUAL
37. 37. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODES ADDITIONAL NOTESSHRINKAGE
AREASSelect Area > Edit > Expand/Srink AreaValentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page:
37ETABS MANUAL
38. 38. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESPIN JOINTExport model to SAFEFile menu
> Export > Save Story as SAFE.f2k Text FileLocal AxisLocal axis 1 X directionLocal axis 2 Y direction
39. 39. ETABS MODELING ACCORDING TO EUROCODESLocal axis 3 Z directionLocal axis 2 (My)
Y directionLocal axis 3 (Mx) X direction Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc Page: 39 ETABS
MANUAL
Recommended
Classroom Management Fundamentals
Flipping the Classroom
iBooks Author for Teachers: Fundamentals
CSI ETABS & SAFE MANUAL: Slab Analysis and Design to EC2
Eur Ing Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc, CEng MICE
Rc bldg. modeling & analysis
Ramil Artates
Book for Beginners, RCC Design by ETABS
Yousuf Dinar
Etabs modeling Design of slab according to EC2
Membrane Plate Shell
neikrof
ETABS manual Seismic design of steel buildings according to Eurocode 3 & 8
Analysis and design of a multi storey reinforced concrete
http://dealindia.org/
English
Español
Português
Français
Deutsch
About
Dev & API
Blog
Terms
Privacy
Copyright
Support
LinkedIn Corporation © 2016
Share Clipboard
Email
Enter email addresses
Add a message
From
Send
Email sent successfully..
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
Link
Public clipboards featuring this slide
No public clipboards found for this slide
Save the most important slides with Clipping
Clipping is a handy way to collect and organize the most important slides from a presentation. You
can keep your great finds in clipboards organized around topics.
Start clipping
No thanks. Continue to download.
Select another clipboard
Looks like you’ve clipped this slide to already.
Search for a clipboard
Create a clipboard
You just clipped your first slide!
Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later. Now customize the name of a
clipboard to store your clips.
Name* Best of Slides
Description Add a brief description so others know what your Clipboard is about.

Visibility
Others can see my Clipboard
Cancel Save
Save this document

ETABS Modelling

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

ETABS Modelling

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ETABS Modelling

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

11/12/2016 ETABS Modelling

You might also like