Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Advantages and Disadvantages Peer Assessment of Error Pronunciation in Learning Process in The Class Room of A2 2015 IKIP Siliwangi Bandung
Advantages and Disadvantages Peer Assessment of Error Pronunciation in Learning Process in The Class Room of A2 2015 IKIP Siliwangi Bandung
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Alternatives in assessment have received much attention in the last decade, in line with
the promotion of student‐centered learning in the university. Self‐ and peer-
assessment have been introduced in higher education as alternatives in assessment as a result
of the increasing demand for lifelong and reflective learners in higher education. Self
assessment involves students in making
judgments and reflection on their learning (Boud & Falchikov, 1989). It encourages active lea
rning among students. Peer-
assessment involves learners judging and evaluating the work or performance of their peers
(Sitthiworachart & Joy, 2004).
There are many variants of peer assessment, but essentially it involves students
providing feedback to other students on the quality of their work. In some instances, the
practice of peer feedback will include the assigning of a grade, but this is widely recognized
to be a process that is fraught with difficulties. “Peer assessment requires students to provide
either feedback or grades (or both) to their peers on a product or a performance, based on the
criteria of excellence for that product or event which students may have been involved in
determining” (Falchikov, 2007, p.132).
The evidence suggests that students become better at peer assessment with practice
(Falchikov, 2007). Students need practice to gain confidence in peer assessment and to
become more competent at it. Other classroom practices can also help to prepare students for
peer assessment, such as exchange and discussion of lecture notes. Peers, it can help to build a
collaborative environment and it helps students to improve and enhance their understanding.